Package: debootstrap
Version: 1.0.140
Severity: normal
Dear Maintainer,
systems newly created by debootstrap still use the old sources.list format,
whereas apt warns when the newer deb822 format is not used.
Here is a sequence of commands to reproduce the problem:
# debootstrap sid foobar
# s
On 29/11/2024 16.51, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
#985463: partman-auto: Use ext4 filesystem for /boot if boot loader supports it
Thank you for the fix!
--
Laurent.
On 3/18/21 9:08 PM, Charles Curley wrote:
How much memory does the computer have?
It is a VM with 1GB of RAM.
On my FIT-PCs, using the same
installer (but with firmware), I see that debian installer (d-i) goes
to ext2 rather than ext4. They have 228Mi of physical memory. On my IBM
R51, with
On 3/18/21 7:51 PM, Ben Hutchings wrote:
I think that the installer uses ext2 for /boot because some boot
loaders only support(ed) ext2 and not its successor filesystem formats.
But I think that's an historical problem for most release
architectures.
If that is true, then an even simpler solut
Package: debian-installer
Severity: normal
Dear Maintainers,
I did a test installation using debian-testing-amd64-netinst.iso from
2021-03-15 (Debian bullseye/11), chose the LVM option,
and noticed that once the system is installed and boots, the kernel complains
with this message:
ext2 fi
Now that gtk 2.8.20 is in sid, would it be possible to update
libgtk+2.0-directfb-dev ?
--
Laurent Bonnaud.
http://www.lis.inpg.fr/pages_perso/bonnaud/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
this bug is fixed in experimental. Thanks!
What prevents you to upload the updated version into unstable?
--
Laurent Bonnaud.
http://www.lis.inpg.fr/pages_perso/bonnaud/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: libgtk+2.0-directfb-dev
Version: 2.0.9.2-14.3
Severity: wishlist
Hi,
installing libgtk+2.0-directfb-dev is not without trouble:
# apt-get install libgtk+2.0-directfb-dev
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree... Done
Some packages could not be installed. This may mean t
Package: discover
Version: 1.5-2
Severity: normal
Hi,
here is the problem:
Setting up discover (1.5-2) ...
[...]
FATAL: Module i810_rng not found.
Skipping i810_rng module; assuming it is compiled into the kernel.
This module only exists in 2.4 kernels.
-- System Information:
Debian Release:
Package: discover
Version: 1.5-2
Severity: normal
Hi,
on this system discover writes:
Setting up discover (1.5-2) ...
[...]
Loading 3w- module.
whereas this module as already loaded into the kernel:
$ lsmod
[...]
3w_40736 1
I guess it is because in 2.4 kernels this m
Package: discover
Version: 1.5-2
Severity: normal
Hi,
this module is deprecated in 2.6 kernels:
- it should not be needed any more
- it forces PIO mode instead of DMA
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux jophur 2.6.0-1-686 #2 Sun Jan 11 1
Adam> Hmm, wouldn't this be a busybox bug? But I try, ona fully
Adam> installed system:
Adam>
Adam> # busybox ping arroz
Adam>
Adam> and ctrl-c works fine. Wierd.
I had done the same test and got the result. That's why I reported
this bug against boot-floppies instead of busybox.
Are you
Package: boot-floppies
Version: 3.0.17
Severity: normal
Hi,
I did a successful network installation with the udma100-ext3
boot-floppies. I only had one minor problem. In the Alt-F2 virtual
console, I used ping to check if the network worked. Unfortunately,
Ctrl-c did not work to stop ping.
Package: boot-floppies
Version: 3.0.17
Severity: minor
Hi,
in the help available in syslinux before booting the kernel (with keys
F1..F10), RAM requirements are:
- 12MB with swap
- 14MB without swap
After the disk partions step, if the user chooses to install without
swap, the warning messa
> "Adam" == Adam Di Carlo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Adam>
Adam> Back up this claim with more facts.
It may be useful for an admin to check:
- if somebody is trying to guess the password of an account (after
having seen it typed on a keyboard)
- if the lower limits imposed on passwo
> "Wichert" == Wichert Akkerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Wichert>
Wichert> Actually I vaguely remember some documentation stating that
Wichert> it's probably a bad idea to have a btmp file. It would
Wichert> certainly be a place where password would be logged plaintest
Wichert> if a users
> "Adam" == Adam Di Carlo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Adam>
Adam> Why should this be provided by base2_2.tgz itself -- shouldn't it
Adam> be provided by base-files or something?
There is no particular reason. It's just that /var/log/wtmp is in
base2_2.tgz and does not belong to base-files
Package: boot-floppies
Version: 2.2.15
Severity: normal
Hi,
the base system in 2.2.15-2000-06-07/base2_2.tgz does contain /var/log/wtmp,
but it does not contain /var/log/btmp. Adding this file has two advantages:
- it is probably better from a security point of view
- logrotate tries to rot
18 matches
Mail list logo
