Christian Perrier a scris:
23 days left before the end of the string freeze
Languages meeting the release criteria: 15
--
Already activated and complete for level 1: 13
Arabic, Bulgarian, Dzongkha, French, Galician, Japanese, Dutch, Portuguese
Russian, Sl
Debian Bug Tracking System a scris:
Thank you for filing a new Bug report with Debian.
An installation afterthought: I saw installed on my laptop toshset and radeontool. I know the second
is a recommends of both acpi-support and pm-utils, but toshset doesn't have any reverse deps or
recommend
clone 493119 -1
reassign -1 alsa-source
retitle -1 MSI PR200WX-058EU: sound card needs model parameter
severity -1 important
kthxbye
2008/7/31 Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Thank you for filing a new Bug report with Debian.
I forgot about the issues I have with the headphones.
Subject: installation-report: MSI PR200WX-058EU installation - almost success
(old image)
Package: installation-reports
Version: 2.35
Severity: important
*** Please type your report below this line ***
The installation hit some issues with lilo and there are some small
issues with the fonts in
Hello,
Since some people know that I am subscribed to this list, I am announcing publically my
unsubscription from the list.
My reasons vary from lack of time, lost interest and personal life changes to huge number of
maintainance mails in relation to *my* perceeved SNR of the list (in the li
On 27/03/2008, Bastian Blank <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 09:18:59PM +0100, Frans Pop wrote:
> > In Debian Installer we're seeing a regression in pidof. For certain
> > processes it no longer returns the PID.
> >
> > # ps ax | grep [d]ebian-installer
> > 452 root
On 27/03/2008, Eddy Petrișor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 27/03/2008, Bastian Blank <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 09:18:59PM +0100, Frans Pop wrote:
> > > In Debian Installer we're seeing a regression in pidof. For certain
> &
Wolfgang Lonien wrote:
Hi Matt & dear DDs,
Hello,
I could need something like Matt Zimmermans OEM-Installer (which Ubuntu
has since 2k5 or so) in Debian. For an explanation, please see
https://help.ubuntu.com/community/Ubuntu_OEM_Installer_Overview
This *looks* really like is Debian Install
Frans Pop wrote:
Most strings of this type correctly don't have a space before the ellipsis,
but three do:
kbd-chooser:
_Description: Configuring keyboard ...
netcfg:
_Description: Searching for wireless access points ...
_Description: Storing network settings ...
I'd like to fix those, but t
On 26/02/2008, Alexander Sack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Yes, but face the truth: unfortunately, neither debian nor linux in
> total have enough market power (read: userbase) to make much of a
> difference yet. We are getting closer to that point, but that doesn't
> mean that its wise to start
01:40:07AM +0200, Eddy Petrișor wrote:
Please can you be more specific?
- versions you have tried
All official versions (there has been a regression at some point, but
unfortunately I can't say when it happened).
I have tried the version from unstable, but even on youtube I get one
Miriam Ruiz wrote:
Gnash maintainers: Do you think gnash overall stability is currently in a
good
state for lenny? If not, how viable is it to make it rock-solid by that
time?
I have removed everything under ~/.local/share/gnash, and now I started
looking for anything containing 'gnash' in .
Robert Millan wrote:
On Mon, Feb 25, 2008 at 12:10:56AM +0200, Eddy Petrișor wrote:
I use gnash regularly (in combination with adblock) and I think it's
reasonably
mature nowadays. At least, it works for the most common flash sites, like
youtube.
I disagree, lately, none of the off
Robert Millan wrote:
Package: tasksel
Version: 2.71
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
I'd like to propose gnash browser plugins being added to the desktop task.
A significant amount of websites nowadays use flash; significant enough
that most of our first-time users are troubled with the difficul
Joseph S. Myers wrote:
Hi,
(note: I am not speaking for the team, but I know their ways pretty
well. I also know how most people like to look at patches ;-) )
At CodeSourcery we're enhancing mklibs for use as a general-purpose tool
for reducing shared libraries for root filesystems together
On 28/01/2008, Frans Pop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Monday 28 January 2008, Daniel Dickinson wrote:
> > I'm hoping that the udebs don't mean anything to d-i unless the d-i
> > build scripts pull them in as specifically directed and therefore don't
> > impact on d-i unless you want them to.
>
>
Frans Pop wrote:
On Tuesday 22 January 2008, Eddy Petrișor wrote:
For translators: it means you still can (AND MUST) update your
translation files. Don't change your own schedules, then. However, the
What do yo mean by translation files? Other translations that we might
have? Or the indiv
On 22/01/2008, Felipe Augusto van de Wiel (faw) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 22-01-2008 07:28, Diego de Soto wrote:
> > Hi Felipe,
> >
> > Is the following (with a specific subject line) acceptable?
> >
> > Package: installation-reports
> > Ver
On 22/01/2008, Christian Perrier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Please note that Debian Installer level 1 "synchronization" daily
> tasks are currently suspended.
>
> With the invaluable help of Frans Pop, the synchronization script was
> rewritten for better logging and prepare the switch to "sublev
On 11/01/2008, Frans Pop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Friday 11 January 2008, Eddy Petrișor wrote:
> > No, in the font udeb build.
>
> No. That completely sucks! It would mean that you'd NEVER really know if all
> characters needed
>
> Especially with Christi
On 09/01/2008, Christian Perrier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Quoting Frans Pop ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
>
> > You are also forgetting that quite a few strings with latin glyphs are
> > generated *at run time* (e.g. udeb names and descriptions in anna; file
> > systems and mount points; names of LVM vo
On 09/01/2008, Otavio Salvador <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> "Eddy Petrișor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > (Frans, sorry for the direct reply;I am still using gmail's web interface).
> >
> > On 09/01/2008, Frans Pop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On 09/01/2008, Frans Pop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wednesday 09 January 2008, Eddy Petrișor wrote:
> > > Also, this is a completely separate issue from what we were discussing
> > > as it would _still_ result in duplication of latin characters.
> >
&g
(Frans, sorry for the direct reply;I am still using gmail's web interface).
On 09/01/2008, Frans Pop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wednesday 09 January 2008, Eddy Petrișor wrote:
> > Why not do an automatic strip of the font and only *keep* the
> > codepoints t
On 08/01/2008, Christian Perrier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Quoting Otavio Salvador ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
>
> > > The udeb size goes from 220768 bytes to 183090 bytes
> >
> > Impressive!
>
>
> Im waiting for some ACK by others to propose the strip patch to the
> font maintainer.
>
> I propose ttf-
On 04/12/2007, Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> * Gordon Farquharson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-12-03 00:12]:
> > nslu2-utils is version 0.10+r71-13, but I don't see any changes to the
> > initramfs hook that should cause this problem. I am using a DFSG image
> > that does not contain t
Josef Wolf wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 29, 2007 at 01:20:30PM +0200, Eddy Petrișor wrote:
>
>> Please create a patch and submit it as a bug report[1] against ppp-udeb.
>> [1] "preseeding the host name does not work for ppp-udeb" or something
>> like that should be f
Frans Pop wrote:
> On Thursday 29 November 2007, Eddy Petrișor wrote:
>> Change line 172 from ppp-udeb's postinst (should be
>> /var/lib/dpkg/info/ppp-udeb.postinst after the ppp-udeb udeb has been
>> loaded):
>> db_input high netcfg/get_hostname
>
Josef Wolf wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 29, 2007 at 03:23:47AM +0200, Eddy Petrișor wrote:
>> Josef Wolf wrote:
>> Oops, apprently ppp-udeb's postinst should handle this return code (30) for
>> preseeding to work correctly (but I'll need a second oppinon from either
>
Josef Wolf wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 28, 2007 at 02:01:31AM +0200, Eddy Petrișor wrote:
>
>> Did you try a regular image without any preseeding?
>
> I could now test regular images. And they both (debian-40r1 and
> ubuntu-7.10 alternate) work as expected.
Ok
>> There i
Josef Wolf wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 28, 2007 at 02:01:31AM +0200, Eddy Petrișor wrote:
>> Josef Wolf wrote:
>>> On Tue, Nov 27, 2007 at 02:41:11PM +0200, Eddy Petrișor wrote:
>> Did you try a regular image without any preseeding? Maybe there's
>> something that brea
Josef Wolf wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 27, 2007 at 02:41:11PM +0200, Eddy Petrișor wrote:
>> Josef Wolf wrote:
> [ ... ]
>> Did you try to manually retry the configuration?
>
> Thanks for your replies and your suggestions, Eddy!
>
> Yes, I tried "udpkg --configure --
Josef Wolf wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 26, 2007 at 06:46:43PM +0100, Josef Wolf wrote:
>
>>Nov 26 16:51:44 main-menu[2970]: INFO: Menu item 'ppp-udeb' selected
>>Nov 26 16:51:44 DEBUG:ppp-udeb: eth0 was not configured. ppp-udeb will
>> bring it up
>>Nov 26 16:51:44 kernel: [ 415.264747] eth
On 24/11/2007, Per Olofsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Christian Perrier wrote:
> > Quoting Eddy Petri?or ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> >
> >>> -Description: Standard system
> >>> +Description: Command-line environment
> >> I agree with Robert; I have been asked quite a few times by friends (while
> >>
Christian Perrier wrote:
> Quoting Eddy Petri?or ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
>
>>> -Description: Standard system
>>> +Description: Command-line environment
>> I agree with Robert; I have been asked quite a few times by friends (while
>> installing, what is the difference between standard and desktop syst
> Policy describes the "standard" priority level as:
>
> "These packages provide a reasonably small but not too limited
> character-mode
>system. This is what will be installed by default if the user doesn't
> select
>anything else. It doesn't include many large applications."
>
> whi
Josef Wolf wrote:
> Hello!
>
> I am trying to create a customized install cd (based on ubuntu-7.10
> alternate install cd).
>
> Everything works as desired so far. Just one problem remains: On the
> installed box, d-i needs to run "pppoeconfig eth1" before it configures
> apt-sources. Without
On 16/11/2007, Frans Pop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Friday 16 November 2007, Frans Pop wrote:
> > > 3) At the end of the building process i get this error
> >
> > If you want help with that, provide the full log, or do a careful check
> > for differences with daily build logs yourself.
>
> The
On 31/10/2007, Frans Pop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wednesday 31 October 2007, Michal Suchanek wrote:
> > I tried to use the installer on a box which had a Linux system
> > suspended on one disk. As I noticed that os-prober mounts the
> > partitions I did not try to resume.
> > According to th
Praveen A wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have created a sub page to DebianInstaller to track progress of d-i.
>
> http://wiki.debian.org/DebianInstaller/Hurd
>
> Looking forward to comments/ideas...
If you are the author of the page (and you are) I suggest you subscribe to it.
I think people would be inte
Jérémy Bobbio wrote:
> Hi!
>
> In Etch installer, it is quite easy to create system without a root
> account enabled (enabled the first user to use sudo instead): to do so,
> one just need to "Go back" when asked for a root password. After
> selecting user-setup in the main-menu, the user will be
Jérémy Bobbio wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 05, 2007 at 07:17:41PM +0300, Eddy Petrişor wrote:
>> If someone has time to prepare a custom image with this patch included
>> I might me able to do it.
>
> I have built a netboot mini.iso for i386 with the patched ppp-udeb in
> EXTRAS [1]. If find you enough e
Bastian Blank wrote:
> Hi folks
>
> I prepared a busybox update. The following changes are not yet done:
> - Remove ifconfig. Scheduled since at least 3 years. 3 users left.
ppp-udeb being one of them (i.e. have you counted here ppp-udeb)? So this means
broken PPPoE installs? ppp-udeb uses ifconf
Geert Stappers wrote:
> Op 22-08-2007 om 00:03 schreef Joey Hess:
>> Geert Stappers wrote:
>
>>> Yes and all other Linux / Unix systems
>>> need a device before they can read a directory path.
>>>
>>> Advice:
>>> Invest some time in normal Linux computers,
>>> before spending time on embedded syst
What would a cool would be to have the possibility to have a special file such
as "/this-is-a-chroot" or something like
that to be able to make some initial setting up of the chroot you might use
before providing control to the command ran
in the shell but maybe this a feature for chroot ?
-
Otavio Salvador wrote:
> Christian Perrier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> Shouldn't we go the Ubuntu way and prompt users for some keys to
>> decide about the keyboard layout?
>
> For a begginer, it's better but if you know your keyboard layout I
> think is better to be able to choose it direct
Robert Millan wrote:
> I think this will help a lot in gaining trustability among users who are
> afraid of running debian.exe because of malware. I've arranged the download
> page as follows:
>
> http://goodbye-microsoft.com/download.html
>
> Note that when user is going to see that bunch of
Frans Pop wrote:
> On Sunday 15 July 2007 17:52, José L. Redrejo Rodríguez wrote:
>> No problem. I will remove it. As you said my intention is not to use it
>> with the official Debian installer, but with the one we customize at
>> LinEx (www.gnulinex.org). I didn't know about
>> http://lists.debia
Package: xserver-xorg
Severity: wishlist
Tags: l10n
It would be nice to be able to choose the right X layout in the installed
system based on the choices made in D-I.
Please read below about the implementation proposal.
Christian Perrier wrote:
>>> Christian Perrier wrote:
I think this pro
Christian Perrier wrote:
> and I will maybe have less
> hard work convincing the release manager that we *can* keep languages
> even when they're not complete.
That is *if* you find a release manager :-/
OTOH, indeed, thanks Colin for doing this. I guess talking face to face is
always more produ
Jasper Mackenzie wrote:
> Good Day,
> I am trying to make a custom install cd for a few of my friends who
> have older powerbooks.
> Using simple-cdd seemes to be the obvious answer. Unfortunatley this
> only seems to build etch cd's and seems tailored to i386 systems.
> So is there a 'profile' o
Matthew Johnson wrote:
> On Thu, 7 Jun 2007 22:49 Geert Stappers wrote:
>> What I know from qemu, is that it can handle one single disk image.
>> Please tell more about your qemu setup. ( I think the 'qemu-img'
>> and the 'qemu' commands will do )
>
> I'm using qemu -hda hda -hdb hdb -cdrom debian
Lars-Göran Larsson wrote:
> Package: installation-reports
> Severity: wishlist
>
>
>
> -- Package-specific info:
>
> Boot method: CD
> Image version:
> http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/dayly-builds/daily/arch-latest/i386/iso-cd/debian-testing-i386-netinst.iso
>
> 03-May-2007 10:50
> Date:
Attilio Fiandrotti wrote:
> clone 342053 -1
> retitle -1 Input driver linux_input crashes on some PPC machines
> tags -1 upstream
> thanks
>
> Ville Syrjälä ha scritto:
>> On Thu, May 03, 2007 at 11:25:34AM +0200, Attilio Fiandrotti wrote:
>>> Christian Schaubschlaeger ha scritto:
> You're rig
Sergei Kanevski wrote:
> Hallo,
>
> i have to install debian etch on about 50 computer
Have you looked at preseeding? Coroborated with some options to set the default
mirror and unsigned mirrors, I think you
can do a pretty nice job.
--
Regards,
EddyP
==
Frans Pop wrote:
>> I however wonder whether this bug is indeed "menu entries using 'gksu'
>> should be corrected to use 'gksudo' when the "sudo way" is chosen in
>> D-I. That could have been Joeyh's rationale when reassigning the bug.
>
> D-I is not allowed to modify menu entries like that. If an
Geert Stappers wrote:
>> I faced the same issue with ppp-udeb for which initially I set its
>> menu-item-number to be 18 (they were up to 100 back then), but it was
>> not chosen since it ordered after netcfg, so I had to set it to 17,
>> so it has priority when is loaded.
>
> Would it make sense
Geert Stappers wrote:
> Op 29-04-2007 om 14:28 schreef Eddy Petri??or:
>> Julien BLACHE wrote:
>>> Apple machines aren't ia64, they're i386/amd64 machines.
>>>
>>> So, you used the wrong architecture, grab an i386 or amd64
>>> installation media instead.
>> Maybe we could add a warning in the ia64
Geert Stappers wrote:
> Op 25-04-2007 om 10:54 schreef Otavio Salvador:
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Geert Stappers) writes:
>>> My advice to make that switch (and switch back) more easy,
>>> is to implement a "bootselector".
>
> | 7000 -> 8000 Post-base-install
> | 7000 apt-setup
> | pkgsel
> + 72
Julien BLACHE wrote:
> "\"Félix" Guerrero" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
>> Image version: debian 4.0 r0 ia64
>
> Apple machines aren't ia64, they're i386/amd64 machines.
>
> So, you used the wrong architecture, grab an i386 or amd64
> installation media instead.
Maybe we could add a wa
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Michael Gilbert wrote:
> On 4/15/07, Geert Stappers wrote:
>> For those users there is "preseeding".
>>
>> See the preseeding section in the manual for details.
>
> ok, so if that's the case, why can't the prompts be upfront and store
> the user choic
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Geert Stappers wrote:
> Op 09-04-2007 om 11:09 schreef Alexander Pohl:
>> Machine: ASUS P4PE Motherboard, Onboard Promise Fasttrack 376
>>
>> The installer did not detect the hard drive connected to the PATA port
>> of the Promise Fasttrack 376 onboard
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Christian Perrier wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The debian-l10n-english team has reviewed the debconf templates for
> xorg. This process has resulted in changes that may make your
> existing translation incomplete.
>
> A round of translation updates is being laun
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
Since Robert mentioned a push into r1, I would like to point another one:
This change in the Romanian translation:
- -msgstr ""
- -"Toate fişierele pe o partiţie (recomandat pentru utilizatori începători)"
+msgstr "Tot pe o partiţie (recomandat
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Robert Millan wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 02, 2007 at 12:38:26AM +0200, Pierre THIERRY wrote:
>> Scribit Otavio Salvador dies 01/04/2007 hora 18:54:
Attached patch rises it to 30s when os-prober has detected another
OS (leaves it to 5s otherwise).
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Frans Pop wrote:
> On Friday 30 March 2007 17:27, Eddy Petrișor wrote:
>> "It will guess the broadcast address (-is-) *as* the bitwise OR of your
>> system's IP address with the bitwise negation of the netmask."
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Of course, this refers to the installation guide text.
Eddy Petrișor wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have complained a while back that this phrase is not that well formed :-)
>
> I will try again, since is still not fixed, although I rai
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello,
I have complained a while back that this phrase is not that well formed :-)
I will try again, since is still not fixed, although I raised the flag in
October last year.
Additions are marked like *this*. Removals are marked like (-this-)
"It
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
# Christian was right
reassign 416544 xserver-xorg
thanks
Eddy Petrișor wrote:
> tags 416544 patch l10n
> thanks
>
> Christian Perrier wrote:
>> I think this probably belongs to xserver-xorg. The X keymap is set in
>> tha
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
tags 416544 patch l10n
thanks
Christian Perrier wrote:
> I think this probably belongs to xserver-xorg. The X keymap is set in
> that package's postinst. In that piece of code, I see nothing to
> properly handle Romanian keymaps (and, yes, this is ugl
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Eddy Petrișor wrote:
> Steve Langasek wrote:
>> On Wed, Mar 28, 2007 at 08:45:44PM +0300, Eddy Petrior wrote:
>>> Network Manager was installed although only the desktop task was
>>> selected. This is broken since on a des
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 28, 2007 at 08:45:44PM +0300, Eddy Petrișor wrote:
>> Network Manager was installed although only the desktop task was
>> selected. This is broken since on a desktop it links the operation of
&g
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Obi Bok wrote:
> Hello. I'd like to suggest a slight visual change to 'debian-installer' in
> terms of menu items layout.
>
> I've been meaning to post this to the list for years now but somehow never
> got
> around to doing so, perhaps thinking th
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
> On Saturday 24 March 2007 17:28, Michael Numberger wrote:
>> On a AMD K7-650 (Slot A), the RC2-Installer installs the
>> linux-image-2.6-486 an not the linux-Image-2.6-k7.
>
> You probably used a netinst CD image. That CD image just does not contai
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Otavio Salvador wrote:
> Sander Marechal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> It's also very annoying for people who have no idea how to answer the
>> expert questions (a.k.a. me). For example, during the install I had to
>> back out of the partitioner, r
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
project linux wrote:
> Hai folksAs we are dealing with the new installer for the debian hurd ,
> kindly help us with the debian internals.We already had a look on the
> links
> http://people.debian.org and the wiki pages.we would like to know the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello,
Frans Pop uploaded for me ppp 2.4.4rel-8 which fixes bug 415077 (can
lead to configuration issues for networking).
Please unblock it.
- --
Regards,
EddyP
=
"Imagination is more important than knowle
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Sven Luther wrote:
> We started an effort last year to get things working on powerpc, but for
[..]
> There was a wiki page somewhere, mayb e Attilio or Eddy can give you the link,
> it would be good to add your hardware there, and do a followup on thos
Uwe Dippel wrote:
> On 3/4/07, Uwe Dippel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> I
>> I'll try another download.
>
>
> Which takes around one day in MY ... .
>
> Just for curiosity, I used the real(== from CDROM) Sarge-netinstaller of
> years ago. It goes through smoothly.
> Now I think to stick with
:44:30 +0100
From: Holger Wansing <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Eddy Petrișor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Hi Eddy,
On Wed, 24 Jan 2007 15:51:20 +0200 Eddy Petrișor wrote:
> So I am asking if there are people interested in testing the image I have
> prepar
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Frans Pop wrote:
> On Thursday 22 February 2007 10:34, filib wrote:
>> Feb 21 13:55:25 dhclient: DHCPDISCOVER on eth1 to 255.255.255.255 port
>> 67 interval 3
>> Feb 21 13:55:25 kernel: Kernel unaligned access at TPC[5e44c8]
>> ip_rcv+0xd0/0x58c
>> Feb
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
(I am forwarding this to Debain Boot since these seem to be
installation issues).
Justin Hartman wrote:
> On 2/18/07, Eddy Petrișor wrote:
>> > * Getting Etch operational from a netinstall cd
>>
>> What image did you used? C
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Robert Millan wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 19, 2007 at 06:03:21PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
>>> Rationale:
>>>
>>> Some computers have BIOSes that don't support USB keyboards. These are
>>> not necessarily old computers; I've found relatively new ones (with amd6
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Björn Hahn wrote:
> Package: installation-reports
> Version: 2.28
> Severity: minor
>
>
>
> -- Package-specific info:
>
> Boot meth: CD
> Image version: netinstall image
> http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/daily-builds/daily/arch-latest/i386/iso-c
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Filipus Klutiero wrote:
> Package: installation-reports
> Severity: normal
>
>
>
> -- Package-specific info:
>
> Boot method: CD
> Image version: Debian GNU/Linux testing "Etch" - Official Snapshot i386
> NETINST Binary-1 20070215-09:31
> Date:
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Rick Thomas wrote:
> Package: installation
> Severity: important
>
>
> After installation on a powerpc system (PowerMac Blue&White G3) when aptitude
> is run in interactive (curses) mode, told
> to do update and finish any pending operations ("g")
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Gregory Colpart wrote:
>> Did you try to unplug the cable between the concentrator search and
>> before you enter the login info. There should be a different error message.
>
> I didn't try.
Don't worry, if you want you can test this, but I am 99.99%
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Christian Perrier wrote:
> Quoting Robert Millan ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
>> Author: rmh
>> Date: Thu Feb 8 19:52:23 2007
>> New Revision: 45041
>>
>> Modified:
>>people/rmh/win32-loader/dil.nsi
>>people/rmh/win32-loader/templates/custom.ini
>>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Gregory Colpart wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, Feb 05, 2007 at 08:38:11AM +0200, Eddy Petri??or wrote:
>> I recommend you to use the official daily image and boot with either
>> "installgui modules=ppp-udeb" or "install modules=ppp-udeb":
>
> I use daily b
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Frans Pop wrote:
> On Tuesday 06 February 2007 09:10, Eddy Petrișor wrote:
>> Frans Pop wrote:
>>> On Monday 05 February 2007 07:38, Eddy Petrișor wrote:
>>>> I advice and *recommend* you to test now with the daily bu
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Frans Pop wrote:
> On Monday 05 February 2007 07:38, Eddy Petrișor wrote:
>> I advice and *recommend* you to test now with the daily built D-I image
>> (ppp is now already in Sid, but you will need to append the
>> "modu
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Toby Chamberlain wrote:
> Hi Geert,
>
> Thanks for replying.
>
> I read those 2 bug reports you mentioned and noticed that they both used
> the amd64 build rather than the i386 build I was using... am I correct
> in assuming that the amd64 build shou
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
# the proposed text in 282771 should be removed when the text in
# 408340 is introduced
retitle 282771 Current PPPoE instructions are deprecated
merge 282771 408340
thanks
PPPoE configuration can now (D-I daily bulit images) be done directly in
D-I, s
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Gregory Colpart wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Sorry for the late reply.
No problem.
> On Wed, Jan 24, 2007 at 03:51:20PM +0200, Eddy Petri??or wrote:
>> So I am asking if there are people interested in testing the image I have
>> prepared with the new ppp-ude
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Attilio Fiandrotti wrote:
> Hi
>
> i just prepared a miniiso with Andre's rootskel-gtk, it's here
>
> https://debian.polito.it/downloads/mini_kaplan_ferreira.iso
>
> I like this :)
Me too.
Still I would opt for a banner that doesn't have an obviou
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Davide Viti wrote:
> I took some screenshots using latest dejavu 2.14; please refer to [1]
> to see what changed since version 2.13.
>
> The screenshots can be found in [2], and in case you wanted to compare them
> to those
> taken using the previous
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Robert Millan wrote:
> Further details (screenshots, GPLed source code) at:
>
> http://goodbye-microsoft.com/more.html
http://linux.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=219164&cid=17788320
- --
Regards,
EddyP
=
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Tammo Block wrote:
> Am Montag, 29. Januar 2007 10:13 schrieben Sie:
>> I suspect this is done intentionally by your ISP and all http traffic is
>> redirected to a page that explains how to contact the ISP if the login info
>> is bad. (Needless to say
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Tammo Block wrote:
> Hello !
> ppp/ip-up.d:
> insgesamt 4
> -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 891 2006-12-19 13:23 usepeerdns
>
> ppp/ipv6-down.d:
> insgesamt 0
>
> ppp/ipv6-up.d:
> insgesamt 0
>
> ppp/peers:
> insgesamt 4
> -rw-r- 1 root dip 1380 200
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Tammo Block wrote:
> Hello !
>
>
> I did the following :
>
> 1.) login with wrong username (19:32:15)
> 2.) Choose mirror -> fails (19:32:42)
> 3.) main-menu -> choose ppp again (19:33:39)
> 4.) enter correct values and try again (19:34:16)
> 5.) Su
1 - 100 of 192 matches
Mail list logo
