12.11.2014 04:27, Diederik de Haas wrote:
> Package: busybox-static
> Version: 1:1.22.0-11
> Severity: important
>
> This is basically the same error as with bug #757941, but it was
> reassigned to glibc and fixed there. As Aurelien Jarno correctly stated
> in https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugre
Your message dated Wed, 12 Nov 2014 10:48:51 +0300
with message-id <546310e3.7060...@msgid.tls.msk.ru>
and subject line Re: Bug#768876: busybox-static is statically linked against
libc6, but doesn't have a Built-Using: field
has caused the Debian Bug report #768876,
regarding busybox-static is sta
12.11.2014 04:35, Diederik de Haas wrote:
> Bug nr 768926 is filed against qemu-user-static, and was supposedly fixed
> with
> busybox version 1.22.0-10
> My guess is that that upload was supposed to fix bug nr 768876 and not 768926
Yes, you're exactly right. This is what happens when I do thin
Bug nr 768926 is filed against qemu-user-static, and was supposedly fixed with
busybox version 1.22.0-10
My guess is that that upload was supposed to fix bug nr 768876 and not 768926
--
GPG: 0x138E41915C7EFED6
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Package: busybox-static
Version: 1:1.22.0-11
Severity: important
This is basically the same error as with bug #757941, but it was
reassigned to glibc and fixed there. As Aurelien Jarno correctly stated
in https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=757941#120
it was indeed fixed with version
Current patches attached here.
I was totally thrown in testing by #768788 - some of my tests on
installed EFI systems were failing, due to the broken GUID on the
ESP. Yay!
I've merged things forward and I'm ready to push these changes. Please
review one last time?
--
Steve McIntyre, Cambridge,
On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 11:26:57PM +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
>Hi,
>
>just noticed this call:
> https://twitter.com/mjg59/status/532291014304604160
>
>pointing to this spec:
> http://www.freedesktop.org/wiki/MatthewGarrett/BootLoaderSpec/
>
>Unfortunately I'm very low on free time right now, b
Hi,
as discussed with Julien yesterdayish, if you need input for packages
possibly affecting d-i (probably because you notice a block-udeb on
them), please tag the relevant unblock/pre-approval request as 'd-i',
and cc: k...@debian.org; I'll then follow up with a 'confirmed' tag
after review and/o
Hi,
just noticed this call:
https://twitter.com/mjg59/status/532291014304604160
pointing to this spec:
http://www.freedesktop.org/wiki/MatthewGarrett/BootLoaderSpec/
Unfortunately I'm very low on free time right now, but if someone
fancies discussing that with him, please keep debian-boot@ i
Accepted:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2014 17:43:43 +0100
Source: partman-efi
Binary: partman-efi
Architecture: source i386
Version: 52
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian Install System Team
Changed-By: Christian Perrier
Your message dated Tue, 11 Nov 2014 18:34:17 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#768788: fixed in partman-efi 52
has caused the Debian Bug report #768788,
regarding Recent installer versions using the wrong GPT partition type GUID for
EFI System Partition
to be marked as done.
This means
partman-efi_52_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
partman-efi_52.dsc
partman-efi_52.tar.xz
partman-efi_52_i386.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debian.org)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.deb
partman-efi_52_i386.changes uploaded successfully to ftp-master.debian.org
along with the files:
partman-efi_52.dsc
partman-efi_52.tar.xz
partman-efi_52_i386.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host coccia.debian.org)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ.
busybox_1.22.0-11_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
busybox_1.22.0-11.dsc
busybox_1.22.0-11.debian.tar.xz
busybox-syslogd_1.22.0-11_all.deb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debian.org)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to deb
On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 04:09:09PM +, Chris Bell wrote:
>
>I understand the reasons for removing these tasks from tasksel in the
> installer but I think that some, especially mail-server, were a great help
> to inexperienced users because they set sensible defaults over all the
> included
Accepted:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2014 09:24:56 +0100
Source: debootstrap
Binary: debootstrap debootstrap-udeb
Architecture: source all
Version: 1.0.65
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian Install System Team
Changed-By
Accepted:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2014 19:24:21 +0300
Source: busybox
Binary: busybox-syslogd
Architecture: source all
Version: 1:1.22.0-11
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian Install System Team
Changed-By: Michael Toka
On Dienstag, 11. November 2014, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Because d-i-n-i fetches d-i from the archive, and because you want a d-i
> that knows about the new linux ABI instead of the old one.
ah, thanks.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
debootstrap_1.0.65_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
debootstrap_1.0.65.dsc
debootstrap_1.0.65.tar.xz
debootstrap_1.0.65_all.deb
debootstrap-udeb_1.0.65_all.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debian.org)
--
To UN
Holger Levsen (2014-11-11):
> > then think about uploading d-i (possibly including some more packages
> > for which unblock requests have been filed), then only d-i-n-i.
>
> why would you want to wait with uploading d-i-n-i until d-i has been uploaded?
Because d-i-n-i fetches d-i from the archiv
11.11.2014 18:08, Michael Tokarev wrote:
> Please unblock package busybox. Last upload has one security bugfix
> (CVE-2014-4607, #768945), the fix is from upstream stable branch,
> fixing an integer overflow in lzo decompressor; it adds a Built-Using
> control field for busybox-static variant (#76
debootstrap_1.0.65_i386.changes uploaded successfully to ftp-master.debian.org
along with the files:
debootstrap_1.0.65.dsc
debootstrap_1.0.65.tar.xz
debootstrap_1.0.65_all.deb
debootstrap-udeb_1.0.65_all.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host coccia.debian.org)
Hi Ben,
On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 03:09:42PM +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > >From 4d91c83577a4dbe8c52271bbd157b450b8c7edf3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> > From: Michael Weiser
> > Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2014 11:36:10 +0100
> > Subject: [PATCH] Allow for devices such as /dev/sdaa
> Based on a quick survey
On Tue 11 Nov, Andreas Tille wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I guess the sad news that Joey Hess leaves Debian has spread also to
> Debian Blends list. The direct consequence for Blends is that Joey will
> not work on this bug (#758096) and will also most probably not rise any
> opinion on it any more but we
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package busybox. Last upload has one security bugfix
(CVE-2014-4607, #768945), the fix is from upstream stable branch,
fixing an integer overflow in lzo decompressor; it adds
Accepted:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2014 17:07:34 +0300
Source: busybox
Binary: busybox busybox-static busybox-udeb busybox-syslogd udhcpc udhcpd
Architecture: source amd64 all
Version: 1:1.22.0-10
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: high
Maintainer
This rings a bell.. I though I already fixed that years ago!? Ah, well…
Signed-off-by: Turbo Fredriksson
---
debian/changelog |6 ++
grub-installer |4
2 files changed, 10 insertions(+)
diff --git a/debian/changelog b/debian/changelog
index 463efd1..64e59b0 100644
--- a/debi
Your message dated Tue, 11 Nov 2014 15:19:44 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#768945: fixed in busybox 1:1.22.0-10
has caused the Debian Bug report #768945,
regarding busybox lzo implementation suffers from CVE-2014-4607 flaw
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the prob
On Tue, 2014-11-11 at 12:32 +0100, Michael Weiser wrote:
> Package: debian-installer
> Version: 20141002
> Severity: important
> Tags: d-i
>
> Dear Maintainer,
>
> installing Debian jessie with weekly snapshot netinst ISO image
> http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/daily-builds/daily/arch-latest/am
busybox_1.22.0-10_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
busybox_1.22.0-10.dsc
busybox_1.22.0-10.debian.tar.xz
busybox_1.22.0-10_amd64.deb
busybox-static_1.22.0-10_amd64.deb
busybox-udeb_1.22.0-10_amd64.udeb
busybox-syslogd_1.22.0-10_all.deb
udhcpc_1.22
I'm trying to re-add the ZoL stuff I made a year and a half ago (we're
'expecting'
ZoL to be accepted 'soon' - it's now in the hands of the legal department, we
finally
got the reject we where expecting).
While testing this out (setting up a local, authenticated repo haven't been
easy!),
I not
Hi,
On Montag, 10. November 2014, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> It'd probably a better idea to wait until src:linux migrates to testing,
ack
> then think about uploading d-i (possibly including some more packages
> for which unblock requests have been filed), then only d-i-n-i.
why would you want to
Package: debian-installer
Version: 20141002
Severity: important
Tags: d-i
Dear Maintainer,
installing Debian jessie with weekly snapshot netinst ISO image
http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/daily-builds/daily/arch-latest/amd64/iso-cd/debian-testing-amd64-netinst.iso
on an x86_64 Server with lots o
Hi,
I guess the sad news that Joey Hess leaves Debian has spread also to
Debian Blends list. The direct consequence for Blends is that Joey will
not work on this bug (#758096) and will also most probably not rise any
opinion on it any more but we somehow need to move on.
I realised that the chan
34 matches
Mail list logo
