12.11.2014 04:27, Diederik de Haas wrote: > Package: busybox-static > Version: 1:1.22.0-11 > Severity: important > > This is basically the same error as with bug #757941, but it was > reassigned to glibc and fixed there. As Aurelien Jarno correctly stated > in https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=757941#120 > it was indeed fixed with version 1.22.0-9+b1, which I have verified. > > However, I just received version 1.22.0-11 of busybox-static and now it > fails again:
Now this is funny. Should I add a versioned build-dependency against libc6-dev perhaps? Because, according to the build log of amd64 (that's your arch), the package has been built against glibc (= 2.19-11) -- grep for Built-Using in the build log: https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=busybox&arch=amd64&ver=1%3A1.22.0-11&stamp=1415729242 now I wonder how the -9+b1 version has been built against fixed glibc-2.19-12 while at least one of amd64 buildds have -11 ? And there's nothing I can do about this on busybox side -- except, again, adding a versioned build-dep. Aurelien? Thanks, /mjt -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/5463120f.6030...@msgid.tls.msk.ru
