On Fri, Apr 05, 2013 at 03:06:00AM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Thu, 2013-04-04 at 19:46 -0400, Chris Frey wrote:
> > Apr 4 22:28:38 kernel: [ 101.522661] FAT-fs (sda5): utf8 is not a
> > recommended IO charset for FAT filesystems, filesystem will be case
> > sensitive!
>
> This irritating
On Thu, 2013-04-04 at 19:46 -0400, Chris Frey wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 04, 2013 at 07:04:02PM -0400, Chris Frey wrote:
> > Why can't it find the kernel?
>
> Looks like it was because of this, from the USB stick I was using,
> with messages from syslog:
>
> Apr 4 22:28:38 kernel: [ 101.522661] FAT-f
On Thu, Apr 04, 2013 at 07:04:02PM -0400, Chris Frey wrote:
> Why can't it find the kernel?
Looks like it was because of this, from the USB stick I was using,
with messages from syslog:
Apr 4 22:28:38 kernel: [ 101.522661] FAT-fs (sda5): utf8 is not a recommended
IO charset for FAT filesystems
On Thu, Apr 04, 2013 at 07:04:02PM -0400, Chris Frey wrote:
> I'm back again, this time trying to install using the RC1 wheezy installer
> to a Dell Inspiron 630m.
Side note: when I select "Help" from the installer boot menu, the
installer goes into an endless loop, with the X server segfaulting (
I'm back again, this time trying to install using the RC1 wheezy installer
to a Dell Inspiron 630m.
It fails for me at the end of installing the base system. In the syslog,
it shows:
Apr 4 22:41:27 base-installer: info: Found kernels ''
Apr 4 22:41:35 base-installer: error: exiting on error
b
Quoting ian_br...@fastmail.net (ian_br...@fastmail.net):
> If Debian bug report #684128 proves anything, it is that you will never
> convince anyone with technical argument, facts advanced in support of
Sorry, but Debian bug #684128 only proves one thing : that we (the D-I
team) were mostly tryin
On 04/04/13 02:28 PM, ian_br...@fastmail.net wrote:
> On Thu, 04 Apr 2013 12:45:55 -0300
> Ben Armstrong wrote:
>
>> Just take care in future that the style of communications you used
>> triggered someone's "wetware spam filter" with a false positive.
>
> I initially wrote up a detailed bug repo
On Thu, 04 Apr 2013 16:45:26 -0300
Ben Armstrong wrote:
> the long and sordid tale of your bid to get attention for this bug
That's right; I wrote it up in detail, provided patches when asked to do
so, provided test scripts to demonstrate the correctness of those
patches, answered every question
On Thu, 4 Apr 2013 19:09:04 +0200
Christian PERRIER wrote:
> This mail is a very good argument to confirm that overcomplicated
> methods to make your point will just fail.
>
> If you have a point to make it, make ti. Once. With facts.
I supplied plenty of facts.
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> # provided the installed system has ifupdown/0.7.6 or later:
> notfound 701884 netcfg/1.106
Bug #701884 {Done: Andrew Shadura } [ifupdown,netcfg]
kfreebsd: unknown method 'inet6 auto'
No longer marked as found in versions netcfg/1.106.
> # this s
Quoting Didier 'OdyX' Raboud (o...@debian.org):
> Hi -boot, -release and Julien,
>
> as far as I read the flow of bugs on -boot, debootstrap is still affected by
> #703889 which really needs fixing for a sane Wheezy. The patches stacked on
> the debootstrap git repository (which drop the InRelea
Accepted:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Thu, 04 Apr 2013 16:17:57 +0200
Source: debootstrap
Binary: debootstrap debootstrap-udeb
Architecture: source all
Version: 1.0.48
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian Install System Team
Changed-By: D
debootstrap_1.0.48_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
debootstrap_1.0.48.dsc
debootstrap_1.0.48.tar.gz
debootstrap_1.0.48_all.deb
debootstrap-udeb_1.0.48_all.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debian.org)
--
To U
Your message dated Thu, 04 Apr 2013 17:32:34 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#703889: fixed in debootstrap 1.0.48
has caused the Debian Bug report #703889,
regarding installation-reports: wheezy fails to install due to missing gpg
dependency (introduced by #703146)
to be marked as done.
Your message dated Thu, 04 Apr 2013 17:32:34 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#703889: fixed in debootstrap 1.0.48
has caused the Debian Bug report #703889,
regarding [Wheezy] Package authentication issue during base installation:
BusyBox
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim
On Thu, 04 Apr 2013 12:45:55 -0300
Ben Armstrong wrote:
> Just take care in future that the style of communications you used
> triggered someone's "wetware spam filter" with a false positive.
I initially wrote up a detailed bug report, and then when somebody
suggested that the problem would get
Hello Didier
- Original Message -
From: "Didier 'OdyX' Raboud"
To: "Andreas Meile" ; <704...@bugs.debian.org>
Sent: Thursday, April 04, 2013 10:22 AM
Subject: Re: Bug#704635: [Wheezy] Package authentication issue during base
installation: BusyBox
Control: reassign -1 debootstrap 1.
On Thu, 2013-04-04 at 03:27 -0700, ian_br...@fastmail.net wrote:
> It seems that Historical Revisionism, of the bad kind, is now in
> operation at Debian, in that critical commentary about unapplied patches
> is made to disappear down the memory hole, without leaving so much as a
> trace on the rel
It seems that Historical Revisionism, of the bad kind, is now in
operation at Debian, in that critical commentary about unapplied patches
is made to disappear down the memory hole, without leaving so much as a
trace on the relevant bug report.
If it were thought that the criticism was unfair, or i
Hi -boot, -release and Julien,
as far as I read the flow of bugs on -boot, debootstrap is still affected by
#703889 which really needs fixing for a sane Wheezy. The patches stacked on
the debootstrap git repository (which drop the InRelease handling, as was done
in apt, attached) look sane to m
Processing control commands:
> reassign -1 debootstrap 1.0.47
Bug #704635 [base-installer] [Wheezy] Package authentication issue during base
installation: BusyBox
Bug reassigned from package 'base-installer' to 'debootstrap'.
No longer marked as found in versions base-installer/1.130.
Ignoring re
Control: reassign -1 debootstrap 1.0.47
Control: forcemerge 703889 -1
Hi Andreas, and thanks for your bugreport.
Le mercredi, 3 avril 2013 21.45:43, Andreas Meile a écrit :
> During the setup of a Debian Box (hardware: IBM NetVista A40 model
> 6840-QDG, 512 MB RAM, Promise Fastrak TX2300 SATA RAI
22 matches
Mail list logo
