On 04/04/13 02:28 PM, ian_br...@fastmail.net wrote: > On Thu, 04 Apr 2013 12:45:55 -0300 > Ben Armstrong <sy...@debian.org> wrote: > >> Just take care in future that the style of communications you used >> triggered someone's "wetware spam filter" with a false positive. > > I initially wrote up a detailed bug report, and then when somebody > suggested that the problem would get fixed faster if a patch were > provided, I wrote that too.
TL;DR Sorry, I, personally, do not care -- note: neither this nor my previous response represent the project as a whole, but is solely *my* opinion -- about the long and sordid tale of your bid to get attention for this bug. I only chimed in because your ranting, baseless accusations against the project all hinged on your assumption that someone was "out to get you" whereas, in fact, it seemed obvious to me why someone mistook your response for spam, and I had hoped to get through to you on that one point. Well, if you can't learn from that and modify your approach, and thus you have decided to put your energies elsewhere, maybe it is best for all parties involved. Ben -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/515dd856.8020...@debian.org
