(Noise from a sometimes user who forgets that the debian list handles
mail correctly, and fails to put the list address in the To: field)
On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 1:27 AM, Lennart Sorensen
wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 05:20:57PM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
>> On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 05:34:30PM
Debian installer build overview
---
Failed or old builds:
* OLD BUILD:armel Aug 09 17:32 buildd@alain build_iop32x_netboot
http://d-i.debian.org/daily-images/armel/daily/build_iop32x_netboot.log
* OLD BUILD:armel Aug 09 17:34 buildd@alain
bu
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 637460 + pending
Bug #637460 [debian-installer] Typo in xm-debian.cfg
Added tag(s) pending.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
637460: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=637460
Debi
tags 637460 + pending
thanks
Gedalya, le Thu 11 Aug 2011 13:55:47 -0400, a écrit :
> Regarding netboot/xen/xm-debian.cfg, the line
>
> #extras = "debian-installer/exit/always_halt=true -- quiet console=hvc0"
>
> has no effect when uncommented, the name of the option needs to be corrected
> to ex
(Noise from a sometimes user)
On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 1:27 AM, Lennart Sorensen
wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 05:20:57PM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
>> On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 05:34:30PM +0100, Miguel Figueiredo wrote:
>> > Good question, but the installer just setups the first account, doesn't
Package: installation-reports
Severity: normal
Hi all,
I tested if I can get the new WPA feature working here and this
is to report success!
Wow!
I went until the installation step "Configure the clock via NTP", and
since that was successful, I aborted the installation at that point.
Some de
package: debian-installer
version: 20110811
severity: minor
Regarding netboot/xen/xm-debian.cfg, the line
#extras = "debian-installer/exit/always_halt=true -- quiet console=hvc0"
has no effect when uncommented, the name of the option needs to be
corrected to extra, not extras.
Thi
On Aug 11, 2011, at 11:49 AM, Miguel Figueiredo wrote:
Package: user-setup
Version: 1.40
Tags: patch
currently it is asked the fullname of the first user being created
during the
standard installation.
Lowering the priority, the question will be skipped and the standard
installation will be
On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 05:20:57PM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 05:34:30PM +0100, Miguel Figueiredo wrote:
> > Good question, but the installer just setups the first account, doesn't
> > manage
> > user's accounts.
>
> The installer should set up the first account in a ma
On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 05:34:30PM +0100, Miguel Figueiredo wrote:
> Good question, but the installer just setups the first account, doesn't
> manage
> user's accounts.
The installer should set up the first account in a manner that does not
require later management simply in order to bring it in
[...]
> Doesn't that mean the user will be created without a full name entered
> at all?
the first account, yes.
> Won't that look ugly in many places?
Good question, but the installer just setups the first account, doesn't manage
user's accounts.
> How do many users know how to later go
On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 11:07:04AM -0400, Lennart Sorensen wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 04:56:39PM +0100, Miguel Figueiredo wrote:
> > Setting the root account password is not mandatory in standard
> > installation,
> > skipping it already adds the first user account to sudo.
> > Lowering the
On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 04:56:39PM +0100, Miguel Figueiredo wrote:
> Package: user-setup
> Version: 1.40
> Tags: wishlist, patch
>
> Setting the root account password is not mandatory in standard installation,
> skipping it already adds the first user account to sudo.
> Lowering the priority skip
On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 04:49:13PM +0100, Miguel Figueiredo wrote:
> currently it is asked the fullname of the first user being created during the
> standard installation.
> Lowering the priority, the question will be skipped and the standard
> installation will be completed with one less questi
On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 04:49:13PM +0100, Miguel Figueiredo wrote:
> Package: user-setup
> Version: 1.40
> Tags: patch
>
> currently it is asked the fullname of the first user being created during the
> standard installation.
> Lowering the priority, the question will be skipped and the standard
Package: user-setup
Version: 1.40
Tags: wishlist, patch
Setting the root account password is not mandatory in standard installation,
skipping it already adds the first user account to sudo.
Lowering the priority skips 2 questions in the standard installation.
The questions will still be available
Package: user-setup
Version: 1.40
Tags: patch
currently it is asked the fullname of the first user being created during the
standard installation.
Lowering the priority, the question will be skipped and the standard
installation will be completed with one less question to the user.
The question
On Wed, August 10, 2011 11:15, Colin Watson wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 09, 2011 at 07:44:38AM +0200, Christian PERRIER wrote:
>> I, for one, would vote for uploading to unstable. It is time to test
*now*. Closer to wheezy release might be too laste.
> Agreed, just go for unstable and (obviously) be respo
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 637432 + pending
Bug #637432 [base-installer] kernel choice offers unusable kernel
Added tag(s) pending.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
637432: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bu
tags 637432 + pending
thanks
Hello,
Miguel Figueiredo, le Thu 11 Aug 2011 13:11:28 +0100, a écrit :
> In standard installation appears a menu to choose the kernel to install.
> In that menu, on a amd64 installation, appears the option to choose a
> kfreebsd
> kernel which results in a system t
Package: base-installer
Version: 1.120
In standard installation appears a menu to choose the kernel to install.
In that menu, on a amd64 installation, appears the option to choose a kfreebsd
kernel which results in a system that does not boot, unusable.
--
Melhores cumprimentos/Best Regards,
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 637284 linux-2.6
Bug #637284 [installation-reports] Can't install wheezy on a 2011 iMac
Bug reassigned from package 'installation-reports' to 'linux-2.6'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
6
Hi all,
according Mike the same happens with the daily buids (11 Aug).
Installs ok and after booting graphical problems in normal and rescue mode.
Hence i am reassigning to package linux-2.6.
Mike can you try to blacklist radeon module to see if it boots correctly?
--
Melhores cumprimentos/Best
23 matches
Mail list logo
