tags 498143 pending
thanks
On Tuesday 25 August 2009, Chris Lamb wrote:
> To frame my thoughts here, this is to support d-i when invoked from
> Debian Live USB sticks - as Debian Live knows the target media when
> building the USB image, "try-usb=true" is appended to all generated
> "usb with d-i"
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 498143 pending
Bug #498143 [cdrom-detect] Please detect non-ISO block devices masquerading as
Debian CDs
Added tag(s) pending.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administ
linux-kernel-di-sparc-2.6_1.41lenny5_multi.changes uploaded successfully to
localhost
along with the files:
linux-kernel-di-sparc-2.6_1.41lenny5.tar.gz
scsi-common-modules-2.6.26-2-sparc64-di_1.41lenny5_sparc.udeb
kernel-image-2.6.26-2-sparc64-di_1.41lenny5_sparc.udeb
xfs-modules-2.6.26-2-
linux-kernel-di-amd64-2.6_1.53lenny5_multi.changes uploaded successfully to
localhost
along with the files:
isofs-modules-2.6.26-2-amd64-di_1.53lenny5_amd64.udeb
cdrom-core-modules-2.6.26-2-amd64-di_1.53lenny5_amd64.udeb
serial-modules-2.6.26-2-amd64-di_1.53lenny5_amd64.udeb
nic-wireless-m
linux-kernel-di-armel-2.6_1.32lenny5_multi.changes uploaded successfully to
localhost
along with the files:
multipath-modules-2.6.26-2-versatile-di_1.32lenny5_armel.udeb
crypto-modules-2.6.26-2-versatile-di_1.32lenny5_armel.udeb
reiserfs-modules-2.6.26-2-versatile-di_1.32lenny5_armel.udeb
Accepted:
cdrom-core-modules-2.6.26-2-parisc-di_1.38lenny5_hppa.udeb
to
pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di-hppa-2.6/cdrom-core-modules-2.6.26-2-parisc-di_1.38lenny5_hppa.udeb
cdrom-core-modules-2.6.26-2-parisc64-di_1.38lenny5_hppa.udeb
to
pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di-hppa-2.6/cdrom-core-modules-2.6.
Accepted:
ata-modules-2.6.26-2-alpha-generic-di_0.37lenny5_alpha.udeb
to
pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di-alpha-2.6/ata-modules-2.6.26-2-alpha-generic-di_0.37lenny5_alpha.udeb
cdrom-core-modules-2.6.26-2-alpha-generic-di_0.37lenny5_alpha.udeb
to
pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di-alpha-2.6/cdrom-core-mo
Accepted:
acpi-modules-2.6.26-2-486-di_1.76lenny5_i386.udeb
to
pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di-i386-2.6/acpi-modules-2.6.26-2-486-di_1.76lenny5_i386.udeb
acpi-modules-2.6.26-2-686-bigmem-di_1.76lenny5_i386.udeb
to
pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di-i386-2.6/acpi-modules-2.6.26-2-686-bigmem-di_1.76lenny
Alexander Wirt dijo [Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 09:14:48PM +0200]:
> Hi,
>
> Unfortunately I have to announce that we have banned Uwe Bugla from our
> mailinglists. In the last days he showed an attitude on our lists that is not
> acceptable in any way ([1-4] and more). We already gave him a warning,
>
Accepted:
cdrom-core-modules-2.6.26-2-4kc-malta-di_1.8lenny5_mipsel.udeb
to
pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di-mipsel-2.6/cdrom-core-modules-2.6.26-2-4kc-malta-di_1.8lenny5_mipsel.udeb
cdrom-core-modules-2.6.26-2-r5k-cobalt-di_1.8lenny5_mipsel.udeb
to
pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di-mipsel-2.6/cdrom-co
Accepted:
cdrom-core-modules-2.6.26-2-4kc-malta-di_1.9lenny5_mips.udeb
to
pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di-mips-2.6/cdrom-core-modules-2.6.26-2-4kc-malta-di_1.9lenny5_mips.udeb
cdrom-core-modules-2.6.26-2-sb1-bcm91250a-di_1.9lenny5_mips.udeb
to
pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di-mips-2.6/cdrom-core-modu
Package: installation-reports
Severity: normal
-- Package-specific info:
Boot method: network
Image version: 20090819 daily,
http://people.debian.org/~joeyh/d-i/armel/images/20090819-23:51/kirkwood/network-console/qnap/ts-219/
Date: 2009-08-20
Machine: QNAP TS-219
Partitions:
Disks are partiti
A problem with providing some global way of turning off recommends by
default in d-i is that tasks are now being maintained with the implicit
and explicit assumption that recommends are installed by default. So, if
recommends are turned off, tasks can be broken in both subtle and
obvious ways.
Fra
I have a patch for this (attached) but as I was writing it I became
unconvinced that this isn't just bloat. After all, the user can be added
to groups via preseed/late_command. And most cases that involve the user
to groups seem likely to already use preseed/late_command, either to
install addition
Probably you are the uploader of the following file(s) in
the Debian upload queue directory:
linux-kernel-di-armel-2.6_1.32lenny5.dsc
linux-kernel-di-armel-2.6_1.32lenny5.tar.gz
This looks like an upload, but a .changes file is missing, so the job
cannot be processed.
If no .changes file arriv
linux-kernel-di-powerpc-2.6_1.48lenny5_multi.changes uploaded successfully to
localhost
along with the files:
ide-modules-2.6.26-2-powerpc-di_1.48lenny5_powerpc.udeb
pcmcia-storage-modules-2.6.26-2-powerpc64-di_1.48lenny5_powerpc.udeb
serial-modules-2.6.26-2-powerpc64-di_1.48lenny5_powerpc.u
linux-kernel-di-mips-2.6_1.9lenny5_multi.changes uploaded successfully to
localhost
along with the files:
md-modules-2.6.26-2-r4k-ip22-di_1.9lenny5_mips.udeb
ipv6-modules-2.6.26-2-sb1a-bcm91480b-di_1.9lenny5_mips.udeb
crypto-dm-modules-2.6.26-2-r4k-ip22-di_1.9lenny5_mips.udeb
input-modules
linux-kernel-di-mipsel-2.6_1.8lenny5_multi.changes uploaded successfully to
localhost
along with the files:
fat-modules-2.6.26-2-sb1a-bcm91480b-di_1.8lenny5_mipsel.udeb
xfs-modules-2.6.26-2-sb1-bcm91250a-di_1.8lenny5_mipsel.udeb
fat-modules-2.6.26-2-sb1-bcm91250a-di_1.8lenny5_mipsel.udeb
c
linux-kernel-di-i386-2.6_1.76lenny5_multi.changes uploaded successfully to
localhost
along with the files:
cdrom-core-modules-2.6.26-2-686-bigmem-di_1.76lenny5_i386.udeb
nic-wireless-modules-2.6.26-2-486-di_1.76lenny5_i386.udeb
zlib-modules-2.6.26-2-486-di_1.76lenny5_i386.udeb
nic-shared-m
linux-kernel-di-hppa-2.6_1.38lenny5_multi.changes uploaded successfully to
localhost
along with the files:
usb-storage-modules-2.6.26-2-parisc-di_1.38lenny5_hppa.udeb
crypto-core-modules-2.6.26-2-parisc-di_1.38lenny5_hppa.udeb
ipv6-modules-2.6.26-2-parisc-di_1.38lenny5_hppa.udeb
crypto-mod
linux-kernel-di-alpha-2.6_0.37lenny5_multi.changes uploaded successfully to
localhost
along with the files:
linux-kernel-di-alpha-2.6_0.37lenny5.dsc
multipath-modules-2.6.26-2-alpha-generic-di_0.37lenny5_alpha.udeb
usb-serial-modules-2.6.26-2-alpha-generic-di_0.37lenny5_alpha.udeb
parport-
Frans Pop wrote:
> It would be much nicer if we could somehow display a dialog offering the
> alternative is mounting a CD fails.
To frame my thoughts here, this is to support d-i when invoked from Debian
Live USB sticks - as Debian Live knows the target media when building the
USB image, "try-us
Hi,
On Montag, 24. August 2009, Alexander Wirt wrote:
> Unfortunately I have to announce that we have banned Uwe Bugla from our
> mailinglists. In the last days he showed an attitude on our lists that is
> not acceptable in any way ([1-4] and more). We already gave him a warning,
> but this didn't
This one time, at band camp, Alexander Wirt said:
> Hi,
>
> Unfortunately I have to announce that we have banned Uwe Bugla from our
> mailinglists. In the last days he showed an attitude on our lists that is not
> acceptable in any way ([1-4] and more). We already gave him a warning,
> but this d
Hi,
Unfortunately I have to announce that we have banned Uwe Bugla from our
mailinglists. In the last days he showed an attitude on our lists that is not
acceptable in any way ([1-4] and more). We already gave him a warning,
but this didn't helped.
We really don't have anything against a good a
On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 06:41:24PM +0200, Uwe Bugla wrote:
> Although some people do not like me I do prefer real democratic communities
> which are free from such authoritarian fascist no-brains.
Thank God we're not a democracy.
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough a
Hi,
The next Lenny point release (5.0.3) is scheduled for Saturday,
September 5th.
With the exception of already planned kernel and installer updates,
stable NEW will be frozen during the weekend of August 29th - 30th.
Regards,
Adam
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debia
Hi,
You are noted as the last translator of the debconf translation for
...debconf (yes, even that package has debconf strings!).
A new string was added so that dialogs that prompt users for media changes
when debconf-apt-progress is used (for instance in D-I) have a properly
translated title.
I
Hi,
You are noted as the last translator of the debconf translation for
...debconf (yes, even that package has debconf strings!).
A new string was added so that dialogs that prompt users for media changes
when debconf-apt-progress is used (for instance in D-I) have a properly
translated title.
I
Am Montag 24 August 2009 18:11:55 schrieb Wouter Verhelst:
> On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 05:09:37PM +0200, Uwe Bugla wrote:
> > Am Montag 24 August 2009 16:11:10 schrieb Wouter Verhelst:
> > > On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 02:33:31PM +0200, Uwe Bugla wrote:
> > > > If I do describe accurately a problem deali
On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 05:09:37PM +0200, Uwe Bugla wrote:
> Am Montag 24 August 2009 16:11:10 schrieb Wouter Verhelst:
> > On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 02:33:31PM +0200, Uwe Bugla wrote:
> > > If I do describe accurately a problem dealing with netinst image, and,
> > > as a consequence, I am asked to p
Am Montag 24 August 2009 17:26:06 schrieben Sie:
> Hi Uwe,
>
> I'm writing to you in my role as one of the debian listmasters. We
> currently have several complaints from users about your behaviour on the
> debian-boot mailinglist. I took a look on some of your mails (for example
> <200908232109.02
Hello Frans,
On Sun, Aug 23, 2009 at 7:25 PM, Frans Pop wrote:
> Attached patches (untested, but straightforward) for three components:
> - base-installer, where the question is asked (at medium priority) and APT
> is configured accordingly; the setting will persist for the installed
> system;
>
Am Montag 24 August 2009 16:11:10 schrieb Wouter Verhelst:
> On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 02:33:31PM +0200, Uwe Bugla wrote:
> > If I do describe accurately a problem dealing with netinst image, and,
> > as a consequence, I am asked to perform a test with a netboot image
> > (which has technologically n
Am Montag 24 August 2009 14:46:18 schrieb Samuel Thibault:
> Uwe Bugla, le Mon 24 Aug 2009 14:33:31 +0200, a écrit :
> > If I do describe accurately a problem dealing with netinst image, and, as
> > a consequence, I am asked to perform a test with a netboot image (which
> > has technologically noth
On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 02:33:31PM +0200, Uwe Bugla wrote:
> If I do describe accurately a problem dealing with netinst image, and,
> as a consequence, I am asked to perform a test with a netboot image
> (which has technologically nothing to do with the netinst one
This is so utterly and completel
Uwe Bugla, le Mon 24 Aug 2009 14:33:31 +0200, a écrit :
> If I do describe accurately a problem dealing with netinst image, and, as a
> consequence, I am asked to perform a test with a netboot image (which has
> technologically nothing to do with the netinst one - I do not have discless
> workst
Am Montag 24 August 2009 02:02:36 schrieb Steve McIntyre:
> Uwe Bugla wrote:
>
> A totally unnecessary personally abusive email targeted at a valued
> Debian developer. I refuse to dignify the message by quoting any of
> it.
>
> This kind of abusive message has no place within the Debian community,
On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 12:28:00AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 09:15:59AM +0200, Bj?rn Mork wrote:
> > > I think the use case is users who are being control freaks about the set
> > > of
> > > packages on their systems. If the set of packages being pulled in as
> > > re
On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 09:15:59AM +0200, Bjørn Mork wrote:
> > I think the use case is users who are being control freaks about the set of
> > packages on their systems. If the set of packages being pulled in as
> > recommends is *wrong* (they don't fit the Policy definition of Recommends),
> > b
Steve Langasek writes:
> I think the use case is users who are being control freaks about the set of
> packages on their systems. If the set of packages being pulled in as
> recommends is *wrong* (they don't fit the Policy definition of Recommends),
> bugs should be filed against those packages
41 matches
Mail list logo
