On Sat, Jan 10, 2009 at 07:06:20AM +0100, Christian Perrier wrote:
> Quoting dann frazier (da...@debian.org):
> > hey,
> > I wanted to give -release & -boot a heads up that the kernel team is
> > looking to do a linux-2.6 upload to sid tomorrow. As discussed on the
> > d-i channel, delays in the d
Accepted:
cdebconf-gtk-udeb_0.138lenny1_i386.udeb
to pool/main/c/cdebconf/cdebconf-gtk-udeb_0.138lenny1_i386.udeb
cdebconf-newt-udeb_0.138lenny1_i386.udeb
to pool/main/c/cdebconf/cdebconf-newt-udeb_0.138lenny1_i386.udeb
cdebconf-priority_0.138lenny1_all.udeb
to pool/main/c/cdebconf/cdebconf-
Quoting Frans Pop (elen...@planet.nl):
> It would have been nice to have a bit more time to comment on such a
> substantial patch, but well.
>
> I would strongly suggest to at least not actually _show_ ext4 as an option
> as long as not all blockers are fixed, i.e. not yet list it in
> valid_f
Quoting Ferenc Wagner (wf...@niif.hu):
> I have no base to decide which is better, but there isn't too much
> difference; I can't consider either one wrong.
>
> The following patch contains an unnecessary change as well: lcreate
> can use up all remaining space by itself, there is no reason to wo
Quoting dann frazier (da...@debian.org):
> hey,
> I wanted to give -release & -boot a heads up that the kernel team is
> looking to do a linux-2.6 upload to sid tomorrow. As discussed on the
> d-i channel, delays in the d-i release have given us a short window to
> introduce a new build for inclus
cdebconf_0.138lenny1_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
cdebconf_0.138lenny1.dsc
cdebconf_0.138lenny1.tar.gz
cdebconf-priority_0.138lenny1_all.udeb
cdebconf_0.138lenny1_i386.deb
libdebconfclient0_0.138lenny1_i386.deb
libdebconfclient0-dev_0.138lenny1_i
cdebconf_0.138lenny1_i386.changes uploaded successfully to ftp.upload.debian.org
along with the files:
cdebconf_0.138lenny1.dsc
cdebconf_0.138lenny1.tar.gz
cdebconf-priority_0.138lenny1_all.udeb
cdebconf_0.138lenny1_i386.deb
libdebconfclient0_0.138lenny1_i386.deb
libdebconfclient0-dev_0
Summary:
arcboot-installer still needed (Martin)
cdebconf still needed (me)
Quoting Christian Perrier (bubu...@debian.org):
> Affected packages:
> arcboot-installer
We still need that one (I forgot to mention it to Martin yesterday)
> cdebconf
I'll upload 0.138lenny1
> flash-kernel
2.12 up
On Saturday 10 January 2009, Colin Watson wrote:
> I realised I'd forgotten about the kernel udebs (we do those
> differently in Ubuntu so it slipped my mind). Should I just add ext4 to
> kernel-wedge/modules/ext3-modules, by analogy with the way I added ext4
> support to partman-ext3? Although aga
Accepted:
partman-palo_12lenny1.dsc
to pool/main/p/partman-palo/partman-palo_12lenny1.dsc
partman-palo_12lenny1.tar.gz
to pool/main/p/partman-palo/partman-palo_12lenny1.tar.gz
partman-palo_12lenny1_hppa.udeb
to pool/main/p/partman-palo/partman-palo_12lenny1_hppa.udeb
Override entries for y
partman-palo_12lenny1_hppa.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
partman-palo_12lenny1.dsc
partman-palo_12lenny1.tar.gz
partman-palo_12lenny1_hppa.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
On Sat, Jan 10, 2009 at 01:08:01AM +0100, Petr Vyslouzil wrote:
>> hey,
>> I wanted to give -release & -boot a heads up that the kernel team is
>> looking to do a linux-2.6 upload to sid tomorrow. As discussed on the
>> d-i channel, delays in the d-i release have given us a short window to
>> intr
On Thu, Jan 08, 2009 at 04:42:36PM +, Colin Watson wrote:
> As you'll see, I decided to tweak partman-ext3 rather than create a
> new partman-ext4 component: I don't think the differences between ext3
> and ext4 from the installer point of view justify a whole new udeb.
>
> Given that we won't
Accepted:
silo-installer_1.15lenny1.dsc
to pool/main/s/silo-installer/silo-installer_1.15lenny1.dsc
silo-installer_1.15lenny1.tar.gz
to pool/main/s/silo-installer/silo-installer_1.15lenny1.tar.gz
silo-installer_1.15lenny1_sparc.udeb
to pool/main/s/silo-installer/silo-installer_1.15lenny1_spa
Accepted:
partman-palo_12etch1.dsc
to pool/main/p/partman-palo/partman-palo_12etch1.dsc
partman-palo_12etch1.tar.gz
to pool/main/p/partman-palo/partman-palo_12etch1.tar.gz
partman-palo_12etch1_hppa.udeb
to pool/main/p/partman-palo/partman-palo_12etch1_hppa.udeb
Override entries for your pa
partman-palo_12etch1_hppa.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
partman-palo_12etch1.dsc
partman-palo_12etch1.tar.gz
partman-palo_12etch1_hppa.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with
hey,
I wanted to give -release & -boot a heads up that the kernel team is
looking to do a linux-2.6 upload to sid tomorrow. As discussed on the
d-i channel, delays in the d-i release have given us a short window to
introduce a new build for inclusion in RC2.
Changes pending for this update incl
silo-installer_1.15lenny1_sparc.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
silo-installer_1.15lenny1.dsc
silo-installer_1.15lenny1.tar.gz
silo-installer_1.15lenny1_sparc.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...
Accepted:
quik-installer_0.0.21lenny1.dsc
to pool/main/q/quik-installer/quik-installer_0.0.21lenny1.dsc
quik-installer_0.0.21lenny1.tar.gz
to pool/main/q/quik-installer/quik-installer_0.0.21lenny1.tar.gz
quik-installer_0.0.21lenny1_powerpc.udeb
to pool/main/q/quik-installer/quik-installer_0.
Accepted:
yaboot-installer_1.1.14lenny1.dsc
to pool/main/y/yaboot-installer/yaboot-installer_1.1.14lenny1.dsc
yaboot-installer_1.1.14lenny1.tar.gz
to pool/main/y/yaboot-installer/yaboot-installer_1.1.14lenny1.tar.gz
yaboot-installer_1.1.14lenny1_powerpc.udeb
to pool/main/y/yaboot-installer/y
Accepted:
partman-prep_16lenny1.dsc
to pool/main/p/partman-prep/partman-prep_16lenny1.dsc
partman-prep_16lenny1.tar.gz
to pool/main/p/partman-prep/partman-prep_16lenny1.tar.gz
partman-prep_16lenny1_powerpc.udeb
to pool/main/p/partman-prep/partman-prep_16lenny1_powerpc.udeb
Override entries
quik-installer_0.0.21lenny1_powerpc.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
quik-installer_0.0.21lenny1.dsc
quik-installer_0.0.21lenny1.tar.gz
quik-installer_0.0.21lenny1_powerpc.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-
yaboot-installer_1.1.14lenny1_powerpc.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
yaboot-installer_1.1.14lenny1.dsc
yaboot-installer_1.1.14lenny1.tar.gz
yaboot-installer_1.1.14lenny1_powerpc.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
Accepted:
partman-newworld_20lenny1.dsc
to pool/main/p/partman-newworld/partman-newworld_20lenny1.dsc
partman-newworld_20lenny1.tar.gz
to pool/main/p/partman-newworld/partman-newworld_20lenny1.tar.gz
partman-newworld_20lenny1_powerpc.udeb
to pool/main/p/partman-newworld/partman-newworld_20le
partman-prep_16lenny1_powerpc.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
partman-prep_16lenny1.dsc
partman-prep_16lenny1.tar.gz
partman-prep_16lenny1_powerpc.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debia
partman-newworld_20lenny1_powerpc.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
partman-newworld_20lenny1.dsc
partman-newworld_20lenny1.tar.gz
partman-newworld_20lenny1_powerpc.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-req
hey,
I wanted to give -release & -boot a heads up that the kernel team is
looking to do a linux-2.6 upload to sid tomorrow. As discussed on the
d-i channel, delays in the d-i release have given us a short window to
introduce a new build for inclusion in RC2.
Changes pending for this update inclu
Accepted:
partman-ext2r0_1.18.dsc
to pool/main/p/partman-ext2r0/partman-ext2r0_1.18.dsc
partman-ext2r0_1.18.tar.gz
to pool/main/p/partman-ext2r0/partman-ext2r0_1.18.tar.gz
partman-ext2r0_1.18_arm.udeb
to pool/main/p/partman-ext2r0/partman-ext2r0_1.18_arm.udeb
Override entries for your pack
Accepted:
flash-kernel-installer_2.12_arm.udeb
to pool/main/f/flash-kernel/flash-kernel-installer_2.12_arm.udeb
flash-kernel_2.12.dsc
to pool/main/f/flash-kernel/flash-kernel_2.12.dsc
flash-kernel_2.12.tar.gz
to pool/main/f/flash-kernel/flash-kernel_2.12.tar.gz
flash-kernel_2.12_arm.deb
to
Accepted:
sibyl-installer_1.15.dsc
to pool/main/s/sibyl-installer/sibyl-installer_1.15.dsc
sibyl-installer_1.15.tar.gz
to pool/main/s/sibyl-installer/sibyl-installer_1.15.tar.gz
sibyl-installer_1.15_mips.udeb
to pool/main/s/sibyl-installer/sibyl-installer_1.15_mips.udeb
Override entries fo
sibyl-installer_1.15_mips.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
sibyl-installer_1.15.dsc
sibyl-installer_1.15.tar.gz
sibyl-installer_1.15_mips.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with
flash-kernel_2.12_arm.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
flash-kernel_2.12.dsc
flash-kernel_2.12.tar.gz
flash-kernel_2.12_arm.deb
flash-kernel-installer_2.12_arm.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ.
partman-ext2r0_1.18_arm.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
partman-ext2r0_1.18.dsc
partman-ext2r0_1.18.tar.gz
partman-ext2r0_1.18_arm.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a sub
Hi,
On Thu, 08 Jan 2009 13:12:43 -0800 Brian C wrote:
> I've used the Lenny RC1 guided partitioner on two laptops to make an
> encrypted LVM and chosen separate /home partition on each. On a 320GB
> drive it allocated only 6.6 GB for / and on a 100GB drive it appears it
> will allocate 7.0 GB
Accepted:
nobootloader_1.24.dsc
to pool/main/n/nobootloader/nobootloader_1.24.dsc
nobootloader_1.24.tar.gz
to pool/main/n/nobootloader/nobootloader_1.24.tar.gz
nobootloader_1.24_all.udeb
to pool/main/n/nobootloader/nobootloader_1.24_all.udeb
Override entries for your package:
nobootloader_
Accepted:
partman-target_59.dsc
to pool/main/p/partman-target/partman-target_59.dsc
partman-target_59.tar.gz
to pool/main/p/partman-target/partman-target_59.tar.gz
partman-target_59_all.udeb
to pool/main/p/partman-target/partman-target_59_all.udeb
Override entries for your package:
partman
Accepted:
partman-efi_19.dsc
to pool/main/p/partman-efi/partman-efi_19.dsc
partman-efi_19.tar.gz
to pool/main/p/partman-efi/partman-efi_19.tar.gz
partman-efi_19_i386.udeb
to pool/main/p/partman-efi/partman-efi_19_i386.udeb
Override entries for your package:
partman-efi_19.dsc - source debi
Frans Pop writes:
> On Thursday 08 January 2009, Ferenc Wagner wrote:
>
>> Looks like it's a problem with conversion to logical extents.
>> After running the recipe, perform_recipe_by_lvm settles on
>>
>> 3246000 0 3246000 linux-swap ...
>>
>> that is, on a 3GB swap, which is correct (300% of the
partman-efi_19_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
partman-efi_19.dsc
partman-efi_19.tar.gz
partman-efi_19_i386.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscri
partman-target_59_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
partman-target_59.dsc
partman-target_59.tar.gz
partman-target_59_all.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of
nobootloader_1.24_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
nobootloader_1.24.dsc
nobootloader_1.24.tar.gz
nobootloader_1.24_all.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of
nobootloader_1.24_i386.changes uploaded successfully to ftp.upload.debian.org
along with the files:
nobootloader_1.24.dsc
nobootloader_1.24.tar.gz
nobootloader_1.24_all.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with
partman-efi_19_i386.changes uploaded successfully to ftp.upload.debian.org
along with the files:
partman-efi_19.dsc
partman-efi_19.tar.gz
partman-efi_19_i386.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject o
partman-target_59_i386.changes uploaded successfully to ftp.upload.debian.org
along with the files:
partman-target_59.dsc
partman-target_59.tar.gz
partman-target_59_all.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with
reassign 511334 linux-2.6 2.6.26-12
thanks
On Friday 09 January 2009, Adam Thornton wrote:
> S390 boot fails (sometimes just after detecting memory, sometimes after
> detecting devices) on z/VM 5.2 and a Flex-ES machine.
>
> Since there are reports of d-i working on z9 boxes, I suspect the issue
>
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 511334 linux-2.6 2.6.26-12
Bug#511334: debian-installer: S390 boot fails on Flex-ES machine
Bug reassigned from package `debian-installer' to `linux-2.6'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Deb
On Friday 09 January 2009 17:18:42 Ana Guerrero wrote:
> I hope the website is a bit clearer now. Still have to update the
> instructions for lenny.
done.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.
Package: debian-installer
Severity: important
S390 boot fails (sometimes just after detecting memory, sometimes after
detecting devices) on z/VM 5.2 and a Flex-ES machine.
Since there are reports of d-i working on z9 boxes, I suspect the issue
is that the kernel is built to exploit later System z
On Fri, Jan 09, 2009 at 11:12:12AM +, Philip Hands wrote:
>
> KDE Folks,
> Might I suggest that the front page be modified to have a link somewhere
> prominent, near the top, linking to the page about how to get KDE
> installed on debian
>
> Also, you should note that in Lenny the def
Hi,
IMHO, it's too late to change things now for Lenny. But I guess, we'll need to
re-discuss the situation after Lenny release for KDE 4 series.
Especially when I read this:
http://www.kdedevelopers.org/node/3416
and the nice screenshot here:
http://en.opensuse.org/Image:OS11.0beta1-inst7.png
Package: tasksel
Version: 0
The package gnome-accessibility provides accessibility features for the
gnome desktop. Consider adding gnome-orca to the tasksel selection for
gnome. This will allow users with some disabilities to more easily start to
use Debian, as it will reduce one step in the
Otavio Salvador a écrit :
>> Affected packages:
>> arcboot-installer
>> cdebconf
>> flash-kernel
>> nobootloader
>> partman-efi
>> partman-ext2r0
>> partman-newworld
>> partman-palo
>> partman-prep
>> partman-target
>> quik-installer
>> sibyl-installer
>> silo-installer
>> vmelilo-installer
>> yab
On Thu, Jan 08, 2009 at 04:42:36PM +, Colin Watson wrote:
> I've attached the necessary d-i patches (against current Ubuntu, but
> I'll do any necessary work to merge into Debian) to this mail.
I actually revised the patches to be against d-i trunk before sending
this mail, but forgot to rewri
Christian Perrier writes:
> Quoting Christian Perrier (bubu...@debian.org):
>
>> Some of these could be safe of the problem but I have to check them
>> individually.
>
>
> Affected packages:
> arcboot-installer
> cdebconf
> flash-kernel
> nobootloader
> partman-efi
> partman-ext2r0
> partman-neww
Package: installation-reports
Severity: normal
-- Package-specific info:
Boot method: netboot image over PXE
Image version: http://people.debian.org/~joeyh/d-i netboot 2009-01-08
Date: 2009-01-08
Machine: VMWare ESXi guest
Partitions:
Base System Installation Checklist:
[O] = OK, [E] = Erro
Colin Watson writes:
> On Thu, Jan 08, 2009 at 09:00:41PM -0200, Otavio Salvador wrote:
>> Colin Watson writes:
>> > parted:
>> > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=511224
>> > (fairly basic support but enough to get the job done)
>> <...>
>> > Comments?
>>
>> Parted has the d
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.26etch1
> submitter 511308 !
Bug#511308: installation-reports: Lenny 2009-01-08 netboot on vmware
Changed Bug submitter from Thijs Kinkhorst to Thijs
Kinkhorst .
>
End of message,
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 511259 partman-auto-lvm
Bug#511259: debian-installer: Guided partitioner should show or allow mods to
partition sizes
Bug reassigned from package `debian-installer' to `partman-auto-lvm'.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Ple
Quoting Christian Perrier (bubu...@debian.org):
> Some of these could be safe of the problem but I have to check them
> individually.
Affected packages:
arcboot-installer
cdebconf
flash-kernel
nobootloader
partman-efi
partman-ext2r0
partman-newworld
partman-palo
partman-prep
partman-target
quik-
reassign 511259 partman-auto-lvm
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
On Fri, Jan 09, 2009 at 11:11:13AM +0100, Noel David Torres Ta??o wrote:
...
> Well, I'll left it closed, but I was thinking in how newbie users accustomed
> to KDE
> would install a Debian KDE computer without them being asked all the 'low'
> questions
> and without having to type anything when
On Fri, Jan 09, 2009 at 10:54:36AM +, Colin Watson wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 08, 2009 at 09:00:41PM -0200, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> > Parted has the detection code support in master branch. I could take
> > a look and port it to stable. That way we could have it as upstream
> > and avoid diverting f
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.26etch1
> reassign 511288 partman-auto
Bug#511288: debian-installer: Partitioner should have an option to separate
/boot
Bug reassigned from package `debian-installer' to `partman-a
On Thu, Jan 08, 2009 at 09:00:41PM -0200, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> Colin Watson writes:
> > parted:
> > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=511224
> > (fairly basic support but enough to get the job done)
> <...>
> > Comments?
>
> Parted has the detection code support in master b
On Saturday 03 January 2009 16:47:49 Christian Perrier wrote:
> Quoting Noel David Torres Taño (env...@rolamasao.org):
>
> > Well, I was doing a graphical default install when I saw it
>
> Could you re-check ?
>
> That template is supposedly displayed at medium priority, so should
> not appear o
Le vendredi 9 janvier 2009 11:11:13 Noel David Torres Taño, vous avez écrit :
> Well, I'll left it closed, but I was thinking in how newbie users
> accustomed to KDE would install a Debian KDE computer without them being
> asked all the 'low' questions and without having to type anything when
> the
On Friday 09 January 2009 10:10:37 Philip Hands wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 09, 2009 at 09:44:43AM +0100, Noel David Torres Ta??o wrote:
> > Package: debian-installer
> > Severity: wishlist
> >
> >
> > debian-installer for Lenny should have a desktop selector if the "Desktop"
> > task is chosen, or sep
Frans Pop a écrit :
> On Tuesday 06 January 2009, M.-A. DARCHE wrote:
>>
>> Could there be a problem in the way the ethernet card is labeled
>> or tracked by the installer? If so, is there a way to make
>> the dhcpdiscover try on all available interfaces instead of
>> only the one detected/selected
Your message dated Fri, 9 Jan 2009 09:10:37 +
with message-id <20090109091037.gg6...@hands.com>
and subject line Re: Bug#511287: debian-installer: Should have a task for
installing KDE or XFCE instead of Gnome
has caused the Debian Bug report #511287,
regarding debian-installer: Should have a
Package: debian-installer
Severity: wishlist
Sometimes even if you are not doing an LVM or RAID installation one wants a
separate /boot partition. Guided partitioner does not allow that, only "all
together", "separate /home" or "separate
/home, /usr, /var and /tmp", but there is not a "separat
Package: debian-installer
Severity: wishlist
debian-installer for Lenny should have a desktop selector if the "Desktop" task
is chosen, or separate tasks for at least KDE and Gnome, and better if for XFCE
as well.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 5.0
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (
71 matches
Mail list logo
