Package: installation-reports
Boot method: CD
Image version:
http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/lenny_di_beta2/i386/iso-cd/debian-LennyBeta2-i386-netinst.iso
Date: Monday June 30 01:00 AM CDT 2008
Machine: Dell Dimension 2350
Processor: Intel Pentium 4
Memory: 1 Gigabyte
Partitions: Filesyste
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, 30 Jun 2008 at 02:15:23 +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
> On Monday 30 June 2008, Simon McVittie wrote:
> > PALO reports that the boot image contains 0/vmlinux32, 0/vmlinux64 and
> > 0/ramdisk, but that it will try to boot 0/linux - however, it turns o
On Sun June 29 2008 17:59:27 Frans Pop wrote:
> Again, the only things you (the release team) have managed to achieve with
> this are:
> - cosmetically improving the RC stats for testing
> - annoying developers and users
There's at least one other consequence. Some of us pointed out
that the new
On Sunday 29 June 2008, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
> FWIW I was the one asking the removal: upstream has a fix that is
> backportable, not trivially, but that is. And there is openntpd that is
> a drop in replacement for most desktop users (and I assume that testing
> users aren't really servers, tha
On Sunday 29 June 2008, Dummy wrote:
> On the other hand, just one idea: If I understand correctly one can
> inform grub about changing harddisk assignment by file device.map. If
> so, an according option in the debian-installer would be nice which
> offers to create such a file if MBR things are i
Hi Simon,
On Monday 30 June 2008, Simon McVittie wrote:
> Comments/Problems:
> PALO isn't very intuitive, but I eventually got the machine netbooted
> using the serial console and the built-in Tulip network interface.
> PALO reports that the boot image contains 0/vmlinux32, 0/vmlinux64 and
> 0/ra
Your message dated Mon, 30 Jun 2008 02:25:28 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Re: Bug#488449: installation-reports: Installation of Lenny
successful on SPARC 64
has caused the Debian Bug report #488449,
regarding installation-reports: Installation of Lenny successful on
Also,
> On Sun, Jun 29, 2008 at 11:34:00PM +0200, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
> > FWIW I was the one asking the removal: upstream has a fix that is
> > backportable, not trivially, but that is. And there is openntpd that is
> > a drop in replacement for most desktop users (and I assume that testing
>
On Sunday 29 June 2008, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
> I'm not the one that removed the package, and I don't know the
> rationale behind this removal.
How is that relevant? I really don't care if it was Tom, Dick or Harry who
did the actual removal. From my perspective this removal was done by the
r
On Sun, Jun 29, 2008 at 11:34:00PM +0200, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 08:31:24PM +, Joey Hess wrote:
> > Another case is NTP, which was kicked out of testing for a
> > licensing bug, causing much grief to be reported on debian-user.
> FWIW I was the one asking the remova
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Package: installation-reports
Severity: normal
- -- Package-specific info:
Boot method: network
Image version: lenny d-i beta 2
Date: 2008-06-29
Machine: A500
Partitions: (sda: guided partitioning, sdb: kept previous installation)
club:~# sfdisk -l
Frans Pop, le Mon 30 Jun 2008 00:13:12 +0200, a écrit :
> On Sunday 29 June 2008, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
> > Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> > > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.30
> > > block 488494 with 486933
> >
> > Bug#486933: bogl: shou
On Sunday 29 June 2008, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
> Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.30
> > block 488494 with 486933
>
> Bug#486933: bogl: should support enter_bold_mode
> Bug#488494: cdebconf: Make the dark the
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.30
> block 488494 with 486933
Bug#486933: bogl: should support enter_bold_mode
Bug#488494: cdebconf: Make the dark theme even more readable
Was blocked by: 488493
Blocking bugs of 488494
On Sun, Jun 29, 2008 at 07:51:59PM +, Frans Pop wrote:
> On Friday 27 June 2008, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
> > Well, the thing is, we have quite a clear policy, which is to remove
> > (not in period of a freeze of course) packages that are:
> > * leaf packages ;
> > * RC buggy ;
> > * for mo
On Sunday 29 June 2008, Gerard MacNeil wrote:
> On Sun, 2008-06-29 at 20:18 +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
> > On Sunday 29 June 2008, Gerard MacNeil wrote:
> > > Comments/Problems:
> > > 1. To set up pppoe, I used modules=ppp_udeb. It was not detected
> > > properly although the fallback DHCP works.
> >
Yes,
I was excited in your first message because the image I was using was
not the same from
the repository I was trying to install, but after get the right image,
the problem persist
and I don't understand.
What I am doing is:
1. I did a download of ISO dvd-1 for Linux Debian/S390.
2. Prepare
Yes,
I was excited in your first message because the image I was using was
not the same from
the repository I was trying to install, but after get the right image,
the problem persist
and I don't understand.
What I am doing right now is:
1. I did a download of ISO dvd-1.
2. Prepare a local rep
On Sun, 2008-06-29 at 20:18 +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
> On Sunday 29 June 2008, Gerard MacNeil wrote:
> > Comments/Problems:
> > 1. To set up pppoe, I used modules=ppp_udeb. It was not detected
> > properly although the fallback DHCP works.
>
> That is the wrong syntax. It should be 'modules=ppp-ud
Package: flash-kernel
Version: 1.1
Severity: normal
Hi,
I just found out why flashing the kernel to the flash of my Thecus N2100
was not working: I had disabled udev there, and as a result there were
no /dev/mtdblock{1,2} files which flash-kernel wants to write to.
Apparently flash-kernel does no
On Sun, Jun 29, 2008 at 08:35:07PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
> On Sunday 29 June 2008, Christopher J. Walker wrote:
> > Comments/Problems:
> > lapack also has a rather worrying note:
> >
> > One or more critical lapack library errors were discovered when this
> > package was built. As of the time o
On Friday 27 June 2008, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
> Well, the thing is, we have quite a clear policy, which is to remove
> (not in period of a freeze of course) packages that are:
> * leaf packages ;
> * RC buggy ;
> * for more than 20 days ;
> * with absolutely no movement from the maintainer
On Sunday 29 June 2008, Gerard MacNeil wrote:
> Comments/Problems:
> 1. To set up pppoe, I used modules=ppp_udeb. It was not detected
> properly although the fallback DHCP works.
That is the wrong syntax. It should be 'modules=ppp-udeb'.
And if that's just a typo then I'm afraid "not detected prop
Your message dated Sun, 29 Jun 2008 20:35:07 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Re: Bug#488520: installation-reports: Itanium X server doesn't
work, but everything else seems to.
has caused the Debian Bug report #488520,
regarding installation-reports: Itanium X server do
Your message dated Sun, 29 Jun 2008 20:22:02 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Re: Bug#488514: installation-report
has caused the Debian Bug report #488514,
regarding installation-report
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
Otavio: When you send replies to the BTS, please take note of where these
replies will
end up. In this report you have sent two replies that never ended up on the
debian-boot
list, when they were clearly intended for that list.
Otavio wrote on Sat, 28 Jun 2008 15:14:06 -0300:
> Not really, loo
Hi there,
Does anyobody know how to switch off "F" flag on Debian AMD64
partitioning expert gui during the install ?
I appreciate any help.
Thanks
Luiz Regis
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
reassign 488441 rootskel
forcemerge 484366 488441
thanks
On Sunday 29 June 2008, Sjoerd Simons wrote:
> > Which leads me to suspect that this may be #484366.
> >
> > Can you try booting with 'BOOT_DEBUG=3' and at the debug shell
> > removing the "/bin/cttyhack " bits from the ::sysinit: and ::res
tag 488494 + pending
thanks
On Sunday 29 June 2008, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> The current dark theme of newt does not use bright colors, and
> sometimes uses background colors for no real use, leading to less
> readability. The attached patch makes a few fixes.
>
> The current text frontend does no
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Frans Pop wrote:
> On Sunday 29 June 2008, Glenn Saberton wrote:
>> I was wondering what the general consensus would be in regard to
>> splitting the netcfg package up a little further than what it is at the
>> moment. After my last set of patches
tag 488493 pending
thanks
On Sunday 29 June 2008, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> The attached patch exposes the theme to the text frontend, so that it
> can apply it when run e.g. on the linux or bterm console.
Committed. Thx.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubsc
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 488441 rootskel
Bug#488441: Installation failed on HPPA D9000 D390
Bug reassigned from package `installation-reports' to `rootskel'.
> forcemerge 484366 488441
Bug#484366: rootskel: cttyhack requires the serial console to be /dev/ttyS0
Bug#488
Hi Guys,
Just to let you know.
I have succesfully installed Debian-arm on NSLU2 with 2GB USB Penstick
on USB port 2.
After that, I was able to boot up with 20GB USB hard drive on port 1 but
when I connected 500GB drive I was not able to boot it up.
I was playing around with UUID and boot by di
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 488494 + pending
Bug#488494: cdebconf: Make the dark theme even more readable
Tags were: patch
Tags added: pending
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrato
On Sunday 29 June 2008, Glenn Saberton wrote:
> I was wondering what the general consensus would be in regard to
> splitting the netcfg package up a little further than what it is at the
> moment. After my last set of patches it was mentioned and I think it
> actually sounds like a fairly goo
Package: installation-reports
Severity: normal
-- Package-specific info:
Boot method: cd
Image version: Debian Installer lenny beta 2
http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/lenny_di_beta2/i386/bt-dvd/ 09 Jun 2008
Date:
25 Jun 2008 13:57:42
Machine: Compaq Presario SR1050NX
Partitions:
fdisk -l
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 488493 pending
Bug#488493: rootskel: Expose the theme to the text frontend as well
Tags were: patch
Tags added: pending
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(adminis
Package: installation-reports
Severity: normal
-- Package-specific info:
Boot method: network
Image version: Lenny beta2
Date: Sun Jun 29 16:10:23 BST 2008
Machine: HP D9000 D220
Partitions:
Disk /dev/sda: 9104 MB, 9104953344 bytes
64 heads, 32 sectors/track, 8683 cylinders
Units = cylinders
On Sunday 29 June 2008, Ventura wrote:
> I am trying to do a network install of Debian 4.0r3 and unfortunately
> I am receiving a message about modules unavailable.
Can you please explain what the hell you're playing at?
You sent the same message to the Hercules mailing list and I replied to
tha
Dear internode.on.net Subscriber,
We are currently carrying-out a mentainace process to your internode.on.net
account, to complete this process you must reply to this email
immediately,Your email address here (*) and enter your password
here (*) if you are the
rightful owner of thi
Package: installation-reports
Severity: normal
-- Package-specific info:
Boot method: CD
Image version: lenny beta2 IA64 netinst
Date: 20:00, 28 June 2008
Machine: HP Workstation 12000
Partitions:
FilesystemType 1K-blocks Used Available Use% Mounted on
/dev/sda2 ext3166350
Package: installation-reports
Boot method: DVD
Image version:
http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/weekly-builds/i386/iso-dvd/ Date:
Saturday 28-06-2008
Machine: HP pavilion a 850 nl
Processor: AMD Sempron(tm) Processor 3100+
Memory: 776MB (231MB used)
Partitions:
FilesystemType 1K-blocks
On Sun, Jun 29, 2008 at 01:29:36AM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
> On Sunday 29 June 2008, Sjoerd Simons wrote:
> > Comments/Problems:
> > Boot stops after: Freeing unused kernel memory: 228k freed
>
> I see:
> 2: console=ttyB0
>
> Which leads me to suspect that this may be #484366.
>
> Can you try
Accepted:
flash-kernel-installer_2.0_armel.udeb
to pool/main/f/flash-kernel/flash-kernel-installer_2.0_armel.udeb
flash-kernel_2.0.dsc
to pool/main/f/flash-kernel/flash-kernel_2.0.dsc
flash-kernel_2.0.tar.gz
to pool/main/f/flash-kernel/flash-kernel_2.0.tar.gz
flash-kernel_2.0_armel.deb
to
I am trying to do a network install of Debian 4.0r3 and unfortunately
I am receiving a message about modules unavailable.
This the part of installation dialog with the messages.
//
No kernel modules were found. This probably is due to
flash-kernel_2.0_armel.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
flash-kernel_2.0.dsc
flash-kernel_2.0.tar.gz
flash-kernel_2.0_armel.deb
flash-kernel-installer_2.0_armel.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 488294 grub-installer
Bug#488294: grub-pc: defaults existing windows installation on first partition
of first hd to (hd0, 0)
Bug reassigned from package `grub-pc' to `grub-installer'.
> forcemerge 473401 488294
Bug#473401: grub-installer: gru
Package: installation-reports
Boot method: netinst CD w. beta 2 of lenny
Image version:
http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/lenny_di_beta2/i386/iso-cd/debian-LennyBeta2-i386-netinst.iso
Date: 28-JUN-2008 19:45 CEST
Machine: made from parts
Processor: AMD Sempron 1600 (64bit)
Memory: 512 M
Partitio
Package: cdebconf
Severity: minor
Tags: patch
Hello,
The current dark theme of newt does not use bright colors, and sometimes
uses background colors for no real use, leading to less readability.
The attached patch makes a few fixes.
The current text frontend does not have a dark theme, this adds
Package: rootskel
Severity: minor
Tags: patch
The attached patch exposes the theme to the text frontend, so that it
can apply it when run e.g. on the linux or bterm console.
Samuel
-- System Information:
Debian Release: lenny/sid
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'oldst
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.30
> block 488494 with 488493
Bug#488493: rootskel: Expose the theme to the text frontend as well
Bug#488494: cdebconf: Make the dark theme even more readable
Was not blocked by any bugs.
Your message dated Sun, 29 Jun 2008 11:55:46 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Re: Bug#488481: debian-installer: timezone is not freely
choosable, it depends on country/language selected
has caused the Debian Bug report #488481,
regarding debian-installer: timezone is not
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello,
I was wondering what the general consensus would be in regard to
splitting the netcfg package up a little further than what it is at the
moment. After my last set of patches it was mentioned and I think it
actually sounds like a fairly g
Package: debian-installer
Severity: normal
I just installed from a Debian testing netinstall with the "lenny beta2
release" of the installer:
http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/lenny_di_beta2/i386/iso-cd/debian-LennyBeta2-i386-netinstall.iso
I chose "English" as language and the "United States" a
* Bastian Blank [Wed, 25 Jun 2008 13:40:44 +0200]:
> Please add s390-tools, s390 only, to the noremove list. It includes
> zipl, the bootloader. It is currently not forcible installed as it have
> important priority, but the installer relies on its availability.
Added, sorry for the delay.
Cheer
* Christian Perrier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-06-29 08:52]:
> If you think this still represents the action taken, yes, that could
> be good: simpler (not being close to a full sentence) and shorter
OK.
> Hmmm, this is indeed something we missed. So, well, I propose adding
> the ellipsis while we
56 matches
Mail list logo
