Your message dated Sat, 15 Mar 2008 07:17:04 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Re: Bug#471006: installation report
has caused the Debian Bug report #471006,
regarding installation report
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
Package: installation-reports
Boot method: CD
Image version: businesscard installation CD (2008-03-08)
Date: 2008-03-15
Machine: selfmade desktop PC
Processor: AthlonXP 1700+
Memory: 512MB
Partitions:
Dateisystem Typ1K-Blöcke Benutzt Verfügbar Ben% Eingehängt auf
/dev/hda1 ext3 6
Hi Frans,
On Fri, Mar 14, 2008 at 08:34:58PM +0100, Frans Pop wrote:
> > Log:
> > Regenerate the initramfs for root on loop-AES.
> [...]
> > +++ trunk/packages/partman/partman-crypto/finish-install.d/05crypto
> [...]
>
> Couldn't this be done in post-base-installer.d instead so there is no need
On Thu, Mar 13, 2008 at 11:58:32PM +0100, Frans Pop wrote:
> On Thursday 13 March 2008, Philip Hands wrote:
> > OK, the next attempt:
> > http://hands.com/~phil/d-i/fetch-url-2.diff
> > http://hands.com/~phil/d-i/wget404-2.diff
>
> Almost there...
Jolly Good (and thanks for spotting the goofs
Frans Pop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Friday 14 March 2008, Frans Pop wrote:
>> Private reply.
>
> As people will hopefully understand, this one got away from me.
> It was intended as a private reply, but I hit the send button before
> checking the address.
> My sincere apologies to Otavio.
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 381895 + pending
Bug#381895: Support installing onto loop-AES encrypted root partition
There were no tags set.
Bug#434158: partman-crypto: due to popular demand: root on loop-aes
Tags added: pending
> tags 470951 + pending
Bug#470951: grub-install
On Friday 14 March 2008, Max Vozeler wrote:
> Author: xam
> Date: Fri Mar 14 19:20:02 2008
> New Revision: 51921
>
> Log:
> Regenerate the initramfs for root on loop-AES.
[...]
> +++ trunk/packages/partman/partman-crypto/finish-install.d/05crypto
[...]
Couldn't this be done in post-base-installer.
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # versioned close for both etch/sid
> close 457403 1.22etch1
Bug#457403: debian-installer: Serial console parameters are not used when
generating grub config
'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#closing.
Bug marked as fixed i
Your message dated Fri, 14 Mar 2008 20:16:24 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Re: Bug#457403: debian-installer: Serial console parameters
are not used when generating grub config
has caused the Debian Bug report #457403,
regarding debian-installer: Serial console paramet
Your message dated Fri, 14 Mar 2008 19:53:40 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line fixed in 1.23
has caused the Debian Bug report #445854,
regarding Installation using i386 NetInstall over a serial line
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # 445854 is about bad grub options, not kernel boot options
> unmerge 445854
Bug#445854: Installation using i386 NetInstall over a serial line
Bug#457403: debian-installer: Serial console parameters are not used when
generating grub config
Disconnected
Package: grub-installer
Tags: patch
I was surprised by grub not showing up on the serial
console after an installation over serial with kernel
option console=ttyS0,11520n8r
The grub menu.lst contained
serial --unit=1 --speed=115200 --word=r --parity=no --stop=1
But 'r' is an invalid value fo
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Frans Pop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Private reply.
Suppose to be ;-)
> On Thursday 13 March 2008, Otavio Salvador wrote:
>> I've done a look on the past and I'm willing to work on that again
>> since it's very important for Debian and for vendor
On Friday 14 March 2008, Frans Pop wrote:
> Private reply.
As people will hopefully understand, this one got away from me.
It was intended as a private reply, but I hit the send button before
checking the address.
My sincere apologies to Otavio. I should have been more careful.
Frans
signature
Private reply.
On Thursday 13 March 2008, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> I've done a look on the past and I'm willing to work on that again
> since it's very important for Debian and for vendors.
>
> Hope to be able to do that soon, if nobody does it before...
Whenever I see one of your enthusiastic re
2008/2/20, Frans Pop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Malayalam is _not_ missing [1]. You probably started the installer in
> the "textual" mode (newt interface) instead of in the "graphical" mode (gtk
> interface). Display of the Malayalam script requires the graphical
> interface.
It was graphical mode
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 384521 partman-lvm
Bug#384521: wishlist: striped logical volume with LVM
Bug reassigned from package `lvmcfg' to `partman-lvm'.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.26
> reassign 384521 lvmcfg
Bug#384521: wishlist: striped logical volume with LVM
Bug reassigned from package `installation-reports' to `lvmcfg'.
>
End of message, stopping processing her
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 470892 pending
Bug#470892: user-params: Should also exclude D-I options passed with ?=
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system ad
Geert Stappers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> What I mis is:
> - If there is help needed
> - If so, what kind of help is needed
People need to fix the machine and there're people working on
that. We can't do much remotely.
> - When a next status update may be expected
As soon as we get news
Op 14-03-2008 om 09:58 schreef Frans Pop:
> On Friday 14 March 2008, Andreas Barth wrote:
> * Otavio Salvador ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [080313 02:36]:
> > > Currently we're trying to get final images built but the building
> > > machine has hardware issues and it's being worked on to get it solves
> >
Op 09-03-2008 om 18:43 schreef Otavio Salvador:
>
> +--+---+
> | Date | What happens |
> +--+---+
> |March 8, 2008 |test of image
Package: di-utils
Version: 1.45
I just noticed that when parameters are passed on the boot prompt so to not
set the 'seen' flag (for example: modules?=network-console), that they do
get added in the grub configuration.
These should also be filtered out in the user-params script.
--
To UNSUBS
Quoting Jérémy Bobbio ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> I'm not totally happy with this approach. If anyone can think about
> anything (and I'm sure you can! ;)), please speak up. :)
I am happy with that approach.
The only minor difficulty I see is "The encryption key for ${DEVICE}
is now being created."
Package: grub-installer
Version: 1.55
Severity: important
Currently no user parameters (such as kernel parameters, vga=, quiet) are
included in the generated configuration file for grub2.
This is a blocker for making grub2 default.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message
reopen 470840
reassign 470840 partman-md
severity 470840 wishlist
retitle 470840 Should warn when /boot is on some types of RAID
thanks
On Friday 14 March 2008, you wrote:
> On Fri, 14 Mar 2008 01:14:19 +0100 Frans Pop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Grub does not support RAID5, only RAID1 and RAID
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 468960 debian-installer-utils
Bug#468960: please warn if you install network-console type images and no sshd
will go to be installed
Bug reassigned from package `debian-installer' to `debian-installer-utils'.
>
End of message, stopping proces
On Friday 14 March 2008, Andreas Barth wrote:
> > Currently we're trying to get final images built but the building
> > machine has hardware issues and it's being worked on to get it solves
> > as soon as possible.
> >
> > I'll mail you all once it has been solved and images are available for
> > f
On Friday 14 March 2008, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> * Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-03-02 17:43]:
> > > IOW, disabling "standard" task leaves you with a brick :-)
> >
> > No, that's not correct. network-console installs openssh-server in
> > its postinst file (or, rather, schedules ope
* Otavio Salvador ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [080313 02:36]:
> Otavio Salvador <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > +--+---+
> > | Date | What happens |
> > +--+--
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.12
> reassign 468960 debian-installer
Bug#468960: please warn if you install network-console type images and no sshd
will go to be installed
Bug reassigned from package `installation-rep
Followup-For: Bug #468960
Package: installation-reports
reasign 468960 debian-installer
retitle 468960 please warn if you install network-console type images and no
sshd will go to be installed
severity 468960 wishlist
thanks
Please warn if you install network-console type images and no sshd will
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> Followup-For: Bug #468960
Unknown command or malformed arguments to command.
> Package: installation-reports
Ignoring bugs not assigned to: installation-reports
> reasign 468960 debian-installer
Unknown command or malformed arguments to command.
> re
* Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-03-02 17:43]:
> > IOW, disabling "standard" task leaves you with a brick :-)
>
> No, that's not correct. network-console installs openssh-server in
> its postinst file (or, rather, schedules openssh-server to be
> installed later).
Martin Zobel just r
34 matches
Mail list logo
