Hi Martin
On 2/18/07, Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
16:20 < fjp> What about not including countrychooser in the initrd and
not preseeding the country?
16:21 < fjp> s/countrychooser/localechooser/
16:22 < fjp> It is what s/390 does with locale preseeded to C. Then
the country get
Package: installation-reports
Boot method: CD
Image version:
http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/daily-builds/daily/arch-latest/powerpc/iso-cd/debian-testing-powerpc-netinst.iso
Date: 02/19/07 01:00
Machine: iBook SE (NewWorld) 300mHz no firewire
Processor: PowerPC
Memory: 192MB
Partitions:
Files
Package: installation-reports
Boot method:
Image version: <2/16/07 Etch AMD64 snapshot from cdimage.debian.org>
Date: <2/18/07 evening>
Machine:
Processor: 2 x AMD Opteron 275.
Memory: 16 GB DDR-400 with registered with ECC (running 3-3-3-8!)
Partitions: <1 GB ext3 in /boot; 26 GB swap; 580 GB
I'm confused -- what is the current status? Do you understand why
mirror/http/proxy should not apply when fetching preseed/include and
preseed/run files, or do you need more clarification?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PRO
severity 399882 wishlist
retitle 399882 boot-prober should support 'module' lines in grub config
thanks
I've just tested using the the provided grub.conf with a daily Etch
installer and AFAICT the grub entries for the regular Fedora kernels are
processed correctly.
The problem is with the Xen e
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 399882 wishlist
Bug#399882: Broken grub entries for multibooting Fedora
Severity set to `wishlist' from `normal'
> retitle 399882 boot-prober should support 'module' lines in grub config
Bug#399882: Broken grub entries for multibooting Fedora
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.26
> submitter 411418 !
Bug#411418: installation-reports: Etch i386 20070215 daily netinst on
SL-NV400-L64 (NForce 2): Success
Changed Bug submitter from Filipus Klutiero <[EMAIL PROTECTE
On Sun, Feb 18, 2007 at 08:18:45PM +0100, Pablo Ripolles wrote:
> >I haven't looked at the low-memory mode menu in quite some time. Do you
> >have the option at this point to mount swap space? That's the only way
> >you're going to get enough virtual memory to be able to continue the
> >install
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 411367 netcfg
Bug#411367: d-i: Diclose MAC Address
Bug reassigned from package `netcfg' to `netcfg'.
> tags 411367 -wontfix
Bug#411367: d-i: Diclose MAC Address
There were no tags set.
Tags removed: wontfix
> stop
Stopping processing here.
P
reassign 411367 netcfg
tags 411367 -wontfix
stop
Op 18-02-2007 om 19:15 schreef Peter Palfrader:
> >
> > The wish to disclose the MAC address during installation doesn't make sense.
>
> I disagree. Most of my servers have dual ethernet chips. I know which
> MAC is connected because tftp/dhcp
Package: tasksel-data
Version: 2.66
Severity: wishlist
Please remove foomatic-gui from the common desktop task, presumably
moving it to gnome-desktop and maybe xfce-desktop.
I believe this will allow to avoid that gksu be pulled by the common
desktop task.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PRO
A build of the Debian Installer Manual was triggered by an update to SVN.
There were no errors during the build process.
The new version of the manual has been uploaded successfully.
A log of the build is available at:
- http://people.debian.org/~fjp/d-i_manual/log/en.log
===
It is possible to u
I would just like to translate the installation comment submitted by the
user. If he has used the Debian installer in spanish, it's only natural
that his installation repost comes in spanish ;)
Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
> [ ] comments/problems: inicio la instalacion con el cd, reconoce el
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 408340 + pending
Bug#408340: PPPoE instructions proposal - installation guide
There were no tags set.
Bug#282711: Current PPPoE instructions are deprecated
Tags added: pending
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you
On Sun, 2007-02-18 at 20:18 +0100, Rene Wagner wrote:
[...]
> Does anyone have any suggestion how to a) get a signed installer image
> that b) verifies the integrity of downloaded files?
PS: Please keep me in Cc: as I'm not subscribed to this list.
Rene
--
Rene Wagner
reenoo at gmx dot de
4F33
A build of the Debian Installer Manual was triggered by an update to SVN.
There were no errors during the build process.
The new version of the manual has been uploaded successfully.
A log of the build is available at:
- http://people.debian.org/~fjp/d-i_manual/log/en.log
===
It is possible to u
Steve Langasek wrote:
On Fri, Feb 16, 2007 at 04:51:55PM +0100, Pablo Ripolles wrote:
recently i've submitted an installation-report associated to a failed
etch installation (CD netinst method) on an AlphaStation 500/266. this
post is mainly because i suspect that it might be an alpha rela
Hi all,
due to missing hardware support in the sarge kernel I need to use an
etch installation medium to install a new system. Unfortunately, I can't
seem to find working images.
First of all I found it a bit irritating that the daily/weekly images
aren't cryptographically singed. I suspect this
tags 411399 + pending
thanks
On Sunday 18 February 2007 19:28, Francesco Poli wrote:
> AFAICT, guided partitioning creates all the other partitions, apart
> from the /boot partition, *inside* the LVM partition.
Yes, that was changed not all that long ago. Thanks for spotting that.
Cheers,
FJP
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 411399 + pending
Bug#411399: installation-guide: claims that the swap partition is created
*outside* the LVM partition
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debi
Hi
Fair enough, it's a bit obscure but documented. But
unless it planned to be fixed by the time Etch gets
out, may I suggest a more informative error message?
If I had gotten "This operation is not supported using
the graphical installer, use the command-line install"
everything would be fine IMO
Package: installation-guide
Version: 20070122
Severity: normal
Hi!
Section 6.3.2.1. _Partitioning Your Disks_[1] states:
| If you choose guided partitioning using (encrypted) LVM, the installer
| will also create a separate /boot partition. The other partitions,
| except for the swap partition,
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 411367 - wontfix
Bug#411367: d-i: Diclose MAC Address
Tags were: wontfix
Tags removed: wontfix
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian B
On Sun, 18 Feb 2007, Geert Stappers wrote:
> tag 411367 wontfix
> stop
>
> The wish to disclose the MAC address during installation doesn't make sense.
I disagree. Most of my servers have dual ethernet chips. I know which
MAC is connected because tftp/dhcp already have that information. What
Eddy Petrișor a écrit :
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Filipus Klutiero wrote:
Package: installation-reports
Severity: normal
-- Package-specific info:
Boot method: CD
Image version: Debian GNU/Linux testing "Etch" - Official Snapshot i386 NETINST
Binary-1 20070215-09:31
FYI,
regards,
Davide
PS: I'm working on the debian package which will be ready in the next few days
- Forwarded message from Ben Laenen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
From: Ben Laenen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
User-Agent: KMail/1.9.5
Date: Sun, 18 Feb 2007 18:21:15 +0100
To:
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 411309 installation-reports
Bug#411309: cdrom, tarjeta de red, discos
Warning: Unknown package 'debian-testing-amd64-netinst'
Warning: Unknown package 'method'
Warning: Unknown package 'de'
Warning: Unknown package 'instalacion'
Warning: Unknow
Op 18-02-2007 om 18:02 schreef Geert Stappers:
>
> Meanwhile I do understand the problem.
>
This BR is allready re-assign to preseed.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Op 18-02-2007 om 17:03 schreef Geert Stappers:
> Op 18-02-2007 om 16:44 schreef Geert Stappers:
> >
> > I don't understand the problem.
> >
> > My gut feeling is that the mirror/http/proxy setting is misconfigured,
> > so I suggest to modify the preseed file that it sets.
> >
> > Next I will CC a
16:20 < fjp> What about not including countrychooser in the initrd and
not preseeding the country?
16:21 < fjp> s/countrychooser/localechooser/
16:22 < fjp> It is what s/390 does with locale preseeded to C. Then
the country gets asked for the timezone as tzconfig depends on
localechooser. (IIRC)
Op 16-02-2007 om 00:43 schreef Vincent Bernat:
> OoO En ce début d'après-midi ensoleillé du jeudi 15 février 2007, vers
> 15:36, "Emmanuel Seyman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> disait:
>
> > As I understand it, this should automatically configure apt to use
> > the cdrom as source and nothing else. Yet, I g
Op 13-02-2007 om 22:27 schreef Roland Dreier:
>
> It seems that the mirror/http/proxy setting should really only be used
> to get things from mirrors, or at least some way should be provided to
> say when to use the proxy and when not to.
I don't understand the problem.
My gut feeling is that t
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Björn Hahn wrote:
> Package: installation-reports
> Version: 2.28
> Severity: minor
>
>
>
> -- Package-specific info:
>
> Boot meth: CD
> Image version: netinstall image
> http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/daily-builds/daily/arch-latest/i386/iso-c
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 411367 wontfix
Bug#411367: d-i: Diclose MAC Address
There were no tags set.
Tags added: wontfix
> stop
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs databa
tag 411367 wontfix
stop
The wish to disclose the MAC address during installation doesn't make sense.
The Media Acces Controll address is Ethernet thingy close to the hardware.
Providing that address during installation is only usefull for a very
very small group of users. For all other users is
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> clone 300837 -1
Bug#300837: d-i: What is Probed?
Bug 300837 cloned as bug 411367.
> retitle -1 d-i: Diclose MAC Address
Bug#411367: d-i: What is Probed?
Changed Bug title.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assi
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 410006 cdrom-detect
Bug#410006: netinstall cdrom detection fails when using external usb cdrom
drive
Bug reassigned from package `installation-reports' to `cdrom-detect'.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you
On Saturday 17 February 2007 20:21, Joey Hess wrote:
> > I also see that a question keeps its value even if it is unregistered
> > and re-registered after setting the value. Is that correct?
>
> Depends on internal garbage collection implementation probably. Not
> true of debconf:
So, should a BR
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> split 300837 -1
Unknown command or malformed arguments to command.
> retitle 300837 d-i: What is Probed?
Bug#300837: Wishlist: Disclose MAC Address and What is Probed?
Changed Bug title.
> retitle -1 d-i: Diclose MAC Address
Bug number -1 not found. (
Accepted:
libdebian-installer-extra4-udeb_0.49_amd64.udeb
to
pool/main/libd/libdebian-installer/libdebian-installer-extra4-udeb_0.49_amd64.udeb
libdebian-installer-extra4_0.49_amd64.deb
to
pool/main/libd/libdebian-installer/libdebian-installer-extra4_0.49_amd64.deb
libdebian-installer4-dev_0
Op 16-02-2007 om 19:07 schreef Mike Hommey:
> On Thu, Mar 24, 2005 at 10:33:30AM +0100, Geert Stappers wrote:
> > The request of displaying the MAC address can be argued about.
>
> I got a usecase yesterday for this: a dual port ethernet card.
FYI:
I have been re-reading http://bugs.debian.org/
libdebian-installer_0.49_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
libdebian-installer_0.49.dsc
libdebian-installer_0.49.tar.gz
libdebian-installer4_0.49_amd64.deb
libdebian-installer4-dev_0.49_amd64.deb
libdebian-installer4-udeb_0.49_amd64.udeb
libdebian-in
Your message dated Sun, 18 Feb 2007 13:32:59 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#411359: After power on Nvidia graphics card only with low
resolution.
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with
Op 13-02-2007 om 15:20 schreef Debian Bug Tracking System:
>* Support command-line preseeding in the form "hostname?=foo" to pressed
> a value without setting the seen flag. Closes: #410392
s/pressed/preseed/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe
Package: installation-reports
This is an update on the installation report 402459:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=402459
Boot method: netinstall, booted from CD
Image version:
http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/etch_di_rc1/amd64/iso-cd/debian-testing-amd64-netinst.iso
Date: Sat
Package: installation-reports
This is an update on the installation report 402459:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=402459
Boot method: netinstall, booted from CD
Image version:
http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/etch_di_rc1/amd64/iso-cd/debian-testing-amd64-netinst.iso
Date: Sat
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Filipus Klutiero wrote:
> Package: installation-reports
> Severity: normal
>
>
>
> -- Package-specific info:
>
> Boot method: CD
> Image version: Debian GNU/Linux testing "Etch" - Official Snapshot i386
> NETINST Binary-1 20070215-09:31
> Date:
>
Your message dated Sun, 18 Feb 2007 10:27:28 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#411318: Failed to configure encrypted volumes
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case
On Sunday 18 February 2007 03:54, Jack Choi wrote:
> While installing the Debian, Etch distribution of Linux I ran into a
> problem while attempting to install the base system. It said to look at
> file:///cdrom/dists/etch/Release.gpg and it stated:
> The base system installation into /target/ fail
49 matches
Mail list logo
