Bug#276100: kernel update changes menu.lst boot location

time for some more troubleshooting.. there is both kernel and grub updates available. kernel update is same version though? updated kernel (only) first... Linux theta 2.6.8-1-386 #1 Mon Sep 13 23:29:55 EDT 2004 i686 GNU/Linux (this is after the 'upgrade') upgrading the kernel overwrote the

Bug#241637: Can't test; machine not accessible

Sorry, the machine I used is no more around at my work place, so I can't test this again. -- GMX ProMail mit bestem Virenschutz http://www.gmx.net/de/go/mail +++ Empfehlung der Redaktion +++ Internet Professionell 10/04 +++ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsu

Bug#244205: Retest

Since I managed to work around the problem first time around and am a happy debian user now, I don't have an empty computer handy to test the new installer. Regards, Rob Hooft -- Rob W.W. Hooft || [EMAIL PROTECTED] || http://www.hooft.net/people/rob/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTE

Bug#262675: about your Debian installation report

Hi, Thanks for your answer. Yes, since i try the debian-installer. The new version in CVS and of course the RC1 had corrected the problem i encountered with the Nvidia drivers and the freeze of KDE. Nice works you'll do, I'm waiting for the final release of Sarge S. CUVELIER Accédez au co

Processed: reassign 275262 to grub-installer, severity of 275262 is normal, tagging 275262

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.5 > reassign 275262 grub-installer Bug#275262: Boot loader install failed on a Mylex Acceleraid 170 RAID adapter Bug reassigned from package `installation-reports' to `grub-installer'. >

debian-boot@lists.debian.org

Your message dated Wed, 13 Oct 2004 20:02:05 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#275672: fixed in discover1 1.7.2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now yo

Bug#273834: marked as done (update-initrd should be in /usr/sbin/, not in /sbin/, since it uses /usr/)

Your message dated Wed, 13 Oct 2004 20:02:05 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#273834: fixed in discover1 1.7.2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now yo

Bug#274822: marked as done (discover1: [INTL:it] updated debian/po/it.po italian translation)

Your message dated Wed, 13 Oct 2004 20:02:05 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#274822: fixed in discover1 1.7.2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now yo

Bug#275698: marked as done (discover1: [l10n:ro]Romanian translation for debconf)

Your message dated Wed, 13 Oct 2004 20:02:05 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#275698: fixed in discover1 1.7.2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now yo

discover1_1.7.2_i386.changes ACCEPTED

Accepted: discover1-udeb_1.7.2_i386.udeb to pool/main/d/discover1/discover1-udeb_1.7.2_i386.udeb discover1_1.7.2.dsc to pool/main/d/discover1/discover1_1.7.2.dsc discover1_1.7.2.tar.gz to pool/main/d/discover1/discover1_1.7.2.tar.gz discover1_1.7.2_i386.deb to pool/main/d/discover1/discove

Processing of discover1_1.7.2_i386.changes

discover1_1.7.2_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: discover1_1.7.2.dsc discover1_1.7.2.tar.gz discover1_1.7.2_i386.deb libdiscover1_1.7.2_i386.deb libdiscover1-dev_1.7.2_i386.deb libdiscover1-pic_1.7.2_i386.deb discover1-udeb_1.7.2_i386.udeb Greetin

Processed: reassign 236745 to hw-detect ...

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.5 > reassign 236745 hw-detect Bug#236745: [i386] [20040304] [floppy] various problems, including hardware detection Bug reassigned from package `installation-reports' to `hw-detect'. > re

Bug#244259: Installation report i386 beta3: Success

severity 244259 minor thanks On Sat, Apr 17, 2004 at 06:26:08PM +0200, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote: > Comments/Problems: > - The LCD monitor (Compaq) blanked out after a few seconds of inactivity > when booted from CD, ctrl+F2 and back to F1 usually helped for a short > moment. Needed to be re

Processed: reassign 220616 to alsa-base, reassign 265845 to alsa-base, tagging 248923

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.5 > reassign 220616 alsa-base Bug#220616: discover1: Loads OSS modules rather than ALSA modules Bug#265845: Don't load OSS modules on boot? Bug reassigned from package `discover1' to `alsa

Processed: Re: Installation report i386 beta3: Success

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 244259 minor Bug#244259: [i386] [beta3] [netinst] 2nd stage package installation usability issues Severity set to `minor'. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator

Processed: reassign 276397 to kernel

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.5 > reassign 276397 kernel Bug#276397: Kernel won't work on XServe G5 Bug reassigned from package `kernel-image-2.6.8-power4-di' to `kernel'. > End of message, stopping processing here.

Bug#241029: about your Debian installation report

Hi, The installation in question was on a friend's home server about 100 miles from here, and apart from the distance I don't think he'd appreciate the downtime involved in my reinstalling his system! I've still got the debian-install logfiles somewhere if they're any use, but I'm afraid I can't

Bug#239966: about your Debian installation report

Hello Joey, On Wed, Oct 13, 2004 at 04:53:58PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote: > Hello, I'm writing you because you filed an installation report a while ago > on an old version of the debian installer. Your installation report was #239966 > and can be viewed online at . Hmm

Bug#272514: verified

reassign 272514 mdcfg tag 272514 d-i thanks I've verified this bug, if I enter mdcfg after deleting a partition in partman, it does not ask me about writing the partition table, and it seems to delete the partition. -- see shy jo signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Processed: verified

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reassign 272514 mdcfg Bug#272514: install: Partition table written to disk without user agreement Bug reassigned from package `installation-reports' to `mdcfg'. > tag 272514 d-i Bug#272514: install: Partition table written to disk without user agreemen

Bug#275263: marked as done (Boot loader install failed on a Mylex Acceleraid 170 RAID adapter)

Your message dated Wed, 13 Oct 2004 15:51:53 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line closing duplicate has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility t

Processed: severity of 274762 is normal

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.5 > severity 274762 normal Bug#274762: installation-reports Severity set to `normal'. > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tr

Bug#236859: marked as done ([i386] [beta2] [netinst] success, graphics card not detected)

Your message dated Wed, 13 Oct 2004 16:26:17 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line closing has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen t

Bug#249346: Please load mousedev module automatically when using 2.6 kernel

On Wednesday 13 October 2004 23:23, AKL. Mantas Kriauciunas wrote: > So, please load mousedev module automatically when using 2.6 kernel, it > would be very good if you do this ASAP, because Debian Sarge must be > released with working mouse when using 2.6 kernel. Why do you say that mouse is not

Bug#276299: netcfg insists on confirming hostname and domainname

Geert Stappers wrote: > The sane defaults come from domain name servers in the network. > > > Please make it possible to surpress these questions. > > For those who use "preseed/url=http://goldserver/seeds/ahost.txt"; > > ( "preseed/file=/hd-media/ahost.txt" users can avoid the confirm ) You c

Processed: reassign 267791 to silo

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.5 > reassign 267791 silo Bug#267791: Fast Data Access MMU Miss on SunFire 280R Bug reassigned from package `installation-reports' to `silo'. > End of message, stopping processing here. P

Bug#238504: marked as done ([i386] [beta3] [floppy] failed to detect Realtek 8139 Cardbus NIC)

Your message dated Wed, 13 Oct 2004 16:36:59 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line closing old installation-reports has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your r

Bug#242385: marked as done ([sparc] [beta3] [netinst] Boot fails on sparc64 with illegal instruction)

Your message dated Wed, 13 Oct 2004 16:36:59 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line closing old installation-reports has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your r

Bug#238495: marked as done ([sparc] [beta3] [businesscard] boot fails on Ultra 5 with illegal instruction)

Your message dated Wed, 13 Oct 2004 16:36:59 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line closing old installation-reports has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your r

Bug#237901: marked as done ([i386] [beta2] [floppy] success, with problems)

Your message dated Wed, 13 Oct 2004 16:36:59 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line closing old installation-reports has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your r

Bug#237679: marked as done ([i386] [20040312] [netinst] nic detection failed)

Your message dated Wed, 13 Oct 2004 16:36:59 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line closing old installation-reports has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your r

Bug#237320: marked as done ([i386] [20040406] [floppy] various problems)

Your message dated Wed, 13 Oct 2004 16:36:59 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line closing old installation-reports has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your r

Bug#236845: marked as done ([i386] [20040308] [netinst] pcmcia problem with installed kernel)

Your message dated Wed, 13 Oct 2004 16:37:01 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line closing reports due to lack of response from submitter has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the

Bug#235540: marked as done ([i386] [unknown] [floppy] various problems)

Your message dated Wed, 13 Oct 2004 16:37:01 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line closing reports due to lack of response from submitter has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the

Bug#235418: marked as done ([i386] [unknown] [netinst] various problems)

Your message dated Wed, 13 Oct 2004 16:37:01 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line closing reports due to lack of response from submitter has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the

Bug#235096: marked as done ([i386] [beta2] [netinst] install to blank disk failed partitioning)

Your message dated Wed, 13 Oct 2004 16:37:01 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line closing reports due to lack of response from submitter has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the

Bug#233007: marked as done ([i386] [20040212] [netinst] various problems on Toshiba A100)

Your message dated Wed, 13 Oct 2004 16:37:01 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line closing reports due to lack of response from submitter has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the

Bug#230705: marked as done ([i386] [beta2] [netinst] various problems)

Your message dated Wed, 13 Oct 2004 16:36:59 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line closing old installation-reports has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your r

Bug#276299: netcfg insists on confirming hostname and domainname

Geert Stappers wrote: > This bugreport is for me and probably other "auto installers" release > critical, some will say it has wishlist severity, so it became 'normal'. > > netcfg insists on confirming the hostname and domain name, > that blocks doing automated installations, as one still has to p

Bug#273327: reassign to kernel

reassign 273327 kernel This yellow screen must be a hardware problem or a bug in the frame buffer driver. Reassigning to the kernel.. (The rest of the problems mentioned are already dealt with or not practical to fix.) -- see shy jo signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Bug#230977: marked as done ([i386] [20040202] [businesscard] error installing lilo)

Your message dated Wed, 13 Oct 2004 16:37:01 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line closing reports due to lack of response from submitter has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the

Bug#232237: marked as done ([i386] [unknown] [netinst] general success, minor problems)

Your message dated Wed, 13 Oct 2004 16:36:59 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line closing old installation-reports has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your r

Bug#233978: marked as done ([i386] [beta2] [CD] generally success)

Your message dated Wed, 13 Oct 2004 16:37:01 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line closing reports due to lack of response from submitter has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the

Bug#234605: marked as done ([i386] [20040222] [DVD] (in German))

Your message dated Wed, 13 Oct 2004 16:37:01 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line closing reports due to lack of response from submitter has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the

Bug#234687: marked as done ([powerpc] [20040219] [netinst] Boot fails on g5 desktop)

Your message dated Wed, 13 Oct 2004 16:37:01 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line closing reports due to lack of response from submitter has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the

Bug#235342: marked as done ([i386] [20040224] [netinst] pcmcia network problem)

Your message dated Wed, 13 Oct 2004 16:37:01 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line closing reports due to lack of response from submitter has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the

Bug#235691: marked as done ([i386] [20040301] [businesscard] success with problems)

Your message dated Wed, 13 Oct 2004 16:37:01 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line closing reports due to lack of response from submitter has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the

Bug#236142: marked as done ([i386] [beta2] [netinst] Swedish translation problems)

Your message dated Wed, 13 Oct 2004 16:37:01 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line closing reports due to lack of response from submitter has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the

Bug#236184: marked as done ([i386] [20040303] [floppy] fails to find hard disk)

Your message dated Wed, 13 Oct 2004 16:36:59 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line closing old installation-reports has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your r

Bug#236293: marked as done ([i386] [20040528] [floppy] aic7xxx problem)

Your message dated Wed, 13 Oct 2004 16:36:59 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line closing old installation-reports has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your r

Bug#237120: marked as done ([i386] [beta2] [netinst] swap, language, lilo problems)

Your message dated Wed, 13 Oct 2004 16:37:01 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line closing reports due to lack of response from submitter has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the

Bug#237295: marked as done ([i386] [20040409] [floppy] various problems)

Your message dated Wed, 13 Oct 2004 16:36:59 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line closing old installation-reports has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your r

Bug#237418: marked as done ([i386] [beta2] [netinst] lilo problems)

Your message dated Wed, 13 Oct 2004 16:37:01 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line closing reports due to lack of response from submitter has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the

Bug#237455: marked as done ([i386] [unknown] [CD] various problems)

Your message dated Wed, 13 Oct 2004 16:36:59 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line closing old installation-reports has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your r

Bug#237508: marked as done ([i386] [20040310] [CD] kernel install fails)

Your message dated Wed, 13 Oct 2004 16:36:59 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line closing old installation-reports has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your r

Bug#237542: marked as done ([i386] [beta2] [netinst] none of the PCMCIA settings were saved)

Your message dated Wed, 13 Oct 2004 16:36:59 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line closing old installation-reports has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your r

Bug#237834: marked as done ([i386] [20040312] [floppy] mkinitrd: Cannot determine root device and other problems)

Your message dated Wed, 13 Oct 2004 16:36:59 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line closing old installation-reports has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your r

Bug#237846: marked as done ([i386] [beta2] [netinst] german keymap console-switching problem)

Your message dated Wed, 13 Oct 2004 16:36:59 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line closing old installation-reports has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your r

Bug#238042: marked as done ([i386] [20040311] [netinst] success, network config issue)

Your message dated Wed, 13 Oct 2004 16:36:59 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line closing old installation-reports has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your r

Bug#238115: marked as done ([i386] [beta2] [netinst] cannot access the hard disk)

Your message dated Wed, 13 Oct 2004 16:37:01 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line closing reports due to lack of response from submitter has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the

Processed: reassign to kernel

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reassign 273327 kernel Bug#273327: installation-reports: screen(in text mode) / keyboard problems Bug reassigned from package `installation-reports' to `kernel'. > This yellow screen must be a hardware problem or a bug in the frame Unknown command or m

Bug#276407: pre-rc2 not installable on Sun SS10

Package: installation-reports Debian-installer-version: 2004/11/09 http://people.debian.org/~joshk/d-i/images/2004-09-29/ uname -a: n/a Date: Sat, 09 Oct 2004 11:00:00 +0200 Method: netboot, serial console Machine: Sun SparcStation 10 Processor: whatever's in an original SS10 Memory: 32 MB Root

d-i floppy builds requring root

d-i has just failed to build on the m68k autobuilder because the vme_boot target tries to use sudo. We cannot rely on there being root access to build the installer; I don't know how the last build worked, just lucky I guess. We have about 1 week to resolve this and to get the final d-i builds. Ma

Bug#249346: Please load mousedev module automatically when using 2.6 kernel

Hi, Gaudenz Steinlin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >Sorry for not replying earlier to your bug report. Discover1 is >currently only optimized for kernel 2.4. The problem is that the format >of the discover1 hardware database cannot hold information about kernel >versions. It seems discover1 from ve

Bug#276406: swap first, RAID-1 after doesn't work

Package: installation-reports Debian-installer-version: 2004/11/13 http://cdimage.debian.org/pub/cdimage-testing/sid_d-i/i386/pre-rc2/sarge-i386-netinst.iso uname -a: Linux customer 2.4.27-1-386 #1 Fri Sep 3 06:24:46 UTC 2004 i686 GNU/Linux Date: Wed, 13 Oct 2004 23:01:00 +0200 Method: CDROM Mac

Bug#268580: GRUB hangs on first boot after base install

Tried again with the latest netinst snapshot, the problem is still present. However I've managed to make it work. I've installed an old 1 GB hard disk as /dev/hdd or (hd1) and installed Debian in that disk (840M ext3 root all inclusive, 256M swap) as a test. Debian Installer still put Grub on t

Re: tell about the technology

On Wed, Oct 13, 2004 at 10:28:03AM +0200, Christian Perrier wrote: > Quoting Geert Stappers ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > > > > I don't think "Logical Volume" is clear in this context (it doesn't make > > > me immediatly think of LVM, and mentioning RAID is a red herring, LVM is > > > not RAID. > > > >

Re: deux pages à supprimer

Quoting Jean-Eudes Gadenne ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > Bonjour. > > Merci de bien vouloir supprimer ces deux pages/messages. > > Mon adresse électronique y figure, pour une raison que j'ignore, (je ne suis > abonné à aucune de vos listes) mais je ne souhaite pas qu'elle soit rendue > publique. (req

Bug#275729: marked as done (installation-reports)

Your message dated Wed, 13 Oct 2004 21:45:35 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#275729: bug to be closed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your respo

Processed: tagging 220616

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.5 > tags 220616 - wontfix Bug#220616: discover1: Loads OSS modules rather than ALSA modules Tags were: wontfix d-i Bug#265845: Don't load OSS modules on boot? Tags removed: wontfix > End

Bug#276299: netcfg insists on confirming hostname and domainname

On Wed, Oct 13, 2004 at 10:45:34AM +0200, Geert Stappers wrote: > Package: netcfg > Severity: normal > Tags: d-i sarge > > Hello, > > This bugreport is for me and probably other "auto installers" release > critical, some will say it has wishlist severity, so it became 'normal'. > > netcfg insist

Bug#276397: Kernel won't work on XServe G5

Package: kernel-image-2.6.8-power4-di Version: .72 Downloaded latest debian installer daily build, burnt to cd, and started off of the cd. The cd started fine, and I typed "expert-power4" to select the kernel appropriate for my xserve G5. Immediately after the message about "Loading ramdisk..

Bug#276076: console-tools: Unable to see Hebrew in the console

I'll test it in the next daily build and update this bug report. Thanks. Christian Perrier wrote: On Tue, Oct 12, 2004 at 08:32:21AM +0200, Denis Barbier wrote: On Tue, Oct 12, 2004 at 01:16:43AM +0200, Lior Kaplan wrote: Since that wouldn't solve the problem to other people. Especially people new

Bug#276396: sparc64: second stage errors

Package: installation-reports Bug#274958 apparently is fixed in debian-installer 2004-10-12, but second stage shows some errors on my Sparc Ultra5: 1. after reboot, the installer complains about read-edid not being available; 2. in tasksel, installing the desktop task fails (I did not find a

Bug#275729: bug to be closed

Hello, Sorry for the inconvenience, but the bug is related to an old version of the debian installer (20040801). This bug reportt should also be closed. Thanks. Guillaume

deux pages à supprimer

Bonjour. Merci de bien vouloir supprimer ces deux pages/messages. Mon adresse électronique y figure, pour une raison que j'ignore, (je ne suis abonné à aucune de vos listes) mais je ne souhaite pas qu'elle soit rendue publique. Merci http://lists.debian.org/debian-l10n-english/2004/07/msg000

Processed: Spell reassign correctly this time...

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reassign 276379 hw-detect Bug#276379: Problems detecting netw. card (e1000) & disk contr. (megaraid2) Bug reassigned from package `installation-reports' to `hw-detect'. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debi

Bug#276379: installation-reports

resassign 276379 hw-detect retitle 276379 Problems detecting netw. card (e1000) & disk contr. (megaraid2) tags 276379 d-i thanks On Wednesday 13 October 2004 18:55, Timo Veith wrote: > Package: installation-reports > Comments/Problems: > Configure network hardware: The configuration of the network

Processed: Re: Bug#276379: installation-reports

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > resassign 276379 hw-detect Unknown command or malformed arguments to command. > retitle 276379 Problems detecting netw. card (e1000) & disk contr. (megaraid2) Bug#276379: installation-reports Changed Bug title. > tags 276379 d-i Bug#276379: Problems d

Bug#276379: installation-reports

Package: installation-reports Debian-installer-version: http://cdimage.debian.org/pub/cdimage-testing/sid_d-i/i386/20041011/sarge-i386-netinst.iso also http://cdimage.debian.org/pub/cdimage-testing/sid_d-i/i386/pre-rc2/sarge-i386-netinst.iso uname -a: Linux samweis 2.4.27-1-386 #1 Fri Sep 3 06:2

Bug#276381: Installation Report

Package: installation-reports Debian-installer-version: 2004-10-11, cdimage.debian.org (rc2 sarge-i386) uname -a: Linux Argo 2.6.8-1-386 #1 Thu Oct 7 02:21:16 EDT 2004 i686 GNU/Linux Date: 2004-10-11, ~ 2200 MDT Method: Installed via sarge-i386-netinst ISO CD image. Network install was done. Mi

Bug#276356: installation Bug

Package: installation-reports Debian-installer-version: debian installer rc2 from debian.org Oct 12 04 uname -a: Should have been 2.6.8-1 (installed with linux26) Date: Oct 13 04 ~9:00am Method: From CD-ROM sarge-i386-netinst.iso Machine: Compaq Presario 2100 (laptop) Processor: Celeron 1.6Ghz M

choosing own kernel at install

Hi I have newly bought a new computer with nForce3 but debian-installer with the 2.6.8-1 kernel can't find my SATA disk. Is there a way to choose a old kernel from the internet or floppy during install? Or compile one of my own during install? Thanks Nils Westlund -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [E

Bug#276351: installation-reports: [i386] [pre-rc2] [netinst] dma problem on first reboot

Package: installation-reports Severity: normal Debian-installer-version: pre-rc2, downloaded from d-i website 8.10.04 uname -a: Linux tigerbay 2.6.8-1-686 #1 Thu Oct 7 03:15:25 EDT 2004 i686 GNU/Linux Date: 9.10.04, ca. 15.00-23.00 UTC Method: Booted off larger CD (netinst) with new HD; packages

Re: initrd build update (last call)

> It looks like all the issues are sorted out for the initrds, I plan to > begin the final build shortly after archive sync tomorrow. I'm only > waiting now for a few builds to be uploaded from the autobuilders and > similar. not sure this is relevant, but here goes - I reported some failures-to-b

Bug#276332: Installation-reports

Title: Installation-reports Package: installation-reports Debian-installer-version: Debian Sarge Installer pre-RC2 Date: 12. Okt. 2004 Method: boot: linux26 Machine: HP ProLiant DL360R03 Processor: Xeon 2800 Memory: 1 GB Root Device: 2xHP U320 SCSI (Raid 1), 36,4 GB Root Size/partit

Re: Bug#272441: unsuccessful installation

Hi, A have got an Acer 3600G too. I have probed with rc1 but still hangs. I have edited the blacklist file but that module (i810-tco) appears in the file yet (in RC1) I'm trying now with rc2. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL

Re: initrd build update (last call)

On Mon, Oct 11, 2004 at 04:25:47PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote: > It looks like all the issues are sorted out for the initrds, I plan to > begin the final build shortly after archive sync tomorrow. I'm only > waiting now for a few builds to be uploaded from the autobuilders and > similar. netcfg preven

Bug#276299: netcfg insists on confirming hostname and domainname

Package: netcfg Severity: normal Tags: d-i sarge Hello, This bugreport is for me and probably other "auto installers" release critical, some will say it has wishlist severity, so it became 'normal'. netcfg insists on confirming the hostname and domain name, that blocks doing automated installati

Processed: Re: Bug#275890: postgresql: dependency on ecpg

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reassign 275890 tasksel Bug#275890: postgresql: dependency on ecpg Bug reassigned from package `postgresql' to `tasksel'. > retitle 275890 tasksel: database-server install list needs revision Bug#275890: postgresql: dependency on ecpg Changed Bug title

Bug#248923: cut still run by initscript

tags 248923 - woody thanks The current /etc/init.d/discover still uses the cut program: $ grep -n cut discover 129:# No cut(1) without /usr 187:mountsent="$(grep "$CDMOUNT " /proc/mounts | cut -f2)" -- Thomas Hood -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "

Processed: cut still run by initscript

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 248923 - woody Bug#248923: discover: [patch] There is no */usr*/bin/cut while rc.S scripts are being run Tags were: woody patch Tags removed: woody > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking

Processed: tagging 248923

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 248923 - patch Bug#248923: discover: [patch] There is no */usr*/bin/cut while rc.S scripts are being run Tags were: patch Tags removed: patch > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug track

Re: tell about the technology

Quoting Geert Stappers ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > > I don't think "Logical Volume" is clear in this context (it doesn't make > > me immediatly think of LVM, and mentioning RAID is a red herring, LVM is > > not RAID. > > Educate users by using jargon from the beginning. > Hiding technical details now

Bug#276095: Package: installation-reports

On Mon, Oct 11, 2004 at 08:04:35PM -0400, Sébastien Mengin wrote: > Comments/Problems: > > Very nice session. Thanks for the great job. The only problem I met > is related to xfree. The xdebconfigurator finds a VIDEO CARD: S3 > ProSavage DDR-K and declares the driver is savage. But once > con

Processed: Re: Bug#276095: Package: installation-reports

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reassign 276095 xdebconfigurator Bug#276095: Package: installation-reports Bug reassigned from package `installation-reports' to `xdebconfigurator'. > thanks mate Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking

Bug#276244: Grub fails on install of Debian Testing

On Tue, Oct 12, 2004 at 11:32:45PM +0200, ketil vestby wrote: ... > Hardware: > - Four Western Digital Venturis P1, 100-133 Hz, > harddisks betwen 13 and 160 GiB (one harddisk on each), > 64 MB RAM on each computer > - One TCI 80486 dx2 > one 80 GiB harddisk > 32 MB RAM ... > **

tell about the technology

On Tue, Oct 12, 2004 at 01:38:30PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote: > Christian Perrier wrote: > > If so, I would reformulate this as "Use all free space for one Logical > > Volume" or "Use all free space for a (software) RAID volume" if we > > want to avoid jargon... > > I don't think "Logical Volume

Bug#276076: console-tools: Unable to see Hebrew in the console

> On Tue, Oct 12, 2004 at 08:32:21AM +0200, Denis Barbier wrote: > > On Tue, Oct 12, 2004 at 01:16:43AM +0200, Lior Kaplan wrote: > > > Since that wouldn't solve the problem to other people. Especially people > > > new to Debian which use d-i for the first installation. > > > > Then packages/lan

Re: Please add me to the debian-installer project

> [last message before my VAC] > Right, we all are coordinating the work using the debian-l10n-italian > list. Grazie, Giuseppe.I validated Cristian for commit access to D-I SVN, even if he has a spelling error in his first name... -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a

  1   2   >