On Tue, Nov 18, 2003 at 10:05:33PM +0100, Julien TOUCHE wrote:
>
> what is the status of unattended install with debian-installer ? there
> were some discusions about it some times ago, but there is no reference
> in Howto or TODO.
>
> some feature planned ? (or suggested)
> - normal install sa
Package: installation-reports
Version: beta1
INSTALL REPORT
Debian-installer-version: 09-Nov-2003, debian.org floppy images
uname -a: n/a (unable to install)
Date: 20031118
Method: attempted to install via usb floppy
Machine: Sony Vaio PCG-Z505R
Processor: PII
Memory: 196 MB
Root Device: ide
On Tue, Nov 18, 2003 at 09:07:44PM -0700, Chris Tillman wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 18, 2003 at 06:20:53PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Hi, I've just bought a PowerBook G4 12".
> >
> > I have downloaded the Beta1 of Sarge NetInst for PowerPC (November 9th)
> > and I have got a problem at the begin
On Tue, Nov 18, 2003 at 12:40:01PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
> Chris Tillman wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 17, 2003 at 01:07:48PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
> > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > > > +- Added ${VERSION} so the version will show in the main menu title
> > > >
> > > > Template: debian-install
On Tue, Nov 18, 2003 at 06:20:53PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi, I've just bought a PowerBook G4 12".
>
> I have downloaded the Beta1 of Sarge NetInst for PowerPC (November 9th)
> and I have got a problem at the beginning of the installation.
>
> I enter Open Firmware, and then boot with:
BTW, I've started working on a really basic
linux-newbie
help file. I'd appreciate any feedback you have; if
you'd like
I can email it. I have it posted at
http://members.cox.net/toff1/ (Download the 'aclue'
link in binary
mode).
--
I have tried your script.
(Had some problems at the begin
On 19 Nov 2003 01:51:51 +0100
Goswin von Brederlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Glenn McGrath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > The reason i havent applied it is because i dont have a raid setup
> > handy to test it, i only tested it on a few loop files.
> >
> > Someone was going to test it, but i
On Wed, Nov 19, 2003 at 01:36:42AM +0100, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > On Mon, Nov 17, 2003 at 11:06:36PM +0100, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> > > > I also don't know why this aboot.conf still has references to jensen as
> > > > a subarchitecture.
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 220705 languagechooser
Bug#220705: unclear language question
Warning: Unknown package 'language-chooser'
Bug reassigned from package `language-chooser' to `languagechooser'.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 220705 language-chooser
Bug#220705: unclear language question
Warning: Unknown package 'language-chooser'
Bug reassigned from package `debian-installer' to `language-chooser'.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if y
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 220704 d-i
Bug#220704: wrong CDROM instantiation
There were no tags set.
Tags added: d-i
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs da
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 218472 + d-i
Bug#218472: cdebconf: conflict with its own dependencies
There were no tags set.
Tags added: d-i
> tags 213482 + d-i
Bug#213482: cdebconf - allocate fd 3 always or use dynamicaly assigned fd
There were no tags set.
Tags added: d-i
>
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 220704 cdrom-detect
Bug#220704: wrong CDROM instantiation
Bug reassigned from package `debian-installer' to `cdrom-detect'.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system admi
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 220640 installation-reports
Bug#220640: d-i on Ultra sparc 5
Bug reassigned from package `debian-installer' to `installation-reports'.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 221203 netcfg
Bug#221203: debian-installer: Minor error in debconf template "netcfg-no_interfaces"
Bug reassigned from package `debian-installer' to `netcfg'.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistanc
If someone would like to look at the following page, fix it, and make sure
that debian-installer builds in a sid chroot with only build deps installed,
then I will be glad to add ia64 back to the architecture list in
build/debian/control. Until that happens, it's turned off, too many buildd
failure
I only release the build directory with arches turned on that I have
gotten a report of a successful build for. Does mips successfully build
in a clean sid debootstrap with the build-deps and build-essential
installed? I also prefer to get a report that the d-i-demo package works
(gets to the main
Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Mon, Nov 17, 2003 at 11:06:36PM +0100, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
>
> > > I also don't know why this aboot.conf still has references to jensen as
> > > a subarchitecture. I haven't found any 2.4 jensen kernels in the
> > > archive, and everything
Attached is a patch for main-menu/debian/po/zh_CN.po, updating the
recent changes.
Sorry for the slow progress of translation, but I don't have much spare
time. Hopefully it's better than nothing.
Regards,
Ming
2003.11.18
-
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 221534 pending
Bug#221534: debian-installer: FTBFS mips (in a good way)
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(a
On Mon, Nov 17, 2003 at 11:04:01PM +0100, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> Andrew Pollock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Installing from net or cd?
net
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tuesday 18 November 2003 05:51, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> Ed Heaney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > I am stooped in setting up linux on a new disk, by a command line
> > request for a Realtek RTL8139 module. I am worn out from searching
> > Google. I am using a Debian GNU/Linux 3.0 r0 "Woody
On Mon, Nov 17, 2003 at 11:06:36PM +0100, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> > I also don't know why this aboot.conf still has references to jensen as
> > a subarchitecture. I haven't found any 2.4 jensen kernels in the
> > archive, and everything I've found from debian-alpha suggests that there
> > a
Package: installation-reports
Severity: important
INSTALL REPORT
Debian-installer-version: Beta 1 100 MB CD image for powerpc
uname -a: Linux (none) 2.4.22-powerpc #1 Sat Sep 27 06:55:23 CEST 2003
ppc unknown
Date: 2003-11-18, 17:00 EST
Method: Boot off CD with 100 MB cd iamge
Machine: iBook
Pro
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Geert Stappers) writes:
> On Thu, Nov 13, 2003 at 09:59:53PM +0100, Geert Stappers wrote:
> The regular
> make TYPE=netboot
> produced an image with nasty GLIBC .ufoobar symbol error.
>
> As workaround we did:
> make tree TYPE=netboot
> then copied the libc.so from the com
"Tarun Kundhi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>
>
> Message
...
It would realy help if you could write a mail in english text instead
of publishing a website.
MfG
Goswin
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: debian-installer
Version: 20031114 (not installed)
Severity: important
Justification: fails to build from source
Hi,
--
dh_gencontrol -- -Vkernel:Package='kernel-image-2.4.19-r4k-ip22'
dpkg-gencontrol: error: current bui
Bastian Blank <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Mon, Nov 17, 2003 at 01:37:10PM +0100, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> > pkg-lists/netboot/s390:pump-udeb
>
> s390 don't have any dhcp capable netdevice
Then feel free to remove dhcp-client-udeb and netcfg-dhcp (if thats in
there) from the pkg-lists f
Dale Amon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> More info. On the target host:
>
> chroot /mnt
> cp -a /etc/lilo.config /etc/lilo.config.bak
> cp -a /usr/share/lilo/contrib/sid.bmp /boot
> liloconfig
> lilo
>
> works but is not what I want.
>
> By playing with the options
Alastair McKinstry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> From: Andrew Forgue <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Alpha Debian Netinst
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2003 20:32:49 -0500
>
> http://www.debian.org/devel/debian-installer/ports-status
>
> It says on that page to report any installati
Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Mon, Nov 17, 2003 at 08:33:33PM +, Alastair McKinstry wrote:
> > A report that was forwarded to me; I am updating the ports-status
> > page with details on submitting reports the offical way.
>
> Content-Description: Forwarded message - Alpha De
Andrew Pollock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Sun, Nov 16, 2003 at 04:28:28PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
>
> > It might help if we didn't keep a fairly useless copy of every .deb used
> > to install the base system in /var/cache/apt/archives. Intelligent use
> > of disk space could at least delete
Alastair McKinstry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Mon, 2003-11-17 at 21:24, Denis Barbier wrote:
> > The keyboard question must be asked, or at least user must be
> > told that his locale setting assumes some default values
> > (which are printed at that point), and he has to lower debconf
> > p
Erik Andersen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Fri Nov 14, 2003 at 12:21:36PM +0100, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> > Any idea how uclibc links against main and why glibc does not have the
> > same problem? I guess glibc links the startsup code into every bin
> > while uclibcs startup code jumps in
Ed Heaney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I am stooped in setting up linux on a new disk, by a command line
> request for a Realtek RTL8139 module. I am worn out from searching
> Google. I am using a Debian GNU/Linux 3.0 r0 "Woody" system disk.
>
>
> Help please.
> EH
Your on the wrong list here.
Martin Sjögren <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> mån 2003-11-17 klockan 18.45 skrev Matt Kraai:
> > Howdy,
> >
> > The daily debian-installer image failed to build on 2003-11-17. I
> > think this happened because libparted1.6-0 was not installed.
>
> Indeed, I've fixed this and hopefully today's bu
"Chris Tillman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Mon, Nov 17, 2003 at 07:59:59PM -0800, eric brown wrote:
> >
> > --- eric brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Date: Sun, 16 Nov 2003 09:06:21 -0800 (PST)
> > > From: eric brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > Subject: Install Report from a Linux newbi
eric brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> --- eric brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Date: Sun, 16 Nov 2003 09:06:21 -0800 (PST)
> > From: eric brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Subject: Install Report from a Linux newbie - some
> > comments
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> > Hello,
> >
> > I tough
Sebastian Ley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Am Di, den 18.11.2003 schrieb Geert Stappers um 11:15:
>
> > > Well, udpkg does not even handle versioned Depends... So as the
> > > situation is now we do only care about names. Hence my proposal would
> > > work. However we should investigate if it wo
Uwe Dippel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Mon, 2003-11-17 at 08:50, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
>
> > Can you select some nic-extra-modules*.udeb package to be installed or
> > are all the net modules allready poulled in?
>
> ??? No understand.
Main-menu has a menu item to install additional
Anton Zinoviev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> By the way, why (most of) the components of the installer are not
> compiled with -Os? Sometimes this makes great difference of sizes.
>
> Anton Zinoviev
Well, once the system is booted and has access to some bigger medium
(cdrom, hd or net) space is
Hi,
I removed discover from the pkg-lists from mips (removed from common,
added to other archs). After that d-i builds fine on mips.
I've tried "make all_images" and "make demo" so far.
demo runs, netboot has to be tried by someone locally.
Building the deb shows the following error:
Err http:/
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi, I've just bought a PowerBook G4 12".
>
> I have downloaded the Beta1 of Sarge NetInst for PowerPC (November 9th)
> and I have got a problem at the beginning of the installation.
>
> I enter Open Firmware, and then boot with:
> boot cd:\\yaboot
>
> And then I ge
Fabio Brito <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm trying to install sarge in a old server, using the new installer.
>
> I'm using the beta1 release and the daily from Nov 15.
>
> The problem is: i can't get the language selection. I get a loop with
> the framebuffer modules. The vga ca
On Wed, Nov 19, 2003 at 12:25:15AM +0100, Robert Millan wrote:
>
> Hi there!
>
> Time to talk a bit about which is going to be the default bootloader for i386
> in next Debian release.
>
> I (as GRUB co-maintainer) have discussed with Jason the possibility of GRUB
> being the default bootloader
Julien TOUCHE <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> what is the status of unattended install with debian-installer ? there
> were some discusions about it some times ago, but there is no
> reference in Howto or TODO.
>
>
> some feature planned ? (or suggested)
> - normal install save to file unattended
[Robert Millan]
> I (as GRUB co-maintainer) have discussed with Jason the possibility
> of GRUB being the default bootloader for i386 in Debian 3.1, and we
> agree that GRUB is now mature enough for that.
Sounds good. I would also use grub as the default. We do it already
in Skolelinux.
> Expec
Hi there!
Time to talk a bit about which is going to be the default bootloader for i386
in next Debian release.
I (as GRUB co-maintainer) have discussed with Jason the possibility of GRUB
being the default bootloader for i386 in Debian 3.1, and we agree that GRUB is
now mature enough for that.
Am Die, den 18.11.2003 schrieb Branden Robinson um 22:53:
> [Please CC me on replies.]
>
> On Tue, Nov 18, 2003 at 06:13:53PM +0100, Gaudenz Steinlin wrote:
> > Unfortunately I can not find the changelog in the pre 2.0.2 tarball on
> > the progeny website. Where can I find it?
>
> Sorry about tha
Steinar H. Gunderson wrote:
I've used d-i quite a lot with automated installation, and I know the
Skolelinux people are using it as well. Customizing d-i for automated
installation is quite easy -- debconf preseeding takes care of almost
everything you need, since most of the bugs related to auto
On Tue, Nov 18, 2003 at 10:05:33PM +0100, Julien TOUCHE wrote:
> what is the status of unattended install with debian-installer ? there
> were some discusions about it some times ago, but there is no reference
> in Howto or TODO.
>
> some feature planned ? (or suggested)
> - normal install save
what is the status of unattended install with debian-installer ? there
were some discusions about it some times ago, but there is no reference
in Howto or TODO.
some feature planned ? (or suggested)
- normal install save to file unattended config (like redhat/fedora,
mandrake)
- fully unattende
Anton Zinoviev wrote:
> By the way, why (most of) the components of the installer are not
> compiled with -Os? Sometimes this makes great difference of sizes.
As far as I know, most are. Do you have any examples that are not?
--
see shy jo
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Package: installation-reports
Version: beta1 / 20031113
INSTALL REPORT
Debian-installer-version: 20031113,
http://http.us.debian.org/debian/dists/unstable/main/installer-i386/20031113/images/
image>
uname -a: N/A
Date: November 18 2003, 21:00
Method: Floppy
Machine: IBM Thinkpad 365XD
Processor:
Hello!
Last week-end, I tried the new debian-installer on my old notebook
without success :
Debian-installer-version:
Beta1 :
http://http.us.debian.org/debian/dists/unstable/main/installer-i386/20031109/images/
Daily build (15/11/03) : http://people.debian.org/~sjogren/d-i/images/daily/
Date:
Your message dated Tue, 18 Nov 2003 14:47:10 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#219558: fixed in autopartkit 0.68
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
Your message dated Tue, 18 Nov 2003 14:47:10 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#221140: fixed in autopartkit 0.68
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
Accepted:
autopartkit_0.68.dsc
to pool/main/a/autopartkit/autopartkit_0.68.dsc
autopartkit_0.68.tar.gz
to pool/main/a/autopartkit/autopartkit_0.68.tar.gz
autopartkit_0.68_i386.udeb
to pool/main/a/autopartkit/autopartkit_0.68_i386.udeb
Announcing to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Closing bugs: 219558 2211
Title: Cannot configure network on sarge install
Package: installation
Version: sarge/testing
Platform is Intel PR440FX, dual PPro 200/512, 2 x Intel i82557 ethernet controllers.
1) Boot Sarge netinstall cd downloaded 11/18/2003.
2) Run through install screens through loading components of
package: Installation-reports
_
Send a QuickGreet with MSN Messenger
http://www.msnmessenger-download.com/tracking/cdp_games
install-report.template
Description: Binary data
[Christian Perrier]
> As discover 1 currently has a FTBFS bug (221302, opened yesterday when
> I tried to build a NMU for it), this is definitely likely.. :-)
Oh. Nto good. NMU required imidiately, I suspect. :)
> But, I guess this switch to discover 2 will occur after sarge
> release ?
I want
--- Paul Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Replying with CC since I'm not sure if Eric is still
> subscribed.
> Eric: You might want to subscribe to debian-boot and
> repost your
> experience there; be sure to reference this thread
> by subjec
Hi all,
I'm trying to install sarge in a old server, using the new installer.
I'm using the beta1 release and the daily from Nov 15.
The problem is: i can't get the language selection. I get a loop with
the framebuffer modules. The vga card is an very old isa non vesa 2.0
compliant.
I've trie
Quoting Petter Reinholdtsen ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> This sounds very good. When will this result in replies regarding the
> patches we have been working on in the d-i team to get it to work with
> d-i. As far as I know, we are now waiting for Progeny to get back to
> us with comments on the patch
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 221447 + d-i patch pending
Bug#221447: russian PO-file translation for debian-installer-utils package
There were no tags set.
Tags added: d-i, patch, pending
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 218208 + pending
Bug#218208: aboot-installer: Debconf templates polishing
Tags were: d-i patch
Warning: Unknown package 'aboot-installer'
Tags added: pending
> tags 218273 + pending
Bug#218273: lilo-installer: Debconf templates polishing
Tags were
By the way, why (most of) the components of the installer are not
compiled with -Os? Sometimes this makes great difference of sizes.
Anton Zinoviev
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
tags 221447 + d-i patch pending
thanks
People, _please_ remember to set the pending tag if you've committed a patch
to CVS but not uploaded the package yet. This is the fifth patch today where
this happens, every one of which means duplicate work (especially when gluck
is slow). :-)
(Other tags,
Hi, I've just bought a PowerBook G4 12".
I have downloaded the Beta1 of Sarge NetInst for PowerPC (November 9th)
and I have got a problem at the beginning of the installation.
I enter Open Firmware, and then boot with:
boot cd:\\yaboot
And then I get:
/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/[EMAIL
On Tue, Nov 18, 2003 at 12:22:33PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
> # ... Lowering debconf priority limit from 'debconf/priority doesn't
> exist' to 'critical'
Sounds like the main-menu bug that was fixed quite recently (giving weird
debconf/priority and lots of other ickyness).
/* Steinar */
--
Homepa
(Sending this in batches of three and three, as BTS seems to get mad at me if
I send to too many at once. :-) )
I've committed most of your template polishing (#218208, #218273, #218342,
#218567, #218884, #220543) to CVS, and the bug reports will be closed when
the respective packages are upload.
(Sending this in batches of three and three, as BTS seems to get mad at me if
I send to too many at once. :-) )
I've committed most of your template polishing (#218208, #218273, #218342,
#218567, #218884, #220543) to CVS, and the bug reports will be closed when
the respective packages are upload.
Chris Tillman wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 17, 2003 at 01:07:48PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > > +- Added ${VERSION} so the version will show in the main menu title
> > >
> > > Template: debian-installer/main-menu
> > > Type: select
> > > Choices: ${MENU}
> > > Default
Please add a changelog entry for these changes.
Also, wouldn't bootfloppy-access be a better name for this?
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Update of /cvs/debian-boot/debian-installer/build/config/type
> In directory gluck:/tmp/cvs-serv4602
>
> Added Files:
> speakup
> Log Message:
> new boot
(Sending this in batches of three and three, as BTS seems to get mad at me if
I send to too many at once. :-) )
I've committed most of your template polishing (#218208, #218273, #218342,
#218567, #218884, #220543) to CVS, and the bug reports will be closed when
the respective packages are upload.
(Sending this in batches of three and three, as BTS seems to get mad at me if
I send to too many at once. :-) )
I've committed most of your template polishing (#218208, #218273, #218342,
#218567, #218884, #220543) to CVS, and the bug reports will be closed when
the respective packages are upload.
- Forwarded message from Jozsef Steger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
From: Jozsef Steger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2003 09:55:49 +0100 (CET)
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Sarge
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.9 required=10.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
version=2.60
Hi Joey!
For
Am Die, den 18.11.2003 schrieb Branden Robinson um 16:43:
> [Please CC me on replies.]
>
> On Tue, Nov 18, 2003 at 04:38:20PM +0100, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
> > [Branden Robinson]
> > > Please feel free to go ahead.
> > >
> > > Progeny is concentrating on Discover 2.x:
> >
> > This sounds ver
On Fri, Nov 14, 2003 at 07:57:22PM +0100, Christian Leimer wrote:
> Hi!
>
>
> I tested powerpc-smp kernel and modules on Umax S900 running sid.
>
> No problem with quik boots fine.
>
> But I miss CONFIG_HIGHMEM to support all ram and the dri module for the
> voodoo3.
Mmm, i had trouble with th
On Mon, 2003-11-17 at 08:50, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> Can you select some nic-extra-modules*.udeb package to be installed or
> are all the net modules allready poulled in?
??? No understand.
Booting that Beta-1 to linux or cdrom freezes completely two seconds
later, whichever parameters I p
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # forgot this one last time :-)
> tags 212920 + d-i
Bug#212920: recovery from failed runs
There were no tags set.
Tags added: d-i
> severity 212920 important
Bug#212920: recovery from failed runs
Severity set to `important'.
> merge 212920 220550
Bug#
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> merge 218606 220550
Bug#218606: debian-installer: debootstrap error during the install
Bug#220550: base-installer: should take into account that deboostrap is not idempotent
Merged 218606 220550.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if
[Please CC me on replies.]
On Tue, Nov 18, 2003 at 04:38:20PM +0100, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
> [Branden Robinson]
> > Please feel free to go ahead.
> >
> > Progeny is concentrating on Discover 2.x:
>
> This sounds very good. When will this result in replies regarding the
> patches we have be
[Branden Robinson]
> Please feel free to go ahead.
>
> Progeny is concentrating on Discover 2.x:
This sounds very good. When will this result in replies regarding the
patches we have been working on in the d-i team to get it to work with
d-i. As far as I know, we are now waiting for Progeny to
On Mon, Nov 17, 2003 at 06:30:56PM +0100, Christian Perrier wrote:
> Well, nothing really happened on these bugs since I opened
> themseveral weeks ago.
[...]
> However, discoiver is used by the debian-installer, so I guess we
> should have it use gettext for debconf templates...and have its
>
On Tue, Nov 18, 2003 at 09:43:17AM -0500, Ed Heaney wrote:
> I am using a Debian GNU/Linux 3.0 r0 "Woody" system disk. I am at the
> step to Partition the disk; and I am stuck at the cfdisk display. I have
> read the man page on cfdisk; and the Instruction Manual at Debian.org;
> but I am stil
I am using a Debian GNU/Linux 3.0 r0 "Woody" system disk. I am at the
step to Partition the disk; and I am stuck at the cfdisk display. I have
read the man page on cfdisk; and the Instruction Manual at Debian.org;
but I am still lost.
My Monitor display:
Disk Drive /dev/hda1
Size 40020664320
Investors: Come see Wall Streets only scale-trading system for blue-chip stocks -
MainScale
We DO NOT TOUT INDIVIDUAL STOCKS - This is an automated, stock-trading system for
blue-chips only
www.mainscale4u.com/?032335
MainScale started on October 1, 2002
Here are the results our investors h
Package: debian-installer-utils
Version: 0.38
This is new/fixed russian translation of po-file ("ru.po" file) for
debian-installer-utils package.
--
Ilgiz Kalmetev
debian-installer-utils_0.38_ru.po
Description: debian-installer-utils_0.38_ru.po
Package: base-config
Version: 1.75
This is new/fixed russian translation of po-file ("ru.po" file) for base-config
package.
--
Ilgiz Kalmetev
base-config_1.75_ru.po
Description: base-config_1.75_ru.po
On Tue, Nov 18, 2003 at 12:25:24AM +0100, Sebastian Ley wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 17, 2003 at 10:27:50PM +, Alastair McKinstry wrote:
>
> > I recommend we insert the question now; if we get bug reports in beta2
> > reporting it as an issue, I will change the kbd-chooser priority.
> >
> > I'm sendi
Am Di, den 18.11.2003 schrieb Geert Stappers um 11:15:
> > Well, udpkg does not even handle versioned Depends... So as the
> > situation is now we do only care about names. Hence my proposal would
> > work. However we should investigate if it would be a good idea to
> > implement version tracking
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 221430 installation-reports
Bug#221430: debian-install "install base system" failure
Warning: Unknown package 'debian-install'
Bug reassigned from package `debian-install' to `installation-reports'.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
On Thu, Nov 13, 2003 at 09:59:53PM +0100, Geert Stappers wrote:
> Package: debian-installer
-- snip --
> Machine: Sun Ultra 5
> Processor: UltraSPARC-IIi 360MHz
-- snip --
> Comments/Problems:
Some items that I/we previous didn't report
>
> The NEWT debconf frontend had a blue cursor on blue bac
On the Subject: Re: Bug#221213: partconf: Uninstallable due to broken depends
On Mon, Nov 17, 2003 at 01:38:32PM +0100, Sebastian Ley wrote:
> Am Mo, den 17.11.2003 schrieb Colin Watson um 13:30:
>
> > > I once proposed that all library udebs should Provide the name of the
> > > "original" librar
On Tue, Nov 18, 2003 at 06:49:32AM +0100, Bastian Blank wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 14, 2003 at 07:26:21PM +, Richard Hirst wrote:
> > Havn't looked closely at this code, but that struct looks like it will
> > end up generating lots of unaligned access traps on ia64, as mem[] will
> > be on a 4 rather
On Fri, Nov 14, 2003 at 12:21:36PM +0100, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> Glenn McGrath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
-- snip --
> >
> > I just attempted to make reduced library uClibc and had some problems
> >
> > # mklibs -d ./tmp -L/usr/i386-linux-uclibc/lib/ ./busybox
> > I: Using ld-uClibc.so
On Mon, Nov 17, 2003 at 10:25:39PM -0700, Chris Tillman wrote:
> You upgraded to _sid_? Not too wise for a newbie. You may
> encounter serious non-newbie-fixable problems. Unfortunately
> there's no 'downgrade' command, so if you've already put some
Well, actually you can, and I've done it on occ
mån 2003-11-17 klockan 18.45 skrev Matt Kraai:
> Howdy,
>
> The daily debian-installer image failed to build on 2003-11-17. I
> think this happened because libparted1.6-0 was not installed.
Indeed, I've fixed this and hopefully today's build should be fine. I
say "should" because I have no idea
1 - 100 of 106 matches
Mail list logo
