On Tue, Nov 18, 2003 at 06:49:32AM +0100, Bastian Blank wrote: > On Fri, Nov 14, 2003 at 07:26:21PM +0000, Richard Hirst wrote: > > Havn't looked closely at this code, but that struct looks like it will > > end up generating lots of unaligned access traps on ia64, as mem[] will > > be on a 4 rather than 8 byte binary. > > please explain why the size of size_t is 4 bytes on your ia64, any ia64 > machine i know have 8 byte.
Sorry for the noise.. I see that s/di_ksize_t/size_t/ was done to fix this problem. > > I'm a little confused, because I > > thought this allocation stuff had been ripped out in favour of plain > > malloc(). > > Not yet, as someone break make demo and therefor the debugging facility. OK, thanks. Richard -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
