Hi,
I have a new Gigabyte K7 Triton motherboard with a 700 mhz amd Duron CPU
and 120 GB master and 40 GB slave Western Digital HDs. I've been trying to
instal Debian on this system, but when I try to instal the base system from
both the net and the cd I get this error message:
failure trying to ru
On Thu, Jul 10, 2003 at 09:32:36AM +0200, Martin Quinson wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 10, 2003 at 12:51:45AM +0200, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
> > [Josip Rodin]
> > > It would seem to me that regardless of anything, we're still waiting
> > > for [EMAIL PROTECTED] to say something...
> >
> > We do? I didn
Package: kbd-chooser
Version: 0.23 (not installed)
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
Hi,
here are 2 patchs. The first one corrects a small error. The second one
makes kbd-chooser handling only console-keymaps-* files. In
maplist_parse_file:374, there is a strlen("console-keymaps-").
thanks for your w
On Sun, Jul 27, 2003 at 10:55:52AM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
> I wonder if this would save any space in the end, since this would
> inflate the size of the control file with all the provides and depends.
Also it needs another dependency parser, which is a little bit more
complex.
Bastian
--
Human
On Sun, 2003-07-27 at 14:57, Eduard Bloch wrote:
> #include
> * Alastair McKinstry [Sun, Jul 27 2003, 02:26:46PM]:
> > As the maintainer of whiptail, I was not aware of this bug, which was
> > filed against modconf. In the current newt package, whiptail and
> > whiptail-utf8 were merged; modconf s
On Sun, Jul 27, 2003 at 10:50:45AM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
> This is why we need some way to call logger in a shell script that does
> not discard return code. I think it can be done using a nasty shell
> function that redirects to a file, but I hope there is a better way, and
> someone is apparent
Blars Blarson wrote:
> Status for different parts of debian-installer. The numbers are
> approximate (as in +/- 50%) and may change in any direction, at any
> time.
>
> [0%] - Not begun
> - Some kind of a mechanism for udebs to declare what parts of
> busybox they need, so we ca
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> @@ -39,7 +38,7 @@
> db_input low hw-detect/module_params || [ $? -eq 30 ]
> db_go
> db_get hw-detect/module_params
> -if modprobe -v "$module" $RET >> /var/log/messages 2>&1 ; then
> +if modprobe -v "$module" $RET 2>&1 | logger -t hw-detect ; then
>
cdebconf-gtk-udeb_0.39_i386.udeb
to pool/main/c/cdebconf/cdebconf-gtk-udeb_0.39_i386.udeb
cdebconf-newt-udeb_0.39_i386.udeb
to pool/main/c/cdebconf/cdebconf-newt-udeb_0.39_i386.udeb
(new) cdebconf-priority_0.39_i386.udeb standard debian-installer
Change debconf priority
This is a udeb that all
#include
* Alastair McKinstry [Sun, Jul 27 2003, 02:26:46PM]:
> As the maintainer of whiptail, I was not aware of this bug, which was
> filed against modconf. In the current newt package, whiptail and
> whiptail-utf8 were merged; modconf seems to work fine for me now.
>
> (There are some minor gr
Umka and Green, do this, and send it to them.
--
Hans
--- Begin Message ---
On Sat, 2003-07-26 at 15:00, Martin Michlmayr - Debian Project Leader
wrote:
> I talked to Hans Reiser at LinuxTag and he was very interested in
> seeing proper reiserfs support integrated in debian-installer. I
> briefly
As the maintainer of whiptail, I was not aware of this bug, which was
filed against modconf. In the current newt package, whiptail and
whiptail-utf8 were merged; modconf seems to work fine for me now.
(There are some minor graphical issues in utf-8 mode, due to an error in
slang, for which a patc
>
> I am not sure, current whiptail looks completely broken, in UTF-8 mode
> as well as with non-UTF-8 locales. If the maintainer does not even
> manage to reply to my bug report, I guess we will have to go back and
> fork a working whiptail-utf8 again.
>
> Just my 0.02¤, still hadn't time to get
#include
* Junichi Uekawa [Sun, Jul 27 2003, 08:15:22AM]:
> tags 191636 + patch
> thanks
>
>
> Hi,
>
> whiptail-utf8 has now become 'whiptail', and so modconf can
> just conflict with older versions of whiptail
>
> Conflicts: whiptail (<< 0.51.4-1)
I am not sure, current whiptail looks comple
Your message dated Sun, 27 Jul 2003 11:41:57 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Threads disabled
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to
On Sat, Jul 26, 2003 at 03:24:49PM +0200, Martin Michlmayr - Debian Project Leader
wrote:
> Most distros these days don't show the boot messages scroll by in text
> mode but have a frame buffer with some nice logos and graphics. Below
> is some information from our kernel maintainer on this. I'm
16 matches
Mail list logo
