Bug#157327: marked as done ([arm/riscstation] segmentation fault in dbootstrap)

2003-03-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 2 Mar 2003 00:22:34 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line problem fixed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reo

Re: m68k, debian-installer, and DevFS

2003-03-01 Thread Nathan E Norman
On Fri, Feb 28, 2003 at 12:00:43AM +0100, Wouter Verhelst wrote: > Hi > > As some of you are already aware, there's a problem wrt m68k in that > there's no decent 2.4 kernel for m68k yet. As such, creating an m68k > debian-installer image that actually works is a bit problematic right > now, since

Re: m68k, debian-installer, and DevFS

2003-03-01 Thread Herbert Xu
Junichi Uekawa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > For example, I have been away from using sparc, but my question would be > "is there much sparc32 kernel hacking going on? Is 2.4.x usable on sparc32?" Architectures that are still having problems with 2.4 should probably be dropped. Since they aren'

Re: Bug#182849: net install - no DHCP after reboot

2003-03-01 Thread topo
> I would ... i will do this new installation tomorrow > Hope I could help! definite, yes :-) thanks Thomas -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: m68k, debian-installer, and DevFS

2003-03-01 Thread Junichi Uekawa
> > But you are right, we should get 2.4 working instead of hacking devfs into > > or out of d-i... > > Sure, but in the mean time we have to make sure there's an installer for > m68k that actually works. Else we could just as well shut down all m68k > buildd's, as it will not be worth it anymore.

Re: Bug#182849: net install - no DHCP after reboot

2003-03-01 Thread Andreas Wüst
Hello Thomas Thomas Pohl wrote: > Moin Martin, > > Martin Sjögren wrote: > >>> i took the Official net install iso-images for the "testing" release Ok, that's the problem! >> installing woody and using apt-get dist-upgrade. >> >> >> > i'm afraid that's the same hint Andreas gave me... Be

Re: Bug#182849: net install - no DHCP after reboot

2003-03-01 Thread Thomas Pohl
Moin Martin, Martin Sjögren wrote: i took the Official net install iso-images for the "testing" release installing woody and using apt-get dist-upgrade. i'm afraid that's the same hint Andreas gave me... so, what should i do: * download CD-Images ? * download inofficial net-install boot imag

Re: Bug#182849: net install - no DHCP after reboot

2003-03-01 Thread Martin Sjögren
lör 2003-03-01 klockan 14.15 skrev Thomas Pohl: > i took the Official net install iso-images for the "testing" release > > http://gluck.debian.org/cdimage/testing/netinst/i386/ > > debian home page propose to try "testing" for workstations, and i > thought new hardware new versions. The pro

Re: Bug#182849: net install - no DHCP after reboot

2003-03-01 Thread Thomas Pohl
Please cc debian-boot, since I am not OK, i put me on the mailing list and checked archive for other answers. 1. download the net boot iso image and burn a boot CD Just a short question: did you download the testing net install image or the stable net install image? i took the Official

Re: a graphical interface for debian-installer

2003-03-01 Thread Sebastian Ley
* Petter Reinholdtsen wrote: > Are these libraries different (different ABI/API) from the ones in > libdirectfb-0.9-16? If they are, I'm interesting in why they are > different, and how they are different. If they are identical, you > probably should use the same file names and sonames for the >

Re: Bug#182849: net install - no DHCP after reboot

2003-03-01 Thread Andreas Wüst
Hello Thomas Please cc debian-boot, since I am not experienced with the net install images, and the people reading -boot are in fact the ones which built those images. Thomas Pohl wrote: > Andreas Wüst wrote: > >> Hi Thomas >> >> Thomas Pohl wrote: >> >> >> >>> Package: install-doc >>> Vers

Re: soname versions in library udebs

2003-03-01 Thread Sebastian Ley
* Petter Reinholdtsen wrote: > > Let us say a new version of libc or libdirectfb enters sid, and > > udebs will be built accordingly. Since they do not have a SONAME > > version, all dependant udebs will be broken because anna will pull > > in the new version of the library via libc-udeb or > > li

Re: TheBase System Installation

2003-03-01 Thread Emile van Bergen
Hi, On Sat, Mar 01, 2003 at 10:48:51AM +0100, Eduard Bloch wrote, in an exceptionally impolite mood: > > file:/instmnt/pool/main/a/adduser/adduser_3.47_all.deb > > was corrupt couldn't download adduser. > > What is so hard to understand this message? Something is going wrong > with your CDRO

Re: m68k, debian-installer, and DevFS

2003-03-01 Thread Wouter Verhelst
Op za 01-03-2003, om 00:16 schreef Petter Reinholdtsen: > [Wouter Verhelst] > > As some of you are already aware, there's a problem wrt m68k in that > > there's no decent 2.4 kernel for m68k yet. As such, creating an m68k > > debian-installer image that actually works is a bit problematic right > >

Re: m68k, debian-installer, and DevFS

2003-03-01 Thread Wouter Verhelst
Op za 01-03-2003, om 05:57 schreef Christian T. Steigies: > But you are right, we should get 2.4 working instead of hacking devfs into > or out of d-i... Sure, but in the mean time we have to make sure there's an installer for m68k that actually works. Else we could just as well shut down all m68k

Re: Bug#182849: net install - no DHCP after reboot

2003-03-01 Thread Andreas Wüst
Hi >3. The kernel you are using isn't compiled with > >CONFIG_PACKET=y and >CONFIG_FILTER=y > >This stuff is needed for the dhcp client to operate AFAIK. Sorry, of course you can also have them built as a module, but then you also have to have them installed.

Re: debian-installer status 2003-02-21

2003-03-01 Thread Martin Sjögren
ons 2003-02-26 klockan 15.08 skrev Martin Quinson: > On Sat, Feb 22, 2003 at 11:32:36AM +0100, Tollef Fog Heen wrote: > > * Larry Gilbert > > > > | Tollef Fog Heen wrote: > > | > Also, having somebody with a good touch for English to go > > | > through the templates would be nice. > > | > >

Re: TheBase System Installation

2003-03-01 Thread Eduard Bloch
#include * Bernard & Jean Dale [Sat, Mar 01 2003, 06:58:10PM]: > I've tried a number of times to install 3.0r0 from a set of 7 cd's > purchased over the internet but before the first installation cd has > finished I'm advised that it is unable to install the base system. > file:/instmnt/pool/m

Re: TheBase System Installation

2003-03-01 Thread Emile van Bergen
Dear mr. Dale, On Sat, Mar 01, 2003 at 06:58:10PM +1000, Bernard & Jean Dale wrote: > I've tried a number of times to install 3.0r0 from a set of 7 cd's > purchased over the internet but before the first installation cd has > finished I'm advised that it is unable to install the base system. > fi

Re: udeb priority issues

2003-03-01 Thread Emile van Bergen
Hi, On Sat, Mar 01, 2003 at 10:15:58AM +0100, Martin Sjögren wrote: > lör 2003-03-01 klockan 09.08 skrev Emile van Bergen: > > Hi, > > > > On Fri, Feb 28, 2003 at 10:00:24PM +0100, Martin Sjögren wrote: > > > > > fre 2003-02-28 klockan 21.22 skrev Emile van Bergen: > > > > I mean, "tasksel"?! N

RE: TheBase System Installation

2003-03-01 Thread David Turetsky
Someone else will be better equipped to reply to your specific issue, but I wanted to give you feedback that I have successfully installed 3.0r1 (rev 1) from 7 CD’s (mostly done with the 1st CD) without such difficulties, so you may want to persist   If you’ve only recently purchased you

Re: debian-installer status 2003-02-21

2003-03-01 Thread Martin Quinson
On Sat, Feb 22, 2003 at 11:32:36AM +0100, Tollef Fog Heen wrote: > * Larry Gilbert > > | Tollef Fog Heen wrote: > | > Also, having somebody with a good touch for English to go > | > through the templates would be nice. > | > | I wouldn't mind helping with this, but I can't seem to figure out

Re: udeb priority issues

2003-03-01 Thread Martin Sjögren
lör 2003-03-01 klockan 09.08 skrev Emile van Bergen: > Hi, > > On Fri, Feb 28, 2003 at 10:00:24PM +0100, Martin Sjögren wrote: > > > fre 2003-02-28 klockan 21.22 skrev Emile van Bergen: > > > I mean, "tasksel"?! No offense, but I highly doubt that a sane installer > > > really needs something lik

TheBase System Installation

2003-03-01 Thread Bernard & Jean Dale
Hi Guys,   I've tried a number of times to install 3.0r0 from a set of 7 cd's purchased over the internet but before the first installation cd has finished I'm advised that it is unable to install the base system.     file:/instmnt/pool/main/a/adduser/adduser_3.47_all.deb was corrupt couldn'

Re: udeb priority issues

2003-03-01 Thread Emile van Bergen
Hi, On Fri, Feb 28, 2003 at 10:00:24PM +0100, Martin Sjögren wrote: > fre 2003-02-28 klockan 21.22 skrev Emile van Bergen: > > I mean, "tasksel"?! No offense, but I highly doubt that a sane installer > > really needs something like tasksel to select which installer modules > > should be downloade