Re: not i18ned part in b-f 2.2.15

Adam Di Carlo wrote: > Is there any way to i18n the forked (potato) debconf? Yes of course. And I know from experience it means touching every file in the package, and writing at least 200 lines of code. -- see shy jo -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscri

Re: Can't Write To Temporary User Settings Files During Install

"A. Scott White" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I don't mean to be a pain in the @ss, but I really need to get this server > installed and I'm completely baffled as to how I should proceed. If anyone > has any answers to the quandary described below, I would certainly > appreciate your input. > >

Re: not i18ned part in b-f 2.2.15

Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Akira YOSHIYAMA wrote: > > On Mon, 10 Jul 2000 20:20:59 -0700 > > Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > Unfortunatly, the debconf in frozen has known very serious problems if > > > it is used with i18n enabled. It basically doesn't work at all. Of

Re: not i18ned part in b-f 2.2.15

Taketoshi Sano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Akira sent me his initial draft for the wrapper script. Here it is: [...] > Maybe Chinese and Korean people can use the scheme by adding > their setup in "case $LANG in". > > If this can be used, then I propose to put this into CVS > as scripts/rootd

Re: bugs 64500 and 64823

On Sat, Jul 15, 2000 at 03:39:30PM -0400, Adam Di Carlo wrote: > I don't think either should hold up potato release, IMHO. Then they're not release critical, and as such they've both been downgraded. Cheers, aj -- Anthony Towns <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> I don't spea

Processed: downgrade

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 64823 normal Bug#64823: incorrect LILO automatic placement on i386 Severity set to `normal'. > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Darren Benham (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To

Processed: downgrade

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 64500 normal Bug#64500: subject boot-floppies don't want to install kernel & modules on ppc/apus. Severity set to `normal'. > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Darren Benham (administrator,

Processed: Re: Bug#66963: boot-floppies: The installation program has a bug creating a new account.

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reassign 66963 base-config Bug#66963: boot-floppies: The installation program has a bug creating a new account. Bug reassigned from package `boot-floppies' to `base-config'. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance.

Re: FWD: Re: Bug#66760: xviddetect fails to figure out driver for DECchip 21030 TGA

Randolph Chung <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > what do you guys think (about the bug severity)? -randolph I don't think it should hold up potato but I think it would be nice to get in for a point release. -- .Adam Di [EMAIL PROTECTED]http://www.onShore.com/> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [E

Re: problem in installation

"sravikumar" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > HELLO > WE ARE FACING THE PROBLEM IN THE INSTALLATION OF DEBIAN 2.1 ON COMPAQ > SERVER ML350. > > THE CONFIGURATION WE ARE USING IS GIVEN BELOW > > COMPAQ SERVER ML350 > MEMORY 256 MB > CPU PIII 600 MHZ > BUILT IN SCSI COMPAQ CARD ( NCR53C896) > RAID

Re: FWD: debian install manual and y2k...

> the date on the front page of the 2.2 install manual has 1990 as the > year... shome mishtake shurely? Which file has that date on it? -- .Adam Di [EMAIL PROTECTED]http://www.onShore.com/> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact

Bug#67173: Bootfloppies and SMC Ether EZ nonrecognition

Please test with 2.2.16 boot-floppies and report success or failure. If you still have failure, more information is needed: - what kernel output is generated if any when you try to get the module loaded? - are you able to load the module manually, i.e., from tty2? - what kernel set are

Re: bugs 64500 and 64823

Anthony Towns <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Hello world, > > After installing b-f 2.2.16, 64500 and 64823 still seem to be > open. Are these RC? Are they already fixed? Do they require a 2.2.17 be > built? What's the deal? Regarding 64500, there aren't a lot of powerpc/apus users, and the ones

Re: Trouble with the debian2.1 rescue

Can you tell us which kernel you are using? You probably should be using either the vanilla one or else the 'compact' flavor of the 2.2.16 series boot floppies. If this still does not work, you'll have to file a bug against the package 'kernel-image-2.2.17' or 'kernel-image-2.2.17-compact' . -

Re: need major help- RESCUE and ROOT disks

Exodous <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I would really appreciate if someone told me on how to do this exactly > (step by step) from making a rescue disk and a rootfs disk I don't believe we support 2.4 or 2.3.x kernels since there are chagnes in the loop stuff which makes the system unusable. So

Re: Boot-floppies: Why depends on "cslatex", "cspsfonts"

Sven LUTHER <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Tue, Jul 11, 2000 at 01:38:02PM +0200, Petr Cech wrote: > > On Tue, Jul 11, 2000 at 11:07:24AM +0200 , Otto Wyss wrote: > > > or suggests, if not removed at all? > > > > Probably recommends for the documentation "depends" should be enough, no? Why? Do

Re: Boot diskettes for an IBM RS/6000 43P-140

"Fore, Frank P [Recruit Dynamics International]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I just acquired an IBM RS/6000 43P-140 (166mhz) for which I have no > software. I would like to install Linux on this system. Could someone > please direct me on where to get boot floppies (or bootable CD-ROM) for th

Bug#67118: base system does not contain /var/log/btmp

laurent bonnaud <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > the base system in 2.2.15-2000-06-07/base2_2.tgz does contain /var/log/wtmp, > but it does not contain /var/log/btmp. Adding this file has two advantages: > > - it is probably better from a security point of view > - logrotate tries to rotate it (

Re: Hardware detection projects

How is going this project? I want to help. Is there a mailing-list? Some alpha-code to play? Quoting Dan Shearer ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > On Sun, 21 May 2000, Wichert Akkerman wrote: > > > Previously Dan Shearer wrote: > > > I very much want to see this done in conjunction with the

Re: tasksel problem

> Gah, this is really nasty. Suppose you want to have a task package that > provides a mail server. This is hypothetically possible, I can think of > a couple of reasons like task-laptop might want to set you up with some > trivial mail server. > > So tasksel runs, and because it was passed -i,