Sent from my iPhone my husband and my
On Mon, 2007-02-26 at 23:07:28 +, Wookey wrote:
> On 2007-02-22 18:47 +0200, Guillem Jover wrote:
> Well spotted. That is indeed the offending bit. dpkg-architecture now seems
> to give the right answers.
Perfect!
> That has revealed that dpkg-cross needed armel support, which I've done,
> bu
On 2007-02-22 18:47 +0200, Guillem Jover wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, 2007-02-22 at 15:33:35 +, ext Wookey wrote:
> > On 2007-02-14 04:00 +, Wookey wrote:
> > > On 2007-01-10 23:06 +0200, Guillem Jover wrote:
> > > > > The first candidate is dpkg. Guillem Jover's patch available here:
> > > >
Hi,
On Thu, 2007-02-22 at 15:33:35 +, ext Wookey wrote:
> On 2007-02-14 04:00 +, Wookey wrote:
> > On 2007-01-10 23:06 +0200, Guillem Jover wrote:
> > > > The first candidate is dpkg. Guillem Jover's patch available here:
> > > >
> > > > http://lists.debian.org/debian-embedded/20
On 2007-02-14 04:00 +, Wookey wrote:
> On 2007-01-10 23:06 +0200, Guillem Jover wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > > The first candidate is dpkg. Guillem Jover's patch available here:
> > >
> > > http://lists.debian.org/debian-embedded/2006/05/msg00032.html
> >
> > Now that I've opened dpkg's trunk f
On 2007-01-10 23:06 +0200, Guillem Jover wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, 2007-01-10 at 17:11:23 +0100, Lennert Buytenhek wrote:
> > More and more VFP-supporting CPUs are coming out lately, and it would
> > be nice to be able to use VFP on them in a sane way. The existing
> > Debian EABI efforts have bee
* Daniel Jacobowitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-01-20 23:12]:
> I'd really recommend...
>
> > blah.F90: In function 'specific__mod_i8':
> > blah.F90:5: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault
> > Please submit a full bug report,
> > with preprocessed source if appropriate.
> > See http://gcc.gnu
I'd really recommend...
On Fri, Jan 19, 2007 at 10:17:27PM +0100, Lennert Buytenhek wrote:
> blah.F90: In function 'specific__mod_i8':
> blah.F90:5: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault
> Please submit a full bug report,
> with preprocessed source if appropriate.
> See http://gcc.gnu.org/bu
On Fri, Jan 12, 2007 at 02:01:28AM +0100, Lennert Buytenhek wrote:
> gcc currently segfaults (not ICEs, but segfaults) when natively
> building libfortran. This needs looking into.
This is a minimal test case that crashes the fortran compiler (seen
when building "../../../src/libgfortran/generat
2007/1/13, Lennert Buytenhek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Yay. What armv4t hardware are you using?
That's an iPAQ h1940 with samsung S3C2410, a 233MHz arm920t.
gcc support for Crunch kind of sucks.
Well, there will be loads of developers wanting it to work well now,
which is maybe what it needed...
On Sat, Jan 13, 2007 at 12:39:52PM +, Martin Guy wrote:
> >
> > http://armel.applieddata.net/developers/linux/eabi/armel-root-fs.tar.bz2
>
> Excellent. Works perfectly for me on real armv4t hardware with no FPU
> (using the angstrom EABI kernel)
Yay. What armv4t hardware are you usi
2007/1/12, Lennert Buytenhek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
http://armel.applieddata.net/developers/linux/eabi/armel-root-fs.tar.bz2
Excellent. Works perfectly for me on real armv4t hardware with no FPU
(using the angstrom EABI kernel)
Code speed/size comparison compared to old ABI using lame to
On Wed, Jan 10, 2007 at 08:43:12PM +0100, Lennert Buytenhek wrote:
> > > I can't share the debs yet (internal and customer use only for now),
> >
> > Is publishing estimated how soon?
>
> I hope soon, but I can't say yet, and I'm not the one deciding this.
> In my opinion, it's only fair that th
On Wed, Jan 10, 2007 at 10:32:39PM +0100, Lennert Buytenhek wrote:
> It it maps arm-linux-gnu to arm-linux, what should arm-linux-gnueabi
> be mapped to? arm-linux as well? or arm-linux-eabi?
FWIW, config.sub canonicalizes arm-linuxeabi to arm-linux-gnueabi.
--
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery
On Wed, Jan 10, 2007 at 11:06:27PM +0200, Guillem Jover wrote:
> > changes DEB_HOST_GNU_{SYSTEM,TYPE} to have -gnueabi at the end. I've
> > found that this doesn't work too well.
>
> GNU_{SYSTEM,TYPE} map to the gnu triplet stuff, so whatever is in
> there should be in those variables, and those
Hi,
On Wed, 2007-01-10 at 17:11:23 +0100, Lennert Buytenhek wrote:
> More and more VFP-supporting CPUs are coming out lately, and it would
> be nice to be able to use VFP on them in a sane way. The existing
> Debian EABI efforts have been taking a while, so November 24 last year
> I started worki
On Wed, Jan 10, 2007 at 08:12:48PM +0100, Lennert Buytenhek wrote:
> Is that something you can share? I have some dual-core Intel h/w I'd
> like to try this on. The xsc3 core doesn't implement all of the v6 ISA
> (v5te only), but does have the standard set of ARMv6 memory barriers.
>
> [ In theo
On Wed, Jan 10, 2007 at 02:41:15PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
> Not using the official name is kinda worrying, if you ask me.
Would it be an idea if we had DEB_BUILD_GNU_SYSTEM as usual, e.g.:
DEB_BUILD_GNU_SYSTEM=linux-gnu
but set DEB_BUILD_GNU_TYPE to this?
DEB_BUILD_GNU_TYPE=ar
On Wed, Jan 10, 2007 at 07:36:29PM +0200, Riku Voipio wrote:
> > I can't share the debs yet (internal and customer use only for now),
>
> Is publishing estimated how soon?
I hope soon, but I can't say yet, and I'm not the one deciding this.
In my opinion, it's only fair that the people who paid
Martin Guy wrote:
> Nokia did this:
> http://cluster.aleph1.co.uk/~martin/packages/dpkg.txt
>
> It's a bit gross having to add "case *-gnueabi)" here and there but
> that is the correct four-part GNU/autotools configuration name. It may
> be that making it -linux-gnu the same as the old one could
On Wed, Jan 10, 2007 at 02:06:49PM -0500, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> > The SMP board that Wookey had? I don't really see why you'd use a
> > board like that for building? Two or three n2100s are cheaper and a
> > lot faster than some SMP quad 80MHz board. Also consider that ARM
> > SMP is still
On Wed, Jan 10, 2007 at 07:44:54PM +0100, Lennert Buytenhek wrote:
> The SMP board that Wookey had? I don't really see why you'd use a
> board like that for building? Two or three n2100s are cheaper and a
> lot faster than some SMP quad 80MHz board. Also consider that ARM
> SMP is still experime
'real' debs, built natively from an EABI ARM root filesystem with a
packaged gcc and a packaged libc6 and with all build-deps satisfied.)
Brill! If I had a hat I'd eat it :)
No, vanilla unpatched glibc 2.3.6 doesn't do EABI. That's pretty
well-known.
Yep, that was the story last April. We we
On Wed, Jan 10, 2007 at 06:20:09PM +, Martin Guy wrote:
> >I started working on a from-scratch EABI port, sponsored by Applied
> >Data Systems (http://www.applieddata.net/) Six and a half weeks later,
> >there's about 6000 debs built, and so far it all seems to work pretty
> >well.
>
> Great
2007/1/10, Lennert Buytenhek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
I started working on a from-scratch EABI port, sponsored by Applied
Data Systems (http://www.applieddata.net/) Six and a half weeks later,
there's about 6000 debs built, and so far it all seems to work pretty
well.
Great news! We are up to all
On Wed, Jan 10, 2007 at 05:11:23PM +0100, Lennert Buytenhek wrote:
> More and more VFP-supporting CPUs are coming out lately, and it would
> be nice to be able to use VFP on them in a sane way. The existing
> Debian EABI efforts have been taking a while, so November 24 last year
> I started workin
Can [EMAIL PROTECTED] please be unsubscribed from the list as he is
looping all mailing list email back to the list (as he was also doing
with the linux kernel mailing list and got kicked off the list for
that a while ago)?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubsc
Lennert Buytenhek wrote:
Two thecus n2100 kindly donated and hosted by Applied Data Systems,
one thecus n2100 kindly donated by Thecus, and one Intel IQ81342EX
dual-core 800MHz iop342-with-512K-L2-cache-per-cpu-core-and-ddr2-ram
evaluation board kindly donated by Intel.
So *now* we know wh
On Wed, Jan 10, 2007 at 04:53:01PM +, Wookey wrote:
> > More and more VFP-supporting CPUs are coming out lately, and it would
> > be nice to be able to use VFP on them in a sane way. The existing
> > Debian EABI efforts have been taking a while, so November 24 last year
> > I started working
On 2007-01-10 16:53 +, Wookey wrote:
> On 2007-01-10 17:11 +0100, Lennert Buytenhek wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> Does that build for you natively?
I forgot to say, it cross-builds OK, but we are trying an
eat-your-own-dogfood approach in order to find probs like this.
Wookey
--
Aleph One Ltd, Bott
On 2007-01-10 17:11 +0100, Lennert Buytenhek wrote:
> Hi,
>
> More and more VFP-supporting CPUs are coming out lately, and it would
> be nice to be able to use VFP on them in a sane way. The existing
> Debian EABI efforts have been taking a while, so November 24 last year
> I started working on a
Hi,
More and more VFP-supporting CPUs are coming out lately, and it would
be nice to be able to use VFP on them in a sane way. The existing
Debian EABI efforts have been taking a while, so November 24 last year
I started working on a from-scratch EABI port, sponsored by Applied
Data Systems (http
32 matches
Mail list logo
