On 2007-02-22 18:47 +0200, Guillem Jover wrote: > Hi, > > On Thu, 2007-02-22 at 15:33:35 +0000, ext Wookey wrote: > > On 2007-02-14 04:00 +0000, Wookey wrote: > > > On 2007-01-10 23:06 +0200, Guillem Jover wrote: > > > > > The first candidate is dpkg. Guillem Jover's patch available here: > > > > > > > > > > http://lists.debian.org/debian-embedded/2006/05/msg00032.html > > > > > > > > Now that I've opened dpkg's trunk for 1.14 (targetted for lenny), I'll > > > > be appliying a cleaner version of the patch, those versions will be > > > > going to experimental for now. > > > > > > I've rebased this patch for dpkg 1.13.25 and it seems to work OK. (I'm > > > currently building an emdebian armel cross-toolchain with it.) > > For some reason I failed to see this previous mail with the patch. Now > skimming over it I see that at least the arch.m4 change is wrong, it > should not be needed anymore, would have to check the rest.
Well spotted. That is indeed the offending bit. dpkg-architecture now seems to give the right answers. That has revealed that dpkg-cross needed armel support, which I've done, but that raises some questions about definitive arch-names, and dpkg-architecture -L. I'll post another mail about that. And that reveals some problems in the existing gcc-4.1-4.1.1ds2 patch (armel/armeb are used as a CPU name in rules.def, but they aren't so the wrong things try to get built). I've fixed that, and will post all three patches once a finished cross-compiler pops out with no further probs. > Unfortunately I'll not go to FOSDEM this year. There was no Lennert either (SFAICS). Despite these lacks it was still excellent. Wookey -- Aleph One Ltd, Bottisham, CAMBRIDGE, CB5 9BA, UK Tel +44 (0) 1223 811679 work: http://www.aleph1.co.uk/ play: http://wookware.org/ -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
