Hi, On Thu, 2007-02-22 at 15:33:35 +0000, ext Wookey wrote: > On 2007-02-14 04:00 +0000, Wookey wrote: > > On 2007-01-10 23:06 +0200, Guillem Jover wrote: > > > > The first candidate is dpkg. Guillem Jover's patch available here: > > > > > > > > http://lists.debian.org/debian-embedded/2006/05/msg00032.html > > > > > > Now that I've opened dpkg's trunk for 1.14 (targetted for lenny), I'll > > > be appliying a cleaner version of the patch, those versions will be > > > going to experimental for now. > > > > I've rebased this patch for dpkg 1.13.25 and it seems to work OK. (I'm > > currently building an emdebian armel cross-toolchain with it.)
For some reason I failed to see this previous mail with the patch. Now skimming over it I see that at least the arch.m4 change is wrong, it should not be needed anymore, would have to check the rest. > > I can't see this filed as a bug/patch for dpkg (but there are an awful > > lot, so I may have missed it), so I'll do that unless someone shouts > > that there is a better plan imminent, or that this has in fact already > > been done. No, it's not there, it's on my TODO list anyway. > After doing some testing I found that in fact there is a bug. > dpkg-architecture for i386 gives the Build arch and host differently: > DEB_BUILD_ARCH=linux-i386 > DEB_HOST_ARCH=i386 > which stops dpkg installing anything on the build machine. > This is probably my fault rather than Guillem's, but needs fixing > before it can go upstream. > I shall try and fix this on the way to fosdem, and if I can't, hope > Guillem is there to explain it all to me :-) Unfortunately I'll not go to FOSDEM this year, but I can forward port the patch even if it's not going to be the defeinitive version merged into svn. regards, guillem -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
