ier to install on atari. If anyone is interested, there are
some preliminary patches floating around I can point you to.
Peace,
Stephen
--
Stephen R. Marenka If life's not fun, you're not doing it right!
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
ouch parted with a ten foot pole. Bloatware,
> buggy. But I can look over the patches.
It's what d-i uses and that's what's keeping atari from being fully
supported in d-i. Once that's working, I can hopefully test more d-i
stuff with aranym (my devious plan).
The patches are in svn at
and in a tarball at
<http://people.debian.org/~smarenka/d-i/atari-parted.tar.bz2>.
Thanks,
Stephen
--
Stephen R. Marenka If life's not fun, you're not doing it right!
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
ux-2.6.21-1-mac
--
Stephen R. Marenka If life's not fun, you're not doing it right!
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Wed, May 16, 2007 at 11:09:55PM +0200, Christian T. Steigies wrote:
> On Wed, May 16, 2007 at 02:36:50PM -0500, Stephen R Marenka wrote:
> > On Wed, May 16, 2007 at 01:53:34PM +0200, Christian T. Steigies wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > > I finally managed to build 2.6.21 for
On Wed, May 16, 2007 at 02:36:50PM -0500, Stephen R Marenka wrote:
> On Wed, May 16, 2007 at 01:53:34PM +0200, Christian T. Steigies wrote:
> > Hi,
> > I finally managed to build 2.6.21 for m68k, images are available for testing
> > from here:
> >
> > http://
Looking at 425011, I found that the following patch will allow gcc-4.1.2
to compile. Does it make sense? (No idea, I was just looking at what
other archs did.)
Thanks,
Stephen
--
Stephen R. Marenka If life's not fun, you're not doing it right!
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- ffi.
On Mon, May 21, 2007 at 02:20:20PM +0200, Roman Zippel wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sun, 20 May 2007, Stephen R Marenka wrote:
>
> > Looking at 425011, I found that the following patch will allow gcc-4.1.2
> > to compile. Does it make sense? (No idea, I was just looking at
Do amiga and atari use at keymaps for 2.6 kernels? I'm trying to cleanup
some d-i stuff.
Thanks,
Stephen
--
Stephen R. Marenka If life's not fun, you're not doing it right!
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
itrd (d-i daily cdrom from 05-07), 2.6.21-4
and 2.6.21-2 end up with corrupted video. 2.6.18-12 gives no video
whatsoever. It seems like my config is screwy (or maybe my initrd :).
Configs attached. Ideas welcome.
Thanks,
Stephen
--
Stephen R. Marenka If life's not fun, you're no
As an additional datapoint, a 2.4.27 I had laying around, boots to the
prompt with the initrd.
Thanks,
Stephen
--
Stephen R. Marenka If life's not fun, you're not doing it right!
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
build the package with itself (although this will
> be done with the next uploads anyway).
I see the listmasters have straightened this message out. I'm building
gcj-4.1 on vivaldi.
Peace,
Stephen
--
Stephen R. Marenka If life's not fun, you're not doing it right!
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
working on it. Otherwise it works
pretty well.
--
Stephen R. Marenka If life's not fun, you're not doing it right!
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
n build a new package just like the old one before I
try messing around with it.
That or I follow what the maintainer did in debian/rules for
binary-arch.
hth,
Stephen
--
Stephen R. Marenka If life's not fun, you're not doing it right!
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Mon, Jun 11, 2007 at 02:16:45PM +0200, Petr Stehlik wrote:
> how about "apt-get build-dep iptables" ?
The obvious answer is also good. :)
Perhaps best if I wait to answer mail until after the first cup of
coffee!
Thanks,
Stephen
--
Stephen R. Marenka If life's n
I noticed that #300730 is still open, can someone with a CT-60 verify if
this is true with debian atari-bootstrap (same version in sarge and
later)?
<http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=300730>
Thanks,
Stephen
--
Stephen R. Marenka If life's not fun, you're no
bin/ld: final link failed: Nonrepresentable section on output
collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
--
Stephen R. Marenka If life's not fun, you're not doing it right!
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Mon, Jun 11, 2007 at 05:35:02PM -0500, Stephen R Marenka wrote:
This
> /usr/bin/ld: final link failed: Nonrepresentable section on output
reminds me of this from xulrunner.
gcc -Wall -W -Wno-unused -Wpointer-arith -Wcast-align -Wno-long-long
-Wall -pipe -pthread -pipe -DNDEBUG -DTRIM
0070426-3_m68k.deb
> binutils_2.17cvs20070426-6_m68k.deb
> binutils_2.17cvs20070426-8_m68k.deb
I have 2.17-3 and 2.17cvs20070426-8. Can you put the others where I can
grab them?
Thanks,
Stephen
--
Stephen R. Marenka If life's not fun, you're not doing it right!
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Mon, Jun 11, 2007 at 05:35:02PM -0500, Stephen R Marenka wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ cat hello.c
> void main(void)
> {
> printf("Hello world\n");
> }
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ gcc -pie hello.c
> hello.c: In function 'main':
> hello.c:3
seems to have upgraded gcc and there has been a
newer binutils since then. Could also be a distcc thing.
We have quite a few self-test failures going on right now, so I didn't
spend a lot of time on it.
Peace,
Stephen
--
Stephen R. Marenka If life's not fun, you're not doin
initrd (some sort of framebuffer thing), but it works fine
booting a disk image. I haven't had success with the 2.6.21 kernels:
2.6.21-1-02 doesn't have ethernet and 04 hangs at scsi probing.
hth,
Stephen
--
Stephen R. Marenka If life's not fun, you're not doing it right
.
Thanks,
Stephen
--
Stephen R. Marenka If life's not fun, you're not doing it right!
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
I wonder if this is related to 427990, a pie problem on hppa?
--
Stephen R. Marenka If life's not fun, you're not doing it right!
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
else has a better idea (ska still couldn't run >2.4 last time I
> tried; but that's been about a year ago, so it might work today)
>
> That's about it for now, I guess. Enjoy,
Sweet!
Thanks,
Stephen
--
Stephen R. Marenka If life's not fun, you're not doing it right!
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Mon, Jun 18, 2007 at 06:21:41PM +0200, Michael Schmitz wrote:
> We can try to build a pre-2.17cvs version on sid, right? I'll try that on
> washi ...
That's the conclusion I came to also.
It looks like from #428582 that the xulrunner problem might be gcc.
Thanks,
Stephe
On Mon, Jun 18, 2007 at 07:45:37PM +0200, Bill Allombert wrote:
> Hello 68k porters,
>
> It seems menu 2.1.34 has built successfully on crest but has never been
> uploaded.
Signed log on its way.
Peace,
Stephen
--
Stephen R. Marenka If life's not fun, you're not d
be
added to etch. At the moment we don't even have a list of how etch-m68k
differs from etch and etch-security.
Peace,
Stephen
--
Stephen R. Marenka If life's not fun, you're not doing it right!
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
; ?
I'm told that all you need to do is upload them with dist=etch-m68k.
Since we have neither a proposed-updates nor a security distribution, I
think we should shove them all in etch-m68k and be done with it.
If you're willing to start building and uploading, that would be great.
Thanks,
S
.0.3-7
> Should I upload them ? If yes, how should I proceed ?
If dist=etch-m68k, then you should be able to sign and upload normally.
I don't know if anyone has actually tried it yet.
--
Stephen R. Marenka If life's not fun, you're not doing it right!
<[EMAIL PROTECTED
On Tue, Jun 19, 2007 at 04:43:01PM +0100, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 18, 2007 at 10:33:26AM -0500, Stephen R Marenka wrote:
> > On Mon, Jun 18, 2007 at 03:30:46PM +0100, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> > > Also, I/we've been asked to start building for oldstable (&#x
r that (specifying the release to
> > generate .changes files for).
>
> So there is no etch-m68k-proposed-updates ? Packages go straight
> to etch-m68k without manual operations ?
Yes. Yes (perhaps subject to NEW).
> No objection if I try to upload some packages I have buil
On Tue, Jun 19, 2007 at 10:13:34PM +0200, Bill Allombert wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 18, 2007 at 01:44:58PM -0500, Stephen R Marenka wrote:
> > On Mon, Jun 18, 2007 at 07:45:37PM +0200, Bill Allombert wrote:
> > > Hello 68k porters,
> > >
> > > It seems menu 2.1.34
binary-upload, since there are no trace of the
> old packages.
I'm seeing a bunch of rejects from oldstable building. I don't know if
it's related.
--
Stephen R. Marenka If life's not fun, you're not doing it right!
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Maybe it's
> a gcc thing after all.
glibc thing?
Should we try building glibc with the latest gcc/binutils?
--
Stephen R. Marenka If life's not fun, you're not doing it right!
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
ild etch-m68k.
-%main::dist_order = ( 'oldstable-security' => 0, stable => 1,
'stable-security' => 1, testing => 2, 'testing-security' => 2, unstable
=> 3 );
+%main::dist_order = ( oldstable => 0, 'oldstable-security' => 0, stable
=> 1,
r things (five are dep-wait right now).
I think xulrunner can be installed manually though. (And I'm currently
building gcj-4.1 on vivaldi.)
Pick one, I guess.
--
Stephen R. Marenka If life's not fun, you're not doing it right!
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
This probably doesn't have any relevance, however it seems that fortran
segfaults when building r-base, except on akire, which may be the only
buildd still running a 2.4 kernel. I probably need to validate this with
aranym.
Unfortunately, -pie is still a problem.
--
Stephen R. Marenka
attribute_hidden;
> extern void (*__fini_array_end []) (void) attribute_hidden;
>
> so it would appear our binutils are to blame? Or gcc?
Got me. Maybe Roman knows?
--
Stephen R. Marenka If life's not fun, you're not doing it right!
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Thu, Jun 21, 2007 at 01:00:43AM +0200, Bill Allombert wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 20, 2007 at 07:25:53AM -0500, Stephen R Marenka wrote:
> > > For the time being I am using 'sbuild -d stable' and I edit the .changes
> > > file manually.
> >
> > Do you ha
On Thu, Jun 21, 2007 at 11:12:07AM +0200, Bill Allombert wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 19, 2007 at 06:38:50PM -0500, Stephen R Marenka wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 19, 2007 at 10:13:34PM +0200, Bill Allombert wrote:
> > > On Mon, Jun 18, 2007 at 01:44:58PM -0500, Stephen R Marenka wrote:
>
the kernel, but I am not sure. It would be great
> though, if you, or somebody else, could offer a fix for it...
396220 has been around for almost a year. Before that the problem was
fixdep in 342248. I don't seem to generate this file for any of my
kernels, so I don't even know what i
le-security and oldstable are being built by zeus and poseidon,
at least.
Thanks!
Stephen
--
Stephen R. Marenka If life's not fun, you're not doing it right!
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
m68k seems to have about 40 packages sitting in state uploaded from on
or before June 11. [0]
I'd appreciate it if you can let us know if there's anything we can do
to get those installed.
Thanks,
Stephen
[0] <http://buildd.debian.org/~jeroen/status/architecture.php?a=m68k>
On Mon, Jun 25, 2007 at 06:08:59PM +0100, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 23, 2007 at 08:50:41PM -0500, Stephen R Marenka wrote:
> > On Sat, Jun 23, 2007 at 11:30:34PM +0200, Bill Allombert wrote:
> > > Hello m68k porters,
> > >
> > > I have build all etc
s. Christian can bring garkin back soon I
> hope.
The oldstable buildds have a wanna-buildd database on buildd.debian.org,
etch-m68k and etch-m68k-security don't. buildd can handle that, it can't
handle multiple wanna-buildd databases on different servers (now that
I'm thinking
answers why crest never seems to be caught up on logs
these days. I dropped Adam an email a while back, but I never heard from
him. I suppose that means a4000t is gone for good too?
I think one of us needs to become primary on crest. Any volunteers? :)
--
Stephen R. Marenka If life's not f
afaik.
Someone else should probably have an account on akire besides
Adam. Any takers?
hostname: akire.buildd.net (akire.smurf.noris.de)
architecture: m68k
buildd admin: Stephen R Marenka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
local admin: Matthias Urlichs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
configured suites: unstab
Building debian-installer under sarge has problems because of a
segfaulting w3m. If I read the thread right from last time, we need
either a box running a 2.4 kernel or an atari and a sarge (oldstable)
chroot.
I'll fire up aranym if nothing else.
Thanks,
Stephen
--
Stephen R. Marenka
On Wed, Jul 11, 2007 at 07:51:28PM +0200, Luk Claes wrote:
> Luk Claes wrote:
> > Stephen R Marenka wrote:
> >> On Thu, Jun 28, 2007 at 11:24:09AM +0200, Michael Schmitz wrote:
> >>
> >>> hostname: crest.debian.org aka crest.biophys.uni-duesseldorf.de
> &
. Any advice?
> Thanks again for the advice.
> larry
You might should just copying or symlinking etch to etch-m68k and see
if that works.
--
Stephen R. Marenka If life's not fun, you're not doing it right!
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Sat, Jul 14, 2007 at 06:47:58PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 14, 2007 at 01:02:35PM -0500, Stephen R Marenka wrote:
> > On Sat, Jul 14, 2007 at 08:09:53AM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > > Thanks for the advice, I am remaking the system as a plain sarge
&
ational section on output" in case anyone is feeling
frisky. ;)
--
Stephen R. Marenka If life's not fun, you're not doing it right!
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Mon, Jul 16, 2007 at 09:07:54AM +0200, Ingo Juergensmann wrote:
> Stephen R Marenka wrote:
> > I apparently haven't been paying attention, but needs-build is now at
> > 322. It looks like it happened today.
> > If any of ya'll have extra power sitting around,
ephen
--
Stephen R. Marenka If life's not fun, you're not doing it right!
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
't been able to solve yet.
Thanks,
Stephen
--
Stephen R. Marenka If life's not fun, you're not doing it right!
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Wed, Jul 18, 2007 at 07:11:49AM -0500, Stephen R Marenka wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 18, 2007 at 07:26:38PM +1000, Aníbal Monsalve Salazar wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > Almost same source code (portmap_6.0-1) compiled okay on m68k before.
> >
> > Please reschedule bu
+0x36): undefined reference to `__init_array_end'
| /usr/bin/ld: a.out: hidden symbol `__init_array_end' isn't defined
| /usr/bin/ld: final link failed: Nonrepresentable section on output
| collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
--
Stephen R. Marenka If life's not fun, you&#x
ck into a rhythm.
--
Stephen R. Marenka If life's not fun, you're not doing it right!
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
/loop-aes-3.2a/debian/build/build_m68k_none_amiga/tmp-d-kbuild/loop.o]
Error 1
Thanks,
Stephen
--
Stephen R. Marenka If life's not fun, you're not doing it right!
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Hopefully someone else will speak up. If not, feel free to send them my
way. Which buildds are you handling right now?
Thanks,
Stephen
--
Stephen R. Marenka If life's not fun, you're not doing it right!
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Sun, Sep 23, 2007 at 01:35:23AM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 20, 2007 at 07:30:25PM -0500, Stephen R Marenka wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 20, 2007 at 11:11:21PM +0200, Christian T. Steigies wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > > I have to go to Athens for a week and after th
On Sun, Sep 23, 2007 at 06:49:10PM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 22, 2007 at 08:09:55PM -0500, Stephen R Marenka wrote:
> > On Sun, Sep 23, 2007 at 01:35:23AM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> > > On Thu, Sep 20, 2007 at 07:30:25PM -0500, Stephen R Marenka wrote:
>
rial connection to
> evil as well, we should be able to log in there.
Yes. I didn't know about the serial connection.
> I'll poke around on evil if I can connect...
Thanks. It hasn't been terribly stable, but the buildd configuration
seems to be valid now.
Mark said that
t would
be good. Feel free to take -override binutils from poseidon.
Thanks,
Stephen
--
Stephen R. Marenka If life's not fun, you're not doing it right!
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
den symbol `__init_array_end' isn't defined
/usr/bin/ld: final link failed: Nonrepresentable section on output
collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
gcc version 4.1.3 20070831 (prerelease) (Debian 4.1.2-16)
binutils 2.18-1
--
Stephen R. Marenka If life's not fun, you're
t.
>
> Does the error still happen with the new binutils? In that case I'd blame
> gcc.
Yes, I tried it with the latest binutils just after it finished
building.
Okay, I'll work up a bug report.
Thanks,
Stephen
--
Stephen R. Marenka If life's not fun, you
t results of these versions. the builds require at least
>256mb ram.
I plan to build these when washi comes back up.
Thanks,
Stephen
--
Stephen R. Marenka If life's not fun, you're not doing it right!
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Fri, Oct 12, 2007 at 07:43:26PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> Stephen R Marenka writes:
> > On Wed, Oct 03, 2007 at 08:28:56PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> > > - patches in gcc-4.2 are updated, so please do build this package
> >
> > failed
>
> kernel
; : Debian developer | Electrical Engineer
`. `' [EMAIL PROTECTED] | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
`-people.debian.org/~aurel32 | www.aurel32.net
- End forwarded message -
--
Stephen R. Marenka If life's not fun, you're not doing it right!
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
finitely seems more stable.
Please let us know before you move so we can get all the pending
packages off washi first, if possible.
Thanks,
Stephen
--
Stephen R. Marenka If life's not fun, you're not doing it right!
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
uffer still goes all wonky.
For now I'm still using 2.6.18-4 for aranym, since everything works.
Thanks,
Stephen
--
Stephen R. Marenka If life's not fun, you're not doing it right!
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Wed, Oct 17, 2007 at 09:49:36PM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> On Wed, 17 Oct 2007, Stephen R Marenka wrote:
> > still doesn't detect the ethernet device, so no network. When booting
> > from an initrd (think d-i), the framebuffer still goes all wonky.
> These da
On Wed, Oct 17, 2007 at 11:00:46PM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> On Wed, 17 Oct 2007, Stephen R Marenka wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 17, 2007 at 09:49:36PM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> > > On Wed, 17 Oct 2007, Stephen R Marenka wrote:
> > > > still doesn'
x27;t have any record of an xfree86 log for m68k.
It was dep-wait for some reason. I cleared that and queued it on zeus.
> Better CC debian-m68k, which used to be the contact point in the past.
As always. :)
Thanks,
Stephen
--
Stephen R. Marenka If life's not fun, you're not doing it right!
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
t-get update
3) chroot unstable apt-get install locales=2.5-11
4) comment out snapshot from sources.list
5) chroot unstable apt-get update
You're done.
Thanks,
Stephen
--
Stephen R. Marenka If life's not fun, you're not doing it right!
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
k in early december.
>
> I'm glad that it was a connector problem only, apparently. Incidentially,
> what kernel version is washi running at the moment? I've gotten the
2.4.30
--
Stephen R. Marenka If life's not fun, you're not doing it right!
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Mon, Oct 29, 2007 at 02:03:08PM +0100, Ingo Juergensmann wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I just created http://wiki.debian.org/m68kLennyReleaseRecertification
> Please add needed information!
I made a first hack at buildds and such.
--
Stephen R. Marenka If life's not fun, you'
On Tue, Oct 30, 2007 at 01:45:44PM -0600, dann frazier wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 21, 2007 at 02:39:33PM -0500, Stephen R Marenka wrote:
> > > > I don't have any record of an xfree86 log for m68k.
> >
> > It was dep-wait for some reason. I cleared that and queued it on z
ked anywhere to help
> me take a look at the problem. Anyone knows where can I find them?
>
> Thanks.
>
> [Please CC: me, I'm not in the list.]
Here's a copy from the buildd. It looks like timestamp skew to me.
(Search for skew in /usr/share/doc/autotools-dev/README.D
ter buildd. Since I
finished it by hand, I'm attaching the changes file. If ya'll return it
to me signed, I'll queue the upload manually.
Sorry,
Stephen
--
Stephen R. Marenka If life's not fun, you're not doing it right!
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Format: 1.7
Date:
With the move of kullervo and crest, crest.debian.org and
m68k.debian.org no longer resolve to anything. Should we punt these
addresses or fix them?
Thanks,
Stephen
--
Stephen R. Marenka If life's not fun, you're not doing it right!
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Desc
> * Arrakis,
> * Vivaldi,
> * Spice
> * ...?
I think all the buildds need incoming passwords:
aahz, akire, arrakis, crest, garkin, hobbes, kiivi, kullervo, poseidon, q650,
spice, tanda, thing2, vault13, vivaldi, washi, zeus
--
Stephen R. Marenka If life's not fun, you're not doing it right!
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Wed, Nov 14, 2007 at 02:20:20AM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote:
> Stephen R Marenka writes:
> > Package: gcc-defaults
> > Version: 1.61
> > Severity: important
> >
> > Please change the defaults to use gcc-4.2 like the other archs. A number
> > of pack
On Wed, Nov 14, 2007 at 01:27:41PM -0600, Stephen R Marenka wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 14, 2007 at 06:20:40PM +0100, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 14, 2007 at 06:17:14PM +0100, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> > > On Mon, Nov 12, 2007 at 09:09:50AM +0100, Christian T. Steigies wrote
nk patching buildd to handle different wb
hosts would be the way to go there.)
Thanks,
Stephen
--
Stephen R. Marenka If life's not fun, you're not doing it right!
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Sat, Nov 24, 2007 at 01:02:05PM -0500, Mark Duckworth wrote:
> Stephen R Marenka wrote:
> >On Fri, Nov 23, 2007 at 11:56:06PM -0500, Mark Duckworth wrote:
> >>Out of curiosity, how strapped are you guys for buildd's? Can you
> >>handle the loss or does this
On Sun, Nov 25, 2007 at 09:12:53AM +0100, Petr Stehlik wrote:
> Stephen R Marenka píše v So 24. 11. 2007 v 15:12 -0600:
> > I've been using images based on the ones here [0]. The only problem is
> > they are 1GB. It looks like aranym can use an IDE1 disk image, so it
> >
On Mon, Nov 26, 2007 at 07:11:23AM +0100, Petr Stehlik wrote:
> Stephen R Marenka píše v Ne 25. 11. 2007 v 16:12 -0600:
> > I love aranym. About the only thing I'd like to see would be a way to
> > suspend or save the current state so I could restart aranym right where
>
On Mon, Nov 26, 2007 at 03:33:10PM +0100, Petr Stehlik wrote:
> Stephen R Marenka wrote:
> >All I really want is a way to dump stuff from linux userspace to a file
> >outside aranym.
>
> What kind of "dump" do you mean here? You know you can use networking
>
the package.
Done.
> (I see Ingo has already mentioned this, but it seems worthwhile to
> bring it up with an obvious subject line.)
Sometimes a cluebat helps. :)
> Thanks in advance,
You're welcome.
--
Stephen R. Marenka If life's not fun, you're n
Has anybody heard about passwords for buildding out of incoming?
It would seem that it's been long enough to generate some new passwords.
Thanks,
Stephen
--
Stephen R. Marenka If life's not fun, you're not doing it right!
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
build system of linux-2.6 would be applied and
> perl-modules 5.8.8-12 were replaced by perl-modules 5.8.8-7 in the
> archive. Then, we should have linux-2.6 built, gcc-4.2 built and perl
> 5.8.8-12 built, in that order.
Point me at the patch, I'll patch one of the buildds.
Thanks,
On Wed, Dec 19, 2007 at 06:34:38PM -0200, Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo wrote:
> I've subscribed to the list. No need to CC me. Thanks.
>
> On Wed, 19 Dec 2007 12:10:08 -0600
> Stephen R Marenka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Dec 19, 2007 at 12:43:
't know if I ever got it working.
I'll check back on that and also on kullervo.
At least that explains why I couldn't get to crest the other day. :)
Thanks,
Stephen
--
Stephen R. Marenka If life's not fun, you're not doing it right!
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Sat, Dec 22, 2007 at 11:07:02AM -0600, Stephen R Marenka wrote:
> If I recall, oldstable-security building hasn't been tested on crest
> since ftpmaster came back, so I don't know if I ever got it working.
> I'll check back on that and also on kullervo.
It looks lik
tephen
--
Stephen R. Marenka If life's not fun, you're not doing it right!
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
d-patches>
They've been working on all the buildds I've supported for months. I
don't know if DSA will be happy with a patched buildd and sbuild.
> Anyway, Merry Xmas from this side of the planet!
Merry Xmas back at you. :)
Peace,
Stephen
--
Stephen R. Marenka I
d.
> wesnoth
needs-build
At least I believe we have two of our faster buildds in the
oldstable{-security} rotation. It doesn't, however, look like
m68k will be ready for the release on Dec. 26. Sigh. :(
Next time, feel free to cluebat me earlier.
Peace,
Stephen
--
Stephen R
On Mon, Dec 24, 2007 at 10:56:47AM -0600, Stephen R Marenka wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 24, 2007 at 01:21:36PM +0100, Luk Claes wrote:
> > Hi
> >
> > The following m68k builds are still missing for the point release
> > scheduled Dec. 26th:
> >
> > oldstable-s
bootable cdrom for atari?
Any ideas?
Thanks,
Stephen
--
Stephen R. Marenka If life's not fun, you're not doing it right!
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
1 - 100 of 849 matches
Mail list logo
