On Fri, May 11, 2007 at 05:15:11PM +0200, Michael Schmitz wrote: > > That said, maybe that Steve can build weely images based on sid for m68k. > > I doubt that - parts will be uninstallable at pretty much all times. > That's why it would be nice to have testing (or maybe testing-m68k, based > on etch-m68k).
testing should be based on sid. > Re: volunteers: I have volunteered to help Wouter with managing testing > for m68k even before the etch release. Repeatedly. Only, anything in the > way of documentation or description of the testing ftpmaster scripts, or > any other tools needed to control progression of unstable packages into > testing-m68k, has NOT been forthcoming. Ever. When I asked about m68k and testing on release, they said they were fine with the idea of m68k testing. However, until we solve our outstanding toolchain problems (gcc-4.1, gcc-4.2, and glibc tls), it pretty much isn't going to happen. > > Back to wearing my 'm68k kernel hacker' hat ... We need more of that too (still don't have 2.6.20 on m68k :). Having parted know about atari partitions would also be nice -- making it much easier to install on atari. If anyone is interested, there are some preliminary patches floating around I can point you to. Peace, Stephen -- Stephen R. Marenka If life's not fun, you're not doing it right! <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
