FYI I guess we knew this was coming.
----- Forwarded message from Aurelien Jarno <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ----- From: Aurelien Jarno <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Bug#446503: [m68k] FTBFS: missing lowlevellock.h X-Mail-Handler: MailHop by DynDNS X-Originating-IP: 88.191.38.19 retitle 446503 glibc: m68K architecture is not supported tag 446503 + wontfix thanks [EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit : > Package: glibc > Version: 2.6.1-5 > Severity: important > > > glibc fails to build from source on m68k due to missing lowlevellock.h. > lowlevellock.h is only the top of the iceberg. m68k is completely unsupported upstream and doesn't have TLS support. We (the glibc team) do not plan to work on that. Patches are welcome though. -- .''`. Aurelien Jarno | GPG: 1024D/F1BCDB73 : :' : Debian developer | Electrical Engineer `. `' [EMAIL PROTECTED] | [EMAIL PROTECTED] `- people.debian.org/~aurel32 | www.aurel32.net ----- End forwarded message ----- -- Stephen R. Marenka If life's not fun, you're not doing it right! <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
