Re: [buildd] Stuff

2007-06-18 Thread Ingo Juergensmann
On Mon, Jun 18, 2007 at 06:53:46PM +, Bill Allombert wrote: > I strongly suggest that the box buildding security update use > distcc+crosscc. This will speed things quite a bit with no > risk of breakage since we are using a stable cross-compiler > that is well tested. > In my opinion, distcc

Re: cross gcc-4.1.2-12 packages

2007-06-21 Thread Ingo Juergensmann
On Thu, Jun 21, 2007 at 10:14:10PM -0700, Brian Morris wrote: > I tested experimentally a little last night with this. I found using > an old mac g3 that is roughly 15times the speed of my mac quadra, > I get consistently about 3.5 times faster compile with simple > examples of one page routines,

Re: Buildds configuration and admins

2007-06-28 Thread Ingo Juergensmann
On Thu, Jun 28, 2007 at 08:38:04AM +0200, Luk Claes wrote: > As Release Team we would like to know for each buildd on what host it is > running, who is(are) the buildd admin(s), who is the local admin and for what > suites is the buildd configured. To make things more clear, I'll put a fictive > e

Re: Buildds configuration and admins

2007-06-28 Thread Ingo Juergensmann
On Thu, Jun 28, 2007 at 07:39:38PM +0200, Luk Claes wrote: > > A first, quick overview, which lacks oldstable: > Thanks. What do the 't' and 'f' mean in the table? The boolean fields in the DB (f = false, t = true). > > I would be interested in keeping the database on buildd.net uptodate as wel

[buildd] Spice offline

2007-06-30 Thread Ingo Juergensmann
Hi! Bad news: Spice will be offline for some days. Good news: when it returns, it will have a faster connection. Reason: we're changing providers and it will last some days until the new DSL line is working again. On a site note: Mail to Vivaldi will be broken as well, until I'll find time o

Re: [buildd] needs-build: 322

2007-07-16 Thread Ingo Juergensmann
Stephen R Marenka wrote: > I apparently haven't been paying attention, but needs-build is now at > 322. It looks like it happened today. > If any of ya'll have extra power sitting around, now would be a good > time to fire it up. Hmm, so it's bad timing that my DSL was shut down (due to changing I

Re: [buildd] needs-build: 322

2007-07-16 Thread Ingo Juergensmann
Stephen R Marenka wrote: >> Hmm, so it's bad timing that my DSL was shut down (due to changing ISP) and >> will not be up until 2007-07-24... anyway, this makes Spice being down in >> the meanwhile... > Is spice still building mesa? If not, it needs to be given-back. If it > was built successfully

[buildd] Spice is back again

2007-07-24 Thread Ingo Juergensmann
Yesterday the new DSL connection has been activated by the ISP, which means that Spice is back to normal operation and has a faster uplink: 16000/1000 kbps down/up, which should make uploading faster. -- Ciao...//Fon: 0381-2744150 Ingo \X/ SIP: [E

Re: Buildds configuration and admins

2007-08-11 Thread Ingo Juergensmann
Stephen R Marenka wrote: >> I noticed some things which could need some buildd maintainer action >> on at least thing2, evolvotron, zeus, vivaldi and poseidon. All the > Mine. I haven't really recovered from travelling yet. I'm trying to work > back into a rhythm. Never heard of evolvotron though.

Re: meeting?

2007-08-11 Thread Ingo Juergensmann
On Sat, Aug 11, 2007 at 09:43:40AM +0200, Michael Schmitz wrote: > > The Amiga systems were pretty popular. I've seen many of them in > > small television stations and in various other forms of video > > post-production that can't afford to buy newer equipment. I have > > never seen an Atari that

Re: [buildd] partitioning crest (and kullervo)

2007-08-29 Thread Ingo Juergensmann
On Wed, Aug 29, 2007 at 09:57:34AM +0200, Christian T. Steigies wrote: > I just received one IDE-SCSI converted and a 250GB disk, which I can > hopefully install on crest during the weekend. How should the disk be > partitioned? When I have a large disk, I usually have some extra partitions, > ie

[buildd] Arrakis is up again

2007-10-04 Thread Ingo Juergensmann
Hi! Some good news! As some may have noticed, Arrakis is back online for about a week now. But it's not as speedy as it could be, because it's using NBD for its buildd chroots. The reasons for the very long downtime were strange SCSI hang ups. I usually expected termination issues and these are

Wiki page for m68kLennyReleaseRecertification

2007-10-29 Thread Ingo Juergensmann
Hi! I just created http://wiki.debian.org/m68kLennyReleaseRecertification Please add needed information! -- Ciao...//Fon: 0381-2744150 Ingo \X/ SIP: [EMAIL PROTECTED] gpg pubkey: http://www.juergensmann.de/ij/public_key.asc -- To UNSUBSCRIBE,

Re: crest.d.o and m68k.d.o

2007-11-10 Thread Ingo Juergensmann
On Sat, Nov 10, 2007 at 08:31:56AM -0600, Stephen R Marenka wrote: > With the move of kullervo and crest, crest.debian.org and > m68k.debian.org no longer resolve to anything. Should we punt these > addresses or fix them? As I understood Christian, Debian was looking for new hosting facilities and

Re: crest.d.o and m68k.d.o

2007-11-11 Thread Ingo Juergensmann
On Mon, Nov 12, 2007 at 01:28:21AM +0100, Michael Schmitz wrote: > > I'm just wondering if there is a way to redirect DNS queries for crest to > > a dyndns service without the debian.org DNS getting involved in dynamic > > DNS itself ... > Having thought about that for a while, I am sure that a CN

[EMAIL PROTECTED] forwarding seems to be broken

2007-11-28 Thread Ingo Juergensmann
Hi! In my blog Zack Weinberg reported today that he wrote "about a spurious dep-wait for my package (monotone - there was a version that build-depended on the thing it's dep-waiting for, but current versions don't) over two weeks ago with no action taken yet." He wrote to [EMAIL PROTECTED] but ap

[buildd] Machines upgraded

2007-12-17 Thread Ingo Juergensmann
Hi! I've upgraded the following machines lately to kernel 2.6.23-m68k and etch-m68k: - Spice - Vivaldi - Akire - Arrakis Just FYI... -- Ciao...//Fon: 0381-2744150 Ingo \X/ SIP: [EMAIL PROTECTED] gpg pubkey: http://www.juergensmann.de/ij/publi

Re: [buildd] Machines upgraded

2007-12-17 Thread Ingo Juergensmann
On Mon, Dec 17, 2007 at 05:41:05AM -0500, Larry Moore wrote: > > I've upgraded the following machines lately to kernel 2.6.23-m68k and > > etch-m68k: > I tried 2.6.21 and .22, but reverted to 2.2.25 because I couldn't get X > running. Well, I'm not running X on those machines as those are auto

Re: [buildd] Machines upgraded

2007-12-18 Thread Ingo Juergensmann
On Mon, Dec 17, 2007 at 11:27:42PM +0100, Roman Zippel wrote: > > I've upgraded the following machines lately to kernel 2.6.23-m68k and > > etch-m68k: > You might want to test 2.6.22 as well. The new scheduler hasn't exactly > been an improvement for us, here are some lmbench numbers: > Context

Re: [buildd] Machines upgraded

2007-12-19 Thread Ingo Juergensmann
On Wed, Dec 19, 2007 at 07:00:10AM +0100, Daniele Gratteri wrote: > Ingo Juergensmann ha scritto: >> Oooops... that's not really an improvement... anyway, I've chosen 2.6.23 >> as it was the latest and the easiest to checkout from the m68k cvs for me. >> And it

Re: [buildd] Machines upgraded

2007-12-19 Thread Ingo Juergensmann
On Wed, Dec 19, 2007 at 01:28:09PM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > > I used the kernel from http://linux-m68k-cvs.ubb.ca/ > > You may keep in mind what Roman wrote about the new scheduler in .23 and may > > want to use .22 instead. > > The problem I faced with .23 and the new SCSI driver was,

[buildd] hugin build

2007-12-28 Thread Ingo Juergensmann
Hi! I recommend that hugin is added to weak-no-auto for machines with less than 128 MB of RAM at least. That's currently just spice and zeus. It uses lots of swap, which is basically ok, but it does a lot of swapping, i.e. it permanently swaps in and out instead of swapping some data in, doing st

[buildd] Access to incoming.d.o?

2008-01-02 Thread Ingo Juergensmann
Hi! It's been a long time since we lost out access to incoming.d.o. Are there any news to this yet? Is there a plan B already? Do we need to escalate this issue finally? Not that I'm a big fan of escalations, but it seems that nobody cares at the moment about giving us access back. http://lists

Re: Missing m68k builds for the point release

2008-01-02 Thread Ingo Juergensmann
Christian T. Steigies wrote: > No uucp or bsmtp (what's that?) here. My friendly provider does not block > any ports (except 80), can I convince anybody to switch? My server can > receive email directly (cts-aahz and co redirect mail directly to the > dyndns > address of my server) and delivers fo

Re: [buildd] Access to incoming.d.o?

2008-01-03 Thread Ingo Juergensmann
On Thu, Jan 03, 2008 at 08:35:32PM +0100, Wouter Verhelst wrote: > > It's been a long time since we lost out access to incoming.d.o. Are there > > any news to this yet? Is there a plan B already? Do we need to escalate this > > issue finally? > With hundreds of packages in needs-build? I don't th

Re: Missing m68k builds for the point release

2008-01-08 Thread Ingo Juergensmann
On Tue, Jan 08, 2008 at 10:34:41PM +0100, Christian T. Steigies wrote: > > With the exception of the mac driver, we might be able to unify the > > various Amiga 53C9x variants (DMA handling being the main difference among > > them). Do we have testers for all the variants of Amiga SCSI around? > K

Re: Missing m68k builds for the point release

2008-01-08 Thread Ingo Juergensmann
Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: >> Erm, that's the same driver as in A4000Ts and on the WarpEngine? > No, A4000T and Warp Engine have a NCR53c7xx. Ah, ok... I just remembered something with 53c..something... ;) -- Ciao... Ingo -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of

Re: [buildd] needs-build @ 914

2008-01-22 Thread Ingo Juergensmann
On Mon, Jan 21, 2008 at 10:39:58AM -0600, Stephen R Marenka wrote: > We seem to be losing ground on the needs-build. This would be a > good time to get all your buildds fired up and running. > If you need some debian-installer help, please let me know. > Even with the fpu bugs, do ya'll think arany

Re: [buildd] needs-build @ 914

2008-01-22 Thread Ingo Juergensmann
On Tue, Jan 22, 2008 at 09:45:02AM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > > Some packages are built quite regularly like bouml, which takes some days to > > build. We maybe should postpone such sort of packages in order to build > > packages that weren't built for a long time? > Does there exist some

Re: [buildd] needs-build @ 914

2008-01-27 Thread Ingo Juergensmann
On Sun, Jan 27, 2008 at 11:24:24PM +0100, Michael Schmitz wrote: > First off - is there any web site where I can get the status overview we > used to have on crest? May be time to revive crest's hourly package status > cronjob, if we can find it... Uhm, how about http://unstable.buildd.net/index-

Re: [buildd] needs-build @ 914

2008-01-28 Thread Ingo Juergensmann
On Mon, Jan 28, 2008 at 07:27:07AM -0600, Stephen R Marenka wrote: > Meanwhile, maybe we need to think about what a debian-m68k distribution > should really have in it. We could probably release a lenny-m68k without > kde, gnome, mathematical packages, and some of the other large packages > that

Re: [buildd] needs-build @ 914

2008-01-28 Thread Ingo Juergensmann
On Mon, Jan 28, 2008 at 08:55:02AM -0600, Stephen R Marenka wrote: > > I think we can take care for about 4000 source packages, but ~7000 packages > > is was too much, especially when some of the porters are always trying to > > bring coldfire support in... > Actually, we generally stay caught up

Re: [buildd] needs-build @ 914

2008-01-28 Thread Ingo Juergensmann
On Tue, Jan 29, 2008 at 02:36:07AM +0100, Michael Schmitz wrote: > > Having a smarter buildd queue is a long term goal and something that I > > wouldn't burden on the shoulders of the m68k porters. I already made some > > proposals to enhance the build process long ago. For example to not remove >

Re: [buildd] needs-build @ 914

2008-01-29 Thread Ingo Juergensmann
On Tue, Jan 29, 2008 at 08:54:41PM +0100, Michael Schmitz wrote: > > Another proposed solution would be the use of lvm snapshots to build the > > packages in. Just lvremoving the snapshot would give you a clean chroot > > again. > Could be worth a try - no idea how much overhead lvm incurs and whe

Re: Missing m68k builds for the point release

2008-02-10 Thread Ingo Juergensmann
On Sun, Feb 10, 2008 at 12:15:08AM +0100, Michael Schmitz wrote: > Is there a ZorroID database in the kernel sources still? I don't know about the kernel, but the package zorroutils should have it, i think... -- Ciao...//Fon: 0381-2744150 Ingo \X/

[buildd] Mails to Arrakis

2008-02-22 Thread Ingo Juergensmann
Hi! There was a problem with Arrakis' mail setup within the last two weeks. It should finally be solved now. Please resend all buildd related mails. There are currently 55 packages in state building on Arrakis. Sorry for the mess... -- Ciao...//Fon: 0381-2744150

Re: FOSDEM thoughts

2008-02-25 Thread Ingo Juergensmann
On Mon, Feb 25, 2008 at 01:06:47PM +0100, Kolbjørn Barmen wrote: > > I think that also some skype meetings from time to time (or at least IRC > > ones) minght be of help. > I've always missed having a linux-m68k hangout on IRC. Since I'm mainly > doing gentoo, I ended up on #gentoo-embedded (freen

Re: FOSDEM thoughts

2008-02-25 Thread Ingo Juergensmann
On Sun, Feb 24, 2008 at 08:44:05PM +0100, Wouter Verhelst wrote: > After going to a conference, I'm usually filled with ideas, and FOSDEM > is no different in that regard. Also, it was nice to finally meet cts :-) Hehe... I met him the first time lately after 7 years also... ;) > As I mentioned

Re: FOSDEM thoughts

2008-02-25 Thread Ingo Juergensmann
On Mon, Feb 25, 2008 at 02:48:27PM +0100, Kolbjørn Barmen wrote: > > There was somewhen someone that used one of my m68ks for a gentoo port > > or such... > Could it have been Zach Lowry? No, it was Michael Frysinger. > I was briefly in contact with him, before he decided to move onto some > s

Re: FOSDEM thoughts

2008-02-25 Thread Ingo Juergensmann
On Mon, Feb 25, 2008 at 12:51:48PM -0500, Michael Casadevall wrote: > I'm suprised that network I/O was that slow; using distcc (especially > with -j2 options passed to dpkg-buildpackage) have drastically sped up > builds; the files themselves are small, usually a few kilobytes round > trip. Then a

Re: debootstrapping m68k-coldfire

2008-03-05 Thread Ingo Juergensmann
On Tue, Mar 04, 2008 at 09:17:54PM -0500, Michael Casadevall wrote: > I'm going to play devil's advocate here for a moment; from the release > manager perspective, does it pay to release two ports, one for (there > perspective) a dead architecture like m68k (popcon lists 10 users, and I Bui

Re: debootstrapping m68k-coldfire

2008-03-06 Thread Ingo Juergensmann
On Thu, Mar 06, 2008 at 09:55:51AM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > On Wed, 5 Mar 2008, Ingo Juergensmann wrote: > > Should support, but won't do so. In fact IT world became rather monocultural > > when it comes down to architectures. MIPS is dead (except for embedded

Re: [buildd] Mails to Arrakis

2008-03-12 Thread Ingo Juergensmann
On Wed, Mar 12, 2008 at 02:10:52PM +0100, Michael Schmitz wrote: Erm, yes? What's the problem? ;) -- Ciao...//Fon: 0381-2744150 Ingo \X/ SIP: [EMAIL PROTECTED] gpg pubkey: http://www.juergensmann.de/ij_public_key.asc -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email t

Re: [buildd] hobbes status (was: Mails to Arrakis)

2008-03-15 Thread Ingo Juergensmann
Michael Schmitz wrote: > What I was going to say: gcc-4.3 built on hobbes but a new version > appeared before it finished. > I tried to reactivate hobbes as buildd, only to notice it had crashed hard > in the meantime (power brownout, most likely). Won't be back in service > before the week after

[buildd] It's finally here!

2008-04-01 Thread Ingo Juergensmann
Oh well... it took nearly two years until that specific machine arrived yesterday - finally! :) It's an Amiga 4000 in a Micronik tower case (same as Crest, IIRC) with a Cyberstorm I 060/50 with just 48 MB RAM at the moment and SCSI module. There's a Hydra v1.1 NIC as well, which means that the

IDE disks in Amigas

2008-04-04 Thread Ingo Juergensmann
Hi! I received an A4000 recently and it's the very first time that I use an IDE disk inside of an Amiga (except that short setup of Crest back then). Under AmigaOS the performance of the IDE disk was "OK", but under Linux it's quite slow. hdparm shows all options OFF and trying to set DMA to on

Re: IDE disks in Amigas

2008-04-04 Thread Ingo Juergensmann
Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: Repost to the list as well... >> Under AmigaOS the performance of the IDE disk was "OK", but under Linux it's >> quite slow. hdparm shows all options OFF and trying to set DMA to on resulted in an error. Is there a reason to not being able to set DMA on IDE >> for Amig

Re: IDE disks in Amigas

2008-04-04 Thread Ingo Juergensmann
On Fri, Apr 04, 2008 at 01:12:00PM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > > 4 MB in 4.06 seconds = 1008.11 kB/sec > Hmm... Indeed not so fast. As you have an '060 and I have an '040 on the > notorious A3640 CPU card, I'd expect higher numbers (at least 2 MiB/s). With DiskSpeed on AmigaOS I got 2.7

Re: more (aranym) buildds needed

2008-04-07 Thread Ingo Juergensmann
On Mon, Apr 07, 2008 at 08:48:16AM -0500, Stephen R Marenka wrote: > So we need more buildds. Specifically, I think we need some more fast > aranym buildds, at least to get us even again. I can tell you that theia > is a pleasure to work with and built boost more than twice as fast as > any of our

Re: latest cdimage?

2008-04-07 Thread Ingo Juergensmann
On Mon, Apr 07, 2008 at 08:00:02AM -0500, Stephen R Marenka wrote: > The amiga string we currently have is this, however it's clearly out of > date. > | amiboot -d -k //kernels/vmlinuz-2.6.24-1-amiga -r //cdrom/initrd.gz > | root=/dev/ram ramdisk_size=9000 debian-installer/framebuffer=false > With

Re: more (aranym) buildds needed

2008-04-07 Thread Ingo Juergensmann
On Mon, Apr 07, 2008 at 12:29:44PM -0500, Stephen R Marenka wrote: > > Currently I have a 2.8 Pentium4 with 2 GB RAM doing nothing. But it's not a > > machine that's not supposed to be online 24/7. > buildds aren't very useful if they're not up 24/7. True. And that's only part of my dilemma...

Re: toolchain problems

2008-04-30 Thread Ingo Juergensmann
On Wed, Apr 30, 2008 at 08:01:12AM -0500, Stephen R Marenka wrote: > > python2.5: hangs forever on test_bsddb3. > Hm. Elgar (our most memory constrained build) managed to build it! To cite an old slogan: "Only Amiga makes it possible!" SCNR ;) -- Ciao...//Fon: 0381-

Re: toolchain problems

2008-05-01 Thread Ingo Juergensmann
On Thu, May 01, 2008 at 02:54:02AM +0200, Michael Schmitz wrote: >>> python2.5: hangs forever on test_bsddb3. >> Hm. Elgar (our most memory constrained build) managed to build it! > Something unusual with that buildd's setup (additiona packages or config > files in the chroot that we don't u

Re: status of gcc-4.3 build?

2008-05-09 Thread Ingo Juergensmann
On Fri, May 09, 2008 at 11:55:44PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote: > please could somebody of you give some estimatates when the gcc-4.3 > build will hit the archive (if it is still building)? It's currently still building on Crest for 6d15:37:42 now (see http://unstable.buildd.net/index-m68k.html)

Hydra NIC and AUI transceiver

2008-05-10 Thread Ingo Juergensmann
Hi! I'm having problems with an AUI transceiver hooked up to the Hydra NIC v1.1 to one of my buildds (Elgar). When using the cheapernet port of the Hydra, the network works for weeks without any problem. But as I need to have another PC running for this setup because of bridging the cheapernet t

[buildd] Implications of DSA-1571-1

2008-05-13 Thread Ingo Juergensmann
Hi! http://lists.debian.org/debian-security-announce/2008/msg00152.html The latest SSL remote "problem" has some serious issues for the buildds: | Permission denied (publickey,keyboard-interactive). | May 13 18:02:27 buildd: wanna-build --list=needs-build --dist=unstable | failed; status 255/0

Re: [buildd] Implications of DSA-1571-1

2008-05-13 Thread Ingo Juergensmann
On Tue, May 13, 2008 at 10:51:43PM +0200, Michael Schmitz wrote: >> Well, those machines that were installed before etch, should be safe. Can >> anyone confirm this? > Should be (they should use OpenSSL 0.9.6c or some such), but they have > been disabled anyway. ... and can be re-enabled by req

Re: [buildd] Implications of DSA-1571-1

2008-05-15 Thread Ingo Juergensmann
On Thu, May 15, 2008 at 11:10:11PM +0200, Michael Schmitz wrote: >> The question is, should we maintain this on a wiki where it can be >> updated? We've potentially got 25 buildds if all of them were up and >> running. I can keep that in a spreadsheet, but it'll bit rot as soon as >> something cha

[buildd] moving to new data center: crest, kullervo & elgar

2008-05-20 Thread Ingo Juergensmann
Hi! The current bandwidth sponsor NMMN wants to relocate Crest and Kullervo to a different data center within the city. Luckily the sponsor agreed to host another m68k machine (Elgar) as well. So, I'll be travelling to Hamburg next week to bring it to its new home. This will either be on 27th or

[buildd] Crest, Kullervo & Elgar

2008-05-26 Thread Ingo Juergensmann
Hi! As already announced earlier, Crest and Kullervo will be moved to a new data center as of tomorrow afternoon (let's assume 12 a.m. until 21 p.m. local time (CEST)). Elgar will be moved to that data center as well. Please be sure to take down the buildds for this purpose! Thanks to NMMN for

Re: [buildd] Crest, Kullervo & Elgar

2008-05-27 Thread Ingo Juergensmann
On Mon, May 26, 2008 at 04:15:32PM +0200, Ingo Juergensmann wrote: > As already announced earlier, Crest and Kullervo will be moved to a new data > center as of tomorrow afternoon (let's assume 12 a.m. until 21 p.m. local > time (CEST)). > Elgar will be moved to that data cente

Re: [buildd] Crest, Kullervo & Elgar

2008-05-27 Thread Ingo Juergensmann
Michael Schmitz wrote: > I'm updating binutils on crest ATM, that'll bring it up to speed again. Before you try to build anything on Crest, you should check the chroots. See the other mail. Crest showed many errors and moved lots of files from /org to lost+found during hours of fsck. ;) -- Cia

Re: Etch install on A1200. Floating point exception

2008-06-04 Thread Ingo Juergensmann
On Wed, Jun 04, 2008 at 03:11:44PM -0500, Stephen R Marenka wrote: > > 1 - iso-scan.postinst and db_progress do not handle the situation of no > > devices found > Which brings to mind the question of whether hd-media has *ever* been > tested on amiga. :) Uh? hd-media? You mean downloading lots

[buildd] getting w-b access back?

2008-06-08 Thread Ingo Juergensmann
Hi! It's been a while since DSA 1571 (vulnerable SSL keys) and disabled access to w-b. In the meanwhile Stephen took the burden to act a human w-b, but that's not a long term solution and should be terminated now (not Stephen, but acting as human w-b of course! ;) So, the question is: how to proc

Serial Console Support in Kernel

2008-06-10 Thread Ingo Juergensmann
Hi Christian, when I configured Elgar lately for the data center, I realized that the Debian kernel was without serial console support. I believe it would be nice to have this enabled by default, so could you please do so? TIA! :) BTW: Elgar dropped off the net and needs a caring hand. I don't k

Re: Serial Console Support in Kernel

2008-06-10 Thread Ingo Juergensmann
On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 05:24:04AM +0200, Michael Schmitz wrote: >> BTW: Elgar dropped off the net and needs a caring hand. I don't know when >> the people at NMMN will find some time to have a look at it, but a serial >> console would surely help... ;) > What sort of serial console do yo need - j

Re: Serial Console Support in Kernel

2008-06-11 Thread Ingo Juergensmann
On Thu, Jun 12, 2008 at 03:19:08AM +0200, Michael Schmitz wrote: >>> Debian kernel was without serial console support. I believe it would be nice >>> to have this enabled by default, so could you please do so? TIA! :) >> Just tell me which option I need to activate, and I will try to include that

Re: Serial Console Support in Kernel

2008-06-12 Thread Ingo Juergensmann
On Thu, Jun 12, 2008 at 09:28:40AM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > On Thu, 12 Jun 2008, Ingo Juergensmann wrote: > > Would be nice to have, yes, but it's difficult to use when there's a > > non-booting kernel and you can't change the commandline remotely to boot

Re: Serial Console Support in Kernel

2008-06-12 Thread Ingo Juergensmann
On Thu, Jun 12, 2008 at 11:42:41AM +0200, Christian T. Steigies wrote: > I wrote a couple of scripts which are now used on crest and kullervo to > switch betwen different kernels, taking into account if the last kernel booted > successfully or not. There are not very pretty, but they seem to do th

SCSI driver for CyberStorm Mk1 in kernel 2.6.25-m68k missing?

2008-06-25 Thread Ingo Juergensmann
Hi! Erm, is there no driver for the SCSI hostadapter on the CyberStorm Mk1 in current linux-2.6.25-m68k CVS? CONFIG_SCSI_LOWLEVEL=y # CONFIG_ISCSI_TCP is not set # CONFIG_SCSI_DEBUG is not set CONFIG_A3000_SCSI=y # CONFIG_A2091_SCSI is not set # CONFIG_GVP11_SCSI is not set CONFIG_SCSI_A4000T=y C

Re: SCSI driver for CyberStorm Mk1 in kernel 2.6.25-m68k missing?

2008-06-25 Thread Ingo Juergensmann
On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 10:27:19AM +0200, Michael Schmitz wrote: >> Erm, is there no driver for the SCSI hostadapter on the CyberStorm Mk1 in >> current linux-2.6.25-m68k CVS? >> CONFIG_SCSI_LOWLEVEL=y >> # CONFIG_ISCSI_TCP is not set >> # CONFIG_SCSI_DEBUG is not set >> CONFIG_A3000_SCSI=y >> # C

Re: SCSI driver for CyberStorm Mk1 in kernel 2.6.25-m68k missing?

2008-06-25 Thread Ingo Juergensmann
On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 01:24:40PM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > > Hmmm, it was still working in 2.6.24-1-amiga I used to install that > > machine... > Yep, they got removed in 2.6.25. As usual, I take patches (and put them > on the fast-track) to revive them using the new esp driver core...

Re: m68k Developers Meeting

2008-06-25 Thread Ingo Juergensmann
On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 01:47:26PM +0200, Christian T. Steigies wrote: > It seems we have a majority for august 29-31. For further planning it would > be important to know how many people are coming. I have a choice of two > rooms. > > Coffeeroom our our group. Tables with switches and powersuppl

Re: [buildd] wanna-build

2008-07-02 Thread Ingo Juergensmann
On Tue, Jul 01, 2008 at 10:35:13PM -0500, Stephen R Marenka wrote: > > No idea how easy this would be to set up, bit what's the basic difference > > between -ports and host our own? > Should be very easy for them, they already support to other archs and > answered me about etch-m68k the same day

Re: [buildd] wanna-build

2008-07-02 Thread Ingo Juergensmann
On Wed, Jul 02, 2008 at 08:06:51AM +0200, Luk Claes wrote: > > No idea how easy this would be to set up, bit what's the basic > > difference between -ports and host our own? > -ports is seen as a staging area and has the synchronisation with > wanna-build already... So, as a some-what unofficial

Re: m68k developer meeting in Kiel

2008-07-07 Thread Ingo Juergensmann
On Fri, Jul 04, 2008 at 06:30:47PM +0200, Christian T. Steigies wrote: > > I may be able to get travel reimbursement, in which case I too will be > > coming. (Holds breath :) > So maybe six people are coming. Still not a lot of people and no volunteer > for a public talk on friday. Thus I hav

Re: Lenny release plans

2008-08-06 Thread Ingo Juergensmann
On Wed, Aug 06, 2008 at 05:17:14PM -0400, Michael Casadevall wrote: > I figure since lenny is now frozen, its time to talk about our plans > for a lenny-m68k release. Talking with Stephen, the current plan of > attack is something as follows: > 1. Install dak on a machine on nemesisnetworks (sorta

[buildd] Vivaldi offline

2008-08-27 Thread Ingo Juergensmann
Hi! Today Vivaldi has fallen off the net. A telephone call brought to light that it crashed somehow and a reboot was revealing memory errors from running a memtest before loading the Linux kernel. The machine is now powered off. Maybe it's just an intermittent problem and another try on the weeke

Re: Unstable synced to debian port

2008-09-01 Thread Ingo Juergensmann
On Mon, Sep 01, 2008 at 03:38:08AM -0500, Stephen R Marenka wrote: > It's actually a bit more than that. > * setup ssh keys on dports (done) > * dd's who want direct access to w-b, send me your ssh key off list > * [EMAIL PROTECTED] >[...] > * ssh known hosts updated. I'll need the download

Re: Reviewing data in the debian-cd packages

2008-09-11 Thread Ingo Juergensmann
On Thu, Sep 11, 2008 at 05:41:57AM +0200, Michael Schmitz wrote: >> I'll have to let Christian answer for the licensing of >> cts_amiga_info.tar.gz. The rest of the amiga icons are in the d-i >> repo. If these have clear licensing (I'm pretty sure they do) then >> we should probably move them ther

Re: Reviewing data in the debian-cd packages

2008-09-15 Thread Ingo Juergensmann
On Sun, Sep 14, 2008 at 10:35:34AM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > > The description there gives little detail on the contents of the .info files > > aside from the icon image data. Is the file name of the associated script > > encoded in the icon file itself? I think that all functionality of

Re: Reviewing data in the debian-cd packages

2008-09-16 Thread Ingo Juergensmann
On Tue, Sep 16, 2008 at 04:13:12AM +0200, Michael Schmitz wrote: > What would the device name for a CD be in AmigaOS? That's rather free to choose. > Fine, so all we'd need to know is the path to the install script on the > CD as seen by AmigaOS? Or does it correctly try to launch the script of

Re: Reviewing data in the debian-cd packages

2008-09-16 Thread Ingo Juergensmann
On Tue, Sep 16, 2008 at 08:13:11AM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > AmigaOS has 2 choices for paths: Basically 3 choices: > - paths involving the device name (which may depend on the driver) > - paths involving the volume name (the label) - paths involving an assign name (assign cd0: cdr

Re: exim performance hint

2008-09-30 Thread Ingo Juergensmann
-- Ciao...// Fon: 0381-2744150 Ingo \X/ http://blog.windfluechter.net gpg pubkey: http://www.juergensmann.de/ij_public_key.asc #!/usr/bin/python # (c) 2003 by Ingo Juergensmann # License: GPLv2, see http://www.gnu.org/licenses/old-licenses/gpl-2.0.html # for

Re: Dead link on http://www.debian.org/ports/m68k/

2008-10-11 Thread Ingo Juergensmann
On Sat, Oct 11, 2008 at 08:14:16PM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote: > I would like to report the following dead link on > http://www.debian.org/ports/m68k/ : > The http://crest.debian.org/";>Debian/68k autobuild > system contains up to date information about the porting effort. > Since crest.debia

Crest, Kullervo & security

2008-11-05 Thread Ingo Juergensmann
Hi! Some time ago Peter Palfrader from DSA asked me by mail how to proceed with Crest & Kullervo. He would like to get rid off it (DSA-wise) and hand it over to us. I mentioned this issue shortly during the Kiel Meeting and said that I would like to have at least one DD-accessible machine for all

Crest, Kullervo & DSA

2008-11-17 Thread Ingo Juergensmann
Hi again! >From Peter Palfrader: > > Mainly unchanged, but I'll ask on debian-68k again, so that we should have > > an answer/plan within the next 1-2 weeks... > Maybe we (i.e. DSA) could still export parts of our LDAP to crest and > kullervo, if that is what you want. > > That would include a

Re: Crest, Kullervo & DSA

2008-11-18 Thread Ingo Juergensmann
On Wed, Nov 19, 2008 at 07:21:25AM +0100, Michael Schmitz wrote: > > > That would include accounts and groups, ssh keys and email forward > > > addresses, but no passwords. > > > Would that be useful? > > Is that ok for everyone? > > I don't know how useful this is without passwords or ~/.ssh/auth

Re: Crest, Kullervo & DSA

2008-11-22 Thread Ingo Juergensmann
On Sat, Nov 22, 2008 at 07:56:39AM +0100, Michael Schmitz wrote: > > | Wed 10:49:18 weasel: die technik war gestern kurz vor ort und hat > > | kullervo resetted, allerdings kommt auch kein bild auf dem monitor und > > | nen serielles kabel hatte derjenige nicht dabei > > | Wed 10:50:01 weasel: d

kullervo up again

2008-12-04 Thread Ingo Juergensmann
Hi! Thanks to the great effort and work of Andreas from NMMN, kullervo boots again and is available as well. The reasons for it's downtime are unclear except that it didn't find its boot disk anymore. Anyway, it's back! :) -- Ciao...// Fon: 0381-2744150 Ingo \X/

Re: kullervo up again

2008-12-05 Thread Ingo Juergensmann
On Thu, Dec 04, 2008 at 08:39:15PM +0100, Michael Schmitz wrote: > > The reasons for it's downtime are unclear except that it didn't find its > > boot disk anymore. Anyway, it's back! :) > Well, sometimes it takes a bit of shaking things up to get it back to working > state - but we should perhap

Re: kullervo up again

2008-12-09 Thread Ingo Juergensmann
On Tue, Dec 09, 2008 at 12:11:21PM +0100, Christian T. Steigies wrote: > The new disks in crest and kullervo did both boot on my Amiga2000/B2060, but > they did not boot in crest or kullervo. There must be a difference between > the SCSI controllers and large disks. The main problem I had with the

Re: future of crest and kullervo

2009-02-13 Thread Ingo Juergensmann
On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 03:05:52PM +0100, Peter Palfrader wrote: > Status? No news, to my knowledge. Sorry. -- Ciao...// Fon: 0381-2744150 Ingo \X/ http://blog.windfluechter.net gpg pubkey: http://www.juergensmann.de/ij_public_key.asc -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, e

Re: future of crest and kullervo

2009-02-19 Thread Ingo Juergensmann
On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 08:08:39AM +0100, Michael Schmitz wrote: > > > > Status? > > > No news, to my knowledge. Sorry. > > Can we get somebody to take them over by say end of March at the latest, > > please? > If no one else steps up, I can remotely admin them. Mind you, I live in NZ so > no >

Re: mailinglists

2005-01-22 Thread Ingo Juergensmann
On Sat, Jan 22, 2005 at 04:30:12PM +0100, Wouter Verhelst wrote: > I was wondering whether anyone would oppose to us moving back to > debian-68k@lists.debian.org instead of this list. > [..] > It would also avoid the recurring theme of $maintainer posting to > debian-68k, $maintainer being redirec

[owner@bugs.debian.org: Bug#152978 acknowledged by developer (Re: Bug#152978: procps: Also on arm)]

2002-08-13 Thread Ingo Juergensmann
acking System) Subject: Bug#152978 acknowledged by developer (Re: Bug#152978: procps: Also on arm) To: Ingo Juergensmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Debian-PR-Message: they-closed 152978 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 13 Aug 2002 07:48:19.0107 (UTC) FILETIME=[CA4BF730:01C2429D]

Re: binutils error? (autobuilder failure)

2003-02-07 Thread Ingo Juergensmann
On Fri, Feb 07, 2003 at 07:32:46AM -0600, Stephen R Marenka wrote: > I've started seeing the following error on a number of builds, on two > different machines now. > > | dh_shlibdeps > | objdump: error while loading shared libraries: unexpected PLT reloc type > 0x00 > | dpkg-shlibdeps: failure:

Re: binutils error? (autobuilder failure)

2003-02-07 Thread Ingo Juergensmann
On Fri, Feb 07, 2003 at 07:32:46AM -0600, Stephen R Marenka wrote: > I've started seeing the following error on a number of builds, on two > different machines now. > | dh_shlibdeps > | objdump: error while loading shared libraries: unexpected PLT reloc type > 0x00 > | dpkg-shlibdeps: failure: ob

Re: binutils error? (autobuilder failure)

2003-02-07 Thread Ingo Juergensmann
On Fri, Feb 07, 2003 at 07:32:46AM -0600, Stephen R Marenka wrote: objdump: error while loading shared libraries: unexpected PLT reloc type 0x00 dpkg-shlibdeps: failure: objdump on ebian/xmms-mad/usr/lib/xmms/Input/libxmmsmad.so' gave error exit status 127 dh_shlibdeps: command returned error code

FastSCSI on WarpEngine

2003-03-02 Thread Ingo Juergensmann
I've some disks hooked up to my A3000: scsi-ncr53c7xx : NCR53c710 at memory 0x4004, io 0x0, irq 12 scsi0: Revision 0x1 scsi0 : NCR code relocated to 0xbefe5e0 (virt 0x03efe5e0) scsi0 : test 1 started wd33c93-1: chip=WD33c93A/9 no_sync=0xff no_dma=0 debug_flags=0x00 setup_args=,,

  1   2   3   >