> > > Same as the oldstable buildds. Christian can bring garkin back soon I
> > > hope.
> >
> > The oldstable buildds have a wanna-buildd database on buildd.debian.org,
> > etch-m68k and etch-m68k-security don't. buildd can handle that, it can't
> > handle multiple wanna-buildd databases on differe
On Tue, Jun 26, 2007 at 07:28:18AM -0500, Stephen R Marenka wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 26, 2007 at 09:15:12AM +0200, Michael Schmitz wrote:
> > > > Eh, I thought the security people wanted to do m68k builds, but I'm not
> > > > sure. Joey?
> > >
> > > buildd.debian.org doesn't have wanna-build db's for e
On Tue, Jun 26, 2007 at 09:15:12AM +0200, Michael Schmitz wrote:
> > > Eh, I thought the security people wanted to do m68k builds, but I'm not
> > > sure. Joey?
> >
> > buildd.debian.org doesn't have wanna-build db's for either etch-m68k or
> > etch-m68k-security. If we setup our own, we have to de
> > Eh, I thought the security people wanted to do m68k builds, but I'm not
> > sure. Joey?
>
> buildd.debian.org doesn't have wanna-build db's for either etch-m68k or
> etch-m68k-security. If we setup our own, we have to dedicate buildds that
> are currently running unstable. I don't think we curr
On Mon, Jun 25, 2007 at 06:08:06PM +0100, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 23, 2007 at 10:40:11PM +, Bill Allombert wrote:
> > On Sun, Jun 24, 2007 at 12:08:32AM +0200, Luk Claes wrote:
> > > If you mean for etch, I guess you should upload them to etch-m68k.
> >
> > I will not do that: I d
On Mon, Jun 25, 2007 at 06:08:59PM +0100, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 23, 2007 at 08:50:41PM -0500, Stephen R Marenka wrote:
> > On Sat, Jun 23, 2007 at 11:30:34PM +0200, Bill Allombert wrote:
> > > Hello m68k porters,
> > >
> > > I have build all etch security updates that do not build-d
On Sat, Jun 23, 2007 at 10:40:11PM +, Bill Allombert wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 24, 2007 at 12:08:32AM +0200, Luk Claes wrote:
> > If you mean for etch, I guess you should upload them to etch-m68k.
>
> I will not do that: I do binary-only upload so etch-m68k Sources file
> would not match the Packag
On Sat, Jun 23, 2007 at 08:50:41PM -0500, Stephen R Marenka wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 23, 2007 at 11:30:34PM +0200, Bill Allombert wrote:
> > Hello m68k porters,
> >
> > I have build all etch security updates that do not build-depend on mysql:
[...]
> > Any suggestion concerning what I should do with t
On Sat, Jun 23, 2007 at 08:50:41PM -0500, Stephen R Marenka wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 23, 2007 at 11:30:34PM +0200, Bill Allombert wrote:
> >
> > Any suggestion concerning what I should do with them ?
>
> Upload them to etch-m68k. That or we need to get the security people to
> create us a distributio
On Sat, Jun 23, 2007 at 11:30:34PM +0200, Bill Allombert wrote:
> Hello m68k porters,
>
> I have build all etch security updates that do not build-depend on mysql:
>
> aircrack-ng_0.6.2-7etch1
> clamav_0.90.1-3etch2
> ekg_1.7~rc2-1etch1
> file_4.17-5etch1
> freetype_2.2.1-5+etch1
> gimp_2.2.13-1e
On Sun, Jun 24, 2007 at 12:08:32AM +0200, Luk Claes wrote:
> Bill Allombert wrote:
> > Hello m68k porters,
> >
> > I have build all etch security updates that do not build-depend on mysql:
> >
> > aircrack-ng_0.6.2-7etch1
> > clamav_0.90.1-3etch2
> > ekg_1.7~rc2-1etch1
> > file_4.17-5etch1
> > fr
Bill Allombert wrote:
> Hello m68k porters,
>
> I have build all etch security updates that do not build-depend on mysql:
>
> aircrack-ng_0.6.2-7etch1
> clamav_0.90.1-3etch2
> ekg_1.7~rc2-1etch1
> file_4.17-5etch1
> freetype_2.2.1-5+etch1
> gimp_2.2.13-1etch1
> ipsec-tools_0.6.6-3.1etch1
> libapa
Hello m68k porters,
I have build all etch security updates that do not build-depend on mysql:
aircrack-ng_0.6.2-7etch1
clamav_0.90.1-3etch2
ekg_1.7~rc2-1etch1
file_4.17-5etch1
freetype_2.2.1-5+etch1
gimp_2.2.13-1etch1
ipsec-tools_0.6.6-3.1etch1
libapache-mod-jk_1.2.18-3etch1
libexif_0.6.13-5etch1
13 matches
Mail list logo
