Hi Adrian,
From: John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
Sent: miércoles, 2 de febrero de 2022 21:11
> Did you use the "hd-media" or the "nativehd" image for your tests?
Both of them. I used "hd-media" for trying to install the OS placing the ISO
image in a FFS or FAT partition, while I used the "nativehd" o
On 2/2/22 21:11, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
>From the git history, it looks like nativehd is an old image type that is only
>being used at all
> on m68k but not on the other architectures. I will perform a test installer
> build and check what's
> actually in the initrd.
OK, so "nativehd"
Hi Carlos!
I have finally found the time to look at hd-media images.
On 12/9/21 23:24, Carlos Milán Figueredo wrote:
> The changes I have made to the debian-installer configurations to the m68k
> builds right are fairly simple:
>
> In /build/pkg-lists/hd-media/m68k.cfg added fol
Hi Andrian,
From: John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
Sent: sábado, 8 de enero de 2022 9:10
> There is no need to create your own Release file or sign it, so I'm not
> sure what you are trying to achieve. You could also use rsync for
> clowning the mirror but then you would have to exclude the other
> arch
Hello Carlos!
On 1/8/22 01:31, Carlos Milán Figueredo wrote:
> Sadly, there is no mention to the keyring package in [1] nor the signing
> process. The documentation is missing several points. First, the sample
> config files to download at [2] do not include Unreleased repo, so I
> figured out tha
Hi Adrian,
From: John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
Sent: martes, 4 de enero de 2022 8:41
> You are missing the "debian-ports-archive-keyring" package, see:
>
> > E: The repository 'file:/srv/debian-m68k-archive sid Release' is not
> signed.
Sadly, there is no mention to the keyring package in [1] nor t
Hi Carlos!
On 12/26/21 00:44, Carlos Milán Figueredo wrote:
> After running these steps I run into some problems. It looks like when running
> sort_deps it just doesn't find any packages. I am attaching a log of the
> output,
> with my configuration files as well.
You are missing the "debian-por
Hi and Merry Christmas!
From: John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
Sent: jueves, 9 de diciembre de 2021 8:50
> 1. Create a local copy of the Debian Ports unstable mirror with reprepro
> 2. Checkout debian-cd from source
> 3. Edit CONF.sh and and easy-build.sh to suit your needs (see my
> attached variants)
Hi Adrian,
From: John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
Sent: lunes, 13 de diciembre de 2021 18:33
> Thanks, but I prefer making all those changes myself as I want to do
> that for all the other architectures where it's missing, too.
>
> Also, I want to do some clean up while at it.
>
> However, if you send
Hello!
On 12/9/21 23:24, Carlos Milán Figueredo wrote:
> If I am able to check that the changes successfully work, I will
> send a Merge Request in the debian-installer repo.
Thanks, but I prefer making all those changes myself as I want to
do that for all the other architectures wher
ild.sh
> NETINST m68k
It sounds easier than I expected. Thank you for pointing me with the right
steps and the attached samples!
The changes I have made to the debian-installer configurations to the m68k
builds right are fairly simple:
In /build/pkg-lists/hd-media/m68k.cfg added following l
Hello Carlos!
On 12/6/21 16:10, Carlos Milán Figueredo wrote:
> I have successfully built my own hd-media initrd and kernel image by cloning
> the
> Debian Installer repository [1] and building them from a Debian install on
> Aranym
> from the latest snapshot [2]. My Aranym ha
Hi Debian/m68k people,
I have successfully built my own hd-media initrd and kernel image by cloning
the Debian Installer repository [1] and building them from a Debian install on
Aranym from the latest snapshot [2]. My Aranym has the following kernel:
Linux aranym 5.15.0-2-m68k #1 Debian
On Fri, 6 Oct 2017, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> So, in the end we're getting binaries on the CD image which users can
> directly start from MacOS? Into what exactly is mkisofs going to convert
> the Macbinary files into?
>
Once again, ISO9660/HFS hybrid.
> What's PenguinColors?
>
It'
On 10/06/2017 11:08 AM, Finn Thain wrote:
I'm confused. Didn't you say back then that the files are there and
usable on the Debian Sarge installation media?
There's no contradiction. Binhex (.hqx) is usable if you can unpack it (at
best inconvenient). OTOH, Macbinary should get decoded by $MKIS
On Fri, 6 Oct 2017, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> On 10/06/2017 03:36 AM, Finn Thain wrote:
> > I see there is code to copy some files that don't exist in any debian
> > package. This code should be copying macbinary files, not hqx or hfs
> > files. That is why I sent you those macbinary fi
On 10/06/2017 03:36 AM, Finn Thain wrote:
> I see there is code to copy some files that don't exist in any debian
> package. This code should be copying macbinary files, not hqx or hfs
> files. That is why I sent you those macbinary files to add to m68kboot.
> (Please refer to email messages of
On Fri, 6 Oct 2017, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
>
> The code to handle Penguin is still present in debian-installer [1] and
> for it to work, I just need to make sure Penguin is available in Debian
> again. [...]
>
I see there is code to copy some files that don't
ffer the penguin.hfs floppy image or hqx
>file as a separate download.
>
>Actually, the Debian 3 hqx is already available at
>
> http://archive.debian.org/debian/dists/Debian-3.0/main/disks-m68k/current/mac/
>
>and a StuffIt archive is available from the
Am 31.08.2017 um 14:32 schrieb John Paul Adrian Glaubitz:
> Hi!
>
> I just created the first debian installer image for m68k since aeons,
Wow, very nice work!
> Again, this has not been tested at all. If this turns your Amiga/Atari/Mac
> into a toaster, you have been warned!
f the installer is usable on real hardware, 40 MB is a lot
a of memory for this kind of machine.
My Mac Centris 650 has 136 MiB of RAM. So that shouldn't be a problem ;).
debian-installer also has low-mem mode which I have successfully used
on my Amiga 1200 in the past.
Adrian
--
.''
Le 04/09/2017 à 23:43, Laurent Vivier a écrit :
> Le 04/09/2017 à 21:51, Laurent Vivier a écrit :
>> Le 02/09/2017 à 07:33, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz a écrit :
>>> On 09/02/2017 05:34 AM, Finn Thain wrote:
The "-probe" and "--netatalk" options are not listed in the upstream man
page for
On Mon, 4 Sep 2017, Laurent Vivier wrote:
> Le 02/09/2017 à 07:33, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz a écrit :
> > On 09/02/2017 05:34 AM, Finn Thain wrote:
> >> The "-probe" and "--netatalk" options are not listed in the upstream
> >> man page for xorrisofs which makes me think that both the m68k and
>
On 09/04/2017 11:43 PM, Laurent Vivier wrote:
> Tested on my Quadra 800:
>
> - the bootloader boots fine, and loads kernel and initrd \o/
Wow, that's really cool. That's quite some progress :D.
> - I had some I/O errors with the CD and the installer doesn't start, but
> I think this is because m
Le 04/09/2017 à 21:51, Laurent Vivier a écrit :
> Le 02/09/2017 à 07:33, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz a écrit :
>> On 09/02/2017 05:34 AM, Finn Thain wrote:
>>> The "-probe" and "--netatalk" options are not listed in the upstream man
>>> page for xorrisofs which makes me think that both the m68k and
Le 02/09/2017 à 07:33, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz a écrit :
> On 09/02/2017 05:34 AM, Finn Thain wrote:
>> The "-probe" and "--netatalk" options are not listed in the upstream man
>> page for xorrisofs which makes me think that both the m68k and the powerpc
>> code here has bit-rotted.
>
> No, no
Le 04/09/2017 à 19:10, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz a écrit :
> On 09/04/2017 07:07 PM, Laurent Vivier wrote:
>> Debian-installer works fine.
>>
>> The keyboard is not correct when we boot the installed installed system.
>
> Then you're most likely right about &quo
ng into the installed system
> or already when debian-installer is running?
Debian-installer works fine.
The keyboard is not correct when we boot the installed installed system.
Thanks,
Laurent
On 09/04/2017 07:07 PM, Laurent Vivier wrote:
> Debian-installer works fine.
>
> The keyboard is not correct when we boot the installed installed system.
Then you're most likely right about "keyboard-configuration" being
the culprit. Feel free to file a bug report aga
On 09/04/2017 07:04 PM, Laurent Vivier wrote:
> Or a package an keyboard-configuration?
Could be. When exactly do you encounter the incorrect keyboard layout?
Does the keyboard work correctly after booting into the installed system
or already when debian-installer is running?
Adr
Le 04/09/2017 à 18:57, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz a écrit :
> On 09/04/2017 06:46 PM, Laurent Vivier wrote:
>> The configuration file is not generated correctly by debian-installer:
>> It uses the old key ids (macintosh specific) whereas kernel uses now the
>> generic ones (si
On 09/04/2017 06:46 PM, Laurent Vivier wrote:
> The configuration file is not generated correctly by debian-installer:
> It uses the old key ids (macintosh specific) whereas kernel uses now the
> generic ones (since linux 2.4?). This change in the configuration file
> fixes the probl
french apple
> wireless keyboard). "install-keymap" seems to work, but on reboot the
> console is always configured to use KERNEL keymap, not the new one.
The configuration file is not generated correctly by debian-installer:
It uses the old key ids (macintosh specific) whereas kernel
On 09/01/2017 10:15 PM, Laurent Vivier wrote:
> Sep 1 20:09:33 in-target: Some packages could not be installed. This
> may mean that you have
> Sep 1 20:09:33 in-target: requested an impossible situation or if you
> are using the unstable
> Sep 1 20:09:33 in-target: distribution that some requir
On 09/02/2017 02:06 PM, Finn Thain wrote:
> In the past, yes, the Debian 3 ISO mounted fine in Mac OS. But the
> etch-m68k ISO shows up as one big audio track, as did your first attempt
> at a Debian 9 ISO.
>
> The -iso-level 4 change was an attempt to fix that by bringing m68k into
> sync with
On Sat, 2 Sep 2017, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> On 09/02/2017 12:11 PM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> > The patch below is now up-to-date? If yes, I'll apply it.
> >
> >> This debian-cd patch sync's up the boot-m68k scripts with
> >> boot-powerpc scripts, making the powerpc and m68k
On 09/02/2017 12:11 PM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> The patch below is now up-to-date? If yes, I'll apply it.
>
>> This debian-cd patch sync's up the boot-m68k scripts with boot-powerpc
>> scripts, making the powerpc and m68k scripts more alike and thus easier to
>> compare. The --iso-lev
On 09/02/2017 12:01 PM, Finn Thain wrote:
> I think we can get by with xorrisofs if that's somehow the "right" tool.
>
> But genisoimage may allow us to create an HFS/ISO9660 hybrid, which may be
> helpful if it allows us to avoid Binhex format for the bootloader or if it
> helps create a bootab
On Sat, 2 Sep 2017, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> On 09/02/2017 05:34 AM, Finn Thain wrote:
> > The "-probe" and "--netatalk" options are not listed in the upstream
> > man page for xorrisofs which makes me think that both the m68k and the
> > powerpc code here has bit-rotted.
>
> No, not
On 09/02/2017 07:33 AM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
>> Interestingly, there's not much use of HFS in there, but it mounts just
>> fine under System 7. So I suspect we need the "-iso-level 4" option.
>> Please see patch below.
>
> Try the above image first and let me know if it mounts. I wil
Hi!
I just generated a fresh set of debian-installer images for
* hppa
* m68k
* sparc64
They can be found in [1].
I didn't create an image for alpha because debian-installer currently
fails to build from source because src:linux fails to build from source
on alpha. Once that has
On 09/02/2017 05:34 AM, Finn Thain wrote:
> The "-probe" and "--netatalk" options are not listed in the upstream man
> page for xorrisofs which makes me think that both the m68k and the powerpc
> code here has bit-rotted.
No, not bit-rotted. But rather, they were never implemented in xorrisofs
w
mage/archive/6.0.10/powerpc/iso-cd/debian-6.0.10-powerpc-netinst.iso
Interestingly, there's not much use of HFS in there, but it mounts just
fine under System 7. So I suspect we need the "-iso-level 4" option.
Please see patch below.
> > > You can also download debian-ins
On 09/01/2017 11:01 PM, Laurent Vivier wrote:
> First time, I tried to install GNOME, but it failed on other unmet
> dependencies (libreoffice, ...)
GNOME? On m68k? That's courageous.
On a sidenote: We do have libreoffice on m68k. So, that shouldn't
be the problem. But I don't expect GNOME to wor
Le 01/09/2017 à 22:56, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz a écrit :
> On 09/01/2017 10:50 PM, Laurent Vivier wrote:
>> I've a working system.
>
> Good. But I really need to find where that libxmlada package comes
> from. It doesn't make any sense at all that it's being pulled in.
>
> Did you choose some o
On 09/01/2017 10:57 PM, Laurent Vivier wrote:
>> Hmm, I can't find it there. I'll continue searching.
>>
>
> The dependency on libgnat seems wrong (it uses 4.6 instead of 5)
But why does it need any Ada libraries in the first place on a minimal
system? I know that Ada is currently half-broken on
Le 01/09/2017 à 22:44, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz a écrit :
> On 09/01/2017 10:32 PM, Laurent Vivier wrote:
>> In the "Select and install software".
>> I think it is pulled by "pkgsel".
>
> Hmm, I can't find it there. I'll continue searching.
>
The dependency on libgnat seems wrong (it uses 4.6 i
On 09/01/2017 10:50 PM, Laurent Vivier wrote:
> I've a working system.
Good. But I really need to find where that libxmlada package comes
from. It doesn't make any sense at all that it's being pulled in.
Did you choose some of the tasks during installation?
> The first problem is the keyboard is
Le 01/09/2017 à 22:08, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz a écrit :
> On 09/01/2017 10:05 PM, Laurent Vivier wrote:
>> It works fine with (/usr/lib/base-installer/kernel.sh)
>
> So, were you able to fully install the system? Any other errors?
I've a working system.
The first problem is the keyboard is us
On 09/01/2017 10:32 PM, Laurent Vivier wrote:
> In the "Select and install software".
> I think it is pulled by "pkgsel".
Hmm, I can't find it there. I'll continue searching.
--
.''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
: :' : Debian Developer - glaub...@debian.org
`. `' Freie Universitaet Berlin - g
Le 01/09/2017 à 22:30, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz a écrit :
> On 09/01/2017 10:20 PM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
>> That's a package that's been removed long time ago [1].
>> We need to find out where it's referenced. Must be one of
>> the other d-i components.
>
> Can you tell me in which d-
On 09/01/2017 10:20 PM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> That's a package that's been removed long time ago [1].
> We need to find out where it's referenced. Must be one of
> the other d-i components.
Can you tell me in which d-i step the package is tried to be installed?
I cannot find a refere
On 09/01/2017 10:15 PM, Laurent Vivier wrote:
> Sep 1 20:09:33 in-target:
> Sep 1 20:09:33 in-target: The following packages have unmet dependencies:
> Sep 1 20:09:34 in-target: libxmlada4.1-dbg : Depends: libxmlada4.1 (=
> 4.1-4) but it is not going to be installed
That's a package that's bee
Le 01/09/2017 à 22:08, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz a écrit :
> On 09/01/2017 10:05 PM, Laurent Vivier wrote:
>> It works fine with (/usr/lib/base-installer/kernel.sh)
>
> So, were you able to fully install the system? Any other errors?
I have configured a remote repo
(http://ftp.ports.debian.org/de
On 09/01/2017 10:05 PM, Laurent Vivier wrote:
> It works fine with (/usr/lib/base-installer/kernel.sh)
So, were you able to fully install the system? Any other errors?
> I've modified "arch_get_kernel_flavour()" to always print "m68k".
I will patch base-installer accordingly and generate another
Le 01/09/2017 à 21:33, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz a écrit :
> On 09/01/2017 09:24 PM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
>> So, I think that arch_get_kernel_flavour() needs to be patched to
>> just always echo "m68k" in [1]. Compare this to amd64 [2].
>
> You should be able to test this yourself. The
On 09/01/2017 09:24 PM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> So, I think that arch_get_kernel_flavour() needs to be patched to
> just always echo "m68k" in [1]. Compare this to amd64 [2].
You should be able to test this yourself. The script m68k.sh can
be found somewhere below /lib/ something. Patch
On 09/01/2017 09:10 PM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> Ah, so it's base-installer which needs to be fixed. I'll have a look.
So, I think that arch_get_kernel_flavour() needs to be patched to
just always echo "m68k" in [1]. Compare this to amd64 [2].
The reason this needs to be changed is beca
On 09/01/2017 08:59 PM, Laurent Vivier wrote:
>>From /var/log/syslog:
>
> Sep 1 18:46:24 base-installer: info: kernel linux-image-m68k not usable
> on mac
> Sep 1 18:46:24 base-installer: info: kernel linux-image-4.12.0-1-m68k
> not usable on mac
> Sep 1 18:46:24 base-installer: info: Found ker
On 09/01/2017 08:40 PM, Laurent Vivier wrote:
>> Please check for the actual log message from the syslog console (switch with
>> + Cursor keys).
>
> And with serial console, how to switch to the syslog console?
On a serial console, debian-installer should automatically sta
Le 01/09/2017 à 20:38, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz a écrit :
> The kernel package was still missing from the debian-cd package inclusion
> list. So my fix was correct.
>
> Please check for the actual log message from the syslog console (switch with
> + Cursor keys).
>
> I need the error message
Le 01/09/2017 à 20:38, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz a écrit :
> The kernel package was still missing from the debian-cd package inclusion
> list. So my fix was correct.
>
> Please check for the actual log message from the syslog console (switch with
> + Cursor keys).
And with serial console, how
The kernel package was still missing from the debian-cd package inclusion list.
So my fix was correct.
Please check for the actual log message from the syslog console (switch with
+ Cursor keys).
I need the error message from syslog.
Adrian
> On Sep 1, 2017, at 8:24 PM, Laurent Vivier wrote
Le 01/09/2017 à 16:24, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz a écrit :
> On 09/01/2017 04:18 PM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
>> Suggestions which packages should be included there for m68k?
>>
>> I assume that should be:
>>
>> - busybox
>> - linux-image-m68k
>> - initramfs-tools
>> - emile
>
> I just did
On 09/01/2017 04:18 PM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
Suggestions which packages should be included there for m68k?
I assume that should be:
- busybox
- linux-image-m68k
- initramfs-tools
- emile
I just did that. Please try this updated image:
https://people.debian.org/~glaubitz/debian-c
On 09/01/2017 04:14 PM, Laurent Vivier wrote:
This one works better, but it doesn't find any kernel to install.
That's a problem we had in the past on sparc64 as well. It's because
there are no kernel packages defined for m68k in [1].
Suggestions which packages should be included there for m68
Le 01/09/2017 à 11:18, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz a écrit :
> On 08/31/2017 03:59 PM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
>>> Aug 31 13:09:07 debootstrap: Errors were encountered while processing:
>>> Aug 31 13:09:07 debootstrap: mac-fdisk
>>> Aug 31 13:09:08 debootstrap: Setting up mac-fdisk (0.1-16+
ny
variant of UAE (WinUAE, FS-UAE), but I would be very interested to
hear the results.
The more testing and bug reports we get, the faster we can improve
the image and debian-installer itself.
The relevant components are:
* debian-installer and its sub-modules:
> https://anonscm.debia
Am 31.08.2017 um 14:32 schrieb John Paul Adrian Glaubitz:
> Again, this has not been tested at all. If this turns your Amiga/Atari/Mac
> into a toaster, you have been warned!
Would FS-UAE (or similar) be able to boot this? That could prevent
"toastering" while experimenting.
On 08/31/2017 03:59 PM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
Aug 31 13:09:07 debootstrap: Errors were encountered while processing:
Aug 31 13:09:07 debootstrap: mac-fdisk
Aug 31 13:09:08 debootstrap: Setting up mac-fdisk (0.1-16+b1) ...
Aug 31 13:09:08 debootstrap: dpkg: error: unknown option
--prin
and matching initrd from somewhere. (The sourceforge v4.1 binary is
probably sufficient, but if you need the mac8390 or mac89x0 NIC driver,
you'd have to untar and insmod that.)
Well, as I said, this is the very first image I created. We had to fix
a large number of packages like debian-inst
On Thu, 31 Aug 2017, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I just created the first debian installer image for m68k since aeons, it
> can be downloaded from here:
>
> > https://people.debian.org/~glaubitz/debian-cd/2017-08-31/
>
Nice work!
> Note: This has
On 08/31/2017 03:58 PM, Laurent Vivier wrote:
This installation fails with:
Aug 31 13:09:07 debootstrap: Errors were encountered while processing:
Aug 31 13:09:07 debootstrap: mac-fdisk
Aug 31 13:09:08 debootstrap: Setting up mac-fdisk (0.1-16+b1) ...
Aug 31 13:09:08 debootstrap: dpkg: error: u
Le 31/08/2017 à 14:32, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz a écrit :
> Hi!
Hi,
> I just created the first debian installer image for m68k since aeons,
> it can be downloaded from here:
>
>> https://people.debian.org/~glaubitz/debian-cd/2017-08-31/
>
> Note: This has not been test
Hi!
I just created the first debian installer image for m68k since aeons,
it can be downloaded from here:
https://people.debian.org/~glaubitz/debian-cd/2017-08-31/
Note: This has not been tested at all and booting on a Mac with EMILE
most likely doesn't work at all since xorr
On 05/22/2017 02:09 AM, Finn Thain wrote:
> Looks good but I suspect that macmace needs to be added to the nic-modules
> list.
Right, forgot that one because I got interrupted. I also have to drop
the atari_ethernec driver which no longer exists.
Also, I'm wondering which of the drivers are actu
On Sun, 21 May 2017, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> On 05/17/2017 02:24 PM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> > Ok, let's get some order into this.
> >
> > I have already opened a bug report to include loop-modules [1].
> >
> > Then, looking at the module packages on m68k [2] and powerpc [3
On 05/17/2017 02:24 PM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> Ok, let's get some order into this.
>
> I have already opened a bug report to include loop-modules [1].
>
> Then, looking at the module packages on m68k [2] and powerpc [3],
> I suggest to add the following new packages first:
> (...)
> D
d I miss anything?
>
> Adrian
>
>> [1] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=862813
>> [2]
> https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/kernel/linux.git/tree/debian/installer/m68k/modules/m68k
>> [3]
> https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/kernel/linux.git/tree/debian/installer
m_mod (although this is a floppy module)
To scsi-modules, we should add:
- atari_scsi
- esp_scsi
- mac_esp
- mac_scsi
Did I miss anything?
Adrian
> [1] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=862813
> [2]
https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/kernel/linux.git/tree/debian/installer/m68k/mod
Le 16/05/2017 à 09:40, Geert Uytterhoeven a écrit :
> Hi Adrian,
>
> On Mon, May 15, 2017 at 11:21 PM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
> wrote:
>> Thus, I would to ask around which modules are needed for the various
>> hardware people have, e.g. SCSI driver for 68k Macs, IDE drivers for
>> Amiga and At
On Mon, 15 May 2017, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Recently, I made some progress with debian-installer on m68k and got it
> to build on m68k, at least the cdrom installer. It can be downloaded for
> testing purpose here [1]. It should work in emulators like Ara
Hi Adrian,
On Mon, May 15, 2017 at 11:21 PM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
wrote:
> Thus, I would to ask around which modules are needed for the various
> hardware people have, e.g. SCSI driver for 68k Macs, IDE drivers for
> Amiga and Atari and so on.
>
> The drivers need to be added to the correspo
Hi!
Recently, I made some progress with debian-installer on m68k and got it
to build on m68k, at least the cdrom installer. It can be downloaded
for testing purpose here [1]. It should work in emulators like Aranym
and qemu-m68k in system mode.
I haven't tested the installer myself yet
ilding $codename cd set ...
-export CODENAME=stretch
+#export CODENAME=stretch
# By default use Debian installer packages from $CODENAME
if [ -z "$DI_CODENAME" ]; then
- export DI_CODENAME=$CODENAME
+ if [ "${CODENAME}" = "jessie-kfreebsd" ]; then
+ export DI_C
On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 01:55:08PM +0100, Steven Chamberlain wrote:
>John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
>> Thus, I was wondering whether any volunteers would be willing to help
>> building
>> ISO images for the various architectures.
>
>I'm already doing this for kfreebsd-amd64, but only the jessie-
Steven Chamberlain, on mer. 12 avril 2017 13:55:08 +0100, wrote:
> I expect there might be problems trying to build linux arches from a
> kfreebsd host. But we should try to find out, and then maybe fix it.
FWIW, I have been building hurd-i386 images from a linux box for a long
time without probl
Hello,
John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> Thus, I was wondering whether any volunteers would be willing to help building
> ISO images for the various architectures.
I'm already doing this for kfreebsd-amd64, but only the jessie-kfreebsd
suite:
http://jenkins.kfreebsd.eu/jenkins/view/cd/job/debian
Hi!
Thanks to the recent efforts within the Debian Ports projects, debian-installer
is finally available for the Debian Ports architectures [1]. Previously, the
installer images had to be built manually because building on the buildds always
required a testing repository to be available for a
Source: linux
Version: 4.9.18-1
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
User: debian-68k@lists.debian.org
Usertags: m68k
Hi!
While working on fixing debian-installer on m68k, I ran into the
following problem after updating the m68k-specific configuration
to use the common m68k image:
# Set up modules.dep
Hector Oron dixit:
>If you have kernel flavours, then you probably want to have
>subarch support for m68k (similar to armel).
I don’t know. Do we have kernel flavours? The -atari, -amiga,
etc. are like -i486 and -i686-pae kernels.
>If you need any update, please send a patch with updated
>inform
Hello,
Sorry for late reply, I have just found this email in my records.
Just note that this email call for update, was related to Squeeze
release.
2011/5/8 Thorsten Glaser :
> The packages are linux-image-2.6.38-2-{amiga,atari,…}
> versioned as *_2.6.38-5_m68k.deb (I don’t know which
> of these
Hector Oron dixit:
>(CC me on replies as I might not be subscribed to this list)
Done.
> On SH4, m68k and alpha architecture, as those are not Debian
>"Official" candidates for release, debian-installer is lagging kernel
>behind.
>
>d-i/installer/doc/devel/kernta
.6.26 (-7) 2.6.26-1 # unoficial
>>sh4 2.6.32 (-??) 2.6.32-5 # unoficial
>
>>If you are interested your architecture to be supported by
>>debian-installer, please update lagging kernel status. You can either
>
> What’s needed to get 2.6.32-5+m68k.3 from debian-por
32-5 # unoficial
>If you are interested your architecture to be supported by
>debian-installer, please update lagging kernel status. You can either
What’s needed to get 2.6.32-5+m68k.3 from debian-ports.org
suite “unreleased” there? I have zero idea of d-i, have only
used debootstrap on m68k
Hi, zumbi.
2010/11/7 Hector Oron :
> (CC me on replies as I might not be subscribed to this list)
>
> Hello,
>
> On SH4, m68k and alpha architecture, as those are not Debian
> "Official" candidates for release, debian-installer is lagging kernel
> behind.
>
Hector Oron dixit:
>m68k 2.6.26 (-7) 2.6.26-1 # unoficial
I’ve got working 2.6.32-26+m68k.2 which I uploaded to unreleased on
debian-ports.org yesterday, and 2.6.32-27+m68k.3 is almost built.
The kernels for m68k sort of need patches to build which, at the
current time, will probably n
(CC me on replies as I might not be subscribed to this list)
Hello,
On SH4, m68k and alpha architecture, as those are not Debian
"Official" candidates for release, debian-installer is lagging kernel
behind.
d-i/installer/doc/devel/kerntabl:
arch kernel udebs build/c
Hello porters,
Most arches has 2.6.29 packages ready (AFAIK only hppa lacks them
right now) and I also did most changes for all arches on SVN to get
2.6.29 updating as easy as possible. Now, we need porters' help.
Please check your pet arch and update the kernel and modules for
2.6.29. This is q
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello Porters,
I've done first set of updates on kernel-wedge and also did trivial
changes ones on the architecture specific packages of kernel. I'd like
to ask for a last look on them so we can upload 2.6.24 based packages
to sid.
Please take a look
1 - 100 of 252 matches
Mail list logo
