On Fri, Jun 01, 2007 at 07:11:09AM -0400, L Moore wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 01, 2007 at 11:48:09AM +1000, Finn Thain wrote:
> > It might be worth your asking on the mailing list too -- certainly Geert
> > knows a lot more about framebuffer drivers than I.
>
> Ok, hopefully their advice will be as u
On Fri, 1 Jun 2007, L Moore wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 01, 2007 at 11:48:09AM +1000, Finn Thain wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, 31 May 2007, L Moore wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > I'm composing these two messages using telnet from the G4 because
> > > the Quadra display and keyboard are frozen. Want any config fil
On Fri, Jun 01, 2007 at 11:48:09AM +1000, Finn Thain wrote:
>
> On Thu, 31 May 2007, L Moore wrote:
>
> >
> > I'm composing these two messages using telnet from the G4 because the
> > Quadra display and keyboard are frozen. Want any config files to look
> > at.
>
> Nah, that seg fault means
> > > > CONFIG_MAC_ADBKEYCODES=y
> > >
> > > That's because I used the debian config for that kernel. I build
> > > smaller kernels for myself, and I don't enable CONFIG_MAC_ADBKEYCODES.
> > > It doesn't do anything in 2.6.x. It should be removed from Kconfig.
> >
> > It used to work until about 2.
On Wed, 30 May 2007, Brian Morris wrote:
> So, you think that the X keyboard and the console are completely
> unconnected ?
If I run loadkeys on my (x86) laptop, virtual consoles are affected but
xorg is not. And I gather that the ADB->linux keycode mapping happens
lower in the input layers
On 5/29/07, Finn Thain <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Tue, 29 May 2007, Brian Morris wrote:
> On 5/27/07, Finn Thain <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Sat, 26 May 2007, Joel Ewy wrote:
> >
> > > Hmm. As I recall, there is another layout (or was in XFree86 4.x)
> > > for the Mac called
On Wed, 30 May 2007, Michael Schmitz wrote:
> > > whoops, looks you guys beat me to it. both finn's 20 and christians
> > > 21 have
> > >
> > > CONFIG_MAC_ADBKEYCODES=y
> >
> > That's because I used the debian config for that kernel. I build
> > smaller kernels for myself, and I don't enable C
> > whoops, looks you guys beat me to it. both finn's 20 and christians 21
> > have
> >
> > CONFIG_MAC_ADBKEYCODES=y
>
> That's because I used the debian config for that kernel. I build smaller
> kernels for myself, and I don't enable CONFIG_MAC_ADBKEYCODES. It doesn't
> do anything in 2.6.x. It sh
On Tue, 29 May 2007, Brian Morris wrote:
> On 5/27/07, Finn Thain <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Sat, 26 May 2007, Joel Ewy wrote:
> >
> > > Hmm. As I recall, there is another layout (or was in XFree86 4.x)
> > > for the Mac called something like "macintosh_old". I believe this
>
On 5/27/07, Finn Thain <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Sat, 26 May 2007, Joel Ewy wrote:
> Hmm. As I recall, there is another layout (or was in XFree86 4.x) for
> the Mac called something like "macintosh_old". I believe this was for
> the older, small ADB keyboards that didn't have Function ke
On Mon, 28 May 2007, L Moore wrote:
> On Sat, May 26, 2007 at 10:42:37AM -0700, David D. Kilzer wrote:
>
> >
> > I recommend using a program called "keychain" to manage your ssh keys
> > while you're logged in. There should be a Debian package for it.
> >
> Ok, thanks.
keychain is a fronte
On Sat, May 26, 2007 at 10:42:37AM -0700, David D. Kilzer wrote:
>
> I'm not sure what the corresponding authorized_keys file would be when using
> MacSSH.
Turn out to be in System:Preferences:MacSSH:
I netatalked identity.ss2.pub to the quadra and included it (with a
little editing, as advised.
On Sat, 26 May 2007, Joel Ewy wrote:
> Hmm. As I recall, there is another layout (or was in XFree86 4.x) for
> the Mac called something like "macintosh_old". I believe this was for
> the older, small ADB keyboards that didn't have Function keys. It
> sounds like you're using a full-sized k
On Fri, 25 May 2007, Brian Morris wrote:
> yes key repeats of regular keys.
>
> no success with xmodmap experiments with the cursor/page keys though.
> still dead keys. tried pc104 layout instead of mac and that got rid of
> xkbcomp errors but dead keys still dead.
Does xev indicate that the
L Moore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Not yet. I'm trying to understand how to sshd on this
> computer from ssh on the same machine. Is there a ssh howto file?
http://www.google.com/search?q=ssh+howto
> My first step is to make a /home/ljmoore/.ssh directory.
>
> drwxr-xr-x 2 ljmoore users40
Brian Morris wrote:
> On 5/22/07, Joel Ewy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> >>
>> >> So I'm curious to know whether the same problem shows up in
>> X.org. You
>> >> mention that the cursor keys don't work -- are you sure the keys
>> don't
>> >> work at all, or do they just not repeat like you would
On Fri, May 25, 2007 at 10:14:44PM -0700, Brian Morris wrote:
>
> appears that Xserver needs ssh running to work.
>
> (besides you may need for error recovery).
>
> Tried ping ?
>
ping 192.168.0.102
PING 192.168.0.102 (192.168.0.102) 56(84) bytes of data.
64 bytes from 192.168.0.102: icmp_seq
On 5/22/07, Joel Ewy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> So I'm curious to know whether the same problem shows up in X.org. You
>> mention that the cursor keys don't work -- are you sure the keys don't
>> work at all, or do they just not repeat like you would expect? In XF86
>
> no nothing at all
On Thu, May 24, 2007 at 09:26:39PM -0700, Brian Morris wrote:
> L Moore wrote:
>
> ls -l /dev/fb0
> crw-rw 1 root video 29, 0 Dec 31 1969 /dev/fb0
>
> cat /proc/fb
> 0 Macintosh DAFB built-in
>
> ...
> i can try X on 605. I should remind us both though i am running unstable on
> 68k which b
On 5/24/07, L Moore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Thu, May 24, 2007 at 09:05:27AM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> On Wed, 23 May 2007, L Moore wrote:
> > On Wed, May 23, 2007 at 04:40:48PM -0700, Brian Morris wrote:
> > > what is the name of your framebuffer device in your machine, you have
>
On Thu, May 24, 2007 at 09:05:27AM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> On Wed, 23 May 2007, L Moore wrote:
> > On Wed, May 23, 2007 at 04:40:48PM -0700, Brian Morris wrote:
> > > what is the name of your framebuffer device in your machine, you have
> >
> > Name of my framebuffer? beyond /dev/fb0 ??
On Thu, May 24, 2007 at 09:05:27AM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> On Wed, 23 May 2007, L Moore wrote:
> > On Wed, May 23, 2007 at 04:40:48PM -0700, Brian Morris wrote:
> > > what is the name of your framebuffer device in your machine, you have
> >
> > Name of my framebuffer? beyond /dev/fb0 ??
On Wed, 23 May 2007, L Moore wrote:
> On Wed, May 23, 2007 at 04:40:48PM -0700, Brian Morris wrote:
> > what is the name of your framebuffer device in your machine, you have
>
> Name of my framebuffer? beyond /dev/fb0 ??
`cat /proc/fb' will tell you.
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
On Wed, May 23, 2007 at 04:40:48PM -0700, Brian Morris wrote:
> On 5/23/07, L Moore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >On Mon, May 21, 2007 at 10:13:19PM -0700, Brian Morris wrote:
>
>
>
> >
> >Dillo is X-dependent? What version of gcc is needed?
>
> I used gcc4.1 to build Dillo against xorg librari
Brian Morris wrote:
> -- Forwarded message --
> From: Brian Morris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: May 21, 2007 10:42 PM
> Subject: Re: X on Mac (was: Re: upgraded to lenny/sid and ordered RAM)
> To: Joel Ewy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> On 5/18/07, J
On 5/18/07, Joel Ewy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Brian Morris wrote:
> I have X work ing (or more than half way anyway) !!
> see below.
>
Someone on this list recently suggested I try a 2.6 kernel, which I
intend to do, but it sounds like you have beat me to it. What are your
findings?
th
26 matches
Mail list logo
