+++ Riku Voipio [06-01-03 15:17 +0200]:
> Hi,
>
> emDebian development is again a bit staganting. One option to fuel
> some fire is to have a worksession[0] at Extremadura[1][2].
>
> I would personally favour March 22-26/April 19-23, as this would let us
> have something to show at debconf for
On Tue, Jan 03, 2006 at 09:52:58PM +0100, Hector Oron wrote:
> On 1/3/06, Gabriel Paubert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > it's my first post to this list, but I've been lurking
> > for a while.
>
>
> Bienvenido ! Welcome to the list !
¡Gracias! Thanks!
>
> I'm really int
On 1/3/06, Gabriel Paubert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,it's my first post to this list, but I've been lurkingfor a while.
Bienvenido ! Welcome to the list !
I'm really interested in upgrading since the distributionI originally used (Linux/PPC) has been abandoned. However
some capabilit
On Tue, Jan 03, 2006 at 03:02:40PM -0300, Daniel Ruoso wrote:
>> I would love to stand up a fully-working armel-uclibc port, or at least
>> get the essential and build-essential packages running. I use
>> debootstrap, so lack of an installer wouldn't be a problem.
>
>The same case for me. But w
On Tue Jan 03, 2006 at 03:02:40PM -0300, Daniel Ruoso wrote:
> Em Ter, 2006-01-03 às 08:16 -0600, Bill Gatliff escreveu:
> > I would love to stand up a fully-working armel-uclibc port, or at least
> > get the essential and build-essential packages running. I use
> > debootstrap, so lack of an in
Em Ter, 2006-01-03 às 08:16 -0600, Bill Gatliff escreveu:
> So many important topics, so little time!
*sigh*... Unfortunally I have to agree...
> > * prepare uclibc ports [4]
> Sadly, I'm not a DD (yet) but I could definitely get behind this
> proposal. Not only does it benefit embedded in a BI
Guys:
* promote DEBUILD_OPTIONS=nodocs flag for not building docs
Stupid question, but it be more appropriate to promote separate *-doc
packages instead?
b.g.
--
Bill Gatliff
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Co
Hi,
it's my first post to this list, but I've been lurking
for a while.
On Tue, Jan 03, 2006 at 03:17:41PM +0200, Riku Voipio wrote:
> Hi,
>
> emDebian development is again a bit staganting. One option to fuel
> some fire is to have a worksession[0] at Extremadura[1][2].
Very nice plac
Riku:
So many important topics, so little time!
* prepare uclibc ports [4]
Sadly, I'm not a DD (yet) but I could definitely get behind this
proposal. Not only does it benefit embedded in a BIG way, but it also
keeps Debian relevant on the class of machines that will likely be used
in
Hi,
emDebian development is again a bit staganting. One option to fuel
some fire is to have a worksession[0] at Extremadura[1][2]. Some ideas
of things that could get done at or before emDebian worksession:
* bring Ed's framework upto date with Etch.
* create configurations for various devices
10 matches
Mail list logo
