On Tue, Jan 03, 2006 at 03:02:40PM -0300, Daniel Ruoso wrote: >> I would love to stand up a fully-working armel-uclibc port, or at least >> get the essential and build-essential packages running. I use >> debootstrap, so lack of an installer wouldn't be a problem. > >The same case for me. But we're a little stuck in the toolchain, due to >gcc(3-4), binutils(0.15-0.16), uclibc(ok, it's just changing too much)
Nobody forces you to keep up with the very latest uClibc for an initial setup, right? IMO it is not fair to state that some library -- which has a working stable release anyway -- currently is changing rather fast *internally*. Is there a branch for dpkg-cross in the tla archive of dpkg, btw? It would certainly be easier to have that in order to move forward wrt the infrastructure i'd say. cheers, Bernhard -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
