On Tue Jan 03, 2006 at 03:02:40PM -0300, Daniel Ruoso wrote: > Em Ter, 2006-01-03 às 08:16 -0600, Bill Gatliff escreveu: > > I would love to stand up a fully-working armel-uclibc port, or at least > > get the essential and build-essential packages running. I use > > debootstrap, so lack of an installer wouldn't be a problem. > > The same case for me. But we're a little stuck in the toolchain, due to > gcc(3-4), binutils(0.15-0.16), uclibc(ok, it's just changing too much) > transition... I'll see some patches I just received to see if we can go > faster...
There is nothing wrong with uClibc 0.9.28. Trying to track the latest and greatest uClibc SVN tree is going to be a huge amount of work with little payoff.... -Erik -- Erik B. Andersen http://codepoet-consulting.com/ --This message was written using 73% post-consumer electrons-- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
