> > What machine did r-base get built on last time?
>
> Perhaps q650? Seems unlikely.
>
> $ wbi r-base
> r-base:
> Package : r-base
> Version : 2.4.1-1
> Builder : buildd_m68k-q650
> State : Installed
> Section : math
> Prior
On Mon, Jan 22, 2007 at 03:12:34PM +0100, Michael Schmitz wrote:
> What machine did r-base get built on last time?
Perhaps q650? Seems unlikely.
$ wbi r-base
r-base:
Package : r-base
Version : 2.4.1-1
Builder : buildd_m68k-q650
State : In
On Mon, Jan 22, 2007 at 03:12:34PM +0100, Michael Schmitz wrote:
> I forgot: all R related build failures usually only happen on 060.
> kullervo just got stuck with r-cran-eco_3.0-2-1 (rescheduling on q650).
> Gotta be something specific to the 060 (integer or floating point
> emulation? Subtle cr
> > > Sadly, the update pulse for the stats at 9:03 is missing, but I doubt that
> > > it's a matter of too less memory as aahz has 1.1 GB of swap.
> > What do these numbers tell me? Aahz crashed, the last change to the log file
> > was at 0919:
> > -rw-r--r-- 1 buildd buildd 8328 Jan 21 09:19
>
On Mon, Jan 22, 2007 at 11:54:00AM +0100, Christian T. Steigies wrote:
> > Sadly, the update pulse for the stats at 9:03 is missing, but I doubt that
> > it's a matter of too less memory as aahz has 1.1 GB of swap.
> What do these numbers tell me? Aahz crashed, the last change to the log file
> wa
On Mon, Jan 22, 2007 at 11:23:04AM +0100, Ingo Juergensmann wrote:
>
> According to the buildd.net database, mcmcpack has been tried to build
> between 2007-01-21 07:09:09 (anthy) and 2007-01-21 14:29:06 (mini-httpd):
>
> buildd=# select dtstamp, uptime, lavg, memfree, swapfree from hoststats
>
On Mon, Jan 22, 2007 at 10:35:08AM +0100, Michael Schmitz wrote:
> > > hobbes froze yet again building dwm - I'll leave it off for now until I
> > > find time to check it out (might take two weeks or so).
> > ahhz froze building mcmcpack_0.8-1-1. I tried to capture a dmesg, but it
> > seems it did
> > hobbes froze yet again building dwm - I'll leave it off for now until I
> > find time to check it out (might take two weeks or so).
>
> ahhz froze building mcmcpack_0.8-1-1. I tried to capture a dmesg, but it
> seems it did not get saved. However, I have one from the previous freeze,
> which lo
On Thu, Jan 18, 2007 at 05:28:23PM +0100, Michael Schmitz wrote:
> > Crest and kullervo froze again, with r-base-core as the suspect package.
> > hobbes froze as well, but that seems to have been a different reason. I've
> > rescheduled all on a 040. Baffled ...
>
> hobbes froze yet again building
> Crest and kullervo froze again, with r-base-core as the suspect package.
> hobbes froze as well, but that seems to have been a different reason. I've
> rescheduled all on a 040. Baffled ...
hobbes froze yet again building dwm - I'll leave it off for now until I
find time to check it out (might t
> > Might have died before the log was written to disk. Does a call to R come
> > immediately after what is the last log line on aahz, usually?
>
> Not immedaitely, it was applying patches, and there were still 5 patches to
> go. No idea what would have happened after that, the package uses cdbs, b
On Wed, Jan 10, 2007 at 04:06:44PM +0100, Michael Schmitz wrote:
> > > So it looks like the 060 is to blame here. I'll preinstall the previous
> > > r-base-core on crest and re-crash ...
> >
> > aahz crashed with texmacs_1:1.0.6-11, which needs R, but the log does not
> > show that R had been calle
> > So it looks like the 060 is to blame here. I'll preinstall the previous
> > r-base-core on crest and re-crash ...
>
> aahz crashed with texmacs_1:1.0.6-11, which needs R, but the log does not
> show that R had been called.
Might have died before the log was written to disk. Does a call to R co
On Wed, Jan 10, 2007 at 09:22:26AM +0100, Michael Schmitz wrote:
> > > > What's the kernel version for aahz? crest runs 2.4.33. Could someone
> > > > with
> > > > 2.4.x and 040 try to build date? Same for 2.6.x and 060?
> > >
> > > vault13 (2.6.18) and vivaldi (2.6.14) are both 060. Both crashed.
> > > What's the kernel version for aahz? crest runs 2.4.33. Could someone with
> > > 2.4.x and 040 try to build date? Same for 2.6.x and 060?
> >
> > vault13 (2.6.18) and vivaldi (2.6.14) are both 060. Both crashed.
>
> aahz (060) has a special 2.6.18, I removed the gvp scsi driver which tends
> t
On Tue, Jan 09, 2007 at 11:16:42AM -0600, Stephen R Marenka wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 09, 2007 at 05:29:34PM +0100, Michael Schmitz wrote:
> > > > > immediately when starting R:
> > > >
> > > > aahz just went down, I'll have to check at home what happened. But it
> > > > seems
> > > > to be building nl
On Tue, Jan 09, 2007 at 05:29:34PM +0100, Michael Schmitz wrote:
> > > > immediately when starting R:
> > >
> > > aahz just went down, I'll have to check at home what happened. But it
> > > seems
> > > to be building nlme_3.1.79-1, which is a pacakge for R...
> >
> > Can we find an older working c
> > > immediately when starting R:
> >
> > aahz just went down, I'll have to check at home what happened. But it seems
> > to be building nlme_3.1.79-1, which is a pacakge for R...
>
> Can we find an older working copy of R, and keep that pre-installed?
Update 1: the last version of r-base-core be
> > > We should test that with aranym ASAP. Please collect test cases :-)
> >
> > First test case: I restarted the date build on crest, carefully watching
> > top, the build log and the kernel log. It does, in fact, freeze
> > immediately when starting R:
>
> aahz just went down, I'll have to check
On Tue, Jan 09, 2007 at 11:07:26AM +0100, Michael Schmitz wrote:
> > > Hmmm, Vivaldi crashed today again during build of littler, which is an R
> > > based application as well. For me it looks as if R is seriously broken on
> > > m68k...
> >
> > We should test that with aranym ASAP. Please collect
> > Hmmm, Vivaldi crashed today again during build of littler, which is an R
> > based application as well. For me it looks as if R is seriously broken on
> > m68k...
>
> We should test that with aranym ASAP. Please collect test cases :-)
First test case: I restarted the date build on crest, caref
> > > r-base 2.4.1-1 crashed vivaldi twice (needed a hard reset), vault13
> > > seems
> > > to be crashed as well after trying r-base. I just killed the build on
> > > arrakis to not get another crashed buildd.
> > > So, can someone find out why the r-base build is causing crashes? Maybe
> > >
On Mon, Jan 08, 2007 at 05:23:12PM +0100, Michael Schmitz wrote:
> > r-base 2.4.1-1 crashed vivaldi twice (needed a hard reset), vault13 seems
> > to be crashed as well after trying r-base. I just killed the build on
> > arrakis to not get another crashed buildd.
> > So, can someone find out why
> r-base seems to be problematic to built:
>
> version | arch | dist |begin| buildd |
> buildtime
> +--+--+-+--+
> 2.4.1~20061205-1 | m68k | unstable | 2006-12-11 08:24:54 | vault13
Hi!
r-base seems to be problematic to built:
version | arch | dist |begin| buildd |
buildtime
+--+--+-+--+
2.4.1~20061205-1 | m68k | unstable | 2006-12-11 08:24:54 | vault13 |
25 matches
Mail list logo
