Hi.
Has everything come to a halt on this ml or have I been "evicted" somehow???
Just curious since I havent seen any post in a week soon.
Regards
--
Thomas Sjölin
http://home.infoscandic.se/thomas
Sex is hereditary. If your parents never had it, chances are you
won't either.
-- Murphy's law
Hi Wouter
On 06-Okt-03, you wrote:
> Op ma 06-10-2003, om 18:19 schreef Thomas Sjölin:
>> Hi,
>>
>> After doing a "apt-get update, apt-get dist-upgrade" on both the amiga
>> and the PC, X fails to start on both machines. Is there some fundamental
>> change in the configuration I have missed that
Hi,
After doing a "apt-get update, apt-get dist-upgrade" on both the amiga and
the PC, X fails to start on both machines.
Is there some fundamental change in the configuration I have missed that
makes the X-server to fail?
Regards
--
Thomas Sjölin
http://home.infoscandic.se/thomas
Everybody
Hi Wouter
>> I will give that a go and see if I get anything.
>>
>> I really don't need to get Mozilla running, a 040 is way to slow
>> anyway...
>
> Sure, but that doesn't mean it shouldn't work :-)
So true and that's the reason why I'm struggling with it :)
Regards
--
Thomas Sjölin
http:/
Hi Wouter
> Hm. That's different from the unstable situation.
>
> I can think of two possibilities, right now:
> 1) there's already a mozilla running, but it takes so much time for it
> to start properly that you're not aware it's there
> 2) the X server doesn't serve enough colors, or has other
Hi again Wouter
> That's what happens on unstable as well. Try doing
>
> echo $?
>
> Right after you tried running mozilla, and _before_ you do anything
> else. Under normal circumstances, that should give you '0' (zero) as
> output; if it gives anything else, that might be indicative of what's
Hi Wouter
>> I honestly don't know what happens. I have tried to get some debug info
>> out but I get nothing that tells me anything. When I try to start Mozilla
>> the computer works hard for a while then it just stops and goes back to
>> idle, after that nothing more happens at all.
>
> That's
>> Hi everyone,
>>
>> I'm just wondering if anyone have gotten the Mozilla in woody to work. I
>> can't get it running on my A4k with CV64/3D.
>
> You mean even the woody version doesn't work?
>
> Last I tried, it didn't run on unstable, but I didn't know even stable
> had problems. Could you el
Hi Christian
On 12-Feb-03, you wrote:
>> Darn... typo.. 2.4.14 was what I ment.
>
> I hope its obvious that the procedure for that is very similar?
> But if I had as much time as you, I would try to get something recent,
> 2.4.20 or even 2.5 from CVS. And if the linux-m68k CVS does not work,
> l
Hi Christian
On 11-Feb-03, you wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 11, 2003 at 08:50:23PM +0100, Thomas Sjölin wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> As usual I have forgotten how to do this..
>>
>> I like fiddling around compiling my own kernels and I thought I'd have a
>> go with 2.2.14.
>>
>> However, I don't remember how
Hi,
As usual I have forgotten how to do this..
I like fiddling around compiling my own kernels and I thought I'd have a go
with 2.2.14.
However, I don't remember how to patch the kernel-source. Both the
kernel-source and the kernel-patch trees are in place in /usr/src but then
I'm stuck...
Con
Hi,
Since I like to fiddle around with making kernels that's more or less
optimised for my system, as well as trying out new ones I wonder what are
the latest kernels for m68k-systems?
Regards
--
Thomas Sjölin
http://home.infoscandic.se/thomas
I like pigs. Dogs look up to us. Cats look down
Hi Aled
On 31-Okt-02, you wrote:
>> I'm having a real "hell" getting my keyboard to work properly in X.
Dunno
>> if I'm missing some settings in XF86Config-4 but some keys are
definately
>> in the wrong place. For example is my right-alt acting as a shift-key
>> right now...
>>
>> Only setting I
Hi Aled
On 30-Okt-02, you wrote:
> I dont know, i know it sounds obvious and youve probabbly already tried
> it, but is there a chance that it could be a keymap problem? I know i had
> a hell of a time gfetting the keymap set right for a uk amiga keyboard.
> (incidently if anyone needs a .xmodmap
Hi
Well.. now I've made a new installation from scratch with the 3.0.24
boot-floppies and all is dandy.
Got X up and running and it works.. but, with some strange effects..
starting X in 8 bits works fine with lousy graphics.. but using -- -depth
15 or 16 makes no difference.. same lousy graphics
Hi Chris
On 25-Okt-02, you wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 25, 2002 at 01:21:23PM +0100, Thomas Sj?lin wrote:
>> messed up screen where I can't see a thing. So.. I need to get a console
>> up and I don't remember what key-combo that does that trick.. so I can
>> remove xdm and not get X from start...
>>
>
Hi Christian
On 24-Okt-02, you wrote:
> Hi,
> I've built boot-floppies for m68k which should fix all(?) the known
> problems, notably the missing device files for SCSI CD-Roms.
>
> Get it from
> http://people.debian.org/~cts/debian-m68k/boot-floppies/current/
> Please test and report any problem
17 matches
Mail list logo