Hi Christian On 12-Feb-03, you wrote:
>> Darn... typo.. 2.4.14 was what I ment. > > I hope its obvious that the procedure for that is very similar? > But if I had as much time as you, I would try to get something recent, > 2.4.20 or even 2.5 from CVS. And if the linux-m68k CVS does not work, > linux-mac68k kernel sources where pretty good last time I tried. I > don't think the 2.4.14 kernel-patch is very useful, there must be a > reason why there are no 2.4.14 kernel-images. I had some luck with > 2.4.18 from CVS, haven't tried 2.4.20 yet. Ok, I'll have a look at any of those then. 2.4.14 wouldn't compile anyway. Regards -- Thomas Sjölin http://home.infoscandic.se/thomas I like work ... I can sit and watch it for hours.
