On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 10:42:51AM +0200, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
> On Wed, 16 Jun 2010, Matthias Klose wrote:
>
> > - multiarch shouldn't be disabled
> > - the selection which multilibs to build should be done by patching
> > gcc/config/m68k/*
>
> Hrm. He didn’t really answer my questions about
On Sun, Jun 06, 2010 at 08:51:05PM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 6, 2010 at 20:37, Brad Boyer wrote:
> > On Sun, Jun 06, 2010 at 10:42:40AM +0200, Andreas Schwab wrote:
> >> Brad Boyer writes:
> >>
> >> > I may be missing something obvious, but why don't we just change the
> >> >
On Sat, Jun 05, 2010 at 11:21:42AM +0200, Andreas Schwab wrote:
> Richard Zidlicky writes:
>
> > As I see it the stack-allocated futex could be automagicaly aligned when
> > pushed as
> > argument to a function
>
> Futexes are indexed by address. You cannot mov
On Sat, Jun 05, 2010 at 12:21:47PM +1000, Finn Thain wrote:
>
> On Sat, 5 Jun 2010, Richard Zidlicky wrote:
>
> > I am not sure what happens if the futex is inside a "misaligned struct"
> > - would that be handled with an attribute of the futex?
>
> I
On Sat, Jun 05, 2010 at 09:19:51AM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 5, 2010 at 00:52, Richard Zidlicky wrote:
> > On Fri, Jun 04, 2010 at 10:57:50PM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> > this is the hardware behaviour but the compiler is free to use more
> >
On Fri, Jun 04, 2010 at 10:57:50PM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 4, 2010 at 21:15, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
> > Andreas Schwab dixit:
> >
> >>One cost is ABI breakage.
> >
> > Hrm, that is true. But then: is that syscall/structure used already?
> > I think I get an idea of the troub
could someone here use this machine?
Richard
--- Begin Message ---
> Richard Zidlicky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Oh, wow. I didn't notice your e-mail address until now.
OT: I've got an LC4 with upgraded processor (full 68040 at 25MHz), upgraded
RAM (24 MB, no less), a splendid
> I suppose we could add a page at a fixed virtual offset from the vDSO
> base address. That would make the code sequence easier since we would
> presumably could use PC-relative addressing in the vDSO code. This would
> be much better than having a fixed virtual address. I'm just worried
> about
On Thu, Nov 09, 2006 at 12:11:13AM +0100, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> > >Thanks. Though I still wonder why it was working in the past...
possibly the jump offest was small enough to fit into 32k?
> > Personnaly I use binutils 2.15, so I think binutils 2.17 adds some
> > (stupid) constraints betwe
On Fri, Sep 22, 2006 at 11:38:30PM -0700, Brian Morris wrote:
> it says 21.4 there. that is the mass build a guy made in
> april for mac68k. it is not necessarily tested, but it did build.
ok, that would mean the old problem that I encountered was
fixed or maybe xemacs reintroduced the old lisp en
On Thu, Sep 21, 2006 at 09:55:18PM -0700, Brian Morris wrote:
> netbsd has emacs21 and xemacs21 running under
> mac68k (its on their download page as of Now).
iirc the change that broke xemacs for m68k-linux was somewhere
between 21.1.10 and 21.1.14, what versions run on netbsd?
Regards
Richard
On Tue, Aug 22, 2006 at 08:56:51PM +0200, Roman Zippel wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, 22 Aug 2006, Stephen R Marenka wrote:
>
> > Any interest in tackling emacs21 or gcj-4.1? ;)
>
> I looked shortly into exmacs21 and that's a bit more complicated. It could
> be a cache issue, so if someone tried to b
On Fri, Aug 04, 2006 at 02:37:03PM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> On Fri, 4 Aug 2006, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> > * Using address register indirect with predecrement or postincrement mode
> > on the stack pointer (A7) in byte context will increment resp.
> > decrement the stack pointer with
On Wed, Feb 01, 2006 at 02:37:31PM +0100, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 01, 2006 at 08:20:10AM -0500, Kevin B. McCarty wrote:
> > OK, thank you! (Cool, I didn't know you could put 512 MB on a 68k
> > machine.)
>
> 68k has 4G address space, so why not? ;-)
even better, m68k has 8GB address
On Sun, Feb 05, 2006 at 03:32:59PM -0600, Lance Tagliapietra wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I've done a bit more investigating since I made this post, and observe
> in the log files referenced below that the X server is aborting with a
> Signal 7. From my research, this could indicate a hardware issue, but
On Mon, Jan 30, 2006 at 01:06:40PM +0100, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 29, 2006 at 06:31:04PM -0500, Peter Krummrich wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > when trying to compile the kernel source, the assembler complained with an
> > error message. Here is what I did:
> >
> >
> > The error message rea
On Mon, Jan 09, 2006 at 12:08:29AM +0100, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 08, 2006 at 02:37:37PM -0500, Steve M. Robbins wrote:
> > Wouter,
> >
> > Thanks very much for your help on this bug!
> >
> > On Sat, Dec 31, 2005 at 05:58:10PM +0100, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> >
> > > My previous atte
On Mon, Dec 05, 2005 at 11:35:47PM -0500, Steve M. Robbins wrote:
> severity 340563 normal
> thanks
>
> The problem turns out to be a failing unit test on
> m68k only, apparently due to a buggy compiler or libstdc++.
>
> I built cppunit on crest and ran the unit tests. The program
> stops with S
On Thu, Oct 13, 2005 at 09:37:00AM +0200, Emiliano wrote:
> Alle 21:34, martedì 11 ottobre 2005, Kars de Jong ha scritto:
> > On ma, 2005-10-10 at 02:41 +0200, Emiliano wrote:
>
> > > I'm using kernel 2.4.27-amiga as found on the first CD. I guess the
> > > "fbdev" (as set in XF86Config-4) is miss
On Mon, Oct 10, 2005 at 06:12:23PM -0400, Mark Duckworth wrote:
>
> Stats are bad. Debian should be maintained for m68k if for no other
> reason than there is no other distro for m68k that I know of. I doubt
> however that m68k beats arm since there's probably more than a couple
> debian using i
On Sat, Sep 24, 2005 at 11:18:11AM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
>
> I see that libcrypto++ previously failed to build with an internal
> compiler error. Did you try to build it with GCC 3.4 for that reason? If
> so, you can revert that change -- gcc 4.0 has seen a recent update which
> should fi
On Thu, Aug 25, 2005 at 09:34:58PM -0500, Lance Tagliapietra wrote:
> Looking at that file, it looks like a process is waiting for a signal
> that it never gets:
> setitimer(ITIMER_REAL, {it_interval={0, 2}, it_value={0, 2}},
> NULL) = 0
> --- SIGALRM (Alarm clock) @ 0 (0) ---
this is
On Tue, May 24, 2005 at 09:19:09AM -0500, Stephen R Marenka wrote:
> On Tue, May 24, 2005 at 03:15:01PM +0200, Petr Stehlik wrote:
> > Stephen R Marenka pí?e v Út 24. 05. 2005 v 08:01 -0500:
> > > On Tue, May 24, 2005 at 10:33:12AM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> > >
> > > > For 2.4.27, all of the
On Mon, May 02, 2005 at 12:35:57PM +0200, Haakon Innerdal wrote:
> > you are using multiple memory chunks? Try with
> > CONFIG_SINGLE_MEMORY_CHUNK
> >
> It worked! Thanks!!!
which leaves us with the problem that multiple memory chunks
are broken.. unfortunately this is one of the subsystems
On Sun, May 01, 2005 at 09:44:59PM +0200, Haakon Innerdal wrote:
> On Sun, 1 May 2005, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
>
> > On Sat, 30 Apr 2005, Haakon Innerdal wrote:
> Call Trace: [<00014c78>] _060_fpsp_effadd+0xbc20/0xd518
> [<0001afa8>] printk+0x0/0xee
> [<00269aba>] free_all_bootmem+0xa/0x10
On Mon, Apr 18, 2005 at 08:59:17AM -0500, Stephen R Marenka wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 18, 2005 at 01:53:10AM +0200, Peter 'p2' De Schrijver wrote:
>
> > We are looking to get some m68k machines sponsored for the debcamp for
> > various
> > development tasks. In order to have an idea which architecture
On Wed, Apr 06, 2005 at 12:29:12AM +0200, Rolf Anders wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 15, 2005 at 01:10:37PM -0600, Stephen R Marenka wrote:
> > Please help test debian-installer to make sure we can make a clean
> > rc3 release. In particular, I can only test m68k/mac so all the other
> > subarchs are somewha
On Fri, Mar 18, 2005 at 06:24:16PM -0800, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
> "Matthias Urlichs" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Thomas Bushnell BSG:
> > > > The size is always 46, and this seems to happen on m68k only.
> > > > Any idea where that comes from?
> > >
> > > Not a clue, but with a build l
On Fri, Feb 25, 2005 at 09:15:18PM +0100, Rafael Laboissiere wrote:
> [Cc: to the Debian m68k crew and debian-admin]
>
> * John W. Eaton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-02-25 14:34]:
>
> > For some time now, the m68k build of octave2.1 has been failing with
> >
> > /usr/bin/g++ -c -fPIC -I. -I.. -I
problem...
> >
> > Took me quite some recompile/reboot cycles, but it turned out to be
> > CONFIG_SINGLE_MEMORY_CHUNK. If this is NOT defined as "Y", the kernel
> > crashes. And this is apparently also true for 2.4.x (x > ??) kernels.
>
> IIRC, Richard Zidli
On Wed, Sep 22, 2004 at 01:13:25PM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> > 2) If anyone has anything to regarding VME or Q40/Q60 machines.
>
> Q40/Q60 has PS/2 keyboard, so I guess it has a PS/2 mouse as well. Richard?
sorry for the late reply, was away for a long while.
Q40/Q60 uses serial mouse.
On Fri, Aug 27, 2004 at 11:08:19AM +0200, Samuel Mimram wrote:
> Hello,
>
> [Please CC me on reply]
>
> I have some problems with the compilation of coq on 68k:
> http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.php?&pkg=coq&ver=8.0pl1-3&arch=m68k&stamp=1093576463&file=log&as=raw
>
> The configure gives the error
On Sun, Aug 22, 2004 at 02:50:33PM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 22, 2004 at 02:46:31PM +0200, Christian T. Steigies wrote:
> > On Sun, Aug 22, 2004 at 02:26:46PM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> > > What you need to grep for is "Macintosh" for mac hardware, "Amiga" for
> > > amiga, or
On Thu, Aug 19, 2004 at 10:13:38AM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> On Wed, 18 Aug 2004, Christian T. Steigies wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 18, 2004 at 10:36:32PM +0200, Kars de Jong wrote:
> > > It boots, but it doesn't detect my IDE hard disk. Gayle is detected
> > > though. With my self-compiled 2.6
On Tue, Aug 03, 2004 at 05:25:09PM +0200, Petr Stehlik wrote:
> V Út, 03. 08. 2004 v 16:36, Geert Uytterhoeven píše:
> > > 1) kernel and ramdisk must be in the same contiguous memory (IIUIC)
> >
> > Perhaps this restriction can be relaxed?
>
> that's the only sensible chance we have. But for that
Hi,
here is my patch for some version of qemu to get SIGINFO
and mcontext right. The special problem with qemu was
that it included which was broken on
my system.. my solution was to define own includes with
all necessary defs. It has also some code to get at the
details of exception frames like
On Tue, Jul 06, 2004 at 05:32:04PM +0530, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> I would definitely be interested in knowing the workaround to get the
> correct mcontext as that is essential for my application too.
just make sure the ucontext.h that you include is equivalent
to that of a 2.4 kernel, usuall
On Tue, Jul 06, 2004 at 04:25:03PM +0530, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hello,
>
>
>
>I am working on a Motorola VME 167 card with a 68040 processor.
> The card is running debian linux 2.2 (kernel 2.2.10). The application I
> am developing needs to handle signals and needs to know the caus
On Thu, May 20, 2004 at 09:52:16AM +0200, Didier MEQUIGNON wrote:
> Errors were encountered while processing
>
> man-db
>
> umount /target/dev/pts: No such file or directory
> umount /target/dev/shm: No such file or directory
may be problems with kernel configuration, those most
be enabled whe
On Sun, May 16, 2004 at 09:27:19PM -0400, James wrote:
> > How about adding
> > alias char-major-10-135 off
>
> Well, I booted to single mode and edited modules.conf, adding the above
> line. It changed some things, but i fear, for the worse... Still cant boot
> into setup (dont even get that we
On Sat, May 15, 2004 at 10:33:08PM -0400, Ray Knight wrote:
> > add "1" or "s" to you kernel args to boot into single mode.
> > Find the line loading boottime.kmap in the initscripts and
> > uncomment it, then see if normal boot gets further.
> >
> This is the solution I use. You need to make su
On Sat, May 15, 2004 at 01:12:14PM -0400, James wrote:
> pengiun loads the installer fine, get thru the first section of install
> (using network to debian servers for packages).
>
> when it reboots with the root set to SDA7 i get rtc errors as expected
>
> i understand the quadra has a RTC bug
On Thu, Apr 29, 2004 at 01:15:20PM +0300, Tuomas Vainikka wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This pops up every time I try to run a 2.4.x kernel.
> I've tried every version for almost half a year now, but the result is
> the same:
>
> kernel: Looking for PCMCIA ethernet card : ethernet PCMCIA card inserted
> kern
nary-m68k from yesterday (20030902):
> >
> > % gcc --version
> > gcc (GCC) 3.3.2 20030812 (Debian prerelease)
> > Copyright (C) 2003 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
> > This is free software; see the source for copying conditions. There is NO
> > warranty; not even fo
On Fri, Aug 22, 2003 at 06:15:16PM -0500, Lance Tagliapietra wrote:
Hi,
> >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun, 10 Aug 3 23:02:23
> >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Aug 22 11:50:13 2003
>
> The first example demonstates the format on the Mutt home page.
> The second example demonstrates what Mutt requires.
>
On Sun, Aug 10, 2003 at 02:10:19AM +, Lance Tagliapietra wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm trying to get Mutt working on my 68K debian machine.
> I have put an mbox format file in /var/mail/username
> which the bsd mail program reads just fine.
>
> When I run Mutt, it reads the file, but it does not fi
On Fri, Aug 01, 2003 at 04:34:59PM +0200, Alfons Van Hees wrote:
.. damn, fix your mailer to
- not send duplicate and incomplete messages
- *NOT* send any HTML
your error message means that the modprobe binary on the ramdisk
was damaged, perhaps there wasn´t enough space to decompress it.
Look fo
On Thu, May 08, 2003 at 04:16:50AM +, Lance Tagliapietra wrote:
> Hello,
>
> When running my Amiga under AmigaDos, I used a program called "Leftymouse"
> to swap the mouse buttons around as I am left-handed. Can someone
> here point me at the man page/configuration line/other which will
> let
On Thu, Apr 24, 2003 at 02:10:43PM -0400, Scott Holder wrote:
> there was a 68k version of Mac-On-Linux :) If Basilisk II natively used the
> CPU it would be close, but alas it doesn't on Linux.
I have once hacked it to run native but it was still rather slow.
Long ago so it may have improved, s
On Wed, Apr 16, 2003 at 11:49:45AM +1000, Kevin Ryde wrote:
> "Christian T. Steigies" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> > ssh2 and libssl and whatever is needed for that would benefit _a lot_ from
> > some 060 improvements. ssh2 is basically unusable on 060 boxes, it takes
> > minutes to connect...
On Tue, Apr 15, 2003 at 08:12:20AM +1000, Kevin Ryde wrote:
> Richard Zidlicky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> > it would run faster on 68020-40 CPU´s, the problem is it would
> > also run *much* slower on 68060 CPU´s..
>
> Oh, you mean 68881 emulated on 060?
On Sat, Apr 12, 2003 at 04:36:11PM +0200, Kars de Jong wrote:
> The keymap thing is easier to solve: add the following to the Keyboard
> InputDevice section:
>
> Option"CustomKeycodes" "on"
>
> I still need to send a patch to make this the default on m68k. It used
> to be for Linux/PPC
On Wed, Apr 09, 2003 at 08:51:57PM +0200, Björn Buske wrote:
> I built a fresh Kernel 2.4 from CVS using the attached .config file and gcc
> 2.95.4. As before, it wouldn't boot. Following this is the debug-output from
> the serial port. The data read faults just repeat ad inmfinitum.
>
> Hope an
On Sat, Apr 05, 2003 at 01:49:55AM -0500, Steve M. Robbins wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm the maintainer of gmp, but fairly ignorant of debian/m68k.
> Would anyone here care to comment?
>
> Thanks,
> -Steve
>
> - Forwarded message from Kevin Ryde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
>
> Date: Sun, 30 Mar 20
On Wed, Apr 02, 2003 at 01:43:32PM +0200, Björn Buske wrote:
> I've just started a new clean build with a fresh Source from CVS. If that one
> still won't run, I'll solder up a nullmodem cable and hook it up to the PC.
> Just to be prepared, what RS232-Parameters does the serial console use
> (bau
On Mon, Feb 24, 2003 at 06:05:27PM -0500, Camm Maguire wrote:
Hi,
> If you like the idea or something similar, may I ask your help in
> advocating its consideration on debian-devel and any other appropriate
> place?
I took quite some time to think about your proposal and related
issues.
As
On Tue, Mar 04, 2003 at 12:54:45AM +0100, Ingo Juergensmann wrote:
> I would like to see around 4-6 MB/s coming out of the disks on that machine,
> so I wonder how to achieve this. Maybe the mentioned change in the source
> code from 50 to 25 would be a way. Instead of facing the frontier and risk
On Mon, Mar 03, 2003 at 03:55:00AM +0100, Ingo Juergensmann wrote:
> Usually I only get around 2 MB/s from disks, either via scsi0 or scsi1.
> Using a raid0 on scsi0 *or* scsi0 doesn't improve speed at all, but raid0 on
> scsi0 *and* scsi1 do (of course, using sdb and sdc), giving a total speed o
O
> When I try to boot the new image from TOS, Bootstrap.prg unpacks the image,
> recognises the bootinfo-version 2.1, and then the system freezes even before
> the screen gets blanked and all I can do is hit the reset button and boot the
> old kernel again.
try to use the serial console, screen
On Mon, Feb 24, 2003 at 11:26:39AM -0500, Camm Maguire wrote:
> Greetings!
>
> Richard Zidlicky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > On Tue, Feb 18, 2003 at 04:46:46PM -0500, Camm Maguire wrote:
> > > Greetings, and thanks for the insight. GCL does a subbuil
On Mon, Feb 24, 2003 at 09:57:26AM -0500, Lincoln Rutledge wrote:
> Howdy,
>
> My install of 3.0r0 is almost complete, but I am still having a couple
> of problems. I'm using a Quadra 610 w/ 1gb SCSI drive and factory
> everything else, extended keyboard and 1 button mouse.
>
> Got the /dev/adbm
On Tue, Feb 18, 2003 at 02:06:51PM -0500, Hank wrote:
> I got the 2.2.20 working with the patch. But it worked on my mac. Still
> having problems building a cross compiler.
>
> Have a few questions:
>
> (1) Are there any recommended versions of binutils, gcc, glibc.to use
> for cross-compiling
On Tue, Feb 18, 2003 at 04:46:46PM -0500, Camm Maguire wrote:
> Greetings, and thanks for the insight. GCL does a subbuild of part of
> GMP. With the default configure script canonical host of
> m68k-unknown-linux-gnu, gmp3 adds -m68000 to the command line.
this is slightly broken - there has ne
On Sat, Feb 15, 2003 at 08:41:55AM -0500, Camm Maguire wrote:
> Greetings! I've seen this before in earlier compilers on arm. Is
> there a work around?
>
>
> ./libgcl.a(gmp3_mpn_mul_n.o)(.text+0xe2c):scan/mul_n.c:977: undefined
> reference to `__mulsi3'
strange, mulsi3 calls should not be gen
On Thu, Feb 13, 2003 at 08:17:26PM -0500, hank wrote:
> Hi.
>
>
> I substituted m68k-linux for powerpc-linux as instructed. And I used the
> source-2.4.14 from the debian package kernel-source-2.4.14. And also
> applied the m68k/patches/2.4.14/ which I also downloaded from Debian.
Compiler se
On Mon, Feb 10, 2003 at 02:23:48PM +0100, Hans Hümmer wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Peter Slegg schrieb:
> >
> [...]
> >
> > Do these error messages suggest that no-one has ever tried to install Linux
> > on a 68060 Atari ? I would be suprised if it hadn't been tried before.
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > Peter
On Mon, Feb 10, 2003 at 10:12:04AM +0100, Christophe Aussagu?s wrote:
>
> The problem of 'fsun' occured indeed when I tried to use the libc
> library. So, I decided then to generate glibc-2.3.1 myself with the gcc
> compiler. I discovered that when I compile some modules (from
> stdio-common) with
On Sun, Feb 09, 2003 at 06:47:12PM +0200, Peter Slegg wrote:
> The irony is that I upgraded this Milan late last year from a 68040 to
> the 68060. Very soon there will be a 68060 upgrade for the Atari Falcon
> machines as well and there is always the Hades 060 Atari clone.
>
> Do these error mes
On Wed, Feb 05, 2003 at 02:01:54PM +0100, Christophe Aussagu?s wrote:
> The last problem is that the compiler generates some 'fsun'
> (m68040/FScc) instructions that are not legal for a 60860 cpu.
are you sure you used -m68060 or the equivalent? Is the illegal
instruction generated by the compil
On Wed, Feb 05, 2003 at 09:06:42AM +0100, Rene Engelhard wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> [ please Cc: me, as I am not subscribed to -68k ]
>
> anyone of you know what causes the follwing build failure and what to do?
> Versions till -3 built successfully; but binutils got updated
> recently...
>
> http://bu
On Mon, Feb 03, 2003 at 04:17:17PM +0100, Szymanski, Frank-Peter wrote:
> Hello,
>
> fortunately in the meantime I found the sources to ataboot (the Linux
> bootprogram for ATARI computers). I try to change it that you can install
> woody again on a 4MB-ST-RAM equipped falcon. Unfortunately I need
>
> On the opposite spectrum from compilers compiling themselves... I'm
> having a problem just getting a Debian install (of woody) going at all
> on my Quadra 660 AV. I believe this time to have my home network setup
> at least to where it'll see other machines on my local net and also out
>
On Fri, Jan 24, 2003 at 02:28:31PM -0800, Jeff Bailey wrote:
> I don't know if it's significant, but upstream announced .18 today with
> the following changelog:
>
> Changes from binutils 2.13.90.0.16:
>
>
...
> 5.
On Fri, Jan 24, 2003 at 11:34:34AM +0900, GOTO Masanori wrote:
> > which binutils are used? Some older versions had bugs that were
> > only triggered by gcc-3.2
>
> At least I tested with binutils 2.13.90.0.16-1.
> But, I don't know the version number of the buildd environment.
seems to be the
On Wed, Jan 22, 2003 at 06:43:55AM +0900, GOTO Masanori wrote:
> > On Sun, Jan 19, 2003 at 07:48:04PM -0800, Jeff Bailey wrote:
> > > I haven't seen mention of it on this list, so I wanted to bring it up -
> > > Bug #175526 against glibc is m68k specific.
> >
> > interesting. I am running glibc-
On Sun, Jan 19, 2003 at 07:48:04PM -0800, Jeff Bailey wrote:
> I haven't seen mention of it on this list, so I wanted to bring it up -
> Bug #175526 against glibc is m68k specific.
interesting. I am running glibc-2.3 and gcc-3.2 without much problems
here, will look if I can see something obvio
On Fri, Jan 17, 2003 at 06:32:16PM -0700, Mark Zimmerman wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 17, 2003 at 07:20:06AM -0700, Mark Zimmerman wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 15, 2003 at 02:28:55AM -0500, Ray Knight wrote:
> > > On Tue, 2003-01-14 at 21:13, Mark Zimmerman wrote:
> > > > Greetings:
> > > >
> > > > Since [EMAIL
On Fri, Jan 10, 2003 at 03:46:15PM +0100, Olivier Goedgebeur wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm looking for drivers for TSB12LV32 chip from TI which is dedicated to
> IEEE1394 serial bus. Somebody has got this driver or does it exist other chip
> for FireWire support by linux68k.
kernel question, try askin
On Thu, Jan 09, 2003 at 03:48:19PM +, Alan Hourihane wrote:
> > It would be certainly good to have the module loader, but for the
> > average m68k user this is of no benefit and so I think m68k should
> > default to statically linked Xserver.
>
> Your loosing a lot of configurability without
On Wed, Jan 08, 2003 at 09:34:40PM +, Alan Hourihane wrote:
> It's only the instruction cache we need to flush. Not the whole cache.
> I notice in asm-m68k/pgalloc.h there's a specific flush_icache() macro
> to do just that.
all cacheflush instructions are priviliged. There is a little trick
On Tue, Jan 07, 2003 at 09:04:35PM +0100, Gerhard Täubl wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Well I read much stuff about xfree and it helps me a lot to get it run, but
> not really.
> When it starts it works fine (yes I have really installed KDE2 wow, real
> slow, but it works..)
>
> I also read bout the problems o
On Sun, Dec 22, 2002 at 01:29:52PM -0500, Scott Holder wrote:
> Hey folks,
>
> Now that I'm actually using my Quadra 80AV running Debian fairly
> frequently, the 5MB/s SCSI throughput is really starting to bug me.
You won't get any faster with a 68040 anyway, iirc the CPU will do
a maximum abou
On Thu, Dec 19, 2002 at 11:52:52AM -0500, Camm Maguire wrote:
> Greetings!
>
> Richard Zidlicky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > On Mon, Dec 16, 2002 at 03:05:37PM -0500, Camm Maguire wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > > > Which kernel version wa
On Tue, Oct 29, 2002 at 06:10:57PM +0100, Yann Dirson wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 21, 2002 at 09:43:05PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> > Yann Dirson writes:
> > > I have several packages (e2fsprogs, bigloo) that fail to build on
> > > m68k, apparently due to one or more gcc bug(s). Maybe that's the same
On Mon, Dec 16, 2002 at 03:05:37PM -0500, Camm Maguire wrote:
Hi,
> > Which kernel version was that? Can you see if the failed flushes
> > were cornercases like address near page-boundaries? What kind
> > of ranges need to be flushed?
> >
>
> 2.2.20. Don't know anything special about the flus
On Fri, Nov 22, 2002 at 10:50:56PM -0500, Camm Maguire wrote:
cc'd to linux-m68k where kernel question should go
> Greetings! gcl/acl2 loads many modules into its data section,
> relocates, flushes the cache, and then executes the module.
> The CACHE_LINE granularity option to cacheflush appears
On Thu, Nov 21, 2002 at 02:16:53PM -, krishnakumar natarajan wrote:
> hi,
kernel question so I have cc'd linux-m68k
> i have a custom built m/c based on m68k clone processor with PCI
> bus.
> does the current m68k port of linux support PCI bus?
the kernel is prepared for this, you will pro
On Fri, Nov 22, 2002 at 02:44:47PM +0100, Stefan Reinauer wrote:
> * Richard Zidlicky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [021007 13:51]:
> > > make CFLAGS='-O' LIBCFLAGS='-g -O2' \
> > > LIBCXXFLAGS='-g -O2 -fno-implicit-templates' bootstrap
> >
On Wed, Oct 23, 2002 at 11:25:58PM -0400, Ray Knight wrote:
> > > console using the "Ctrl + Alt + Fx" combination anymore.
> >
> > works for me.
> >
>
> On a Macintosh? I can't seem to get it to work. If you have it working
> on a Mac, please tell us the appropriate XFConfig file magic.
no M
On Wed, Oct 23, 2002 at 10:23:38AM -0700, Erik van Roode wrote:
> At 09:36 10/22/2002, Branden Robinson wrote:
>
> >I beseech you to help debug and fix the XFree86 module loader on m68k.
>
> If I understand correctly the issue with 68040/68060 is cache coherency.
> When looking
> at the 68040 ma
On Wed, Oct 23, 2002 at 08:11:54AM -0400, Hank wrote:
> Just a few comments on X (4.1.0.1):
>
> Finally got it running after working around a few problems: (Quadra
> 840AV, 1 MB
> video memory).
>
> Looks better than the old one. Just noticed that you couldn't switch
> back to the
> console usi
On Tue, Oct 22, 2002 at 11:36:13AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> Okay, for m68k I will make x-window-system core depend on
> xserver-xfree86-dbg instead of xserver-xfree86.
isn't xserver-xfree86-dbg compiled without optimisations? That
would be bad on slower m68k machines.
> I beseech you to
On Sat, Oct 12, 2002 at 11:58:40PM +0100, Steve Hargreaves wrote:
>
> 2. I can't get xfree to start. At first it complained about not "No screens
> found", and after searching around the web, I used dpkg -reconfigure to set up
> xfree using the virgeS3 driver - now it just quits without a specifi
On Mon, Oct 07, 2002 at 08:37:25PM +0100, Aled wrote:
>
> On 07-Oct-02, you wrote:
>
> > At 21:21 10/5/2002, Christian T. Steigies wrote:
> >> On Fri, Oct 04, 2002 at 12:40:53AM +0100, Aled wrote:
> The only problem now is with Xwindows 4 - i have a keymap for the console
> but under X i only ha
On Mon, Oct 07, 2002 at 04:02:42PM +0200, Dirk Heinrichs wrote:
> > I have attached some patches in case you want to play with it. The gcc
> > patch has also the effect to change cpu target default to 68020-60.
> OK, I'll give them a try. To summarize, I could use vanilla gcc 3.2 with a
> recent s
On Mon, Oct 07, 2002 at 12:42:22PM -0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I have an Amiga 4000 with a Warpengine Turbocard. On the SCSI-Port
> are 2 IBM DCAS 3430 and a Teac CD-R56S connectet.
> I`m running Debian 2.2rev7 with Kernel 2.2.10.
get a newer kernel and try again. If it persists ask in the
id 6F1FB145FB; Sat, 24 Aug 2002 18:31:58 +0200 (MEST)
X-Authentication-Warning: sykes.suse.de: schwab set sender to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
using -f
To: Richard Zidlicky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "H. J. Lu" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: binutils problem
Re
On Fri, Sep 20, 2002 at 09:17:49AM -0400, Camm Maguire wrote:
> That did it -- thanks! As Richard Fateman observed, its quite
> surprising the magnitude of the difference was so large. Apparently
> m68k has the more accurate answer, right? In any case, I'm adding
> -ffloat-store to gcl's compil
On Mon, Aug 26, 2002 at 09:10:54PM +0200, Marcus Brinkmann wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 26, 2002 at 12:50:22PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> > > I can't believe he actually intends to keep it like this..
> >
> > I'm going to #define DEV_RANDOM /dev/random for Linux systems.
>
> That's bad, because tha
On Thu, Aug 22, 2002 at 07:23:34PM -0400, R.A. wrote:
> How's the support for the java sdk (or any compiler, like jikes) on
> m68k? is it available? how does it perform?
I have done some little testing of gcj and kaffe. gcj should work
out of the box with gcc-3.2 release but doesn't have complete
1 - 100 of 109 matches
Mail list logo
