On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 10:42:51AM +0200, Thorsten Glaser wrote: > On Wed, 16 Jun 2010, Matthias Klose wrote: > > > - multiarch shouldn't be disabled > > - the selection which multilibs to build should be done by patching > > gcc/config/m68k/* > > Hrm. He didn’t really answer my questions about the c++ symbols > problem, but this would help us further along at least. > > Does anyone have an idea about the symbols thing? > • LP bug: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gcc-4.4/+bug/514579 > • build log: http://launchpadlibrarian.net/44949657/gcc44m68k.log.gz > (338K gzip’d, look at the end) > • Thread: http://lists.debian.org/debian-68k/2010/04/msg00025.html > > What multiarch targets do we want to build? > > I can see use for m68040, dunno about m68060, don’t think mcpu32 > or mfidoa. What about Coldfire – is that a gcc-4.5 thing (I’m > strictly concentrating on gcc-4{3,4} with libc-2.7 at the moment)?
might make sense to have separate m68020-40 and m68060. 68020-30 appear almost the same as 68040 from gcc point of view. Richard -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-68k-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100618135406.gb14...@linux-m68k.org
