[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Re: Bug#362590: FTBFS on m68k]

2006-04-18 Thread Reinhard Tartler
Stephen R Marenka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - Envelope-to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivery-date: Tue, 18 Apr 2006 19:37:40 +0200 Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2006 12:36:49 -0500 From: Stephen R Marenka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Reinhard Tartler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: Debian GNU/Linux m68k , [EMAIL

Re: Bug#362590: FTBFS on m68k

2006-04-18 Thread Reinhard Tartler
On Tue, Apr 18, 2006 at 12:36:49PM -0500, Stephen R Marenka wrote: > It looks like the concensus is that right now there's no real point > in building openal and friends on m68k. > > I've marked openal not-for-us and I'll include it in an update to p-a-s > soon. > > You'll need to request to hav

Re: Bug#362590: FTBFS on m68k

2006-04-18 Thread Reinhard Tartler
dropping the bugreport from this CC. On Tue, Apr 18, 2006 at 12:50:15PM +0200, Ingo Juergensmann wrote: > > > I believe 3D on m68k is rather useless nowadays, but if someone > > > knows better than me, please shout now! :-) > > Indeed, until someone gets the Mediator going, and we can start > > us

Re: Bug#362590: FTBFS on m68k

2006-04-18 Thread Reinhard Tartler
On Tue, Apr 18, 2006 at 09:32:07AM +0200, Ingo Juergensmann wrote: > > > I'd like to hear if somebody knows about multi-channel soundscards, which > > > would/could work. > > I'm not sure that's really all that important? I've never used any such > > card, but OpenAL has been working nicely for me

Re: Bug#362590: FTBFS on m68k

2006-04-17 Thread Reinhard Tartler
I think this could help this port to keep up with the other archs. Otherwise I'd be more than happy if some porter could provide a patch for this FTBFS: http://bugs.debian.org/362590 -- Reinhard Tartler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - GnuPG Id: 945348A4 Fingerprint = 9300 5DC2 7E87 6C37 ED7B CA9A 9808 3544 9453 48A4 signature.asc Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil