Re: Howto checkout amiga-fdisk sources?

Dirk Heinrichs writes: > Hi, > > the "viewvc" URL does not work. Just got a HD > 4G, which I can't > partition with HDToolBox :( So I need amiga-fdisk. > > BTW: When my Amy boots, I can see the usual Debian message "Activating > LVM and MD...". Does this mean that LVM actuall works with RDB > par

Re: amiga 1200

heym...@acm.org writes: > On 5 March 2010 at 2:35, Giuseppe Panassidi > wrote: > >> I would install a full working debian on my amiga 1200 ( AGA ) >> I have an ethernet adapter ( etherlink III pcmcia) >> I installed a version of debian but Xfree86 does not works > > According to the base debian-m

Re: Debian-NetBSD for 68k would ease porting issues ?

"Brian Morris" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > to answer the original question, maybe: > > on the netbsd cd/mirror there is a mac directory and a > shared directory. i think the shared means other kinds > of 68k. there is more in the mac directory on netbsd than > you find in debian-linux-68k. some

Re: Debian-NetBSD for 68k would ease porting issues ?

"Brian Morris" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > hi, I was reading up on netbsd and saw claim that porting > is simplified under their kernel because of some abstraction > to the hardware, that only in the kernel and a few toolchain > items would actually porting usually be much of an issue there. > >

Re: What aranym to use?

Petr Stehlik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Goswin von Brederlow pí¹e v Po 27. 11. 2006 v 13:16 +0100: >> I tried out aranym (sid version) this weekend with the etch hd-image >> from the homepage and it looked fine. But when trying to upgrade I got >> illegal inst

Re: building icedove_1.5.0.8-3

Bill Allombert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Tue, Nov 28, 2006 at 07:59:18AM -0600, Stephen R Marenka wrote: >> On Tue, Nov 28, 2006 at 01:57:03PM +0100, Bill Allombert wrote: >> > Hello m68k porters, >> > >> > Please mark me (ballombe) as building icedove_1.5.0.8-3 (and other >> > packages yo

Re: Buildd

Michael Schmitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> > I would say that it would get updated at dinstall. Hmmm, it's not in >> > incoming and it's not in the archive. >> >> Makes me wonder what happened with the upload. I'll have to set up a scp >> upload queue somewhere ... > > It seems to have been up

What aranym to use?

Hi, I tried out aranym (sid version) this weekend with the etch hd-image from the homepage and it looked fine. But when trying to upgrade I got illegal instructions on 'dpkg --compare-versions'. I guess the sid version isn't new enough. What version should I have to be able to compile something?

Re: sendfile() syscall on 68k with 2.4.27 kernel

Bill Allombert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Dear Debian 68k porters, > > It seems that that boa try to use the sendfile syscall on m68k and > fails, see bug #330871. Is sendfile available with m68k linux 2.4.27 ? > > Cheers, Sendfile should be but sendfile64 is not I believe. I guess you use _FI

Re: Setting up a new buildd

Steve Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Hi folks -- > > I set up a Quadra 700 as an 'unstable main' buildd, in hopes that > another one might help with the current backlog. It is running 2.2.25 > headless with EMILE, and seems to be fairly reliable. It is > pathetically underpowered: 25Mhz '04

Re: bug status

Roman Zippel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Hi, > > On Mon, 6 Nov 2006, Stephen R Marenka wrote: > >> > emacs21: somehow got magically fixed, just retry with new gcc >> >> still failing on the buildds > > The weird build system had me confused there. > Anyway, I fixed one gcc bug, but now it's fai

Bug#398158: PATCH: generic arch support

0100 @@ -1,3 +1,9 @@ +inotify-tools (2.6-1a0.mrvn.1) unstable; urgency=low + + * Use for syscall numbers + + -- Goswin von Brederlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sun, 12 Nov 2006 05:43:02 +0100 + inotify-tools (2.6-1) unstable; urgency=low * Initial release (Closes: #394249) diff -Nru /tmp

Re: building emile

Wouter Verhelst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Thu, Nov 09, 2006 at 02:14:51PM +0100, Richard Zidlicky wrote: >> On Thu, Nov 09, 2006 at 12:11:13AM +0100, Wouter Verhelst wrote: >> > Well, it works until I reach second/MMU030_asm.S; the same error occurs >> > there, and I obviously can't comment

Re: Why are these Not-For-Us?

Riccardo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Hey, > > On Tuesday, October 31, 2006, at 11:57 PM, Goswin von Brederlow wrote: >> cynthiune.appWas Dep-Wait, for what? > well, it is an audio player. I don't know if any of the supported 68k > architectures ha

Why are these Not-For-Us?

Hi, the subject says it all: Why are these Not-For-Us? adacontrol No ada on m68k? cacao cynthiune.appWas Dep-Wait, for what? edos-debcheck liblinux-inotify2-perl libpam-encfs vnstat Source archlist says any wmnetload Any insights? MfG Goswin

Re: First package build on aranym+distcc+NFS

Bill Allombert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Some realy great news. > Since my setup is working well now, I offer to attempt to build others > packages you would like to try out. Here are a few suggestions: Times in s on amd64 just building (~ *90 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]) --

Re: m68k release future

Anthony Towns writes: > Okay, so the idea is: > > (a) move m68k from etch to testing-m68k > > (b) automatically promote m68k packages from unstable to testing-m68k > when the same version gets promoted into etch. Which, since no special britney run is done, makes it absolutely and exac

Re: m68k release future

Anthony Towns writes: > On Fri, Oct 27, 2006 at 02:13:03PM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote: >> Um, I think I've missed something. What'd be the functional difference >> between the two? > > testing-m68k == having something that updates from unstable at its own > pace for m68k only. That might mean

Re: m68k release future

Anthony Towns writes: > On Fri, Oct 27, 2006 at 12:47:19PM +0200, Roman Zippel wrote: >> On Fri, 27 Oct 2006, Anthony Towns wrote: >> > Personally, I think m68k would be better served by having a testing-m68k >> > and taking occassional snapshots which serve as the supported stable-m68k >> > rele

Please retry: libs/openvrml_0.15.10-8

Hi, openvrml is listed as libs/openvrml_0.15.10-8: Building by buildd_m68k-q650 [optional:out-of-date] but the package failed to unpack source for no reason I can reproduce. Please retry. MfG Goswin -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Troubl

Re: ICE on linux-2.6 (2.6.18, official debs)

"Christian T. Steigies" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Mon, Oct 23, 2006 at 06:43:22PM +0200, Roman Zippel wrote: >> > >> > How do you build them for amd64? I tried building the toolchain-source >> > package for m68k-linux on amd64 but it failed. I also asked Hector >> > Oron (zumbi on irc) if

Re: m68k release future

Wouter Verhelst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Sat, Oct 21, 2006 at 06:58:21AM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote: >> Hey all, >> >> So, from the other thread, seems like the idea for m68k is: >> >>(a) keep building unstable as per usual A per architecture tracking of arch:all package would be ni

Re: m68k not a release arch for etch; status in testing, future plans?

Roman Zippel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Hi, > > On Sat, 21 Oct 2006, Anthony Towns wrote: > >> On Wed, Oct 18, 2006 at 06:11:38PM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: >> > Assumed m68k would be able to kill (most of) the backlog in time, what >> > would >> > prevent m68k from becoming releasable?

Re: arches and etch

Petter Reinholdtsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > [Brian Morris] >> if there is a way to deal with all this i welcome suggestions, >> especially if it is amenable to automation. > > The default submission method for popularity-contest is now HTTP. It > might make it easier for your setup. Also,

Re: arches and etch

Petter Reinholdtsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > One exciting thing with the next etch release is that the default > installer will ask if the machine should submit information to > popcon.debian.org. I look forward to see how that will affect the > number of machines submitting, as well as how

Re: ICE on linux-2.6 (2.6.18, official debs)

"Christian T. Steigies" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Fri, Oct 20, 2006 at 08:11:30AM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote: >> >> Could someone tell me how the official images were build? Same question for linux-2.6.16 (in build-m68k-none-amiga): AS ar

ICE on linux-2.6 (2.6.18, official debs)

Hi, after failing to build my own kernel from the debian package I tried to rebuild the official images. But all I get is CC net/core/link_watch.o CC net/core/filter.o include/linux/nodemask.h:170: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault Please submit a full bug report, with pre

Re: [buildd] Etch?

Hi, would it be possible to install the popularity-contest package? If your system is running 24/7 anyway then you can let popcon run at night when nobody is bothered by a little cpu time loss. MfG Goswin -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Tr

Re: [buildd] Etch?

Geert Uytterhoeven <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Fri, 4 Aug 2006, Wouter Verhelst wrote: >> Indeed. However, I do not feel that the impact will be unbearably large. >> So far, I have found only two cases where the documentation documents >> different behaviour for a given opcode on ColdFire vs

Re: [buildd] Etch?

Stephen R Marenka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Fri, Aug 04, 2006 at 02:03:53PM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote: > >> > Might something be done within the debian infrastructure to assist those >> > architectures that are excluded from the etch release, such that they >> > could make a late relea

Re: [buildd] Etch?

Wouter Verhelst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Hi all, > > I don't know what everyone else thinks about it here, but it would > appear to me that making it in time for Etch is not going to happen > anymore now. > * Too many compiler bugs > * As a result, too many uncompiled packages since *ages*. W

Re: [buildd] configure: error: C++ preprocessor "/lib/cpp" fails sanity check

Wouter Verhelst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Hi, > > Anyone seen one of those error messages before from autoconf? I've been > seeing them on some of my buildd, not sure where they're coming from > yet. Maybe a mismatch between gcc and g++ packages? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTE

Re: More RAM - a bad trend for m68k debian

Ingo Juergensmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Mon, Mar 27, 2006 at 12:23:54PM +0200, Tore Rødningen wrote: >> So my A1200 with an 040/25mhz and 2mb chip +32mb of fastram!! would not be >> enough for the latest Debian:=o > > Hmm, I think 32M is the minimum requirement, but better read the d-i

Re: More RAM - a bad trend for m68k debian

Geert Uytterhoeven <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Mon, 27 Mar 2006, Ingo Juergensmann wrote: >> On Mon, Mar 27, 2006 at 11:15:53AM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: >> > On Fri, 24 Mar 2006, Christian T. Steigies wrote: >> > > I haven't seen any m68k machine, that uses ZIP RAM, but that stuff >>

Re: native amiga linux loader

Kars de Jong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Sat, 2005-05-07 at 21:02 +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote: >> Franziskus Meier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> >> > Hello! >> > >> > I'm searching for a linux loader starting my Amiga 200

Re: native amiga linux loader

Franziskus Meier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Hello! > > I'm searching for a linux loader starting my Amiga 2000b with Blizzard 2060. > The used Sarge-Installer doesn't support mounting the small > Amiga-FFS-Partition, so i had to shut off the system without getting a > startable Debian-Linux.

Re: lost package

"Richard B. Kreckel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Hi, > > Apparently the ginac package was built a while ago [0] but failed to > propagate to the archives, according to [1]. Is there anybody there who > might be able to give it a little kick? Thanks in advance. BTW: Since > this appears to be

Re: Rebuild of cernlib requested on m68k

"Christian T. Steigies" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Sat, Sep 04, 2004 at 06:55:01PM -0400, Kevin B. McCarty wrote: >> On 09/04/2004 10:12 AM, Christian T. Steigies wrote: >> > Automatic build of cernlib_2004.01.20-6 on aahz by sbuild/m68k 1.170.5 >> > Build started at 20040904-1331 >> > >> >

Re: Please requeue gcl 2.6.5-2

Camm Maguire <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > ... the autobuild appeared to fail for system related reasons. > > Take care, > > -- > Camm Maguire [EMAIL PROTECTED] > == > "The earth is bu

Re: Rebuild of cernlib requested on m68k

Stephen R Marenka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > cc'ing m68k-build. > > On Fri, Sep 03, 2004 at 11:08:45AM -0400, Kevin B. McCarty wrote: > >> It's back in the build queue, but maybe some Debian Developer could >> build it on their own machine, less heavily loaded, where the build is >> less likely

Mac specific RC base bugs

Hi, mac-fdisk: fails to build from source http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=262457 A patch is attached but needs someone with a mac to test. After testing this needs to go to testing-proposed-updates. MfG Goswin

Re: please re-queue liblrdf

Robert Jordens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Hi! > > liblrdf 0.3.7-2 has failed to build because of an RC bug in libraptor. > The bug is now fixed and liblrdf should be retried on > sparc, arm and m68k. > > Thanks, > > Robert. Wrong lists :) Each architecture has an @buildd.debian.org a

Re: mozilla-thunderbird package on buildd - stuck

Alexander Sack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Hi, > > mozilla-thunderbird failed with no space left on device and is somehow > stuck! Could someone > please requeue it? > > Thanks > > Alexander Wrong list. CCing. The official email for buildd problems is @buildd.debian.org. But I have yet to see

Re: okle listed as dep-wait?

Christopher Martin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Hello, > > I'm curious as to why okle_0.4-4 is listed as: > > kde/okle_0.4-4: Dep-Wait by buildd_m68k-zeus [optional:out-of-date] > Dependencies: ogle-mmx > Previous state was Building until 2004 Apr 25 22:07:22 > > Assuming that I'm reading thi

Re: [rebuild request] t38modem/ openh323gk

Mark Purcell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Tue, Apr 06, 2004 at 07:44:22AM -0500, Stephen R Marenka wrote: > > On Tue, Apr 06, 2004 at 07:22:24AM +1000, Mark Purcell wrote: > > > > > According to: > > > http://bjorn.haxx.se/debian/testing.pl?package=t38modem > > > > And according to > >

Re: [rebuild request] scsh for woody

Joost van Baal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Sun, Mar 28, 2004 at 10:39:33PM +0200, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote: > > > > Please help me move scsh from woody/main to woody/non-free by > > rebuilding it for all 32 bit released architectures (don't try on 64 > > bit architectures, it won't work). I

please retry ttcn3parser [#233052 FTBFS m68k: invalid static_cast]

Hi, I got a mail from the maintainer asking if bug 233052 is still reproducible. Due to my Amiga being out of reach and offline I can't do so currently. Someone please retry to build ttcn3parser on m68k and report back to the bug report. MfG Goswin

Re: please rebuild lablgtkmathview on m68k

Stefano Zacchiroli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Mon, Feb 23, 2004 at 12:44:15PM +0100, Michael Schmitz wrote: > > > More generally I think a pointer should be added somewhere in the > > > developers reference which states where to ask for rebuild requests > > > architecture per architecture.

Re: please rebuild lablgtkmathview on m68k

Michael Schmitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > I'm unable to find the list you mention on lists.debian.org. On the > > "port" section I see debian-68k, as you pointed out, with tagline > > "Debian port to m68k", but no mention of m68k-build (nor 68k-build). On > > the "developers" section of list

Re: xfree86 4.3 cannot be auto-built

Josh Metzler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Sorry if this has already been communicated to you by someone else. > > It looks like xfree86 4.3 needs to be handbuilt, and that it is fairly > urgent that this happen. Until it is built, no packages > Build-Depending on xlibs-dev can build (including

Re: Problems with "/dev/console" and some "ttys"

Storm66 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Wed, 2004-02-11 at 03:07, Hank wrote: > > Storm66 wrote: > > > > >Hello, > > > > > >Since some days (since an update) I get many messages copmlaining about > > >/dev/console : > > > > > >Feb 10 21:43:03 a2000 getty[31391]: /dev/console: cannot open: No suc

Kernel for an A1260

Hi, I'm trying to boot my A1200 with Blizzard 1260 card and an ide disk. I tried the kernel from woody/main/disks-m68k/current/amigainstall.tgz but that gives me I/O errors on the harddisk (which is a dd of my a4000 harddisk and works fine). I get /sbin/init started but pretty much everything els

Kaffe (java) for your arch [Was: Re: 185 Packages that look orphaned]

I'm forwarding this to the ports lists in the hope someone there is intrested in helping out. For all of you java friends out there, kaffe needs your spare time to get ready for sarge. Feel free to pitch in and help. See below. --- Begin Message --- Goswin von Brederlow wrote: > Arnaud

Re: [linux-mac68k] Install mac68k woody

"Paul Spilner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > The problem is that i have pppoe internet connection. Do you have an idea ? > > thanks Install base from CD, pppoeconfig and pppd and you are all set for the rest. Or use a second computer as router. MfG Goswin

Re: stupid pointer alignment question (re: cernlib on m68k)

"Kevin B. McCarty" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Hi, > I am wondering: will g77 et al. cause programs to automatically align all > 32-bit integers in memory with pointers that are multiples of 4 bytes? > (Given that the integers are array elements that aren't members of any > other structure, an

Re: current mozilla or phoenix debs for PPC?

Wouter Verhelst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Fri, Nov 28, 2003 at 04:13:27PM +0100, Goswin von Brederlow wrote: > > Consider the following: > > > > A good starting point would be the popularity-contest data. Anything > > used in the last half year gets build.

Re: Request for help tracking down m68k assembler error in cernlib

"Kevin B. McCarty" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Hi, > > It seems that (at least on the 'crest' buildd), compiling cernlib on m68k > dies on the file src/mclibs/isajet/code/sigssz.F with this error: > > /tmp/ccpviqVJ.s: Assembler messages: > /tmp/ccpviqVJ.s:9432: Error: value out of range > /tmp

Re: current mozilla or phoenix debs for PPC?

Wouter Verhelst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Op vr 28-11-2003, om 06:40 schreef Scott Holder: > > Chris Tillman wrote: > > > > > Well, it's true we owe our elders respect (as I give a quick glance > > > > > >towards my Mac IIci). But, OTOH, I think the current philosophy of > > >all-or-none may

Re: swh-plugins generated gcc ICE

Anand Kumria <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Tue, Oct 21, 2003 at 08:22:05PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote: > > Hi, > > > > if anyone has some spare time please investigate swh-plugins and file > > a detailed bugreport: > > >

Glibc 2.3.2-9 build maybe successfull

Hi, I compiled glibc 2.3.2-9 on m68k and noticd that some selftests failed during build. I'm not familiar with glibc builds so I'm not sure if this is normal on m68k (like gcc failing some tests) or indicates a serious error. You can look at the build log and sources at: rsync://mrvn.homeip.net/

swh-plugins generated gcc ICE

Hi, if anyone has some spare time please investigate swh-plugins and file a detailed bugreport: surround_encoder_1401.xml: In function `instantiateSurroundEncoder': surround_encoder_1401.xml:88: internal compiler error: in verify_initial_elim_of fsets, at reload1.c:3349 Please submit a full bug r

Re: gcc ICE when compiling 2.4 kernel

Geert Uytterhoeven <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On 3 Sep 2003, Goswin von Brederlow wrote: > > I'm trying to build the Linux 2.4.22 kernel from the linux-m68k cvs: > > > > :pserver:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/home/linux-m68k/cvsroot > > Pass: anon > > >

gcc ICE when compiling 2.4 kernel

Hi, I'm trying to build the Linux 2.4.22 kernel from the linux-m68k cvs: :pserver:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/home/linux-m68k/cvsroot Pass: anon When compiling ide cdrom support the compiler ICEs: make[3]: Entering directory `/mnt/linux-m68k-cvs/drivers/ide' gcc -D__KERNEL__ -I/mnt/linux-m68k-cvs/includ