Mark Purcell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Tue, Apr 06, 2004 at 07:44:22AM -0500, Stephen R Marenka wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 06, 2004 at 07:22:24AM +1000, Mark Purcell wrote:
> >
> > > According to:
> > > http://bjorn.haxx.se/debian/testing.pl?package=t38modem
> >
> > And according to
> > <http://buildd.debian.org/build.php?arch=&pkg=t38modem> it seems
> > unlikely to build, however it's been requeued on m68k.
> >
> > Fortunately, we're pretty much caught up, so if rebuilding these will
> > help you, we're happy to help.
>
> Thanks Stephen.
>
> One thing I don't exactly understand, and haven't been able to find
> documented is the criteria by which the buildd kick off a buildd
> request of a previously failed build.
When someone notices that a problem could be gone?
> For this case in point the last rebuild of t38modem on m68k was attempted
> on 28 Feb 04. The t38modem dependant packages which fixes the issues
> which failed on 28 Feb 04, is the openh323 build which was successful on
> m68k on 22 Mar 04.
>
> How was the buildd to know that t38modem should be rebuilt given the new
> openh323 which was succesful on 22 Mar 04?
>
> Mark
The t38modem package should not have been failed but put on dep-wait
on openh323 then. That way wanna-build notices it itself.
MfG
Goswin
