On Mon, Dec 24, 2012 at 09:15:09PM +, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
> Wouter Verhelst dixit:
>
> > schroot -c source:sid-m68k-sbuild -- apt-get update
> >
> > and have it run every six hours, but *not* at 6-12-18-24, because
> > that's just *before* the archive run. This is because 'apt-get update
Wouter Verhelst dixit:
> schroot -c source:sid-m68k-sbuild -- apt-get update
>
> and have it run every six hours, but *not* at 6-12-18-24, because
> that's just *before* the archive run. This is because 'apt-get update'
Archive runs take 1½-3½ hours on average, so 4-10-16-22 is probably
sane.
So, I spent most of today whipping arrakis into being a buildd again. The
result:
http://grep.be/blog/en/computer/debian/m68k/arrakis
Party!
Now, while it's still fresh in my memory, for those of you who want to
set things up, here's a (not so) short HOWTO:
- First, set up sbuild so it can bui
On Mon, Dec 24, 2012 at 07:30:03PM +, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
> Wouter Verhelst dixit:
>
> >> >It's probably better to add them to no-auto-build on all our buildd
> >> >hosts -- or, better yet, to use packages-arch-specific for that. Not
> >>
> >> I think adding one entry into one centralised d
Wouter Verhelst dixit:
>> >It's probably better to add them to no-auto-build on all our buildd
>> >hosts -- or, better yet, to use packages-arch-specific for that. Not
>>
>> I think adding one entry into one centralised database is better
>> than distributing a file across all hosts or…
>>
>> >sur
Aurélien Jarno dixit:
>It should be done now.
Yes, thanks. Happy yuletime!
bye,
//mirabilos
--
> Hi, does anyone sell openbsd stickers by themselves and not packaged
> with other products?
No, the only way I've seen them sold is for $40 with a free OpenBSD CD.
-- Haroon Khalid and Steve
On Mon, Dec 24, 2012 at 02:55:37PM +, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
> Wouter Verhelst dixit:
>
> >To make this a bit more practical and directly useful:
> >
> >ssh leda.debian.net # I see there's a 'tg' user there already; we may
> > need to ask for a glaubitz one, too
> >wanna-buil
On Mon, Dec 24, 2012 at 04:01:38PM +, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
> Wouter Verhelst dixit:
>
> >Mmm. Actually, I'm starting to doubt if that --no-build isn't reset
> >after an installation event; it might be.
>
> Resetting it manually would be easy.
Yes, but we wouldn't *want* it to be reset.
Wh
Hi again,
On Mon, Dec 24, 2012 at 06:17:28PM +0100, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 24, 2012 at 01:26:17PM +0100, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> > This took far longer than I'd hoped, but if everything's done right,
> > we've now got a buildd up and running. It's not the VM that I wrote you
> > abou
On Mon, Dec 24, 2012 at 01:26:17PM +0100, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> Hi Aurelien,
Hi,
> On Fri, Jul 06, 2012 at 11:54:33AM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> > Hi Wouter,
> >
> > On Wed, Jul 04, 2012 at 03:58:28PM -0600, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> > >
> >
> > [...]
> >
> > >
> > > > I have put the li
Wouter Verhelst dixit:
>Mmm. Actually, I'm starting to doubt if that --no-build isn't reset
>after an installation event; it might be.
Resetting it manually would be easy.
>It's probably better to add them to no-auto-build on all our buildd
>hosts -- or, better yet, to use packages-arch-specific
On Mon, Dec 24, 2012 at 03:17:52PM +, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
> Wouter Verhelst dixit:
>
> >> What about those where I have patches
> >> in unreleased?
> >
> >Eh. If they're built and uploaded, they *should* show as "installed". If
> >they're not built yet, just take them for building, so no bu
Wouter Verhelst dixit:
>> What about those where I have patches
>> in unreleased?
>
>Eh. If they're built and uploaded, they *should* show as "installed". If
>they're not built yet, just take them for building, so no buildd tries
>to build them.
Hum. These where my upload to unreleased is indeed
On Mon, Dec 24, 2012 at 02:30:49PM +, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
> Wouter Verhelst dixit:
>
> >To make this a bit more practical and directly useful:
>
> Great, thanks! I will mark all those as failed which I have
> in my list as FTBFS. What about those where I have patches
> in unreleased?
Eh.
On Mon, Dec 24, 2012 at 02:55:37PM +, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
> Wouter Verhelst dixit:
>
> >To make this a bit more practical and directly useful:
> >
> >ssh leda.debian.net # I see there's a 'tg' user there already; we may
> > need to ask for a glaubitz one, too
> >wanna-buil
Wouter Verhelst dixit:
>To make this a bit more practical and directly useful:
>
>ssh leda.debian.net # I see there's a 'tg' user there already; we may
> need to ask for a glaubitz one, too
>wanna-build -A m68k -d unstable --list=needs-build | head -n 10 # or so
># now pick one
Wouter Verhelst dixit:
>To make this a bit more practical and directly useful:
Great, thanks! I will mark all those as failed which I have
in my list as FTBFS. What about those where I have patches
in unreleased? Looks like --no-build is for them? (Right
now, that’s mostly eglibc, gcc-4.6 and qt4
Hi Aurelien,
On Fri, Jul 06, 2012 at 11:54:33AM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> Hi Wouter,
>
> On Wed, Jul 04, 2012 at 03:58:28PM -0600, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> >
>
> [...]
>
> >
> > > I have put the list at then end of the mail. Could you please tell me the
> > > one
> > > that should be kep
On Fri, Dec 21, 2012 at 03:48:16PM +0100, Ingo Jürgensmann wrote:
> In general you question the w-b database by invoking something like
> wanna-build --query or --list or so and it gives back some packages. You can
> then claim a package by issueing another w-b call and the state turns from
> needs
19 matches
Mail list logo
