Petr Stehlik píše v Út 22. 08. 2006 v 14:56 +0200:
> And ARAnyM related: has anyone tried running different kernel than the
> one I provided? Different distro than sarge or woody?
BTW, I have just uploaded a disk image with preinstalled testing/etch.
140 MB. http://web.zln.cz/~joy/etch.img.bz2
Pe
Geert Uytterhoeven píše v Út 22. 08. 2006 v 18:37 +0200:
> .fb_fillrect
> .fb_copyarea
> .fb_imageblit
Atari VDI source code is available. Also EmuTOS has these routines, I
think. Should be almost copy&paste.
> After all these years, I think I finally understand how Atari bitplanes re
On Tue, Aug 22, 2006 at 08:56:51PM +0200, Roman Zippel wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, 22 Aug 2006, Stephen R Marenka wrote:
>
> > Any interest in tackling emacs21 or gcj-4.1? ;)
>
> I looked shortly into exmacs21 and that's a bit more complicated. It could
> be a cache issue, so if someone tried to b
Hi,
On Tue, 22 Aug 2006, Stephen R Marenka wrote:
> Any interest in tackling emacs21 or gcj-4.1? ;)
I looked shortly into exmacs21 and that's a bit more complicated. It could
be a cache issue, so if someone tried to build it on 030 machine, it might
help to confirm the suspicion.
I haven't rea
Michael Schmitz píše v Út 22. 08. 2006 v 17:59 +0200:
> AFAIR 2.5.15 still did not have discontig memory support, so wouldn't
> boot with TT-RAM. (I did send patches for 2.6.13 which went on top of
> Roman's patches, but didn't find any of these made it into 2.6.15)
Luckily ARAnyM offers up to 1
On Tue, Aug 22, 2006 at 06:56:42PM +0200, Roman Zippel wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, 22 Aug 2006, Stephen R Marenka wrote:
>
> > Your fixes have allowed a bunch of packages to build!
>
> Wait for the next update. :)
> It should take care of most the issues on the DebianM68kGcc page with the
> most i
Hi,
On Tue, 22 Aug 2006, Stephen R Marenka wrote:
> Your fixes have allowed a bunch of packages to build!
Wait for the next update. :)
It should take care of most the issues on the DebianM68kGcc page with the
most important one probably the kdelibs problem.
> log4cxx seems a puzzle though.
>
On Tue, 22 Aug 2006, Michael Schmitz wrote:
> > On Tue, 22 Aug 2006, Petr Stehlik wrote:
> > BTW, what happened to the patches for framebuffer support? I remember
> > someone
> > was working on it for ARAnyM, but I'm still waiting for the patches...
> >
> I did receive some patch from Petr, but t
On Tue, 22 Aug 2006, Petr Stehlik wrote:
On a related note: Finn keeps telling me to go for 2.6.x kernel. Where I
can get the latest source code? How far (apart from framebuffer) are
http://linux-m68k-cvs.ubb.ca/
they from running on Atari hardware? If I patched in my ethernet support
I cou
On Tue, Aug 22, 2006 at 11:43:18AM +0200, Roman Zippel wrote:
> cppunit and grace as well. I have to check mpfr, but everything else
> shouldn't need this anymore.
> BTW over the weekend I checked the failed nano build and it builds fine
> here, so I guess it can just be requeued.
thanks, done.
On Tue, 22 Aug 2006, Petr Stehlik wrote:
> On a related note: Finn keeps telling me to go for 2.6.x kernel. Where I
> can get the latest source code? How far (apart from framebuffer) are
http://linux-m68k-cvs.ubb.ca/
> they from running on Atari hardware? If I patched in my ethernet support
> I c
Hi,
in the last few days Finn almost convinced me (during numerous tests
we've made) that ARAnyM is perhaps not buggy at all and that the errors
I experience are actually due to bugs in kernel and/or glibc. Note that
I am running a 2.4.27 kernel compiled by myself on a minimal sarge
installation t
Hi,
On Mon, 21 Aug 2006, Stephen R Marenka wrote:
> > BTW does anyone have a list of packages, which are currently compiled with
> > -O0 or -O1? It would be nice to get rid of it again.
> > I'm just seeing a failed erlang compiled because it timed out in the test
> > suite, but it's also compil
13 matches
Mail list logo
