On Tue, Aug 22, 2006 at 08:56:51PM +0200, Roman Zippel wrote: > Hi, > > On Tue, 22 Aug 2006, Stephen R Marenka wrote: > > > Any interest in tackling emacs21 or gcj-4.1? ;) > > I looked shortly into exmacs21 and that's a bit more complicated. It could > be a cache issue, so if someone tried to build it on 030 machine, it might > help to confirm the suspicion. > I haven't really looked into gcj yet, but some preconditions (libgc and > libffi) are working now, so it needs retesting. experimental has a newer > version, although it doesn't has the latest libgc patch yet, so it doesn't > work with 2.6 right now and I haven't tested it with 2.4 yet.
wow. It looks like libgc needs the patch in 383817. libffi is part of gcc, which is preparing for a -12. After that we should rebuilt gcj and see if it works? Thanks, Stephen -- Stephen R. Marenka If life's not fun, you're not doing it right! <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
