Re: Embeddded Debian meetup @ Extremadura

2006-01-03 Thread Hector Oron
On 1/3/06, Gabriel Paubert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi,it's my first post to this list, but I've been lurkingfor a while. Bienvenido ! Welcome to the list ! I'm really interested in upgrading since the distributionI originally used (Linux/PPC) has been abandoned. However some  capabilit

Re: [I386-uclibc-devel] Re: Embeddded Debian meetup @ Extremadura

2006-01-03 Thread Bernhard Fischer
On Tue, Jan 03, 2006 at 03:02:40PM -0300, Daniel Ruoso wrote: >> I would love to stand up a fully-working armel-uclibc port, or at least >> get the essential and build-essential packages running. I use >> debootstrap, so lack of an installer wouldn't be a problem. > >The same case for me. But w

Re: [I386-uclibc-devel] Re: Embeddded Debian meetup @ Extremadura

2006-01-03 Thread Erik Andersen
On Tue Jan 03, 2006 at 03:02:40PM -0300, Daniel Ruoso wrote: > Em Ter, 2006-01-03 às 08:16 -0600, Bill Gatliff escreveu: > > I would love to stand up a fully-working armel-uclibc port, or at least > > get the essential and build-essential packages running. I use > > debootstrap, so lack of an in

Re: [I386-uclibc-devel] Re: Embeddded Debian meetup @ Extremadura

2006-01-03 Thread Daniel Ruoso
Em Ter, 2006-01-03 às 08:16 -0600, Bill Gatliff escreveu: > So many important topics, so little time! *sigh*... Unfortunally I have to agree... > > * prepare uclibc ports [4] > Sadly, I'm not a DD (yet) but I could definitely get behind this > proposal. Not only does it benefit embedded in a BI

Re: Embeddded Debian meetup @ Extremadura

2006-01-03 Thread Bill Gatliff
Guys: * promote DEBUILD_OPTIONS=nodocs flag for not building docs Stupid question, but it be more appropriate to promote separate *-doc packages instead? b.g. -- Bill Gatliff [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Co

Re: Embeddded Debian meetup @ Extremadura

2006-01-03 Thread Gabriel Paubert
Hi, it's my first post to this list, but I've been lurking for a while. On Tue, Jan 03, 2006 at 03:17:41PM +0200, Riku Voipio wrote: > Hi, > > emDebian development is again a bit staganting. One option to fuel > some fire is to have a worksession[0] at Extremadura[1][2]. Very nice plac

Re: Embeddded Debian meetup @ Extremadura

2006-01-03 Thread Bill Gatliff
Riku: So many important topics, so little time! * prepare uclibc ports [4] Sadly, I'm not a DD (yet) but I could definitely get behind this proposal. Not only does it benefit embedded in a BIG way, but it also keeps Debian relevant on the class of machines that will likely be used in

Embeddded Debian meetup @ Extremadura

2006-01-03 Thread Riku Voipio
Hi, emDebian development is again a bit staganting. One option to fuel some fire is to have a worksession[0] at Extremadura[1][2]. Some ideas of things that could get done at or before emDebian worksession: * bring Ed's framework upto date with Etch. * create configurations for various devices