Re: Call for bids for DebConf24

2023-11-02 Thread Giacomo Catenazzi
On 1 Nov 2023 17:46, Andreas Tille wrote: Am Tue, Oct 31, 2023 at 12:28:41PM +0100 schrieb Aigars Mahinovs: Specifically Heidelberg, Vaumarcus, Cáceres spring my mind as quite I'd fully support this idea but I'm not sure whether the local team members of Vaumarcus and Cáceres are very active a

Re: Incident response at DC20 (and onward)

2020-05-06 Thread Giacomo Catenazzi
On 06.05.20 18:46, Molly de Blanc wrote: Hi DebConf Team, I'm contacting you on behalf of the Community Team. We'd like to open a channel of communication around Code of Conduct enforcement and incident response at DebConf. While DefConf is under the organization of the DebConf Team, we're ve

Re: More info for DebConf21 Lisbon bid

2020-02-05 Thread Giacomo Catenazzi
On 05.02.2020 12:01, Judit Foglszinger wrote: And note also: professional fee is usually around the "covering own costs", and we have many attendees which are not sponsored but also not "professional or corporate", so they are still a cost for DebConf organization. Out of curiosity - Are thos

Re: More info for DebConf21 Lisbon bid

2020-02-05 Thread Giacomo Catenazzi
On 04.02.2020 16:41, Daniel Lange wrote: Hi again, another interesting data point may be: ~40 attendees paid for the professional or corporate registration. So 90% were attending for free. And note also: professional fee is usually around the "covering own costs", and we have many attendee

Re: Debconf Saint-Petersburg

2019-07-23 Thread Giacomo Catenazzi
Hello Yury, On 23.07.2019 12:26, Юрий Андреев wrote: Dear colleague, Has the next conference location been chosen? Thank you! Yes, DebConf for 2020 is already decided (Haifa). November was somewhat late to start a bid. But DebConf for 2021 is undecided. Now bidding team should start to m

Re: Debconf Saint-Petersburg

2019-07-23 Thread Giacomo Catenazzi
Hello Yury, On 23.07.2019 12:26, Юрий Андреев wrote: Dear colleague, Has the next conference location been chosen? Thank you! Yes, DebConf for 2020 is already decided (Haifa). November was somewhat late to start a bid. But DebConf for 2021 is undecided. Now bidding team should start to m

Re: Join in the DC19 bursaries team

2018-10-08 Thread Giacomo Catenazzi
On 06.10.2018 21:39, Adriana Cássia wrote: Hi Nicolas, Em seg, 10 de set de 2018 14:58, Adriana Cássia > escreveu: Hi Nicolas, Thanks a lot  for the information. May I join in the bursaries team? It's very likely that during the process I will ask s

Re: List of members

2018-09-15 Thread Giacomo Catenazzi
On 02.09.18 17:49, Paulo Henrique de Lima Santana wrote: Hi, Can we have a page listing Committee members and teams members (staff?) like video, registration, sponsorship/fundraising, content, and so on? I believe it's important to know "who is who". I'm not sure if it should be here: https://

Re: Question regarding talk slot for sponsor

2018-09-12 Thread Giacomo Catenazzi
On 12.09.2018 15:24, Daniel Lange wrote: Hi Helen, Am 12.09.2018 um 14:45 schrieb Helen Koike: Usually in Brazil, when a company sponsors an event, they usually get a talk slot too. [..] So we were wondering: If (and only if) a sponsoring company request explicitly for a

Re: [DebConf19] Budget Approval Request [2018-08]

2018-08-22 Thread Giacomo Catenazzi
On 21.08.2018 20:24, Paulo Henrique de Lima Santana wrote: De: "stefanor" That does give us some time to get a full budget, and see if we actually need 268 beds... Sure. To deal with hotels is very different from deal with student accommodation or on site accommodation because when you re

Re: Photo policy for DebConf

2018-08-07 Thread Giacomo Catenazzi
On 05.08.2018 17:44, Carl Karsten wrote: I think it is an excellent compromise I don't. I'd like to bring up priorities. photos are an important way to show what happens at an event to the world, Who are these people and why do they need to see photos? There is no cabal, right? We are v

Re: Talk/event proposals "Closed source"

2018-03-21 Thread Giacomo Catenazzi
On 20.03.2018 23:07, Carl Karsten wrote: > Can someone elaborate on why > "unfortunately means rejecting some." > is a reason to keep anything about this secret? Because if we make public the rejection, less people will submit talks. Debian (and Free Software) communities suffer of the impostor