]] Bernelle Verster
> For me it's less about duplicating the obvious things we expect -
> more interaction with faces through video, for example, and more about
> finding out the needs we were trying to express/address with the
> different things we did. We may end up at the same solutions, but
On Fri, May 14, 2021 at 3:39 PM Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton
wrote:
>
>
>
> On Friday, May 14, 2021, Bernelle Verster wrote:
>>
>>
>> I think it is possible to have a significant social aspect both on-
>> and off-line that complement each other, to have local 'mini-DebConfs'
>
>
> which ensures t
Thanks for this discussion, this is something very close to my heart.
On Fri, May 14, 2021 at 12:46 PM Paul Sutton wrote:
>
>
> >
> > On the other hand, if the mission of the conference is promoting
> > Debian around the globe, with carbon emissions, pandemia, etc. we
> > should also consider a m
Hi,
Em 14/05/2021 07:35, Héctor Orón Martínez escreveu:
However, I think DebConf has lost the point a long time ago. I believe
DebConf should be the venue to discuss Debian project matters and
enable teams and developers with plans, roadmaps, help to coordinate
the project, etc. After all this
On the other hand, if the mission of the conference is promoting
Debian around the globe, with carbon emissions, pandemia, etc. we
should also consider a more fragmented conference, localized in
different areas/continents. Maybe it would make sense to run all those
piled up DebConfs the same y
Hello,
On Thu, 13 May 2021 at 08:52, Andreas Tille wrote:
> I admit my gut feeling is not very good about this long term fixing.
> Its announced now and its possibly my fault that I did not joined the
> discussion, but fixing locations 3 years in advance seems not very good
> to me. Its divergi
