Hi!
micah anderson:
> Wouter Verhelst writes:
>
>> On Sat, Aug 04, 2018 at 04:56:00AM +, Ulrike Uhlig wrote:
>>> Furthermore, I would like to see a policy in which BoFs may be
>>> explicitly choses by the participants to be no-photo zones, on top of
>>> being marked as "non-recorded".
>>
>>
Hi!
Wouter Verhelst:
> On Sat, Aug 04, 2018 at 04:56:00AM +, Ulrike Uhlig wrote:
>> Furthermore, I would like to see a policy in which BoFs may be
>> explicitly choses by the participants to be no-photo zones, on top of
>> being marked as "non-recorded".
> If you do not want to be on a photo,
Hi Laura,
The Brazilian Portuguese version is attached.
Em 03-08-2018 21:19, Laura Arjona Reina escreveu:
Dear all
Please review and translate the article about DebConf 18 closing
available here:
https://salsa.debian.org/publicity-team/bits/blob/master/content/2018/dc18-closes.md
(to be publ
On Sat, Aug 04, 2018 at 03:41:36PM -0400, micah anderson wrote:
> Wouter Verhelst writes:
>
> > As a member of the video team, I would strongly object to such a policy.
> > There is nothing more annoying than hearing a question on a video but
> > not seeing the speaker.
>
> There are plenty off
On Sat, Aug 04, 2018 at 03:38:29PM -0400, micah anderson wrote:
> Wouter Verhelst writes:
>
> > On Sat, Aug 04, 2018 at 04:56:00AM +, Ulrike Uhlig wrote:
> >> Furthermore, I would like to see a policy in which BoFs may be
> >> explicitly choses by the participants to be no-photo zones, on top
On Sat, Aug 04, 2018 at 01:35:26PM -0500, Gunnar Wolf wrote:
> Wouter Verhelst dijo [Sat, Aug 04, 2018 at 05:38:24PM +0200]:
> > On Sat, Aug 04, 2018 at 04:56:00AM +, Ulrike Uhlig wrote:
> > > Furthermore, I would like to see a policy in which BoFs may be
> > > explicitly choses by the particip
Wouter Verhelst writes:
> As a member of the video team, I would strongly object to such a policy.
> There is nothing more annoying than hearing a question on a video but
> not seeing the speaker.
There are plenty off things that are more annoying than that: audio not
working, video playing some
Wouter Verhelst writes:
> On Sat, Aug 04, 2018 at 04:56:00AM +, Ulrike Uhlig wrote:
>> Furthermore, I would like to see a policy in which BoFs may be
>> explicitly choses by the participants to be no-photo zones, on top of
>> being marked as "non-recorded".
>
> No.
Yes.
> Anything which req
Wouter Verhelst dijo [Sat, Aug 04, 2018 at 05:38:24PM +0200]:
> On Sat, Aug 04, 2018 at 04:56:00AM +, Ulrike Uhlig wrote:
> > Furthermore, I would like to see a policy in which BoFs may be
> > explicitly choses by the participants to be no-photo zones, on top of
> > being marked as "non-recorde
On Fri, Aug 03, 2018 at 05:11:39AM -0500, Gunnar Wolf wrote:
> Wouter Verhelst dijo [Thu, Aug 02, 2018 at 11:58:33AM +0200]:
> > > I know that some of them were specifically requested to be without
> > > recording, so I suppose there is no reason to put them in a different
> > > room if that was go
On Fri, Aug 03, 2018 at 08:40:59AM +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
> Ulrike Uhlig wrote:
>
> > it has been pointed out to me that there *is* a photo policy for
> > DebConf within the code of conduct.
>
> Not having video pans of the audience since it doesn't necessarily add
> much value to the streams
Th
On Sat, Aug 04, 2018 at 04:56:00AM +, Ulrike Uhlig wrote:
> Furthermore, I would like to see a policy in which BoFs may be
> explicitly choses by the participants to be no-photo zones, on top of
> being marked as "non-recorded".
No.
Anything which requires a photographer to check a list at th
12 matches
Mail list logo
