Hi,
On Friday 31 March 2006 04:22, Gunnar Wolf wrote:
[lots of interesting stuff deleted, I hope somebody from the press team takes
care of that...]
> Third, Presidencia has a weekly podcast-like show dealing with Free
> Software issues - They want to stream it from Oaxtepec, having some
> inte
Hi,
On Thursday 13 April 2006 02:02, Gunnar Wolf wrote:
> I have been quite busy in this front lately. I'm sending this mail
> mainly so I don't forget about any of them. This is the result of a
> couple of days, not only one, but still - a productive week.
>
> 1- k001operator (Ivan Alfredo Zenten
On Monday 17 April 2006 06:58, Marcela Tiznado wrote:
> The translation is quite expensive, its another thing to care about...I
> would suggest somebody to do it as gwolf said, or maybe move that talk
> to debconf and leave a free space in debian day...I think I can still
> find some spanish talk t
Hi,
On Tuesday 18 April 2006 09:56, Amaya wrote:
> Also, a couple of weekends ago, I was at a conference where they had a
> screenshot of the speaker's slides on a website in real time (good for
> people with sight problems like me, poorly lit places or misplaced
> projectors). Of course it made a
Hi,
I just added 900 U$ for renting sound equiqment from the hotel to the budget
(for 9 days one set (they have three different ones *), that is for one day
of testing, one of debian day and seven for debconf) and noticed we are
38.000 U$ in red!
Is that really the current situation?
regards
Hi,
On Tuesday 18 April 2006 22:36, Gunnar Wolf wrote:
> Do we really need that sound equipment? We have not asked for sound
> stuff to anybody, as we (at least I) completely forgot about it.
Nadeshda took at least pictures of it and gave me a list of available audio
sets.
> The
> work
Moin,
On Tuesday 18 April 2006 22:50, Gunnar Wolf wrote:
> On the down side, there are two reasons _not_ to have the video team
> set in the tower: First and foremost, the tower will have a wireless
> link to the rest of our areas, so directly storing in the RAID will be
> impossible. Second, we w
Hi,
On Thursday 20 April 2006 16:16, you wrote:
> > I agree with scraping it (because of the 24h problem) but I want to
> > remark that we will (need to) setup a cable link to the parlamentary
> > tower for the video team. There is even money in the budget for it :-)
> Umh... I'm not sure if this
Hi,
to be able to plan video, we need to know when talks are held where.
DebianDay will happen in the tower or where ?
DebConf (talk, bof, workshops) will take place in the tower and in the
hacklab ?
regards,
Holger
pgpmJ5eB4QoF5.pgp
Description: PGP signature
__
Hi,
On Monday 24 April 2006 18:24, you wrote:
> My proposal -which might change, might be suboptimal, but is what we
> have right now- is:
Gunnar thank you for this mail and the others!
Did you bcc: Luiz on this mail, too?
I think your proposal is good and we should give that information to h
Hi,
On Tuesday 25 April 2006 15:31, Thomas Bliesener wrote:
> This could be done better next time. To avoid confusion and race
> conditions the registration and confirmation periods shouldn't end at
> the same time.
Ack.
Will you remind us then ? :)
regards,
Holger
pgpvLzykbnL7m.pgp
Hi,
On Wednesday 26 April 2006 00:02, Gunnar Wolf wrote:
> Ok, I got our phone number in Mexico City, thanks to NeoCenter - It
> is (+52-55)8590-9000. This is NeoCenter's main line; we will have
> extension numbers 1000-1004. Extension 1000 will be a wildcard (all of
> our phones will ring), and 1
Hi,
On Tuesday 02 May 2006 13:57, you wrote:
> On Tue, May 02, 2006 at 12:58:02PM +0200, Holger Levsen wrote:
> > Whats the plan to get that connected ? Will we setup a asterisk server or
> > something else ? And who will set it up ? :)
> they come and set it up for us. When?
Hi,
On Tuesday 02 May 2006 19:19, you wrote:
> Yes. One of the Neocenter people (probably Octavio Ruiz, Tacvbo, as he
> will be at least part time at Debconf) will set it up at one of our
> servers.
Ah. So it will be asterisk? And we need to decide on which of our servers...
regards,
Ho
Hi,
On Wednesday 03 May 2006 15:05, Jesus Climent wrote:
> I believe there is no van, finally.
I believe there will be...
regards,
Holger
pgpm80okGqzqF.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
Debconf-team mailing list
Debconf-team@lists.debconf.o
Hi,
I need a fax or scanner today, to give the mexican aruba partner, who borrowed
us the aruba equiqment, confidence & and an indication that they will get
their stuff back.
This has been neglected for 5 (?) days and I really would like to have it done
today...
Thanks,
Holger
pgp
Hi,
we should be able to give you wireless in the tower from now on, only if we
encounter streaming problems due to ethernet collisions or whatever (its a
10mbit link+tunnel thru the hotel network) we _might_ turn it off to ensure
streaming to the world. But I'm quite confident, that this will
Hi,
On Wednesday 17 May 2006 19:33, Herman Robak wrote:
> * Where shall slides be uploaded?
via anonymous ftp to homer://video/slides/
> Speakers who are willing and eager to provide slides to the
> video team should be told where to put them (and how).
> * What is the stream URL? Could be more
Hi,
On Tuesday 06 June 2006 15:12, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
>Monday, 19th June in #debconf-team on OFTC
For personal and other reasons and also to allow Patty Langasek to participate
(she's getting involved in the Montreal team for the "bid" for debconf8), I
would suggest friday, the 23th of ju
ably the local team iirc
(...)
> So, I propose to delegate
>
> Andreas Schuldei (lead of the team),
> Fabian Fagerholm,
> Gunnar Wolf,
> Joerg Jaspert
Holger Levsen as soon as he is DD
I agree
> [3] There was the suggestion to always CC such mails to
> [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
-- Forwarded Message --
Subject: Re: DebConf "Legal" BoF continued - lets get it to a Delegation
Date: Friday 09 June 2006 08:19
From: Andreas Barth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Hi,
* Joerg Jaspert ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [060608 21:34]:
> I want to keep this as short as possible, as the
-- Forwarded Message --
Subject: Re: DebConf "Legal" BoF continued - lets get it to a Delegation
Date: Friday 09 June 2006 11:59
From: Alexander Schmehl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Hi!
* Andreas Barth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [060609 08:19]:
> * Joerg Jaspert ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [060608 2
-- Forwarded Message --
Subject: Re: DebConf "Legal" BoF continued - lets get it to a Delegation
Date: Friday 09 June 2006 16:45
From: Joerg Jaspert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On 10680 March 1977, Andreas Barth wrote:
> * Joerg Jaspert ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [060608 21:34]:
>> I want to
-- Forwarded Message --
Subject: Re: DebConf "Legal" BoF continued - lets get it to a Delegation
Date: Friday 09 June 2006 13:45
From: Holger Levsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Hey,
On Friday 09 June 2006 08:19, Andreas Barth wrote:
> * Joerg Jasper
-- Forwarded Message --
Subject: Re: DebConf "Legal" BoF continued - lets get it to a Delegation
Date: Friday 09 June 2006 17:04
From: Joerg Jaspert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On 10680 March 1977, Alexander Schmehl wrote:
> One bigger question: Shoudln't such a proposal be discussed
-- Forwarded Message --
Subject: Re: DebConf "Legal" BoF continued - lets get it to a Delegation
Date: Friday 09 June 2006 17:24
From: Andreas Schuldei <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On Thu, Jun 08, 2006 at 09:31:46PM +0200, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
> as the DebConf organizers[1], responsibl
-- Forwarded Message --
Subject: Re: DebConf "Legal" BoF continued - lets get it to a Delegation
Date: Friday 09 June 2006 17:34
From: Holger Levsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Hi,
On Friday 09 June 2006 17:24, Andreas Schuldei wrote:
> thinking about it
-- Forwarded Message --
Subject: Re: DebConf "Legal" BoF continued - lets get it to a Delegation
Date: Friday 09 June 2006 17:23
From: Andreas Barth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Joerg Jaspert ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [060609 16:47]:
> On 10680 March 1977, Andreas Barth wrote:
> > * Joerg
-- Forwarded Message --
Subject: Re: DebConf "Legal" BoF continued - lets get it to a Delegation
Date: Friday 09 June 2006 17:35
From: Andreas Schuldei <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On Fri, Jun 09, 2006 at 05:24:34PM +0200, Andreas Schuldei wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 08, 2006 at 09:31:46PM +0
-- Forwarded Message --
Subject: Re: DebConf "Legal" BoF continued - lets get it to a Delegation
Date: Friday 09 June 2006 17:19
From: Andreas Schuldei <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On Thu, Jun 08, 2006 at 09:31:46PM +0200, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
first of all, thanks for sending this fir
-- Forwarded Message --
Subject: Re: DebConf "Legal" BoF continued - lets get it to a Delegation
Date: Friday 09 June 2006 20:55
From: Joerg Jaspert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On 10680 March 1977, Andreas Schuldei wrote:
>> So, I propose to delegate
>
> I would like to have delegates
-- Forwarded Message --
Subject: Re: DebConf "Legal" BoF continued - lets get it to a Delegation
Date: Friday 09 June 2006 20:56
From: Joerg Jaspert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On 10680 March 1977, Andreas Schuldei wrote:
> thinking about it, there should be a distinction between the
-- Forwarded Message --
Subject: Re: DebConf "Legal" BoF continued - lets get it to a Delegation
Date: Friday 09 June 2006 20:57
From: Joerg Jaspert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On 10680 March 1977, Andreas Barth wrote:
>> Si, and even if not, where would be the problem, its a proposal
-- Forwarded Message --
Subject: Re: DebConf "Legal" BoF continued - lets get it to a Delegation
Date: Friday 09 June 2006 21:24
From: Andreas Schuldei <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Joerg Jaspert ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [060609 20:56]:
> On 10680 March 1977, Andreas Schuldei wrote:
> >> S
-- Forwarded Message --
Subject: Re: DebConf "Legal" BoF continued - lets get it to a Delegation
Date: Saturday 10 June 2006 08:27
From: Anthony Towns
On Thu, Jun 08, 2006 at 09:31:46PM +0200, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
> So, I propose to delegate [...]
> as the DebConf organizers[
-- Forwarded Message --
Subject: Re: DebConf "Legal" BoF continued - lets get it to a Delegation
Date: Saturday 10 June 2006 15:27
From: Joerg Jaspert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On 10681 March 1977, Anthony Towns wrote:
>> as the DebConf organizers[1], responsible to organize the yea
-- Forwarded Message --
Subject: Re: DebConf "Legal" BoF continued - lets get it to a Delegation
Date: Sunday 11 June 2006 06:52
From: Anthony Towns
On Sat, Jun 10, 2006 at 03:27:48PM +0200, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
> Until now I only now of krooger who "complaine
-- Forwarded Message --
Subject: Re: DebConf "Legal" BoF continued - lets get it to a Delegation
Date: Saturday 10 June 2006 23:11
From: Andreas Barth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Joerg Jaspert ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [060610 15:29]:
> > Personally, I've got a few concerns about how the
o delegate
>
> Andreas Schuldei (lead of the team),
> Fabian Fagerholm,
> Gunnar Wolf,
> Joerg Jaspert
>
> as the DebConf organizers[1]
> (...)
> [1] And Holger Levsen also, if he is a DD by then. If not then that
> should be done right after he got it.
In general,
-- Forwarded Message --
Subject: Re: DebConf "Legal" BoF continued - lets get it to a Delegation
Date: Monday 12 June 2006 18:36
From: Alexander Schmehl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Hi!
* Gunnar Wolf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [060611 17:43]:
[..]
> On one side, I acknowledge Tolimar's conc
Hi,
On Sunday 18 June 2006 11:11, Safir Secerovic wrote:
> I was told by Bosnian Foreign Office that we could ask from them to issue
> you a visa in one of the European coutries, say in Rome, Italy or
> somewhere convenient for you, on your way to here, and they apparently
> would issue you a visa
Hi,
On Monday 03 July 2006 18:57, Andreas Schuldei wrote:
> we have now looked at the possible/likely venues of debconf7. I
> expect reports to surface soon on this mailinglist.
real soon would be good, as we wanted to decide tomorrow...
> it turns out that only one of the options would not requ
Hi,
On Tuesday 04 July 2006 14:40, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> > Sarajevo
> > Currently the only way from and to the small and quite Airport is
> > by taxi. It is possible that public transport will be available
> > by next year.
> Have someone checked if there's handicapped capable taxi?
Safir (or
Hi,
On Tuesday 04 July 2006 15:01, Alexander Schmehl wrote:
> Here is my report about our visit in Sarajevo.
Thank you for those two reports!
> Again we would need to set up the entire network our self, as well as
> doing stuff like reception, etc. Again we heard of several grocery
> stores nea
Hi,
On Tuesday 04 July 2006 20:58, Andreas Schuldei wrote:
> We could come up with a "shuttle" service for the participants
> from/to the culture center during the day, so they dont need to
> walk in the heat of the day, to take the edge off.
Besides this costs money it also requieres volunteers.
Hi,
On Tuesday 04 July 2006 09:07, Holger Levsen wrote:
> On Monday 03 July 2006 18:57, Andreas Schuldei wrote:
> > it turns out that only one of the options would not require us to
> > come up with an alternative way of funding debconf (one of the
> > ones in sarajevo, whic
Hi,
so last night I couldn't fall asleep (and took some notes) and tonite I woke
up after after a really short time of sleep and couldn't sleep more.
So this document is the result of thinking last night (with taking notes..)
after+about the meeting what rational thoughts I have for not being i
Hi,
On Thursday 06 July 2006 10:28, Safir Secerovic wrote:
> No, we could save lot of money on the dorm option. I will check if the
> United Nations building by the dorm is usable for auditorium purposes.
> It does not hurt to check.
/me nods.
But then you also wrote this today: "Dorm is out of
Hi,
I wanted to write a mail about these two topics and my idea on howto better
find a decision (than the current process) was something like "not to try to
find a consensus between anybody randomly (or not) hanging out on
#debconf-team, but only the ones who have been involved in previous debc
Hi,
I have created a spreadsheet now, based on the numbers Alexander put in
http://wiki.debian.org/DebConf7/VenueComparisonPrices - the version last
edited at 2006-07-09 20:02:35 by AlexanderSchmehl.
With one change, the food prices in Edinburgh: according to the wiki-page it's
4.5-6e. Accordi
Hi,
just a quick reminder: in .mx we discussed to plan two years in advance... I
dont wanna suggest a dc8 meeting now, but... I still think that plan is good.
Maybe this time decide about dc8 1.5 years in advance (Decembre or so) and
then speed up and decide dc9 2 years in advance. And 2 years
Hi,
On Tuesday 11 July 2006 23:29, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
> So, this all is a suggestion, you are of course free to propose your own
> solution. I just like it as it reflects parts of how DebConf6 worked
> already.
I also like to keep lots of things like they were, because they worked well.
And I
Hi,
On Wednesday 12 July 2006 10:17, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
> > But I dont like neither this rush now nor Jörg's proposed structure.
> Propose something better.
IMHO I did :) Main point: let us take more time for this. Moray and Marga
already stated, that friday "evening" (UTC wise) doesnt suit th
Hi,
I've put a preliminary agenda for the meeting tomorrow at 19oo UTC on
http://wiki.debian.org/DebConf7Meetings - the meeting will be held on
#debconf-team on irc.debian.org. (Unless we now have a rush of last minute
"please move to the 30th of july" requests.)
Please add topics and modify.
Hi,
On Wednesday 26 July 2006 11:11, Fabian Fagerholm wrote:
> The claim that Andreas has failed to lead the team has gone undisputed
> for too long. A few vocal persons have used this as an argument to
> radically restructure the DebConf organisation. So far, the
> restructuring seems to have fai
Hi,
On Friday 04 August 2006 09:18, Fabian Fagerholm wrote:
> Does anyone have any comments? Do you need more time to think this over?
Yes, yes. Actually not to think it over, but more to put it in written words.
Basically I'd say: last years report was good, from the targeted audience and
the
Hi,
On Tuesday 08 August 2006 08:36, Fabian Fagerholm wrote:
> I could just go ahead and make something up on my own, but I would much
> rather base everything on a vision that the group stands by. If that's
> not possible then I'll have to go ahead without that vision.
I think the vision and goa
Hi,
we have not decided upon a time and date for the next meeting yet. As it
should be either next week or the week after (I am in favor of that week), we
should do so somewhat soon.
http://wiki.debian.org/DebConf7Meetings has a very preliminary agenda now.
regards,
Holger
pgpILnU2a
Hi,
On Tuesday 15 August 2006 18:00, Anthony Towns wrote:
> FWIW, I'd love to see a summary of what worked at the previous debconf,
> so that we don't forget it. Things like what projects people managed
> to get further progressed, or which organisational tactics worked well,
> how was involved an
Hi,
On Thursday 10 August 2006 22:33, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
> So, as a small summary, I would like to say thank you to our former domain
> sponsors Jonathan Oxer and Ean Schuessler (Brainfood Inc.) for their
> support during the past years and welcome our new domain sponsor Gandi.net.
/me too :) A
Hi Wolfgang,
On Thursday 17 August 2006 12:17, Wolfgang Lonien wrote:
> FYI: that's "LaudatioC", which I also took for thedebianuser.org. I
> could volunteer to make up the word "DebConf" in several sizes in the
> Gimp. Where should I upload the resulting images to?
If you make a svg version that
Hi,
On Wednesday 16 August 2006 22:49, Holger Levsen wrote:
> we have not decided upon a time and date for the next meeting yet. As it
> should be either next week or the week after (I am in favor of that week),
> we should do so somewhat soon.
>
> http://wiki.debian.org/DebConf
Hi,
http://wiki.debian.org/DebConfWhy has a priorized list of goals, why we
have DebConf. Please comment, discuss and improve :)
I've also put it on the agenda for our next irc meeting, but the more we
discuss on the list before the meeting, the less time we need to spend
on it during the meeting
Hi,
On Sunday 20 August 2006 13:10, Holger Levsen wrote:
> So I suggest mondays, (28th of Augst,) 19 UTC or wednesdays, (30th of
> August,) 22 UTC.
on which there were the following replies:
On Sunday 20 August 2006 18:18, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
> 22 UTC not for me, but the monday i
Hi,
for all not reading IRC...
On Friday 25 August 2006 11:06, Holger Levsen wrote:
> It seems, this wednesday 19 UTC could be the best time (for now).
So be it... (as "discussed" yesterday on irc..)
> "BTW", please look at the agenda at http://wiki.debian.org/
Hi,
On Tuesday 05 September 2006 08:52, Fabian Fagerholm wrote:
> Was this meeting held? Is there a log and/or minutes available?
Yes, it was held.
Minutes will be provided, aeh, when they are ready :-/ I have a log but I have
never color-beautified one, if someone points me howto, I'll happil
Hi,
http://wiki.debian.org/DebConf7Meetings/Minutes/2006-08-30
Thanks Jon!
regards,
Holger
pgpVk3ZMVdv7w.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
Debconf-team mailing list
Debconf-team@lists.debconf.org
http://lists.debconf.org/mailman/listinfo/d
-- Forwarded Message --
Subject: minutes of localteam localmeet 2006-09-09 online
Date: Wednesday 13 September 2006 11:00
From: Jon Dowland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I expect everyone has already seen this, but just for
completeness:
The minutes of the localte
Hi,
(bcc:ed to debian-project@, please reply to debconf-team@ only.)
back in July (or June) we discussed to have a decision about where DebConf8
will be held around the end of this year. (And from then on, to have this
decision two years in advance.)
So, to be able to decide in around three mo
Hi Yuriy,
On Sunday 22 October 2006 16:29, Yuriy Padlyak wrote:
> You don't have permission to access
> /pub/debian-meetings/2006/debconf6/dvd/menus/en-1/credits.html on this
> server.
fixed now, thanks for pointing this out.
regards,
Holger
pgpB6VGOSZ4Rp.pgp
Description: PGP signatur
Hi,
On Tuesday 17 October 2006 17:09, Felipe Augusto van de Wiel (faw) wrote:
> > There will be a (global) team meeting at 19 UTC on Monday 30 October, on
> > OFTC #debconf-team.
Just a reminder (though you probably noticed this this morning yourself :-)
(In many places) summertime is over , so
Hi,
http://wiki.debian.org/?action=fullsearch&context=180&value=DebConf&titlesearch=Titel
lists 242 pages with "DebConf" in the title.
I think, the contents of some was copied to wiki.debconf.org, but the pages
were left on wiki.debian.org.
If this is not a mess by now, it will be one very s
Hi,
this is a draft of a post which should end up on times.debian.net and
elsewhere. Please give feedback, as I'm much too tired to think and write
clearly...
The links to the wiki pages will need to be fixed as the new wiki.debconf.org
replaces wiki.debian.org...
regards,
Holger
H
Hi,
I should list the four most important priorities from our list in that mail:
- "affordable" for both sponsors and attendees
- strong, mature, experienced local team
- good working spaces
- excellent network connectivity
regards,
Holger
pgpt8y6GqhQKO.pgp
Description: PGP signatu
Hi,
On Monday 06 November 2006 22:20, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
> Thos two that volunteered to move the wiki data got told to mark the
> pages they moved.
Who are those two? I think Luciano would like to know :)
Also I have not seen any marked pages, maybe I missed them, but... (..making
them read-o
Hi,
On Tuesday 07 November 2006 02:42, Alejandro Rios Peña wrote:
> > Who are those two? I think Luciano would like to know :)
> Those would be Ana Delgado (anubis) and me (alerios).
Yay! Thanks!
> Anubis and I arranged to divide the work, and the progress of my
> debconf6 pages can be seen by n
Hi Alejandro,
On Tuesday 07 November 2006 17:49, Alejandro Rios Peña wrote:
> I have moved the following already:
> http://wiki.debconf.org/wiki/PriorityList
> http://wiki.debconf.org/wiki/LocationCheckList
> http://wiki.debconf.org/wiki/DebConf8
> http://wiki.debconf.org/wiki/DebConf8/Venezuela
Hi,
btw, I got your mail twice.
On Tuesday 07 November 2006 22:36, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
> > future DebConfs should be even better prepared than they are now, thats
> > why we (debconf-team) decided to plan DebConfs for two years in advance
> > from now.
> That heavily implies we are doing a bad j
Hi,
On Thursday 09 November 2006 03:05, José Parrella wrote:
> Is the wiki the right place to work on press releases or is it done
> through IRC or e-mail? My nickname in IRC is "bureado", just in case.
thanks for your offer to help!
The people who do the work should decide how they want to work
Hi Andi,
On Thursday 09 November 2006 10:35, Andreas Barth wrote:
> I'm interessted to work in the press area.
Yay! Welcome to the team :)
regards,
Holger
pgpizQ8KUP3Fm.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
Debconf-team mailing list
Debconf-tea
Hi,
On Friday 10 November 2006 05:05, you wrote:
> View proposal: http://valessio.ul-jb.org/projetos/WikiDebConf/ <
> logo0*1,2,3,4*.png
I like logo02.png the best (IMHO no need to mention "wiki" in the logo), but I
dont like the clean swirl. Why not use the real rough debian swirl? :)
regard
Hi,
On Sunday 26 November 2006 21:04, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
> there has been a short meeting about DebConfs press team future today.
> The basic result is
>
> - creation of the list [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Everyone is free to subscribe here and discuss press releases, post
>suggestions and comm
Hi,
On Thursday 30 November 2006 20:40, Jimmy Kaplowitz wrote:
> P.S. - I haven't intentionally fallen off the face of the earth with
> regard to DebConf, it's just that for most of this semester the Monday
> 19:00 UTC meeting time has been bad for me and I haven't had much time
> to loiter and di
Hi,
I have a clash of meetings on January the 8th: there is a debian-edu meeting
at 19.30 UTC and a debconf-team meeting scheduled at 20:00 UTC.
Any suggestions how to resolve this? Maybe by moving the debconf-team meeting
to 20:30 UTC?
regards,
Holger
pgpngl5wc3tAb.pgp
Description:
Hi,
as it turns out, I will not be able to attend any of the two meetings :(
For february I would be very happy, if one meeting is not on the first monday
of the month. Or at least with no overlapping times.
debconf-team meeting at 18.30 UTC, debian-edu meeting at 20 UTC?
regards,
Hol
Hi,
LCA (which was very well organized, btw!) had different classes of sponsors
(something like royal, king, regular - I can't reach the website atm) and I
would like to ask you to share these experiences with us (the organizer team
of the Debian conferences):
So I have some questions:
1. How
Hi,
On Saturday 20 January 2007 05:21, Safir Secerovic wrote:
> We have started working on a draft of Letter of Invitation for DebConf7,
where is the draft?
> and a copy of which will be available soon (a month or two from now). We
debconf7 starts in less than 5 month and I think not all visas
Hi,
On Tuesday 23 January 2007 12:09, Safir Secerovic wrote:
> > where is the draft?
> It will be available on svn in 2-3 days.
Cool!
> >> and a copy of which will be available soon (a month or two from now). We
> My bad, not a month or two.
> Half a moth the longest.
Great!
> > as quickly as
Hi,
tonite at 19.30 UTC we have our monthly meeting on #debian-edu on
irc.debian.org. Agenda at http://wiki.debian.org/DebianEdu/Meeting
As this partly clashes with the debconf7 meeting (starts at 20 UTC) I will
only be fully there the first half, but respond to highlights the second
half.
As
Hi,
On Monday 29 January 2007 23:36, Margarita Manterola wrote:
> The idea is to try to evaluate the options and arrive to a consensus
> of which of these two locations is better suited for hosting DebConf8.
> For this, we should have a meeting similar to that which led to the
> decision of DebCon
Hi,
On Tuesday 30 January 2007 11:14, Jon Dowland wrote:
> I don't have the time to regularly police the sites, but if
you can subscribe to a recent changes rss-feed and read that with rss2email -
works fine for me.
regards,
Holger
pgp9BbSdSeqVP.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
Hi,
On Saturday 13 January 2007 10:16, Fabian Fagerholm wrote:
> On Fri, 2007-01-12 at 19:34 -0200, Felipe Augusto van de Wiel (faw)
>
> wrote:
> > Ok, so here we are again, a couple of months later, anything
> > happen since them? What should be the next steps? What is holding us
> > to finis
Hi,
I honestly think it's a big mistake not to go with sponsorship levels, as was
"decided" (*) in the sponsorship team meeting:
1. I believe, that we get more money from sponsors, if they have an incentive
to spend more money to reach higher levels. Currently it doesnt really matter
how much
Hi,
On Wednesday 07 February 2007 18:57, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
> On 10923 March 1977, Holger Levsen wrote:
> Yeah. Point at me, have fun.
I'm sorry, that was not appropriate. (Even though I had the impression that I
had.)
> But realize its not only me,
I did and I do.
regards,
Hi,
On Wednesday 07 February 2007 18:34, Jonathan McDowell wrote:
> The addition of such sponsorship levels could well scare off smaller
> sponsors;
So why does almost everybody else do it?
And being listed on the bottom doesnt scare them away?
regards,
Holger
pgppKw3SIM7BR.pgp
Desc
Hi,
On Thursday 08 February 2007 01:25, you wrote:
> You are right: We currently rate them. However, there might be some
> logic behind it.
There "might" be logic behind it? I seriously hope this a language issue...
> > 4. If we dont have sponsor classes, my (poorly doing) freelancing
> > busine
Hi Safir and everybody else wanting to help DebConf getting more money,
On Thursday 08 February 2007 13:45, Safir Secerovic wrote:
> P.S. I would also like to be involved more with helping sponsorship team.
in the -team-svn there is a file, sponsors-table, where you can find a huge
lists of comp
Hi,
On Friday 16 February 2007 04:06, Felipe Augusto van de Wiel (faw) wrote:
> OTOH, some of us do think that such a change could lead to
> the lost of sponsors.
While I do see this might be true for some sponsors, I do believe it doesnt
affect the majority of small sponsors and also I t
Hi,
On Friday 02 March 2007 03:32, Moray Allan wrote:
> > There are two suggestions:
> >
> > One: have debianday as part of the debconf website.
> This seems fine to me. (And having separate websites would be likely to
> confuse some people.)
I fully agree.
regards,
Holger
pgp8GW7RW
Hi,
On Saturday 03 March 2007 01:40, J D Freeman wrote:
> Further to my discussion with Steve earlier, I would like to request
> room for myself +1 in one of the hostels with other debconf attendees.
Did someone register them in pentabarf, so that this request doesnt get lost?
regards,
901 - 1000 of 1142 matches
Mail list logo
