Hey people,
let's sync up tonight again on what needs to be done for DC15
locally. Agenda is (will be) here:
https://wiki.debconf.org/DebConf15/Germany/Minutes/2015-03-09
Topics will mainly be day trip, conference dinner, child care, and
also starting off on stuff like furniture for job fair a
also sprach martin f krafft [2015-03-09 14:37 +0100]:
> https://wiki.debconf.org/DebConf15/Germany/Minutes/2015-03-09
Thanks edrz for pointing out, the link should be
https://wiki.debconf.org/wiki/DebConf15/Germany/Minutes/2015-03-09
--
.''`. martin f. krafft @martinkrafft
: :' : Deb
Hi Michael and other orga folks--
On Sun 2015-03-08 17:15:58 -0700, Michael Banck wrote:
> We will send out the CfP on Tuesday, so I thought I'd run the current
> list of proposed topics/tracks by this list to get any final feedback.
> Please note the list is already quite long right now, so if w
Hi,
On Mon, Mar 09, 2015 at 10:34:33AM -0700, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
> On Sun 2015-03-08 17:15:58 -0700, Michael Banck wrote:
>
> > We will send out the CfP on Tuesday, so I thought I'd run the current
> > list of proposed topics/tracks by this list to get any final feedback.
> > Please note
also sprach martin f krafft [2015-03-03 22:02 +0100]:
> Ideally, you could send this to me by Sunday afternoon. The reason
> is that the only real time I have next week for this is Sunday and
> Tuesday evenings, and I want to have enough time to be able to ask
> questions if needed.
As per Richi'
martin f krafft writes:
> As per Richi's request, I split infrastructure and video up. As
> I have not received any other feedback, am I to assume that the
> budget is good then, that is that your needs are addressed in the
> budget? If not, please let me know ASAP!
Hi Martin;
I'd like to see t
also sprach David Bremner [2015-03-09 20:05 +0100]:
> I'd like to see the travel sponsorship split into an amount for
> internal use (sponsoring key volunteers) and the "normal" part
> allocated by bursaries.
That's easily done and possibly already included. The travel
sponsorship budget is alrea
On Mon, Mar 9, 2015 at 6:38 PM, Michael Banck wrote:
> My immediate reaction would be that (i) it would fit into "Security,
> Safety, and Hacking" (and if you think it might not, then maybe we
> should add "Crypto" or "Cryptography" to the track title?), and (ii) you
> should consider having a Deb
On Wed, Mar 4, 2015 at 6:35 AM, Richard Hartmann
wrote:
> If at all possible, I think quickly accepting a few good talks and
> then having 1-3 waves of accepted talks will help with press work.
I didn't see any updates in this regard and still think it's really
important. What do others think?
On Mon, Mar 9, 2015 at 7:40 PM, martin f krafft wrote:
> As per Richi's request, I split infrastructure and video up. As
> I have not received any other feedback, am I to assume that the
> budget is good then, that is that your needs are addressed in the
> budget? If not, please let me know ASAP!
On Fri, Mar 6, 2015 at 4:06 PM, Tassia Camoes Araujo wrote:
> I really don't like this approach. People who have a problem with video would
> refrain from participating if they need to convince us that they have a good
> reason. Yes video is important, but IMHO we shouldn't do it on the cost of
>
On Fri, Mar 6, 2015 at 4:07 PM, Tassia Camoes Araujo wrote:
> I would then suggest to differentiate between the final #agreed and previous
> (possible multiple) #proposed?
#proposed is not implemented atm [1]. Proposing an #agreed line is
trivial, though.
> And really only state an agreement w
also sprach Richard Hartmann [2015-03-09 22:24
+0100]:
> > What do you expect from Thursday's meeting? I am asking because the
> > previous two budget meetings weren't very, uh, productive.
>
> To turn this around: What do you expect?
I did not call the meeting.
In my dream world, we'll spend
On Mon, Mar 9, 2015 at 10:59 PM, martin f krafft wrote:
> and then have 45 minutes or more available to reach
> final approval of the budget by chairs and DPL.
Just to make sure, we do expect to be able to change this later on, correct?
Richard
___
De
Hello Martin,
> On 09 Mar 2015, at 19:40, martin f krafft wrote:
>
> also sprach martin f krafft [2015-03-03 22:02 +0100]:
>> Ideally, you could send this to me by Sunday afternoon. The reason
>> is that the only real time I have next week for this is Sunday and
>> Tuesday evenings, and I want
also sprach Giacomo Catenazzi [2015-03-09 23:26 +0100]:
> T-shirt and conference bags are already in budget. I don’t think
> it is our domain, so I didn’t check carefully the prices. But
> I think orga + video needs more t-shits.
Good point about orga+video, though I already did increase the
numb
also sprach Richard Hartmann [2015-03-09 23:14
+0100]:
> > and then have 45 minutes or more available to reach final
> > approval of the budget by chairs and DPL.
>
> Just to make sure, we do expect to be able to change this later
> on, correct?
In general: no; once the budget is decided, money
On Mon, Mar 9, 2015 at 11:47 PM, martin f krafft wrote:
> Good point about orga+video, though I already did increase the
> number of t-shirts by 15% or so.
We should plan with staff being able to get a new shirt at least every
other day. Personally, I don't fancy running around in a sweaty shirt
Richard Hartmann writes:
> On Wed, Mar 4, 2015 at 6:35 AM, Richard Hartmann
> wrote:
>> If at all possible, I think quickly accepting a few good talks and
>> then having 1-3 waves of accepted talks will help with press work.
>
> I didn't see any updates in this regard and still think it's really
19 matches
Mail list logo
