also sprach Giacomo Catenazzi <c...@cateee.net> [2015-03-09 23:26 +0100]: > T-shirt and conference bags are already in budget. I don’t think > it is our domain, so I didn’t check carefully the prices. But > I think orga + video needs more t-shits.
Good point about orga+video, though I already did increase the number of t-shirts by 15% or so. > Lanyards: if we don’t want printed lanyards, the budget seems OK > (including badges). Otherwise I think we should increase the > budget. I'd say that we don't have the money for something fancy and we did turn down a sponsor that would have paid this for us, in return for a small logo. > “Front desk registration costs” in “Venue and board” is not clear > to me but I think some sort of bank fee etc. Yes, credit card fees and accounting stuff mainly. Probably will be paid by each person, actually (5 €/person) > We need a phone (and a registration phone number) and few credit > (possibly it could be the the registration desk budget) As far as I understood, Sipgate will be providing all of that for free. > Transport seems very low. I expect more expenses (e.g. parking), > because I expect more logistic travels, and if we had some people > with disabilities, we should provide transportation to C&W, > conference dinned, etc. Parking is free, C&W on-site and conference dinner transportation budgeted there. I am not entirely sure what local transport was about in past budgets and just copied it, but I assume this is stuff like local transport and taxi travel stuff needed for orga… > Remember the banners:. we need them with the sponsor logos. Right, and how much should I budget for them? > And we need a lot of electrical stuffs. FD, orga office, hacklabs, > etc. I don’t know these are in infrastructure budget (still > missing) or a new item. The infrastructure budget is now there. We can also use everything the venue has, and maybe borrow stuff from the university (closed during this time, so…) > “diversity programme” and “newbies”. This means that bursaries > team should handle also these two queues? [BTW usually these two > are special funds from Debian, so they were budgeted also as > income.] So far, we have zero income from Debian. Lucas wanted first the budget approved before making any commitments. > In Income, section “Perk”, item C&W: what is it? Credativ is the sponsor of the C&W party, and they already paid for this. > What I don’t like it is the “child care”. Previously we provided > support, but parents had to organise and pay/support each other. > I raised the question on last meeting, but I was stopped, so > possibly I’m the only one who don’t like it. I don't think we *can* really pay for child care in total, and the figure in there is definitely too much. I'll adjust it down. We don't want to provide child care and get mixed up in liability and legal issues. But we can and should act as a liaison between parents and babysitters, and some budget for that will be necessary. -- .''`. martin f. krafft <madd...@debconf.org> @martinkrafft : :' : DebConf orga team `. `'` `- DebConf15: Heidelberg, Germany: http://debconf15.debconf.org DebConf16: Cape Town: https://wiki.debconf.org/wiki/DebConf16
digital_signature_gpg.asc
Description: Digital signature (see http://martin-krafft.net/gpg/sig-policy/999bbcc4/current)
_______________________________________________ Debconf-team mailing list Debconf-team@lists.debconf.org http://lists.debconf.org/mailman/listinfo/debconf-team
