On 25.02.2015 07:53, martin f krafft wrote:
> also sprach Santiago Ruano Rincón [2015-02-24 23:41
> +0100]:
>> what about not having a default about food? the diet field
>> could be mandatory, with an empty option by default
>> ...
>> a real *-tagged field
>
> I think this is the best sugges
El 25/02/15 a las 09:52, Giacomo Catenazzi escribió:
> On 25.02.2015 07:53, martin f krafft wrote:
> > also sprach Santiago Ruano Rincón [2015-02-24 23:41
> > +0100]:
> >> what about not having a default about food? the diet field
> >> could be mandatory, with an empty option by default
> >> ..
Giacomo Catenazzi writes:
> On 25.02.2015 07:53, martin f krafft wrote:
>> also sprach Santiago Ruano Rincón [2015-02-24 23:41
>> +0100]:
>>> what about not having a default about food? the diet field
>>> could be mandatory, with an empty option by default
>>> ...
>>> a real *-tagged field
also sprach Giacomo Catenazzi [2015-02-25 09:52 +0100]:
> No. Having no default is not acceptable for registration people.
> It cause us to send many many mails to remember people to set
> something sensible.
As others have pointed out: unless a choice is made, the
registration cannot be
Hi,
On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 10:41 PM, David Bremner wrote:
> - people who have previously served on the DebConf bursaries team
> - people who have previously received travel sponsorship to attend DebConf
> - people contributing to Debian in ways other than packaging
> - people who identify thems
On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 4:59 AM, martin f krafft wrote:
> also sprach Giacomo Catenazzi [2015-02-25 09:52 +0100]:
>> No. Having no default is not acceptable for registration people.
>> It cause us to send many many mails to remember people to set
>> something sensible.
>
> As others have
also sprach Brian Gupta [2015-02-25 15:53 +0100]:
> Since Debian is a culturally diverse organization, it would be
> impossible to cater this to individual omnivores, so I would
> argue, that we should aim for local norms.
Yes, that is what we'll be doing: the youth hostel will be serving
regiona
Maximiliano Curia dijo [Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 08:56:25PM +0100]:
> > If there is no stark opposition, then I'd like to get the ball
> > rolling here… I think the documentary is highly relevant to what we
> > do and so it seems like a perfect addition to our programme.
>
> I think this would be a ni
Hi,
On Feb 25, 2015 11:01 AM, "Gunnar Wolf" wrote:
> I also suggest it to be held as an ad-hoc, off-the-schedule,
> after-formal-activities thing — More or less as the screening of "Sita
> sings the blues" was done in New York.
It was on the schedule:
http://penta.debconf.org/dc10_schedule/event
Jeremy Baron dijo [Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 04:16:30PM +]:
> On Feb 25, 2015 11:01 AM, "Gunnar Wolf" wrote:
> > I also suggest it to be held as an ad-hoc, off-the-schedule,
> > after-formal-activities thing — More or less as the screening of "Sita
> > sings the blues" was done in New York.
>
> It
On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 10:36:49AM -0600, Gunnar Wolf wrote:
> Jeremy Baron dijo [Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 04:16:30PM +]:
> > On Feb 25, 2015 11:01 AM, "Gunnar Wolf" wrote:
> > > I also suggest it to be held as an ad-hoc, off-the-schedule,
> > > after-formal-activities thing — More or less as the
also sprach martin f krafft [2015-02-23 15:58 +0100]:
> - to make it easier for people operating out of a business
> context, a checkbox should be added with text like "Instead of
> a donation receipt, I need a proper invoice. I am aware that
> this invoice will then include 19% VAT
El 25/02/15 a las 17:54, Michael Banck escribió:
> On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 10:36:49AM -0600, Gunnar Wolf wrote:
> > Jeremy Baron dijo [Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 04:16:30PM +]:
> > > On Feb 25, 2015 11:01 AM, "Gunnar Wolf" wrote:
> > > > I also suggest it to be held as an ad-hoc, off-the-schedule,
>
also sprach Santiago Ruano Rincón [2015-02-25 22:04
+0100]:
> Do you think it would fit in the Open Weekend? Should we consider
> to screen it on Saturday night, or later during the conference?
Hard call.
If it's just a screening, then maybe it's a bit too much for the
Open Weekend and we might
Can we just owe them a glass of water?
Richard
Sent by mobile; excuse my brevity.
___
Debconf-team mailing list
Debconf-team@lists.debconf.org
http://lists.debconf.org/mailman/listinfo/debconf-team
On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 9:58 AM, martin f krafft wrote:
> Hello,
>
> DebConf attendance is free of charge for everyone, but we have
> suggested (and are planning to suggest) to our professional and
> corporate attendees to contribute certain amounts towards covering
> the conference costs. These a
On 26 February 2015 at 04:00, martin f krafft wrote:
> For the future, we could consider a "corporate registration package"
> that we could sell for an invoice, including services as e.g.
>
(Why is that not possible now?)
> - listing of names, affiliation and contact details in a booklet
>
also sprach Brian Gupta [2015-02-26 01:08 +0100]:
> Could we just say these fees are mandatory tickets, and treat the
> people we don't charge as need-based special exceptions that we
> sell discounted tickets to? When I say discounted, I mean
> discounted down to zero.
Not convinced. For need-ba
On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 7:09 AM, martin f krafft wrote:
> also sprach Anthony Towns [2015-02-26 06:13 +0100]:
>> On 26 February 2015 at 04:00, martin f krafft wrote:
>> > For the future, we could consider a "corporate registration package"
>> > that we could sell for an invoice, including servi
also sprach Richard Hartmann [2015-02-26 07:49
+0100]:
> > Well, mainly because we've not done it before and I am not sure we
> > can work out all the details in time for registration to open, which
> > really should not get held up any longer.
>
> As far as I know, we are mainly talking about f
20 matches
Mail list logo
